- Joined
- Aug 1, 2023
The former is a lot more serious than the latter. I don't think it's a surprise that a guy, much less an autistic one, quoted a shock-factor line from a viral video in the middle of a session of private messages in 2010 (following it up by saying what he was quoting). That in itself is not worthy of note 14 years after the fact, and to give full benefit of the doubt, that was earlier in the conversation where he apparently didn't know the girl was underage. The "loli" mentions and conversations with slight but obvious sexual undertones is where it gets a lot sketchier, I just think it's a shame that people can't tell which from which when things get released years later.Sir Dalton is shameless and opportunistic as fuck. It's also wild for a 19-year-old to call a 15-year-old a loli and PEDOCRUSH, or to send the message "I'm going to rape you" to someone regardless of whether it's from a YouTube Poop from 2006 or whatever
Autistic people are often given very limited internet freedom exactly because of the risk that they'll get themselves into trouble in ways like this. With hindsight I think ideally Chugga would have had a closer eye on his posting habits, at least until he was 18, which maybe could have helped preempt or identify this pattern. The most important question to my mind, and maybe there's info I've missed that could hint at an answer for or against, is did he continue the pattern of talking to underage girls? Seems like he's kept the whole foot thing, but I'd hope that as he matured and the age gap grew (even) bigger, he realised that talking to mid-teen kids like this was morally and practically a terrible idea.