What is your opinion on the Israel-Palestine Armed Conflict? - Keep the other thread focused on the hard facts

And Israel is going to ignore this ruling.

Screenshot 2024-01-26 081328.png
 
Not in the ME. If not Europe, I would choosy grorious Nippon and endure the karaoke with the drubk boss.
No you would not. You wouldn't last a year in their corporate structure where you must behave like a slave towards your capitalist piglet boss, but this time with the bonus of racial difference and you being a minority.
Europeans are a rebellious bunch. We're not meant to submit to foreigners nor integrate in their societies.
Also, anime and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. Mostly for Yuropoors and Amerimutts.
 
Last edited:
Dead babies vs dead babies I mean at the end of the day both sides should lose because they're filled to the brim with psychos.
 
No you would not. You wouldn't last a year in their corporate structure where you must behave like a slave towards your capitalist piglet boss, but this time with the bonus of racial difference and you being a minority.
Europeans are a rebellious bunch. We're not meant to submit to foreigners nor integrate in their societies.
Also, anime and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. Mostly for Yuropoors and Amerimutts.
Some companies hire a dedicated American, who has the role of telling upper management what their employees concerns are. Nissan started hiring one after a series of really dumb mistakes.
 
No you would not. You wouldn't last a year in their corporate structure where you must behave like a slave towards your capitalist piglet boss, but this time with the bonus of racial difference and you being a minority.
Europeans are a rebellious bunch. We're not meant to submit to foreigners nor integrate in their societies.
Also, anime and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race. Mostly for Yuropoors and Amerimutts.

Ah, I thought you meant as in, if I could have been born somewhere else, what would I choose. Though Hungarians have a habit of malicious compliance until someone shows us his back.

The nip corporate culture IS horrible, and the Chinese are just worse, but what is the others?

There is western europe /Straya/ US faggot insanity where I would need to worship gypsies and suck their cocks. Yeah, I'll rather do crunch.
There is Islam where I could have the "joy" of a totally sober love life with my goat in abject poverty while US and Israel bomb me for sport. Pass.
There is South America, with the same abject poverty and being killed by cartels instead of Uncle Sam. Not an improvement.
There is Africa, which is basically South America but with state sponsored vs warlords and even more predators than SA if possible.
India, eating with a rat from the same floor while Ranaj Cowhindu takes a poo besides me as appetiser? Maybe some german fetishists would like that, but not me.

And the violence in SA/Kangfrica is insane, on a level that makes arabs/US schools look safe by comparison (if we disregard Uncle Sam's occasional bunker buster dropped because Schlomo is bored).

So far as for me, the Eastern Europe deal is basically the best I can get. It is poor, but not Africa/SA poor. It is relatively safe, and mostly sane. But I think Japan does have foreign programs for English teachers. You don't even need to accompany the boss on his after work 21 to 23 beer and karaoke, because the bars are yellow-only.
 
So far as for me, the Eastern Europe deal is basically the best I can get. It is poor, but not Africa/SA poor. It is relatively safe, and mostly sane. But I think Japan does have foreign programs for English teachers. You don't even need to accompany the boss on his after work 21 to 23 beer and karaoke, because the bars are yellow-only.
Very sane and incredibly based.
This is our home.
 
Very sane and incredibly based.
This is our home.
To quote the secondary anthem, translation my own, trying to best convey the meaning:
Worship your homeland with dauntless loyalty, hungarian. It is your crib, and it will be your grave, which nourishes you, and will shroud you(r corpse).

I am fine with living and dying where I am supposed to.
 
You as a native person, whose ancestors have lived in the area for thousands of years, are not obligated to just stand by and yield your country to a group of people who have a fraction of your genetic claim to it.
You are not obligated to follow their political process or their plans for the area.
You are not obligated to "meet them for peace" when they massacre your countrymen and shove the rest of you into ghettos.
You are not obligated to forgive them or play along to anything. Not a "ceasefire" (because they will not cease fire, you have learned this from the past 100 years of dealing with them). Not a "two state solution" (because they will not honor a two state solution, they have demonstrated this clearly over the past 100 years of dealing with them).
I'd take this argument more seriously if Amerimutts realized their country came to be in much the same way.
 
As an mutt I must comment, a political and social collapse from a couple plagues transmitted at initial contact (America circa 1400-1600) leaves a shite load less evidence than wholesale direct massacre and razing. Also people got camera phones now. Again, going "both sides same" is Hasbara bullshit where there are many people paid to workshop this until it turns into the magic words that avert attention from Israel being Nazi Germany 2.0.
 
Amerimutts are hypocrites on the issue of annexing land.

Russia does it, OY VEY
Israel does it, I LUV JEWS

View attachment 5671258
America hasn’t explicitly gone to war for territory in nearly two hundred years. When the US rassled the Southwest away from Mexico, they were dousing themselves in pig viscera to combat illnesses because germ theory hadn’t won out against pseudoscience like animal magnetism.

The suggestion that Americans can’t criticize conquest today just because the father of our father’s grandfather might have partook in it is just as retarded as the snake oil they were drinking at the time.
 
Amerimutts are hypocrites on the issue of annexing land.

Russia does it, OY VEY
Israel does it, I LUV JEWS
Interesting comment section.
Notice how he's talking about the Holocaust, in which European Jews were massacred by the Third Reich.
People in the comment section are talking about Palestine and Gaza non-stop.
Not to mention all the genocide denial involving the Re'im music festival.
The only type of person who used the term "zionist" constantly and boycotted business who happen to support Israel were who? Stormfronters. Now every single they/them wants to boycott everything remotely owned by Jews, even if they're not Israeli. They also bully minors who do not comply. They spam gore to people as a way to shock.
Antifas saw hundreds of Jews being killed live from their phones, and they cheered for the killers despite them hating antisemitism. Feminists denied that were incidents of rape and abuse of women in October. Queers excused Palestinian XYZphobia because they don't have time to think about "queer rights" due to being bombed all the time.
1706444293746.png1706444312932.png
QuGjK8qXTj.png1706444459734.png
 
Amerimutts are hypocrites on the issue of annexing land.

Russia does it, OY VEY
Israel does it, I LUV JEWS

View attachment 5671258
Everyone is, the current UN "plan" is to return to the '67 borders(no Palestine) then take land from Egypt, Jordan, and Syria to create a nation of first cousin marrying Palestinians.

The international accord that borders are sacrosanct, is more of a guideline depending on geopolitical alliances.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
Interesting comment section.
Notice how he's talking about the Holocaust, in which European Jews were massacred by the Third Reich.
People in the comment section are talking about Palestine and Gaza non-stop.
Not to mention all the genocide denial involving the Re'im music festival.
The only type of person who used the term "zionist" constantly and boycotted business who happen to support Israel were who? Stormfronters. Now every single they/them wants to boycott everything remotely owned by Jews, even if they're not Israeli. They also bully minors who do not comply. They spam gore to people as a way to shock.
Antifas saw hundreds of Jews being killed live from their phones, and they cheered for the killers despite them hating antisemitism. Feminists denied that were incidents of rape and abuse of women in October. Queers excused Palestinian XYZphobia because they don't have time to think about "queer rights" due to being bombed all the time.
View attachment 5673610View attachment 5673612
View attachment 5673613View attachment 5673615
This might be the war that sinks "vote blue no matter who" for the Democrats.

Which makes this all even funnier.

Can the looney left finally abandon Biden out of principle.

All those "storm fronters" will most likely stay home or vote Trump given to what degree do they tolerate Trump as a Jew lover.

But Biden Amd his kike donors created this golem when they could have stopped it.
 
America hasn’t explicitly gone to war for territory in nearly two hundred years. When the US rassled the Southwest away from Mexico, they were dousing themselves in pig viscera to combat illnesses because germ theory hadn’t won out against pseudoscience like animal magnetism.

The suggestion that Americans can’t criticize conquest today just because the father of our father’s grandfather might have partook in it is just as retarded as the snake oil they were drinking at the time.
The word 'explicitly' is interesting as a qualifier because its precise meaning depends on your outlook.
For example. One could argue the US putting down an insurrection in a colonial territory it got as part of a peace deal with another nation - a colonial territory that itself never had a say in this arrangement as 'explicit war for territory.'
 
The word 'explicitly' is interesting as a qualifier because its precise meaning depends on your outlook.
For example. One could argue the US putting down an insurrection in a colonial territory it got as part of a peace deal with another nation - a colonial territory that itself never had a say in this arrangement as 'explicit war for territory.'
There’s ample room to debate the merit and morality of coincidentally picking up a couple islands in the pacific during a war where that probably wasn’t the intent at the start, and if we really want to get autistic we can question the integrity of Hawaiian sovereignty when we put them down. The problem I see with that then becomes a point where we’re now offering unfalsifiable claims where we’re basically trying to read the minds of men who died long before you or I were born. It also opens the doors to claim that any time the armed forces are deployed, it’s to conquer/reconquer territory where the US has its authority questioned, and I think that’s just retarded. From where I’m sitting, the Mexican-American war is the most recent war in US history where there’s absolutely no room for debate regarding the motives of the conflict, as opposed to the Spanish-American war for example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MrJokerRager
Back