EU European Parliament backs resolution calling for suspending Hungary's EU voting rights - "If 26 members, agree that a breach is occurring, a qualified majority of the Council can suspend some of Hungary's membership rights, including voting rights, under Article 7.3 until all duties are fulfilled."


The European Parliament supported on Jan. 18 the resolution calling on the European Council and member states to suspend Hungary's voting rights, said Petri Sarvamaa, a senior member of the European Parliament (MEP).

Earlier this month, Sarvamaa launched a petition to remove some of Budapest's membership rights due to the country's "erosion of the rule of law" and obstructive behavior in the face of EU consensus building.

The resolution, supported by 345 MEPs with 104 voting against and 29 abstaining, calls on the European Council to examine whether Hungary is committing a "serious and persistent breach" of the bloc's values under Article 7.2 of the EU treaty.

If 26 members, excluding the 27th member who is under consideration, agree that a breach is occurring, a qualified majority of the Council can suspend some of Hungary's membership rights, including voting rights, under Article 7.3 until all duties are fulfilled.

"The European Parliament has done its part; now it's up to Member States to follow through," Sarvamaa said on the social media platform X.

Earlier this week, Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico, who is considered close to Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, said he would fight against any attempts to restrict Hungary's EU rights. Bratislava's opposition could prevent consensus on Article 7.2.

Both Fico and Orban have repeatedly criticized Western support for Ukraine and sanctions against Russia. Hungary also blocked the EU's long-term budget, including 50 billion euro ($54 billion) for Kyiv, during a European Council summit in December.

This aid is especially crucial now for Ukraine as assistance from the U.S. of over $60 billion remains stalled by domestic political infighting.

EU leaders are to reconvene to vote on the budget on Feb. 1. European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said that the bloc is prepared to provide support for Ukraine even without Hungary's approval.

The EU Parliament's resolution condemned Hungary for blocking the funds. It also threatened legal action over the European Commission's decision to unfreeze over 10 billion euros (roughly $11 billion) for Budapest ahead of the December summit.

The European Commission said that the decision was taken strictly due to procedural reasons, namely due to judicial reforms undertaken by Hungary.

Although Orban blocked the funding for Ukraine, he allowed other EU leaders to reach a consensus on accession talks with Kyiv by leaving the room during a key vote.
 
Screenshot 2024-01-29 171816.png
Screenshot 2024-01-29 171844.png
 
Article 2
The Union is founded on the values of respect for human dignity, freedom, democracy, equality, the
rule of law and respect for human rights, including the rights of persons belonging to minorities.
These values are common to the Member States in a society in which pluralism, non-discrimination,
tolerance, justice, solidarity and equality between women and men prevail.

Please point to me where on here Hungary is breaching Article 2. Surely partaking in the core value of democracy even if by vetoing something couldn't be the reason to throw them out right?
 
Please point to me where on here Hungary is breaching Article 2. Surely partaking in the core value of democracy even if by vetoing something couldn't be the reason to throw them out right?
What does a union do when one member constantly becomes disruptive and starts trying to play both sides with another country outside the union?
 
AfD promised to do that if they win
Screenshot 2024-01-29 172645.png
Weidel has an autistic hatred of the Euro. Also has the most hilarious back story for a populist right wing figure I'm amazed everyone doesn't call her a fed. And you promised me Hungry Hungarians in Community Happenings and all I get is Euro's having a resolution to take into consideration the action of another vote to remove "EU privileges" from Hungary.
 
What does a union do when one member constantly becomes disruptive and starts trying to play both sides with another country outside the union?
Ukraine is outside of the Union. Hungary is refusing to send European Union funds, gotten at gunpoint from taxpayers, to non-European Union members. By any count, Hungary is more inline with the original intent of the EU (economic alliance for the member states) than EU itself is now.

At any rate, if voting is allowed, Hungary is allowed to disagree with the Union, as is Germany, Poland, France, etc. Weirdly enough, EU keeps threatening to kill the nations that disagree (or could in future disagree), or to coup them. Isn't that kinda undemocratic? Vote for us, or you become dead or a slave state isn't exactly what I'd call a free choice.
 
My sincere sympathies for the people of Hungary, with a bitterly ironic name for their country at the moment.

They can't possibly have the military forces to take on the entire EU and although I know little details I'm sure that unlike Russia they could absolutely be sanctioned into Irish Famine 2.0 if the EU really wanted to make an example of them.
 
Inviting Hungary to the EU was a stupid fucking decision and this is the EU's fucking mess. You wanted them in the EU, you now have to deal with their shitty fucking votes. Either devise a way for exit to the EU and kick them out or deal with it. The EU doesn't have any way to deal with a Turkey and as far as I know the EU rules were instituted when it was a lot smaller. A lot of our problems is we have these institutions or governments formed then t

The EU was never going to just be an economic alliance, not with how economies and power are intertangled or how power concentrates.
 
Sounds a lot like Athens in the years leading to the peloponnesian war. It didn't end well for them.
The Athenians were actually honest. They didn't hide behind "protecting democracy" or other such platitudes. These were the people who razed entire islands to the ground and justify it by stating "the strong do what they will and the weak suffer what they must."
 
Back