TheHarbinger
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Mar 22, 2022
No way you read the books in 1996. The consensus was that the scene was a failed attempt at a male fatass blob like GRRM trying to write some Penthouse forum level tale of "hot romance". Everyone was grossed out and the sex scenes were brushed off as just typical male power fantasies. It was clearly a horned up old man writing erotic fan fiction. GRRM's sex scenes have always been received with revulsion. A huge amount of people dismissing ASOIAF before HBO made Game of Thrones were specifically because of the graphic sex scenes. You can tell that the new book readers who came from the HBO show were shocked at how often there are perverted sex scenes in the books.That was published back in 1996 (oof), and it was a different time. People understood that the tragedy of Dany's character was that she was sold this young to fulfil the delusions of her insane brother. In any case, any positive reaction of her was her coping to survive, not to say that her situation was much better than the average Essos girl. Getting fucked by a nice savage made her a "Queen" and that was better than being kidnapped by the savages to be sold as a prostitute for the rest of her life.
In the books and the show she is never raped. She just doesn't like the sex position that her husband forces on her. So she seduces him so she can ride on top. It was Emilia Clarke who misinterpreted the perversion in the script and filmed it like a rape scene. But the scripts have it as consensual sex the entire time. And in the book the sex position change is portrayed as this empowering moment for Dany where she is now equal to Drogo. It's all a very weird incel creep fantasy that GRRM clearly gets off on writing. Drogo literally gets Dany to consent to sex on their wedding night. But in the HBO show the actress for Dany reacted like it was rape and it created a revisionist version of the book scene.
GRRM never wrote it as exploitation. The ASOIAF fandom is infested by weirdos who have taken GRRM's already terrible prose and writing and turned him from the next Tolkien into the next MLKjr. or some virtue signalling freak. They think that Dany is some female empowerment fantasy. Same with Arya. Hence the "slay queen!!!" cheers from the hair-dyed dykes at that bar that were in those reaction videos.Now, you have people saying "you can't write that! it's exploitation!!!" despite, yes, it's exploitation and it's meant to be portrayed as such and just because Dany tried to make the best of her situation, it doesn't mean the author agrees with the situation being positive.
The revisionism in ASOIAF is massive. Think about this example. Originally Targaryens were all White and pale with purple and blue eyes. Now? They are niggers. Literally half of them in House of the Dragons are flat out dark skinned niggers. What the fans say about the show now is so warped by social justice fags and politics that they are literally willing to contradict and destroy the entire lore and series just to shove niggers and fag characters and rape and female empowerment into the series.