- Joined
- Aug 3, 2022
Where would you rather live than in this hellhole?It is a rough deal. I do second the claim that it is an accursed hellhole too.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where would you rather live than in this hellhole?It is a rough deal. I do second the claim that it is an accursed hellhole too.
No you would not. You wouldn't last a year in their corporate structure where you must behave like a slave towards your capitalist piglet boss, but this time with the bonus of racial difference and you being a minority.Not in the ME. If not Europe, I would choosy grorious Nippon and endure the karaoke with the drubk boss.
Some companies hire a dedicated American, who has the role of telling upper management what their employees concerns are. Nissan started hiring one after a series of really dumb mistakes.No you would not. You wouldn't last a year in their corporate structure where you must behave like a slave towards your capitalist piglet boss, but this time with the bonus of racial difference and you being a minority.
Europeans are a rebellious bunch. We're not meant to submit to foreigners nor integrate in their societies.
Also, anime and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. Mostly for Yuropoors and Amerimutts.
No you would not. You wouldn't last a year in their corporate structure where you must behave like a slave towards your capitalist piglet boss, but this time with the bonus of racial difference and you being a minority.
Europeans are a rebellious bunch. We're not meant to submit to foreigners nor integrate in their societies.
Also, anime and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. Mostly for Yuropoors and Amerimutts.
Very sane and incredibly based.So far as for me, the Eastern Europe deal is basically the best I can get. It is poor, but not Africa/SA poor. It is relatively safe, and mostly sane. But I think Japan does have foreign programs for English teachers. You don't even need to accompany the boss on his after work 21 to 23 beer and karaoke, because the bars are yellow-only.
To quote the secondary anthem, translation my own, trying to best convey the meaning:Very sane and incredibly based.
This is our home.
Ignore what? Teacher basically said "Now play nice" before turning around and minding her own business.
I'd take this argument more seriously if Amerimutts realized their country came to be in much the same way.You as a native person, whose ancestors have lived in the area for thousands of years, are not obligated to just stand by and yield your country to a group of people who have a fraction of your genetic claim to it.
You are not obligated to follow their political process or their plans for the area.
You are not obligated to "meet them for peace" when they massacre your countrymen and shove the rest of you into ghettos.
You are not obligated to forgive them or play along to anything. Not a "ceasefire" (because they will not cease fire, you have learned this from the past 100 years of dealing with them). Not a "two state solution" (because they will not honor a two state solution, they have demonstrated this clearly over the past 100 years of dealing with them).
America hasn’t explicitly gone to war for territory in nearly two hundred years. When the US rassled the Southwest away from Mexico, they were dousing themselves in pig viscera to combat illnesses because germ theory hadn’t won out against pseudoscience like animal magnetism.Amerimutts are hypocrites on the issue of annexing land.
Russia does it, OY VEY
Israel does it, I LUV JEWS
View attachment 5671258
Interesting comment section.Amerimutts are hypocrites on the issue of annexing land.
Russia does it, OY VEY
Israel does it, I LUV JEWS
Everyone is, the current UN "plan" is to return to the '67 borders(no Palestine) then take land from Egypt, Jordan, and Syria to create a nation of first cousin marrying Palestinians.Amerimutts are hypocrites on the issue of annexing land.
Russia does it, OY VEY
Israel does it, I LUV JEWS
View attachment 5671258
This might be the war that sinks "vote blue no matter who" for the Democrats.Interesting comment section.
Notice how he's talking about the Holocaust, in which European Jews were massacred by the Third Reich.
People in the comment section are talking about Palestine and Gaza non-stop.
Not to mention all the genocide denial involving the Re'im music festival.
The only type of person who used the term "zionist" constantly and boycotted business who happen to support Israel were who? Stormfronters. Now every single they/them wants to boycott everything remotely owned by Jews, even if they're not Israeli. They also bully minors who do not comply. They spam gore to people as a way to shock.
Antifas saw hundreds of Jews being killed live from their phones, and they cheered for the killers despite them hating antisemitism. Feminists denied that were incidents of rape and abuse of women in October. Queers excused Palestinian XYZphobia because they don't have time to think about "queer rights" due to being bombed all the time.
View attachment 5673610View attachment 5673612
View attachment 5673613View attachment 5673615
The word 'explicitly' is interesting as a qualifier because its precise meaning depends on your outlook.America hasn’t explicitly gone to war for territory in nearly two hundred years. When the US rassled the Southwest away from Mexico, they were dousing themselves in pig viscera to combat illnesses because germ theory hadn’t won out against pseudoscience like animal magnetism.
The suggestion that Americans can’t criticize conquest today just because the father of our father’s grandfather might have partook in it is just as retarded as the snake oil they were drinking at the time.
There’s ample room to debate the merit and morality of coincidentally picking up a couple islands in the pacific during a war where that probably wasn’t the intent at the start, and if we really want to get autistic we can question the integrity of Hawaiian sovereignty when we put them down. The problem I see with that then becomes a point where we’re now offering unfalsifiable claims where we’re basically trying to read the minds of men who died long before you or I were born. It also opens the doors to claim that any time the armed forces are deployed, it’s to conquer/reconquer territory where the US has its authority questioned, and I think that’s just retarded. From where I’m sitting, the Mexican-American war is the most recent war in US history where there’s absolutely no room for debate regarding the motives of the conflict, as opposed to the Spanish-American war for example.The word 'explicitly' is interesting as a qualifier because its precise meaning depends on your outlook.
For example. One could argue the US putting down an insurrection in a colonial territory it got as part of a peace deal with another nation - a colonial territory that itself never had a say in this arrangement as 'explicit war for territory.'