US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Taking this in face value, how do people get these interviews set up and do they know they're being recorded? With that, why do they continue to do it? It seems too good to be true; like a villain revealing his plans out in the open from one of those movies. Unless they are whistleblowers or try to play a "fake." I don't know.
They dont know they are being recorded. Sometimes it just an opinion, sometimes there is something deeper. Like the faggot that tried to boast that he was engineering the next covid for Pfizer
 
They dont know they are being recorded. Sometimes it just an opinion, sometimes there is something deeper. Like the faggot that tried to boast that he was engineering the next covid for Pfizer
And almost all of them are honey pots set up through Tinder and Grindr. O'Keefe is old school and knows the best way to get someone to spill their beans is to dangle pussy/dick in front of them.
 
Taking this in face value, how do people get these interviews set up and do they know they're being recorded? With that, why do they continue to do it? It seems too good to be true; like a villain revealing his plans out in the open from one of those movies. Unless they are whistleblowers or try to play a "fake." I don't know.
They brag because they think what they have to say will impress the person who's pants they're trying to get into.
 
The White House is REFUSING to hand over early drafts of President Biden’s 2015 Ukraine speech where he called for the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor, Viktor Shokin.

These drafts are important as it is believed, based on public reporting, that the then-VP “called an audible” and changed U.S. policy toward Ukraine to benefit his son on the plane ride to Ukraine.

Joe Biden later bragged about withholding a U.S. loan guarantee if Ukraine did not fire the prosecutor.

If the White House does not permit the production of these documents, our committee will consider the use of compulsory process.

IMG_1638.png
IMG_1639.png
IMG_1640.png
 
They brag because they think what they have to say will impress the person who's pants they're trying to get into.
Someone here or Twitter explained that a lot of DC staffers are gay and will go to great lengths to get gay sex in the butt. Sexuality used to be a way to compromise someone in the intelligence gathering world, and what the glowies may have done to others, the average person is capable of doing to people in-the-know now.
 
The White House is REFUSING to hand over early drafts of President Biden’s 2015 Ukraine speech where he called for the firing of the Ukrainian prosecutor, Viktor Shokin.

These drafts are important as it is believed, based on public reporting, that the then-VP “called an audible” and changed U.S. policy toward Ukraine to benefit his son on the plane ride to Ukraine.

Joe Biden later bragged about withholding a U.S. loan guarantee if Ukraine did not fire the prosecutor.

If the White House does not permit the production of these documents, our committee will consider the use of compulsory process.

View attachment 5682833
View attachment 5682834
View attachment 5682835
Tick-tock, 2 more weeks, trusty plan, etc.
 
Taking this in face value, how do people get these interviews set up and do they know they're being recorded? With that, why do they continue to do it? It seems too good to be true; like a villain revealing his plans out in the open from one of those movies. Unless they are whistleblowers or try to play a "fake." I don't know.
I don't think you understand the lengths some of these guys will go to and the embarrassing shit they'll brag about if it'll net them a crumb of pussy.
O'Keefe is just a front for a group of moderately attractive conservative women endlessly catfishing desperate lefties.
 
O'Keefe is just a front for a group of moderately attractive conservative women endlessly catfishing desperate lefties.
And gay men. Some of his best scoops from the tech industry have come from fags.

@Useful_Mistake Okay, genius Angloid. Your entire paragraph is dictated from the perspective of the writer until the 2nd half of your last sentence.
 
O'Keefe supposedly has a army of good looking women but I bet he gets the most information from horney gay staffers. Surprised he still does it himself through.
The funny thing about blocking everyone who mildly disagrees with you is that it's hard to put a face to your opposition
 
There are reasons people were warry about hiring the gays in the 50s.
It had more to do with universal idea that all homosexuals were pedophiles and less to do with corporate espionage. If knowledge is power, I'm sure some of the most powerful people in the world back then were fat titted secretaries with 65 IQs.
 
The fact that they are still more interested in keeping up appearances then having functional people at the helm is so depressing.
Because appearances are incredibly important to the left, among the wider average voter at least. There's an inherent benign assumption that if minorities are discriminated against for positions, something they defacto take as law, then any minority who does make it must inherently be especially competent - how else would they overcome their discrimination to rise to the top? The idea of a token hire by manipulative powers isn't on their radar, because in their worldview, the manipulative powers would put an old white man in that position because of the old boys club if they could.

On the flip side, it also means trying to remove one of these people without incredibly irrefutable good reason is practically impossible. If your operating off the presumption that they're competent and good at their job, then the only reason to replace them would be outside of their work performance, IE Discrimination. As the guy says, the optics become terrible. The only way they can cut them out is when they're so obviously fucking the job up, for everyone to see, that even the lefties can internally justify it. Bonus points if the successor is also a minority.
 
The funny thing about blocking everyone who mildly disagrees with you is that it's hard to put a face to your opposition
Especially since most libs abuse block bots, meaning they don't even know who these people are in most cases. Because one person they follow is listed on the block bot, BAM! They get blocked.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back