- Joined
- Nov 18, 2020
I think those situations with those families are intensely private, and the government needs to stay out. It needs to be between the consent of the mother and the provider who really is trying to adhere to the principle of treating and healing, whatever that means in that context. It's going to vary from person to person, and I am okay with that. Federal licensed provider discretion is an excellent bedfellow with patient consent. The trouble is when it starts forcing people to practice outside their consciences, even with referrals. (I won't deep dive that and trigger overly angry pro-choicers, but it happens.) I don't think Roe vs. Wade really defined it enough. Back to the murder thing.You're absolutely right, there should not be black and white thinking but when such issues are politicised rather than considered medically, this is where we end up.
My vexation came from the use of "murder" as a way to emotionally manipulate readers, in conjunction with the refusal to consider the potential suffering that the baby would endure in its short time on Earth.
Once parents are given the diagnosis that their fetus is incompatible with life I find it easy to believe that some mothers are so traumatised that they can't consider carrying a baby to term that is doomed to die. If they choose to terminate that is their choice, one they should never be shamed or judged for. The mother's psychological state is also a factor that has to be considered.
The reality of termination is really not something most people understand, even if they've had a miscarriage, induced or otherwise. Punctuating with cries of murder isn't making anyone consider if maybe rather than ending a HEALTHY pregnancy that ends with a healthy and supported mom and baby maybe isn't a better outcome with greater purpose and love.