Skitzocow David Anthony Stebbins / Acerthorn / stebbinsd / fayettevillesdavid - Litigious autist, obese livestreamer, elder abuser, violent schizo, ladyboy importer, hot dog enjoyer, wereturkey.

[Mikoyan]

Given Stebbins v. Doe and the Quasi-War with Tomlinson, I get the impression that it's a principle that you don't have to self-dox to defend against civil actions like this. What's the actual legal basis for that?

I mean it's why these fucks like the DMCA so much.

 

[Kendrick]

Given Stebbins v. Doe and the Quasi-War with Tomlinson, I get the impression that it's a principle that you don't have to self-dox to defend against civil actions like this. What's the actual legal basis for that?

I mean it's why these fucks like the DMCA so much.

Gonna guess it's part of 230, but you can avoid giving your real name and address by having a lawyer bureau answer for you and give their contact information.

That or Stabbin's claims are so spurious on their faces that YT doesn't even entertain them anymore so the defendant doesn't have to contest (and dox themselves) to Stabbin.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

Gonna guess it's part of 230, but you can avoid giving your real name and address by having a lawyer bureau answer for you and give their contact information.

That or Stabbin's claims are so spurious on their faces that YT doesn't even entertain them anymore so the defendant doesn't have to contest (and dox themselves) to Stabbin.

It's a small few to get a lawyer to answer a DMCA for you. Plus you can have your Youtube account under a business name depending on how you set things up he'd had to subpoena the business as well.

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

I dunno you'd have to ask our legal "experts" on the forum @AnOminous or @Useful_Mistake but I'm pretty sure if your case goes to trial you can't maintain your anonymity from your accuser. Sooner or later you will have to hand over your personal info to the court.

I think Quasi was allowed to stay anonymous because Fatrick's case was dismissed before it went to trial so Fatrick was never allowed to issue a subpoena to discover Quasi's real identity as the judge found Fatrick to be fat and stupid and his lawsuit a waste of time.

At least I think, I don't follow Fatrick much as I find his antics to be rather boring so I'm not 100% sure.

I think the only "win" for Stabby was vs Zell Zelander and that was only the court allowing Stabby to discover Zell's idenity via a subpoena to Google so he could be served with the lawsuit paperwork. So far Stabby has only been able to get peoples personal idenity when they counter claim his DCMA take downs. Which is part of why he does them, more victims for his ever growing army of the undead er for his lolsuits.

Again, I dunno for sure but I think thats how it works.

 

[AnOminous]

I dunno you'd have to ask our legal "experts" on the forum @AnOminous or @Useful_Mistake but I'm pretty sure if your case goes to trial you can't maintain your anonymity from your accuser. Sooner or later you will have to hand over your personal info to the court.

Ever heard of a case called Roe v. Wade? I mean it was only in a minor court called the "Supreme Court."

Yes, the court knew the identity of the party, but the other side didn't.

 

[S.C.U.D.]

Not to mention in the lolcow sphere, Quasi remained anonymous the whole time against Patrick Tomlinson who has already paid him over 40 grand.

 

[Useful_Mistake]

I mean it was only in a minor court called the "Supreme Court."

I mean, in NY, that's considered a minor court. If you never stepped foot into civilized lands, you could be forgiven for the confusion.

For those not in on the joke, in New York, the Supreme Court of New York is one of the lowest courts in the state

https://nycourts.gov/courts/structure.shtml

 

[Star Platinum]

I mean, in NY, that's considered a minor court. If you never stepped foot into civilized lands, you could be forgiven for the confusion.

For those not in on the joke, in New York, the Supreme Court of New York is one of the lowest courts in the state
View attachment 5516306

https://nycourts.gov/courts/structure.shtml

everything about New York's courts is fucked. they still haven't even codified their Rules of Evidence. it's a giant dumpsterfire of common law.

 

[Adr1anD]

He either hits the bank of Mom & Dad

No way they'd support him after evicting him, and subsequently he lost his litigation against them and lost all allowed appeals on that judgment of the jury trial that he requested himself.

I'd like the Court to see the videos of him giving "$60 in cold hard cash" to his audience.

I believe this cash and a couple other weird expense instances came from one of the stimulus checks.
Additionaly, those secret joke giveaway of games were the way of him getting the information of either Raul Mateus or Frederik Alison, "the co-conspirators with SofiannP", because he made it so the winners had to provide him their information.

 

[MongolianMongoose]

In this old video Acerthorn puts famous quotes through Google Translate multiple times and reads the Engrish result. It takes Acerthorn 2 minutes to explain this simple concept. The quotes he chooses are
* Gettysburg Address
* Eye of the Tiger lyrics
* Joker's father kitchen knife attack from The Dark Knight

12:35 "Funny Automatic Translations"

Father? Knife? Very interesting choice of quotes.

 

[Chimplord1997]

Does anyone have the backup of the full turkey hot dog stream? The bitchute link doesn't work

 

[WTBOnlineFather]

Does anyone have the backup of the full turkey hot dog stream? The bitchute link doesn't work

Do you mean the metokur stream about him? It's up on odysneed: https://odysee.com/@morningswithmetokur:0/GobbleGobble:1

 

[Useful_Mistake]

Stebbins v. Doe

David Stebbins v. Karl Polano, et al (appeal)

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

This is what I hate about legal cows

Everything moves at the speed of bureaucracy. At this rate we will have some more laffs at Stabby's expense sometime in 2025. I want more Acerthorn milk now damnit. This little shit needs to be slapped down hard.

 

[AnOminous]

This is what I hate about legal cows

Everything moves at the speed of bureaucracy. At this rate we will have some more laffs at Stabby's expense sometime in 2025. I want more Acerthorn milk now damnit. This little shit needs to be slapped down hard.

You need to lol calm down because the milk from lawcows is slow.

The longer you wait, the funnier it will be.

So chill. Deal.

 

[yydszmiteg2]

This is what I hate about legal cows

Everything moves at the speed of bureaucracy. At this rate we will have some more laffs at Stabby's expense sometime in 2025. I want more Acerthorn milk now damnit. This little shit needs to be slapped down hard.

Get another hobby. Jesus.

 

[MongolianMongoose]

On July 8th, 2022 Acerthorn asked two questions about Kiwi Farms on Avvo

https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/should-i-file-in-california-florida-or-my-own-stat-5578744.html

Should I file in California, Florida, or my own state?
On June 25, I did a livestream on Twitch that was only viewable by my Twitch subs. I transferred the video to Youtube but restricted viewing only to those who paid my channel $1 per month.On June 28, someone paid the money and downloaded the video off Youtube using third-party software. He then proceeded to upload it to Kiwifarms, in its entirety, while providing a grand total of TWO SENTENCES worth of "criticism and commentary."I announced the livestream well over 2 days in advance and included a disclaimer in that announcement that I would be seeking copyright protection. So I should have a § 411(c) exemption to the 4th estate rule.Since he had to pay money to get access to the stream, that means his credit card info (including his name and billing address) are on file with Youtube. So I can easily locate him. But I don't know what district to file the lawsuit in.Do I file in California, where Youtube is? After all, his initial downloading of the video happened on Youtube's servers. But his subsequent distribution happened in Florida.Do I get to pick which district I file in?

Even though Avvo is anonymous this is obviously Acerthorn planning to sue @ZellZander.


A few hours earlier that same account asked the stupidest question ever.
https://www.avvo.com/legal-answers/can-a-dmca-takedown-notice-itself-be-copyrighted--5578734.html

Can a DMCA Takedown Notice itself be copyrighted?
Kiwifarms is one of the most toxic websites on the entire Internet. On their page regarding DMCA Takedowns (which you can see here: https://kiwifarms.net/help/removing-content/), they acknowledge that, in order to take advantage of the DMCA, you have to dox yourself. They state that your DMCA notice will be posted in its entirety "without any information being redacted," and that this must include a return address. So your IRL name and address will be posted on that site.But here's an idea: What if, when they post the DMCA Notice, that is itself an act of copyright infringement?After all, it's not fair use if you post something in your OP and then invite other people to provide criticism and commentary on it. If that were enough, any Youtube video would automatically be fair use, just by means of turning the comment on.So could the author of a DMCA takedown notice potentially claim a copyright over the takedown notice? Obviously, he would need minimal creativity to get a copyright, but that can be accomplished through the simple expedient of giving a quick explanation as to why it's not fair use! That's minimally creative!What do you think?

Acerthorn appears to have contemplated manufacturing a copyright infringement claim against the Kiwi Farms. Of course the law doesn't work like that but he has no common sense. Anticipating a website will disclose correspondence as standard practice and using this as justification to file suit smacks of bad-faith.
Would Acerthorn have to send another DMCA if @Null posted the first? This could cause an endless stream of DMCA requests.

 

[DSP's Tax Lawyer]

Acerthorn appears to have contemplated manufacturing a copyright infringement claim against the Kiwi Farms. Of course the law doesn't work like that but he has no common sense. Anticipating a website will disclose correspondence as standard practice and using this as justification to file suit smacks of bad-faith.
Would Acerthorn have to send another DMCA if @Null posted the first? This could cause an endless stream of DMCA requests.

If he continuously did that, do you think that would get him to vexatious litigant status?

 

[Sweeter and Savoury]

If he continuously did that, do you think that would get him to vexatious litigant status?

He has the vexatious label in two districts already. That's why he's hunting for somewhere he can file more lolsuits without getting reamed again by the judge.

In his home district he's got a 1 per 3 month, under judicial supervision only limit rule and the Google team slapped him with a no go for pretty much anything in California and absolutely nothing, not IP stuff, not DMCA stuff, not even his famous insta-win contract arbitration related to Google/You-Tube without a judge looking it over and giving an OK first.

It's pretty tough to get yourself completely shout out of the justice system and ole Stabby is no where near the lead in being the asshat who files lolsuits.

I mean, we all pretty much knew that once this thread was made Stabby would find someway to pull Null into his legal lolfare. On the plus side Null is pretty experienced in this shit now sadly and Stabby can't just spam DMCA's like he does at poor You-Tubers. He could maybe try a harassment suit but good luck with that as aside from ZellZelander, whose in for a real hard time due to poor OpSec, no one has directly contacted Stabby and as much as he hates it talking about assholes isn't illegal so Null should be in the clear.

I'd also like to point out to Stabby, who is no doubt reading this thread, that Null is a particularly vengeful type. If you waste his time and money on lolsuits he will counter sue and take from you what ever meagre dribs and drabs you possess. No Stabby, your best off going back to trying to bully small time Tubers and grifting billions of dollars from corporations rather then kicking this hornets nest.

 

[MongolianMongoose]

Acerthorn is starting yet another lolsuit. From his latest community post

If you need a recap of his fight with Dragon Knight.
Dragon Knights channel is still terminated https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAnqpb_VqgbQ6FEyfIt-uqA

This account has been terminated because we received multiple third-party claims of copyright infringement regarding material the user posted.

I didn't know it was possible for a channel terminated 6 months ago to counter copyright claims.