Null is out of touch with women

You're speaking as if "the public being able to participate" is a necessary good in and of itself. The only good that should matter is correct policy outcomes and governance. If that can be better achieved by not having most of the public participate, then that's, in an ideal world, how things would work.
That's an utterly naive way to think about enfranchisement. If it weren't for the public being able to participate in the scale that they do then we would have no counterbalance whatsoever to the excesses and depravity we see from the government we have. It's a testament to this republic that even as degenerated as the average voters has become, that said elites were forced to willfuly and flagrantly cheat in order to get the administration we have and are now forced to await their destruction in the coming year.
 
Okay, should I do it in ovarit or mumsnet?
What, the places for women to express conservative opinions, because you can't say trannies don't real anywhere controlled by the left? That's what a liberal site is to you?
 
Voting is a right for all us citizens, not a privilege retard
No, it's a right for women, but an obligation for men. Voting for a war mongering idiot or someone too stupid to know when outgunned is an invitation for a draft (look at Ukraine and how many whores get to be whores in Europe while their men die all because the Zelenksi wants to appear strong)
Genuinely curious why you types never advocate for taking the rights of non-whites away?
As much as I hate niggers, many of them have been forced to fight for this country.
How does taking coffee help with sleep medication @Johnny Salami
w*man moment
This thread would be so much more interesting if incel types weren't all the exact same person saying the exact same things over and over and over and over again. There isn't any discussion to be had with NPCs cause the dialogue options never change.
As opposed to the type of man hating women that can only fantasize about hurting men knowing any man can slap them at any moment and there's nothing they can do to stop it
 
I wonder if he has a Serbian chick on the side that he's not telling anyone about. Maybe that's why he's relocating back to the states, his love quest is complete.
You know that the US requires a visa to enter, right? A side chick can't move with him unless they're married.

Besides, in Serbia it's not normal to be so obese that your dick doesn't work. Most people there are of normal weight (or skinny by American standards), and women with self-respect have better options than fat "nice guy" Americans who don't even speak the language. Reminder that this is the same Josh who started a weight loss contest with Ralph that Ralph won, while Josh gave up 2 weeks in.
 
I don't even really give a shit about what people think about women online, I just find the regulars in the Women-Hate thread to be annoying, whiny faggots.

For example this guy was a regular there:
A0B8CAFD-C8D1-441B-AF3B-86ED3741C1F1.jpeg
That thread must be entirely comprised of incels turned Troons so it's not really surprising why Null doesn't like them.
 
I just find the regulars in the Women-Hate thread to be annoying, whiny faggots.
There's a bit of circle jerk and some users are clearly bitter incel but overall it's okay.
A step above the man hate thread who has skizos and a lolcow with a thread as regular users.

You're also on the shit list as an A&N tard ( 80% of your posts are there)
 
That's an utterly naive way to think about enfranchisement. If it weren't for the public being able to participate in the scale that they do then we would have no counterbalance whatsoever to the excesses and depravity we see from the government we have. It's a testament to this republic that even as degenerated as the average voters has become, that said elites were forced to willfuly and flagrantly cheat in order to get the administration we have and are now forced to await their destruction in the coming year.

Again, history proves this false. The United States started out with only a small section of the population who met specific qualifications able to vote. This was still plenty enough to support elections much like the ones of today in which conflicting groups of elites tried to appeal to the voters in order to win, with the obvious implication that if one coalition was too incompetent or abusive, voters might react by putting the other coalition into power instead.

There's no reason or evidence to believe that you can't maintain that dynamic while also disqualifying large classes of people who demonstrably worsen governance if allowed to participate. Another group that should probably not be voting are welfare recipients, for instance. The obvious corrupt bargain of politicians buying votes by promising free stuff to useless people is indefensible.
 
I don't even really give a shit about what people think about women online, I just find the regulars in the Women-Hate thread to be annoying, whiny faggots.

For example this guy was a regular there:
View attachment 5674375
That thread must be entirely comprised of incels turned Troons so it's not really surprising why Null doesn't like them.
The majority are, unsurprisingly, homosexual men.
 
The majority are, unsurprisingly, homosexual men.
Thank goodness, here I was thinking they were a majority incels mad because women won't date them, behaving like crabs in a bucket due to Josh getting out via male feminism. I heard a user say that a couple pages back and it sounded pretty convincing.

Anyways how do you feel about Josh's belief that all women want to have children, and if they claim otherwise they aren't being truthful?
Because I sort of agree with that one on some level, but I think a lot of feminists would respond poorly to it.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Ser Prize
Again, history proves this false. The United States started out with only a small section of the population who met specific qualifications able to vote. This was still plenty enough to support elections much like the ones of today in which conflicting groups of elites tried to appeal to the voters in order to win, with the obvious implication that if one coalition was too incompetent or abusive, voters might react by putting the other coalition into power instead.

There's no reason or evidence to believe that you can't maintain that dynamic while also disqualifying large classes of people who demonstrably worsen governance if allowed to participate. Another group that should probably not be voting are welfare recipients, for instance. The obvious corrupt bargain of politicians buying votes by promising free stuff to useless people is indefensible.
I just pointed to recent history to describe my point with regards to the 2020 elections supporting my point so clearly history has proven nothing for you and the idea of rolling back voting rights en masse is a slippery slope with truly sinister implications in this day and age, especially with a social structure as stratified as the one we have currently.
 
Thank goodness, here I was thinking they were a majority incels mad because women won't date them, behaving like crabs in a bucket due to Josh getting out via male feminism. I heard a user say that a couple pages back and it sounded pretty convincing.

Anyways how do you feel about Josh's belief that all women want to have children, and if they claim otherwise they aren't being truthful?
Because I sort of agree with that one on some level, but I think a lot of feminists would respond poorly to it.


Probably truth behind this meme. Although I do think it's likely that, one, there is a very small number of outlier women who legitimately don't want to have children (likely over-represented in activist/academic feminist types), and two, a good number of women can basically be convinced that they don't want to have children by their liberal environment and then they just engage in sunk cost fallacy from there (i.e. once they're too old to practically reproduce even if they wanted to, they make up self-serving excuses for why it was the right thing for them to stay childless, because the alternative is way too much harder to deal with).

I just pointed to recent history to describe my point with regards to the 2020 elections supporting my point so clearly history has proven nothing for you and the idea of rolling back voting rights en masse is a slippery slope with truly sinister implications in this day and age, especially with a social structure as stratified as the one we have currently.

If your premise is that elections are fake then why do you give a shit who can vote or not? I would think you'd want to roll back on the voting so that the regime can't hide behind the veneer of "democracy" to give itself fake legitimacy.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Johnny Salami
Anyways how do you feel about Josh's belief that all women want to have children, and if they claim otherwise they aren't being truthful?
Because I sort of agree with that one on some level, but I think a lot of feminists would respond poorly to it.
I think it's true for the majority of mentally healthy women. The issue of childlessness isn't so much that women don't want to have them, it's that they can't find a man they think would actually be a good father who will stay in their life, be supportive, will never cheat or be violent and will help out with child rearing instead of making the woman do all of the work PLUS work a job while he sits around jerking off to OnlyFans after work. Also a lot of people can't afford to have kids.

I think in the future women will just form women-only communes where they raise children together without men while supporting each other. Buying chad sperm at the sperm bank and aborting all boy babies.

Thank goodness, here I was thinking they were a majority incels mad because women won't date them, behaving like crabs in a bucket due to Josh getting out via male feminism. I heard a user say that a couple pages back and it sounded pretty convincing.
It's still true tho. They are prison gay incels.
 
If your premise is that elections are fake then why do you give a shit who can vote or not? I would think you'd want to roll back on the voting so that the regime can't hide behind the veneer of "democracy" to give itself fake legitimacy.
My premise is that elections force accountability and the fact that the powers that be were forced to cheat in order to ram a senile corpse instead of whatever you're suggesting points to numerous benefits from universal suffrage.
 
The issue of childlessness isn't so much that women don't want to have them, it's that they can't find a man they think would actually be a good father who will stay in their life, be supportive, will never cheat or be violent and will help out with child rearing instead of making the woman do all of the work PLUS work a job while he sits around jerking off to OnlyFans after work.

If women were this selective for these traits then they wouldnā€™t need to abort their retarded bastard offspring by the millions.

I think in the future women will just form women-only communes where they raise children together without men while supporting each other. Buying chad sperm at the sperm bank and aborting all boy babies.

Lol. Lmao.
 
To incels in this thread: if women are really as stupid and shallow as you think, then why is it so hard for you to find one and at least unwind?
To manhaters in this thread: if men are as bad as you say, then why do you approach them the way you do? All this chiding and whining is just wearing them down until they tune you out and do what they want regardless of how you wish. Do you truly not understand how to win a man to your side or inspire him to look higher?
 
To incels in this thread: if women are really as stupid and shallow as you think, then why is it so hard for you to find one and at least unwind?
Recently I found out it isnā€™t hard, but I want someone who is interesting, has her own opinions, and can somewhat understand me. I donā€™t expect anyone to share my retarded views and autistic hyperfixations. Iā€™m not nearly as upset at this as I used to be, but I just simply am not what most girls want and itā€™s completely understandable. Iā€™m just being realistic in saying that what Iā€™m searching for is highly exceptional and I need to really improve myself if I am to secure that opportunity if it ever comes.
 
Back