Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The real struggle with "conservatives" is trying to get through to them with the uncomfortable reality that our constitution has been toilet paper for a very long time.Stop nitpicking over the Constitution, the thing doesn't matter any longer and anyone wise will tell you that it never did, they will always circumvent, distort or ignore its provisions.
I often repeat this but 911 changed everything.The real struggle with "conservatives" is trying to get through to them with the uncomfortable reality that our constitution has been toilet paper for a very long time.
There is nothing left to conserve.
Anything they would want has to be reconquered and reimposed by raw power.
This entire argument could be used for Trump and the 14th amendment disqualification claims. I've seen people claim that Colorado has the right to declare insurrection because the feds refuse to do their job and declare it. Abbott is doing the same. Both are wrong.No.
Being under invasion is being under invasion.
One could choose NOT to fight the invasion, if, for instance, your commander in chief is a traitor compromised by the invaders.
Thus, no war declared.
Under invasion but not under war is possible.
This seems to be the root of your argument, which is logically unsound.
This only matters if the constitution is still in effect.
If the feds are abrogating their duty, and no corrective action happens, guess what happens to the constitution.
Says someone who cites corrupt authority, does not understand how a contract works, and does not understand the difference between invasion and war.
Who is illiterate again?
Biden's administration has been coordinating and guiding invaders to points in the border where they then aid the invaders in crossing, after which they are aided in going further inland, fed and made comfortable with taxpayer dollars.
Need I get into any more specifics?
The difference being that insurrection is defined as a federal law, and requires a federal conviction (per the bill of rights due process amendments), while the invasion at the southern border is a matter of emperically observable fact and an official determination and declaration by the state of Texas.This entire argument could be used for Trump and the 14th amendment disqualification claims. I've seen people claim that Colorado has the right to declare insurrection because the feds refuse to do their job and declare it. Abbott is doing the same. Both are wrong.
That inverse relationship with expulsions, thoElon speaking out against Biden blatantly
View attachment 5611601
In face value, if true, divorce could salvage her reputation but even so, this just shows that TPTB knew about Epstein's dealings. It'd be interesting to see how this plays out.And I doubt Hillary would be as quick to defend pedophilia as a woman vying for the POTUS Iron Throne (again, gimme rainbows). Extramarital affairs are one thing, but this? I'd offer condolences to @The Last Stand, but he seems to have turned over a new leaf recently.
I dunno, wasn't he a Rhodesian larper?The black pandering is no surprise although I seem to recall it was revealed years after the shooting that the gunman went to the church because it was a soft target and had nothing to do with race.
Coming soon to a southern border near you, best friend goyim.
You'd think so, but we have video evidence of Joe Biden walking up and rubbing little girl's nipples when they can't escape him, on multiple occasions, often with their parents restraining them so they can't escape his sadistic ass."Bill Clinton likes them young."
View attachment 5611549
To those who doom about Hillary being parachuted in for '24, let it be clear that the above words (in the context of Epstein) have fully ensured that it will never be Her Turn™. This alone would tank her campaign. Given that pedophilia is so fucking morally and physically repugnant unlike anything else, something like this can never be avoided/suppressed fully during something as public, spotlit and long form as a presidential campaign. Especially when the public at large already views it as factual. It would take herculean efforts on the part of the journoswine to even marginally bury it, and it's unlikely* (gimme rainbows) that they would hemorrhage whatever lingering shreds of trust/reputation they have left to defend someone with non-existent political and social capital from something so heinous. And I doubt Hillary would be as quick to defend pedophilia as a woman vying for the POTUS Iron Throne (again, gimme rainbows). Extramarital affairs are one thing, but this? I'd offer condolences to @The Last Stand, but he seems to have turned over a new leaf recently.
*Who am I kidding? If it were Trump v. Hillary v2, they'd be pumping out "Yeah, her husband licks underage twat, but that's okay because OMGOMGOMG BLUMPFTH LIDDERALLY HITLER!!!! PROTECT OUR DEMOCRACY™ AT ALL COSTS!!!!! WATER YOU A RUSSIAN NAZI WHO WANTS BROWN CHILDREN TO CRY AT THE BORDER!!!????!!!!!! (Incoherent babbling and sobbing)"
White supremacy strikes again.Biden has moved his speech to Friday because snow is in the forecast on 1/6.
NEW - Biden labels millions of Americans as "extremists" in his first campaign ad of 2024.
And in the end it didn't matter much because the GOP was too busy stabbing their own base in the face to capitalize on it for 2022
Of course they do. It's that time a bunch of wh*te supremacists killed thousands of innocent Blacks in cold blood using a legion of semi-automatic Dodge Challengers.Do the 18 year zoomies who will be voting for the first time even know what the fuck Charlottesville was?
Its the event that Trump referred to when he called nazis and white supremacists decent people. And where that MAGA Chud killed an innocent fat women with his Dodge Charger.Do the 18 year zoomies who will be voting for the first time even know what the fuck Charlottesville was?