To play devil's advocate for tj: every time he's supposed to talk this thread diggs in on calling him a mush mouth and how he ah and ums.
That's not it at all... It has nothing to do with TJ's ahs and ums. Maybe the fish think this, but I don't.
Watching them try incriminate TJ its excruciatingly painful, it makes me feel intelligent. I think TJ is lubecooch, but their justification is laughably bad. How is TJ supposed to prove a negative? The burden of proof is laid on the accuser for a reason.
I thought Frank did an okay job at incriminating TJ. He could have done better.
Also if we are going to talk about legal standards let's talk about
mens rea.
The first time "lubecooch" was brought up over TTS, in the context of horse porn, TJ panicked, looked guilty as shit, then immediately ran downstairs to production and tried to quit the show.
TJ sheepishly came back up awhile later, with a lame excuse direct to the camera about he just "freaked out" for no particular reason.
To this day, TJ can't explain
why he behaved that way.
If TJ was innocent why would he have such an over-reaction?
More importantly, if TJ was innocent, how would he even know there was a connection between 'lubecooch' and 'horse porn'?
Why would TJ run away looking extremely guilty and try to quit the show in shame?
His behavior shows that
TJ knew of the connection between his account name and the material on rule 34... This suggests that he created the rule 34 account himself.
In court, this sort of action can be used as evidence of someone's guilt. It's called "mens rea" which literally translates as "guilty mind"
It's like if you see a cop and then suddenly run, and while being chased, you threw a satchel of money onto a roof.
The fact you ran from the cops - and threw away the satchel of money - can be used against you as evidence that
you knew the satchel contained all counterfeit bills.
I don't need beyond a reasonable doubt. All I need is more likely than not.
What's more likely?
TJ used the coomer-brained username "lubecooch" on multiple platforms, including TikTok, admitted this was HIS username, but a
different coomer created a rule34 account with the
same username, and TJ just happened to act with
mens rea - a "guilty mind" - when TTS mentioned his username in the context of horse porn?
Or is the simpler more sensible explanation that
it's his rule 34 account, and he was mortified at being found out?
Only a degenerate porn-addicted coomer would even pick a username like "lubecooch".
We can't tolerate sexual deviancy that involves animals or children.
You've gotta draw the line at beastiality and pedophilia.
face
