Why do so many losers on the Internet gravitate to the right wing?

The only people on the left are loser freaks with rainbow hair and lizard people like Zuckerborg who make your blood run cold just looking at them.

images (1).jpeg
 
I don't hate these people, I'm just bewildered they get so attached to extreme right wing politics. Normal, well adjusted people don't end up on the extreme right side of the spectrum calling for the deaths of jews, gays, and such.
The simplest answer to a complex question regarding large amounts of people is usually an extreme measure.
For example: A german in the 1930s notices jews have a disproportionate representation in the media, government, and finance at the cost of non-jews. They start to see a pattern, and see how it has negative effects on them.
The "simple" solution to this is just to eliminate them from the equation.
This is the same way that you have "Amalekites" being blamed for the suffering of the jews, from extreme jewish sects.
This is the same as trans people blaming hetero-normativity for why they can't be seen as normal.
This is the same as Muslims hating on infidels and jews.
This is the same as fat people blaming skinny people for fatphobia.
The same as blacks blaming whites for why they aren't successful.
Atheists blaming the religious.
Skateboarders hating BMX riders for ruining concrete at the skatepark.
Bicyclists blaming cars.
Socialists blaming Capitalists.
Do you see what I mean?
If I pull away from any kind of bias, its clear to me that its "path of least resistance" type thinking. Whats the easiest way i can just get rid of something I don't like?


 
The majority of left-wing thoughts and views are so mainstream that you have a 50/50 chance of being a normal, well adjusted person who thinks trans people should live their lives and immigrants should get a fair shot or being a drugged-up NEET fantasizing about the fall of white supremacist capitalist governments from the comfort of your mom's basement/1,000 dollar inner city apartment. Right-wing thoughts and viewpoints are so discredited, shunned, banned and mocked that you'd be more likely to be some autistic dork/bitter shut-in than you would be some chad who's "just noticing things". Edgy opinions are getting pretty mainstream though through sites like YouTube and Twitter in a way that hasn't been seen in years.
 
I know this is easy bait but I'll respond like it isn't.

The actual people I know who identify as conservative (over 30, served the military, aren't incels, just want to be left the fuck alone) have done generally well for themselves. They're in management positions, keep in shape or have retired.
The lefties I know are mostly losers/literal NEETS because the current left promotes infantilization. If you fail it's because you just 'need to take a mental health day', or people are fatphobic, homophobic, transphoic, racist, sexist, (ect.) for not indulging you. Or you can blame capitalism and every system, your parents, your mental health around for why you didn't get what you wanted out of life.
The truth is most level-headed people can understand people are prejudice sometimes and not every system is fair but not use that as a cope for not trying to have a decent life.
The older, working class left seems to understand reality and circumstances better than the modern nepo/trustfund offspring some of them have produced.

The reason some of the modern right are losers is because they don't engage in the modern social landscape. In any age/era, you'd think the person not drinking, having gratuitous sex and joining in popular social causes would be the losers, as it's usual for young people to engage in debauchery and have less inhibitions.

Why does the right do this? A million reasons, but mostly because they're either grifting, believe the people who are grifting, or actually don't see the point in engaging in the social landscape as it exists.

The question I would ask someone (if they weren't doing a weak bait like here) is what would constitute a loser? A loser is just someone who's contrarian to the times they grow up in. A loser could be someone who opposed Hitler in 1940, someone who was for civil rights in the 50s, or someone who thought disco was lame in the 70s. Are you a loser because you lack character/strength or are you a loser simply because you do not nod with the popular notion of the times?
 
I don't believe in your religion and I'm not going to indulge your schizoposting.

An ad hominem is not an argument.
Go choke on a dick. Preferably not a child's.

I wasn't even trying to take his post seriously, much less make an argument against it. Seriously replying to religious posts and arguments is a waste of time, much less ones that talk about "pedo cannibal cults".
I am not religious you stupid fuck. Not an ounce. Go dilate some more and fap to whatever disgusting porn you have. Also, wash your ass. I know you don't bathe properly.
 
I think they are just highlighted more because the right places more focus on self reliance and being productive rather then being more numerous. People who make their entire existence their political identity rarely have any accomplishments beyond those in said parties leadership.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeChampion1992
This is a cope, most data shows Gen Z and Millennials as the most progressive generations and as much as people want to believe Gen Z is more right wing, the actual data doesn't support that (despite much hand wringing from journalists).


Additionally, it's questionable to call something "counter culture" when it's the same thing your parents and grandparents believe.
I don't think you know what counterculture means. It's specifically the less popular thing.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: JustTheFaxcts
You both deserve each other. You're both losers and the only reason you harp on the right so much is you're a gay furry and the idea that God forbid you could take some responsibility and accountability for yourself= fascism.

Like I've seen the left wing rabbit hole it ends with divorce rape, transing out, and bullshit cope stories about how we still need to worry ab
Why the autistic react, sweet friend?
Which of the following claims are untrue or autistic?
  • a lot of losers online gravitate toward left wing politics
  • to a way more extreme degree than left wingers IRL
  • there's jealousy at play
  • The type of people to rant about [...] aren't the type enjoying their lives or having much fun
  • so they want to deny fun to everyone else
This seems like it for the most part. You see right wing chuds having fun and minding their own business and some reddit tier person is like a heckin racism was said ban them offline forever.

The majority of left-wing thoughts and views are so mainstream that you have a 50/50 chance of being a normal, well adjusted person who thinks trans people should live their lives and immigrants should get a fair shot or being a drugged-up NEET fantasizing about the fall of white supremacist capitalist governments from the comfort of your mom's basement/1,000 dollar inner city apartment. Right-wing thoughts and viewpoints are so discredited, shunned, banned and mocked that you'd be more likely to be some autistic dork/bitter shut-in than you would be some chad who's "just noticing things". Edgy opinions are getting pretty mainstream though through sites like YouTube and Twitter in a way that hasn't been seen in years.
There is no issue with being safe. Like nearly every normies will say trans rights and probably are also sympathetic to it's okay to be white. Again the problem is you don't have to worry about being cancelled for saying be gay do crime when Spencer's did that for the last 15 years.
Most of these people are safe edgy people. It's hard to say something that marginally makes a joke about Jews or brown people without a bunch of mostly white nimbyist leftists deciding you shouldn't have a voice.
 

Attachments

  • 1702871585436659.png
    1702871585436659.png
    11 KB · Views: 10
granted this study on incels has quite a small sample size, but the majority of respondents identified as left wing. I'd also be willing to wager that more right wing e-celebs hit the gym than leftist ones, every breadtuber is either a tranny or just straight dysgenic (thought slime for example)
1704885842660.png


this post is largely a projection imo, leftists love nothing more than ugliness and everything they produce reflects it. Every piece of art made by leftists now has the most ugly and dehumanizing of aesthetics, everything to them must be a fucking freakshow like the oliver tree shit or all the google commercials full of fat black women. I think it goes back to the ted kaczynski thing where because the leftist in some capacity sees themselves as ugly, inferior, defeated, or marginalized they will tend to identify more with things they deem to be of that nature, thus black tranny midgets with beards is something that they actually think looks cool and pleasing to the eye.
 
Last edited:
It's hard not to notice this, but a whole lot of losers online gravitate toward right wing politics, often to a way more extreme degree than even right wingers IRL.
You are essentially suggesting that the BreadTuber fanbase is not the largest collection of loosers on the entire Internet.
That's quite a bold assertion, and to support such a claim, you'd need to provide at least a reasonable argument.


Could you share some general information about yourself without revealing any identifying details? I'm interested in understanding your perspective.

What are your political views?

Do you adhere to any particular religious or ideological beliefs?

What are the biggest problems the world is facing?

Which ethnic group do you identify with?
 
Back