I'm a person of alphabet soup experience and I've met way too much dudes (and some women too) in their 40's dating abusing 15 years olds and none of the adults seeing a problem with that.
Legal age in my country is 16, but I have yet to meet a middle age straight person at a bar with friends a their 16 years old partner victim. It's not a society problem, is a dikefag culture problem.
Word.
I’ve said numerous times before, and this is a homo-culture issue.
It’s NORMAL for young gay teenagers (especially boys) to find/be found by a faggot in his 30ies or 40ies who “introduces” him to the lifestyle.
Most of them have a similar story of being sexually abused by a much older person, except it’s rewritten as a loving introduction to the lifestyle.
They don’t advertise about it, but when they talk amongst themselves, you realize how common this shit is. They even romanticize it as a “rite of passage” for young homos.
Shit is fucked.
What exactly is the point of a no-hole pussy? Because that's what he's talking about.
Link -
Archive
View attachment 5674167
Key quote:
Not even the pretense of being a real
anything. 
Well.
Considering the low rate of complications these surgeries have compared with the full depth procedures, a shallow/no depth SRS is actually the same choice.
They suck for sex anyways, so considering that your partner will likely have a few frustrating tries fucking your stinkditch, before switching to anal, why not just skip the extra steps and go for a zero depth procedure?
View attachment 5675275
Question 1: Yes, I would consider that a radical circumcision.
Question 2: Yes, the whole phallus would be considered foreskin, so lop the whole thing off again.
What an absolutely retarded question!
As for 2, they CAN’T make an “uncircumcised” phallo since (surprise!) it’s not an actual penis. They can’t replicate how thin foreskin is, and even if they could, the blood supply just isn’t there.
So they only make flesh rolls that emulate the circumcised look.
