Is there anything wrong with genocide as a concept?

Is there anything wrong with genocide as a concept?

  • Yes

    Votes: 22 62.9%

  • No

    Votes: 13 37.1%
  • Total voters
    35
Mango Cobra

Mango Cobra

Anime is the thinking man's media
kiwifarms.net
Joined
Apr 20, 2022
@Badungus Kabungus said he was waiting to hear what is wrong with genocide as a concept and I figured it might be a good idea to make a thread about it.

Badungus Kabungus said:
Still waiting to hear what, if anything, is wrong with genocide as a concept.
Click to expand...

I personally don't think genocide is acceptable, but that might just be because I'm Native and the whole history regarding that.
 
  • Autistic
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Lunacy
Reactions: eatler, Defensive Ella Purnell, AgendaPoster and 3 others
Badungus Kabungus said:
About 95% of the people on this planet are worthless, and that's still a rather generous estimate. Deal with it.
Click to expand...
Kabungus is an elitist dickhead who looks on the common man. Only difference between him and the "globalist elites" he loves ranting about is he's an autistic man with zero power over anyone.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: teriyakiburns, im5!XxhO and Free the Pedos
Bad idea if you generally like people and want them to stay alive. Good idea if you want to take new territory and keep it. Because genocide if you have the power generally works.
 
Genocide seems sort of hard to completely define. It's described as a "deliberate killing" of a group of specific people, but what actually constitutes something being deliberate? Africa has had a massively booming population for the past few decades thanks to handouts from other nations. If those other nations suddenly cut off their donations, a ton of African people would certainly die. Does something like that count as a genocide? Another example: If there was a minority race of people within a nation and they were causing a worse quality of life for the majority, is the majority committing a genocide by kicking that minority out? It would absolutely lead to them dying in large amounts due to losing their homes and government assistance. I think those two examples, while tragic, aren't really morally wrong. If a group of people is being a burdened by another, they have no responsibility to keep supporting the ones giving them problems.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: murph and Pitbull Victim
As long as it happens to the Anglos, don't think anyone would mind. Sink that whole gay little island to the bottom of the ocean if you have to. Except for Rowan Atkinson, he gets a free pass and a new dacha, everyone else gets to meet Spongebob.

Tablet County said:
He seems like the kind of guy who'd try and make his own adrenochrome in his bathtub.
Click to expand...
I have a guy for that. Market's been heavily oversaturated since the whole Ukraine situation, they're having problems just giving that shit away.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Lunacy
Reactions: Greggs, JambledUpWords, teriyakiburns and 2 others
AgendaPoster said:
Stop being retards. I know it's much to ask.
Click to expand...
But, Great Intellectuals, we must consider this; what of people who are already being killed for their race? What of the gentle Whites who had done naught wrong? The insidious races, Evil to a child, seek mostest to destroy the gentle White. Is, therefore, it wrong for a gentle White to consider equal retribution, for naught other reason than to secure their fate? Yes! - say the insidious races who would seek sleep for-ever-after for the gentle White. Yes! - say the traitors of race, those who would seek to deflower the gentle White, for reason no other than greedful profit, to appease the insidious races. Yes! - say all enemies of the gentle White.

This is naught but lie. Whyever should the gentle White listen to poison whispering in his ear? It is not so! For the fact remains most truest! It is the enemies of the gentle White, who seek naught but endless death and torment, it is these insidious peoples that must be purged. To consider the concept of Genocide upon the gentle White is wrong, for the gentle White is indeed gentle; but to consider this concept on those who would hurt the gentle White, well surely that can never be wrong.

Therefore it remains that the gentle White may consider retribution proper; but the insidious people, all Evil to the core, cannot. For they have harmed the gentle White, for they have answered the gifts of knowledge and kindness with blood of the gentle White and anguish. It is therefore most prudent for the gentle White to not consider a Genocide as a notion improper; but merely a means to an end, to ensure the fate of the gentle peoples. A single thrust; one final struggle. The cancer removed; the gentle White prosper.

The gentle White must prosper. The gentle White must persevere. The gentle White must claim their destiny.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: AgendaPoster
AgendaPoster said:
Found the problem.
Click to expand...
Is a White not gentile for suffering through all attacks on his character, his culture, and his race? Is a White not gentle for burdening the White Man’s burden? What right, I ask of you, do the insidious races have to seek the gentle White’s demise? None. And yet they do so, forever trying to demise the gentle White. And the White who has suffered through this; is he not gentle and merciful? Surely he is! But the gentle White needs to defend himself too. And only cure for those who would see the gentle White dead, is to see the see-er himself dead.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: AgendaPoster
It’s a real big waste of resources even if you force the people you want to exterminate in permanent labor camps. It’s honestly just better to cut your losses and build barriers between the wants and unwanted in society.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: pork and beans and Fever Dreaming
Shidoen said:
It’s a real big waste of resources even if you force the people you want to exterminate in permanent labor camps.
Click to expand...
An easier and more efficient way of genocide was invented by the Angloids of Canada, the US and Australia where they just straight up kidnap the children and send them to "Residential Schools" to teach them to be white and killing them via neglect, as well as coming up with concepts of "Blood Quantum" that determine an arbitrary % of blood required to be part of a group, one that basically requires that they either inbreed to stay native or dilute the heritage until they are no longer considered native, something that no other ethnic group has to belong to.
 
Mango Cobra said:
An easier and more efficient way of genocide was invented by the Angloids of Canada, the US and Australia where they just straight up kidnap the children and send them to "Residential Schools" to teach them to be white and killing them via neglect, as well as coming up with concepts of "Blood Quantum" that determine an arbitrary % of blood required to be part of a group, one that basically requires that they either inbreed to stay native or dilute the heritage until they are no longer considered native, something that no other ethnic group has to belong to.
Click to expand...
That wasn't invented by the anglos. The concept of kidnapping women and children from another tribe/band/group/whatever and integrating them into your own predates humans themselves. Even apes practice it.
 
Badungus Kabungus said:
That wasn't invented by the anglos. The concept of kidnapping women and children from another tribe/band/group/whatever and integrating them into your own predates humans themselves. Even apes practice it.
Click to expand...
The Angloids perfected it via the residential school system and inventing blood quantum.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Badungus Kabungus
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back