@Android Raptor Hate Thread

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

according to this 60,000 marriages in the US since 2000 have involved an age difference that would otherwise be a sex crime and the youngest bride the advocate interviewed has seen was 10.

Another issue with legal child marriage is that it's basically a loophole that makes statutory rape legal in many states.

So my question about conservatives marrying child brides last year is replied to with a quarter century's worth of data without any proof that those 60k are conservatives. And even 10, horrific as it is, seems to be a rare outlier and isn't a toddler (and isn't a gang rape).

Maybe, just maybe, there's not actually a big problem with predatory conservatives and it's actually liberals, especially LGBT men, and that whenever you hear about gang raped toddlers there's a good reason straight white Christian men don't come to mind for most people.

Like I said multiple times, I don't see how handwringing over gross cartoons does a damn thing to help real kids.

And I don't see how banning gross cartoons does a damn thing to hurt anyone.

 

[Android raptor]

So my question about conservatives marrying child brides last year is replied to with a quarter century's worth of data without any proof that those 60k are conservatives. And even 10, horrific as it is, seems to be a rare outlier and isn't a toddler (and isn't a gang rape).

Maybe, just maybe, there's not actually a big problem with predatory conservatives and it's actually liberals, especially LGBT men, and that whenever you hear about gang raped toddlers there's a good reason straight white Christian men don't come to mind for most people.

Unless they're familiar with Josh Duggar.

I can't imagine it's really possible to know the political alignment of ever person in a child marriage, but the article specifically notes its linked to conservative religious communities and the states with the most child marriages per capita are Nevada, Idaho, Arkansas, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Wyoming, Utah, Alabama, West Virginia and Mississippi.

And I don't see how banning gross cartoons does a damn thing to hurt anyone.

It opens up a pretty nasty legal can of worms and violates the same constitutional rights as banning the Turner Diaries. Abhorrent speech is still constitutionally protected speech. Plus, where do you draw the line? Books like Lolita that aren't meant for any sexual gratification (the polar opposite, in fact) have been challenged since its publication and banning lolicon could open the door to banning works like Lolita that deal with CSA in any capacity. It's pretty much the same issue as banning hate speech.

 

[Johnny Salami]

It probably has to do with her and the fact that she's a pretend lesbian who gets off to little boy anime children in sexual situations.

For some reason many of the lesbos I knew who were into anime were into Yaoi. Even in fandom there were a lot of lesbos into that shit (and this was before the troon shit)

Love how this thread took a sharp turn from
"Hurrr she based because make users mad durrrr"
To
"Wow what a sick freak!"

Both can be true at the same time

I ship Null and Dyn personally.

Most sane Jersh fangirl

 

[RollerGator]

Unless they're familiar with Josh Duggar.

I can't imagine it's really possible to know the political alignment of ever person in a child marriage, but the article specifically notes its linked to conservative religious communities and the states with the most child marriages per capita are Nevada, Idaho, Arkansas, Kentucky, Oklahoma, Wyoming, Utah, Alabama, West Virginia and Mississippi.

It opens up a pretty nasty legal can of worms and violates the same constitutional rights as banning the Turner Diaries. Abhorrent speech is still constitutionally protected speech. Plus, where do you draw the line? Books like Lolita that aren't meant for any sexual gratification (the polar opposite, in fact) have been challenged since its publication and banning lolicon could open the door to banning works like Lolita that deal with CSA in any capacity. It's pretty much the same issue as banning hate speech.

Your responses are like a nigger when people bring up 13/50 "BUH WAH BOUT DEM YT SKOOL SHOOTAS!?

Public masturbation is illegal because it isn't freedom of expression. Cartoon CP isn't free speech.

 

[Android raptor]

For some reason many of the lesbos I knew who were into anime were into Yaoi. Even in fandom there were a lot of lesbos into that shit (and this was before the troon shit)

On the Japanese end most of the creators are bi and lesbian women. I think it's a way to explore homosexuality without having to deal with your own as directly as with f/f media (though I like that as well and many BL creators also do f/f stuff). Which is why most fujos get into BL when we're young and often pretty repressed about our own sexualities (I know I was).

Your responses are like a nigger when people bring up 13/50 "BUH WAH BOUT DEM YT SKOOL SHOOTAS!?

Public masturbation is illegal because it isn't freedom of expression. Cartoon CP isn't free speech.

Put a case before the Supreme Court and we'll see.

Either way, it's not going to do a damn thing to help real kids.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Unless they're familiar with Josh Duggar.

You're wearing out his name. You libtards recycle the same handful of guys, it's telling.

I can't imagine it's really possible to know the political alignment of ever person in a child marriage

So then it's irrelevant to bring up because you have no proof.

the article specifically notes its linked to conservative religious communities

Let's say we pretend each of them were conservatives, even then it's almost as if you've never heard of "wolves in sheep's clothing", the oldest trick in the book.

Abhorrent speech is still constitutionally protected speech.

But free speech already isn't absolute, and porn being considered free speech is a particularly dubious concept to begin with.

banning lolicon could open the door to banning works like Lolita that deal with CSA in any capacity.

I'm not really familiar with Lolita but Berserk contains that type of material. Assuming it's the same idea, loli is different than Berserk because the former doesn't have any "serious artistic merit". Berserk does, and a judge could determine that quite easily.

Banning loli shouldn't result in Berserk's ban, it's just an abuse of the slippery slope argument (which can be legitimate, as LGBT have proven, going from "pls just let us exist" to "we're jailing you and grooming your kid, bigot" within a relatively short timeframe).

It's pretty much the same issue as banning hate speech.

Not even close, there's no comparison between trying to ban a guy saying "I don't like fags" to the phonographic depiction of fictional minors. Hate speech is a bullshit concept, any truly bad speech is already illegal (such as inciting violence); fags not liking being called fags isn't a reason to ban that speech.

Both can be true at the same time

 

[RollerGator]

On the Japanese end most of the creators are bi and lesbian women. I think it's a way to explore homosexuality without having to deal with your own as directly as with f/f media (though I like that as well and many BL creators also do f/f stuff). Which is why most fujos get into BL when we're young and often pretty repressed about our own sexualities (I know I was).

Put a case before the Supreme Court and we'll see.

Either way, it's not going to do a damn thing to help real kids.

Stop pretending like you care about kids groomer. You're like those slimey male feminists that turn out to be rapists.

 

[Billy Bob Dick]

Sounds like it needs to be banned even more than loli, then.

Might as well ban "Mein Kampf," which will never happen for obvious reasons.

Banning books is always a bad idea. The only two books actually banned by the US government contain either fraudulent or classified information:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_books_banned_by_governments

 

[Android raptor]

Not even close, there's no comparison between trying to ban a guy saying "I don't like fags" to the phonographic depiction of fictional minors. Hate speech is a bullshit concept, any truly bad speech is already illegal (such as inciting violence); fags not liking being called fags isn't a reason to ban that speech.

But there is a comparison to a novel that features fags and all other minorities brutally murdered.

I'm not really familiar with Lolita but Berserk contains that type of material. Assuming it's the same idea, loli is different than Berserk because the former doesn't have any "serious artistic merit". Berserk does, and a judge could determine that quite easily.

Except that's not quite the case. I'm sure there are people chomping at the bit to ban Berserk. Works like that have been banned in the past.

You're wearing out his name. You libtards recycle the same handful of guys, it's telling.

Yet people like you are still unaware of who he is and what he did, and just how common people like him are in conservative religious communities.

 

[PistachiosOnMyDesk]

Notice that Android never answered my question.

Btw, I noticed you chose to omit this part of my post and not reply to it, how curious, almost like I nuked your argument or something:

Your responses are like a nigger when people bring up 13/15 "BUH WAH BOUT DEM YT SKOOL SHOOTAS!?"

As you can see from these three separate people complaining about the same thing, there's a bit of a trend here. Anytime you say something that shuts her the fuck down, she simply pretends you didn't say anything at all. Basically she is just not smart enough to keep up with any of this, so she ducks into defensive snark. She has pulled this same dumb trick on me several times now.

"fiction", culture, are incredibly important and constitute insanely potent propaganda.

She knows. Her arguments are disingenuous - she is one of the people you're talking about. She wants culture and art to be as ugly as possible. She wants the world to be a reflection of her soul: hideous and broken. I'd love to see her 23andme, I'm guessing there's a hearty chunk of ashkenazi in there.

Android Raptor fans when she's stanning lolicon: "w... t... f...."

What the fuck is going on in this thread? It took a weird turn

I'm just glad she's gone mask off with this. This is the same dumb bitch who called me a pedophile over nine thousand times because I said it was normal to want to fuck Britney Spears back in the day when she was on stage gyrating. I've noticed that Billy faggot has been awfully quiet ever since she started openly promoting her love of drawn child porn. Wonder if he'll address that? Heh.

Basically I don't think you get to call anybody a pedophile, really, when you sound exactly like a greasy Discord chomo who is trying to explain how loving loli totally isn't the same thing as wanting to fuck kids. Basically if you are into this shit, what you are is no big mystery. Android (and probably most of her simps) are exactly what people suspected they were: degenerate pedophiles projecting their illness onto other people.

Love how this thread took a sharp turn from
"Hurrr she based because make users mad durrrr"
To
"Wow what a sick freak!"

Simps are real fucking dumb, but even simps realize that being associated with a child porn enthusiast is a real bad look.

Put a case before the Supreme Court and we'll see.

I don't need old people in robes to tell me what should and shouldn't be illegal. The civil rights act is unconstitutional because it guts freedom of association, but you don't see the supreme court fixing that. Likewise, obscenity laws either don't exist anymore or are ignored. The cartoon child porn which you apparently love so much has no lofty ideas that it's transmitting - it's wank material for people who should be launched into the sun. It's nothing but obscenity and it should not exist. Porn in general should be illegal, actually, for the same reason that anthrax is illegal - it is mental and emotional poison which benefits no one.

You know, a hundred years ago you would have either started acting decently or been subjected to a lobotomy so that your family wouldn't have to deal with the shame you'd bring upon them. Women like you are really just incapable of being decent without some looming threat from society at large that says "behave or else." Probably most of the reason society is broken is because it forgot how to say "no" to people like you, even when you're out here in public talking about how much you love child porn.

 

[Android raptor]

Might as well ban "Mein Kampf," then, which will never happen for obvious reasons.

Shit, Mein Kampf has value as probably the most infamous criminal manifesto in history. It's impossible to study Hitler and try to learn about his psychology without Mein Kampf. The views exposed are abhorrent, but it's incredibly important from a historical and psychological standpoint.

 

[Billy Bob Dick]

I don't need old people in robes to tell me what should and shouldn't be illegal.

You're the stupidest fuck on this whole site. Kill yourself.

 

[Android raptor]

You know, a hundred years ago you would have either started acting decently or been subjected to a lobotomy so that your family wouldn't have to deal with the shame you'd bring upon them. Women like you are really just incapable of being decent without some looming threat from society at large that says "behave or else." Probably most of the reason society is broken is because it forgot how to say "no" to people like you, even when you're out here in public talking about how much you love child porn.

Says the person that derailed a thread on a pedo defender to defend actual pedophilia against very real children (including one of the most famous victims of it in the last couple decades)

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

Might as well ban "Mein Kampf," then, which will never happen for obvious reasons.

I never read it, but I'm aware of it and can accurately assume its contents. It has historical significance above all, but also, it doesn't seem to actually pose any kind of threat. I can maybe see banning it in Germany, given the context, but there's no legitimate argument I can conceive of beyond the typical liberal whimpering to ban it in America.

Loli, on the other hand, has no historical significance and is obscene. One may then resort to the tired position of subjective morality, arguing "who among us is to say drawing a baby getting raped is bad", but it's not compelling in the slightest.

 

[Android raptor]

Loli, on the other hand, has no historical significance and is obscene. One may then resort to the tired position of subjective morality, arguing "who among us is to say drawing a baby getting raped is bad", but it's not compelling in the slightest.

And you can say the exact same thing about the Turner Diaries, especially since it's just as connected to real world crime as lolicon is. Including some of the most infamous terror attacks of the past 40 years.

It's also banned in at least one country (Canada) as obscene.

 

[Billy Bob Dick]

I never read it, but I'm aware of it and can accurately assume its contents. It has historical significance above all, but also, it doesn't seem to actually pose any kind of threat. I can maybe see banning it in Germany, given the context, but there's no legitimate argument I can conceive of beyond the typical liberal whimpering to ban it in America.

Loli, on the other hand, has no historical significance and is obscene. One may then resort to the tired position of subjective morality, arguing "who among us is to say drawing a baby getting raped is bad", but it's not compelling in the slightest.

I'm OK with obscenity being banned, but the US judicial system tends to permit "freedom of expression" with a broad brush in rhe defence of First Amendment principles. I agree with you in principal. In practice, you have to look at countries that actually ban shit to see what a mess it makes and what it goes hand in hand with. Look at the UK, Dubai, Australia, the UAE

EDIT: and Canuckistan as AR pointed out^^, fuck that shithole.

EDIT 2: I stand corrected. Ban it. Ban anything that harms kids.

 

[Android raptor]

I'm OK with obscenity being banned, but the US judicial system tends to permit "freedom of expression" with a broad brush in rhe defence of First Amendment principles. I agree with you in principal. In practice, you have to look at countries that actually ban shit to see what a mess it makes and what it goes hand in hand with. Look at the UK, Dubai, Australia, the UAE.

And those countries aren't exactly known for being free of sex crimes, including and especially against children.

I think the fact that the US hasn't even banned child marriage is a much bigger issue than the legality of gross cartoons. Let's tackle that issue first, especially since it would help actual children.

 

[Black Man Underwear]

And you can say the exact same thing about the Turner Diaries, especially since it's just as connected to real world crime as lolicon is. Including some of the most infamous terror attacks of the past 40 years.

I'm OK with obscenity being banned, but the US judicial system tends to permit "freedom of expression" with a broad brush in rhe defence of First Amendment principles. I agree with you in principal. In practice, you have to look at countries that actually ban shit to see what a mess it makes and what it goes hand in hand with. Look at the UK, Dubai, Australia, the UAE.

Loli isn't actual CP, so banning it sets a very problematic precedent. I dunno man. It's right on the cusp.

Dyke and friends argue their ideology does not promote pedophilia.
Weeks later they argue in support of pedophilia.

Loli isn't actual CP, so banning it sets a very problematic precedent. I dunno man. It's right on the cusp.

Years later:
"CP isn't physical molestation, so banning it sets a very problematic precedent. I dunno man. It's right on the cusp."

 

[Billy Bob Dick]

Dyke and friends argue their ideology does not promote pedophilia.
Weeks later they argue in support of pedophilia.



Years later:
"CP isn't physical molestation, so banning it sets a very problematic precedent. I dunno man. It's right on the cusp."

Don't put words in my mouth, fuckhead.

Fuck it, ban the loli shit. I'd never even heard of it until this website. Ban anything and everything that hurts kids. Just be aware that every action sets legal precedents.

 

[Android raptor]

"CP isn't physical molestation, so banning it sets a very problematic precedent. I dunno man. It's right on the cusp."

CP by definition is actual molestation, since it involves real children being sexually abused. That's why it's illegal.

Shame child marriage isn't also illegal, especially since it legalizes child molestation in some states.