War North Korea's Kim Jong Un abandons unification goal with South - North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has said unification with the South is no longer possible, and that the constitution should be changed to designate it the "principal enemy".

kim.png
Kim Jong Un met Russian leader Vladimir Putin in September

North Korean leader Kim Jong Un has said unification with the South is no longer possible, and that the constitution should be changed to designate it the "principal enemy".

Mr Kim also said three organisations dealing with reunification would shut down, state media KCNA reported.

South Korea's president said it would respond "multiple times stronger" to any provocation from the North.

The two Koreas have been divided since the Korean War ended in 1953.

They did not sign a peace treaty and therefore have remained technically still at war ever since.

In a speech delivered at the Supreme People's Assembly - North Korea's rubber-stamp parliament - Mr Kim said that the constitution should be amended to educate North Koreans that South Korea is a "primary foe and invariable principal enemy".

He also said that if a war breaks out on the Korean peninsula, the country's constitution should reflect the issue of "occupying", "recapturing" and "incorporating" the South into its territory.

Mr Kim - who replaced his father, Kim Jong-il, as North Korean leader in 2011 - said the North "did not want war, but we also have no intention of avoiding it", according to KCNA.

He said he was taking a "new stand" on north-south relations, which included dismantling all organisations tasked with reunification.

Speaking to his cabinet on Tuesday, South Korean President Yoon Suk Yeol said that if the North carried out a provocation, the South "will retaliate multiple times stronger", pointing to the South Korean military's "overwhelming response capabilities".

Dr John Nilsson-Wright, who heads the Japan and Koreas Programme at Cambridge University's Centre for Geopolitics, described Mr Kim's remarks as "unprecedented", and said it was "highly unusual" for a North Korean leader to depart from the policy of unification.

"It's not unusual for relations between the North and South to cool, but this has taken the relationship in a different direction," he told the BBC.

He added that Mr Kim's anti-Western stance can be traced back to the 2019 summit with then-US President Donald Trump in Vietnam, which ended without an agreement.

"This has been an acute disappointment and loss of face for Kim," Dr Nilsson-Wright said.

Heightened tensions​

Mr Kim's comments came as relations significantly weakened on the Korean Peninsula in recent months.

In November, North Korea fully suspended a five-year military deal with the South aimed at lowering military tensions. It promised to withdraw all measures "taken to prevent military conflict in all spheres including ground, sea and air", and said it would deploy more forces to the border region.

The South had partly suspended the agreement days earlier after Mr Kim claimed to have successfully launched a spy satellite into space.

The rhetoric - and provocative actions - from the North have only escalated since then.

At year-end policy meetings, Mr Kim said he needed to "newly formulate" the North's stance towards inter-Korean relations and reunification policy, adding that the stated goal was to "make a decisive policy change" related to "the enemy".

He also threatened a nuclear attack on the South, and called for a build-up of his country's military arsenal.

The North has also launched missiles in recent weeks, as well as live-fire exercises close to South Korean territory.

In a report published last week for 38 North, a US-based organisation with a focus on North Korea, former State Department official Robert Carlin and nuclear scientist Siegfried S Hecker said they saw the situation on the Korean Peninsula as "more dangerous than it has ever been" since the start of the Korean War in 1950.

"That may sound overly dramatic, but we believe that, like his grandfather in 1950, Kim Jong Un has made a strategic decision to go to war," it said.

"We do not know when or how Kim plans to pull the trigger, but the danger is already far beyond the routine warnings in Washington, Seoul and Tokyo about Pyongyang's 'provocations'."

It added that it did not see the "war preparation themes" in North Korean media as "typical bluster".

Dr Nilsson-Wright agreed and said the "risk of escalation should be taken seriously".

Meanwhile North Korea's Foreign Minister Choe Son Hui is in Russia where she is expected to meet President Vladimir Putin.

The two countries have boosted ties recently, with both isolated by Western powers, and last September Mr Kim visited Russia where he met Mr Putin.

Article Link

Archive
 
They can't. NK has half the population and their economy and living standards are shit. Birthrate is little better than the South's.
Birthrate also doesn't mean much when you can't feed the populace regularly.
Reunification was never in the cards
This, I refuse to believe the Norks had any honest plans for a peaceful reunification with the South. And by which I mean a True and Honest peace, not "peace through overwhelming land-based invasion"
 
They can't. NK has half the population and their economy and living standards are shit. Birthrate is little better than the South's.
Demographic collapse is rarely felt before it happens, but once it does, it hits like a freight train.

Too much of ROK's infrastructure is built around the fantasy of perpetual progress. If ROK's economy declines, it will be terminal
 
Americana malding aside, the Norks only have to wait.

Who wants to have K-pop? Can't blame them.
 
So that's it, war over? Oh wait.. so it's all just a formality. Instead of invading and "reunifying" SK with NK by force, they will aim to invade and take it over/annex it by force instead. lol
Lot's of luck in doing that.. and I do mean lots and lots.. because that still wont be enough.

I was reading that some fear that he might at the very least be serious about changing the status officially. They have to know that they are running out of time. They might mistakenly believe this would be a good time to try.

It's always easy to forget that so many of these troglodytes (including Kim here, who not only went to school but grew up in the west) that run places like NK and China, get educated and spend a lot of time in the west. In some cases sending their children and whole families here too. I remember right around the beginning of covid, people, even media were reporting on unofficial info from mid to high level chinese officials and or their families living in the west. Specifically in one instance, in Texas. I mean that's how you know the true nature of most of the anti-west bullshit that comes out of China. A lot of the people who run it, have family living or spending time in the west. They themselves come too. Xi's teen daughter spent 4 or 5 years here (in CT, USA) going to school, ending a few years back, while he was in power.



What would the terms of peace be? South Korea could help their birthrates with such a peace.

A price far too high to ever even consider, even in full societal collapse. This is a country that puts teens to death for getting caught bringing in and watching western media (as in bad western fiction and netflix etc) and still practices generational punishment. (usually 3.. there are tens-to-hundreds of thousands living in slave/near death camps for crimes their grandparents committed 50 years ago) The NK are so completely fucked up that people who have escaped said that they had no idea the rest of the world didn't live like they did, under such totalitarian control, starving etc. (making these claims from china no less.. even the CCP knows they are fucking insane and generally don't cover for those aspects of them) This is the reason North Koreans aren't even allowed to visit their friend china. They literally have a slave population so conditioned and brainwashed that they don't even understand the most basic aspect of most of human society. The worst of the CCP, Soviets or Nazis would seem like an unbelievable jump in freedom.
 
Last edited:
Russia/China are now in a position to support NK. They fell apart because the USSR fell apart, and it might just be - NK doesn't need them anymore. They had a full-blown famine because the USSR was their primary source of food, and now Russia is able to reassume that role.
 
This, I refuse to believe the Norks had any honest plans for a peaceful reunification with the South. And by which I mean a True and Honest peace, not "peace through overwhelming land-based invasion"
They didn't, but it was a useful tool politically because they could always point to that as a reason to engage with SK politically and economically. It also always gave them a scapegoat for a lack of progress to point to domestically and internationally. They'd typically engage more with left leaning administration and use conservatives as a boogeyman. See, both us and President XYZ are trying, but those dang ol' dirty trolls aren't letting us come together. It's performative, but so much of international politics is and the word of the supreme leader in Norkland is the word of god. The fact that they have no interest in doing this anymore is a dramatic. It's a departure from the vision Sung set down 50 years ago.
Its certainly a strange shift in their stated intent. Not that reunification on the level of germany was ever a practical goal, even in the long term without massive changes in the north and building of infrastructure on the level north korea isn't capable of even if they wanted to do it, before even attempting something like that. It was always more of a political thing to try to push the idea that they were really one korea being forcibly kept apart by US control of the south. That they would suddenly abandon that long standing political claim makes me wonder what kim is thinking and whether its his real intent or he's being pressured by some generals or members of the government who believe their own propaganda enough to do something stupid, or some kind of desperate change as a result of damage from covid. Its not a good idea to invade the south a second time, there is no way it will end well for the north and the end result would be removing kim and the government, but the end result wouldn't be that far off from a reunified korea anyway. You'd then end up with the south and the US stuck with an occupied north korea and having to support the population enough to prevent them all dying of starvation, which would fuck the south up for quite some time. Its not like they could toss the kims out and refuse to do anything about it and let everybody die, the international community would have their head for it. So even in provoking and losing a war they screw the south one way or another
It's entirely possible this is from pressure from the military or other power brokers. It's proposed that Un took a big risk and lost a lot of face in 2019 when the talks with the Trump administration failed. His sister began her rise to prominence shortly before that. While the internet meme was that she was cute, she looks like an evil stepmother from a Disney movie, by all accounts she is more ruthless and hardline than Un. That may have been the point. Make her the hardliner so Un can soften his image and be the public face as she takes the reigns behind the scenes.
 
@pikachudidnothingwrong , my understanding is that a big part of the crackdown on western media is that it shows real conditions in the US.

Nork propaganda has long been that people in the US are starving and miserable under the iron boot of capitalism, while the 100% accurate documentary of American life that is "Friends" shows normal people living under conditions of comparative luxury. Even if they know that you can't get a thousand-square-foot apartment working as a barista or whatever, it's apparently enough to break through the propaganda that Americans routinely stand in line for an hour in the snow for a small cup of broth.
 
Back