Megathread Tranny Sideshows on Social Media - Any small-time spectacle on Reddit, Tumblr, Twitter, Dating Sites, and other social media.

Troon wonders how they can refute the "Well I identify as another race" argument.
I know troons aren’t the only retards guilty of asking the internet to think for them (and specifically Reddit—you’re better off shouting into a well for all the diversity of thought you’ll get there), but it’s so telling, isn’t it? “Help me make the bad voices go away.” They can’t seem to do it alone.
How many of those lesbians and gays who have a very positive view of trans people have actually met one?
I know of a handful of “gay” men who fuck pooners and get really, really mad at the idea that they’re not 100% gold star gays for that. People seem allergic to correctly calling themselves “bisexual”. Gay men are also often defensive of troons bc drag queens and HSTSs are the same group. I don’t doubt that there’s lesbians (and “lesbians”) doing the same, I just don’t have personal experience knowing any that tolerate troons :)
I’m of the opinion that AGP is clearly found in gay men as well, despite it afaik still being defined as separate type of troon comprising hetero/bisexual males. I’ve seen enough drag queen routines where they clearly get off to themselves in drag to believe wires are being crossed, even if many still wouldn’t go so far as to fuck a pooner ie are homo, not bisexual.
 
My partner is trans nightmare.
Almost feels written by a terf?
If not, she will be one day.

IMG_3234.jpeg
 
Troon wonders how they can refute the "Well I identify as another race" are
You can transition race as validly as you can transition gender
150612092018-rachel-dolezal-split.jpg
importedImage4e51f8d5-75ea-4f63-a231-d551dfd9270b.jpeg
Both of these women "transitioned" and to this day there are some black people who validate then as black. So that meets the same threshold as being trans and pointing to handmaidens who validate them as women.
 
Troon wonders how they can refute the "Well I identify as another race" argument.
If some eye makeup is all it takes to be a woman, then some shoe polish is all it takes to be a black person.

My partner is trans nightmare.
Almost feels written by a terf?
If not, she will be one day.

View attachment 5693581
Trooning out should be treated as a ground for fault-based divorce like adultery is. She married a man, not a weird pervert that tries to skinwalk as a woman.
If this is real she's obviously already on her last sip of copium, if she doesn't kick that creep to the curb she is complicit in whatever horrible things he'll do to their son.

This makes me MATI every time I see Pause Button used to describe puberty blockers.

You're literally retarding the cognitive, physical, and emotional development of a minor.
Being MATI over videogames and anime is gay and embarrassing, being MATI over children being groomed is normal and healthy. 👍
 
Can't people see how fucked up it is for a grown ass adult who works at Twitter to be jumping for joy because an 8 year old boy was stolen from his father and put on puberty blockers?
Puberty is fucking serious, it's not like pausing and resuming a youtube video. Do they think that once they're off puberty blockers at age 20, puberty will resume as if nothing ever happened?
I've archived both posts for posterity. Jenny's is here, Vader's is here.

In any case, the troons saying this have already gone through male puberty. Jenny there was fine as a man until he decided to transition into an inbred Arab. He's also diabetic, yet doesn't use the "if you take away my insulin I'll literally die" as often as he uses the hormone argument. Troons have to get them young - that's how they'll get their "passing queens", and project their fantasies onto them.

The argument that kids with cancer or diabetes being comparable to puberty blockers is fundamentally retarded. You'll die without insulin or radiation therapy and that is a given. You'll live without puberty blockers.

They're becoming far more candid about grooming kids, and far too open about celebrating it, that they wonder why the hate against them is building.

Eight years old is too young for alcohol or voting, but get em on blockers because their munchie mom says so. All these stories about school teachers stealthily transitioning kids are helping.
 
You can transition race as validly as you can transition gender
View attachment 5693606
View attachment 5693608
Both of these women "transitioned" and to this day there are some black people who validate then as black. So that meets the same threshold as being trans and pointing to handmaidens who validate them as women.
The 'trans race' argument actually really nicely illustrates the lunacy of a lot of trans positions, mainly because if we accept the troon premise that gender is a social construct and a spectrum, I think it can be argued that race is also a social construct and way, way, way more of a spectrum than gender.

1000012960.jpg

What race is this man?

>Inb4 some politisperg says 'demon' or whatever

Why, that's Barack Obama, the first black president of the United States.

Oh, but wait! Obama has a white mother, so he's actually mixed race. But you'd never hear anyone say that Obama wasn't black.

1000012959.jpg

What about this man, serving a kind of 'Alex Jones' vibe in this picture?

This is the actor, Stephen Graham, from Pirates of the Caribbean 4 and This Is England, where he played a skinhead (In This Is England, that is - there weren't any skinheads in Pirates of the Caribbean 4). What race is he? White?

Well, fucking guess again, because his dad's from the West Indies. He's mixed race. But he passes so well as white he was literally able to play a white supremacist in This Is England.

Both of these men are mixed race, so technically, you could call them both black, but would you? If you had to give a description, how would you describe them?

It's not just men. Meghan Markle is black, but she's arguably the whitest black woman I have ever seen (though apparently still not white enough for the Royal Family, if the gossip is to be believed) and people used to make jokes all the time, back in the day that Halle Berry wasn't really black.

1000012961.jpg1000012963.jpg

It gets even more complicated if we factor in Australian Aboriginals, or people from the very south of India, where their skin gets very dark. Are they black too? And if not, why not?

Also, people's views of what constitutes a race have changed over time. To the Romans, for example, there were only two races: Roman and barbarian. Skin colour never really entered into it.

It's only in fairly recent history that Slavs and Irish people have been considered to be white. Benjamin Franklin wrote about his anxieties of the 'hordes of swarthy Germans' coming into America, and then, a hundred years or so later, some little bloke with a funny moustache (Andy... Hilter? Or something?) was jumping up and down, very angry and excited, proclaiming the Germans to be the MOST white white people there are, so the concept of whiteness is clearly an elastic one, as well.

I would say that by the same logic that someone could declare themselves transgender, if we're being honest and internally consistent in our beliefs, 'trans race' should absolutely be an accepted thing. But it's not.

If I started saying that I always knew I was black, because I'm really loud, obnoxious and lazy and I love fried chicken, hip-hop music and gang-based crime, these people would rightfully say that that's ridiculous and based entirely on offensive stereotypes. I wonder why? 🤔
 
Last edited:
What race is this man?
Half White/Half-Indonesian.

His mother and foster father were both members of Subuh International. Loretta Fuddy, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health who released Obama's birth certificate was the chairwoman of Subud USA's National Committee. She later crashed in a plane and was the only person out of nine to die.

Anyway, here's Obama's dad:

muhammad-subuh.png

Sumohadiwidjojo-1975.jpg
 
Move over, women. The trans uterus is what matters now.

Uuuuh fucking men.

Since the usage of the term period was popularised by it's Latin meaning - recurrent cycle. Which is what a fucking menstrual cycle is!

It is not the self inflicted fucked up digestive problems caused by extrogenous hormones in the wrong fucking system. Especially since a period is caused by a monthly surge of hormones, not their shit storm caused by a daily dose of dick destroyers...
 
Half White/Half-Indonesian.

His mother and foster father were both members of Subuh International. Loretta Fuddy, Director of the Hawaii Department of Health who released Obama's birth certificate was the chairwoman of Subud USA's National Committee. She later crashed in a plane and was the only person out of nine to die.

Anyway, here's Obama's dad:

View attachment 5693902
View attachment 5693901
Eh…

Not sure if someone being 1/4 black is in any way an argument that “race is a social construct” lol!

Yeah, if someone is a mutt, they won’t exactly look 100% black.

Most basketball Americans have various degrees of white ancestry, so when one of them hooks up with a white dude, the result is a Megan Markle (who’s like what… 20-30% black?) who looks mostly white.
 
I can’t quote the post, but that Jenny tightpants troon doesn’t actually work for twitter, he’s just a creepy troon in the same vein as jun1per: annoying pest that gets off on the thought of kids being groomed and annoying people significantly more valuable than himself.
 
This post is making the rounds in some of my Facebook groups. The context is, there is a straight couple where the man is IDing as a woman. He is a substitute teacher and either he told his wife this lie or his wife made up this fanfic to feel better about marrying someone so hideous. Some people also think it might be the husband larping as his wife.

Like, it's a blatant lie. I sincerely doubt an entire class of first grade girls saw the Barbie movie and remember Tranny Barbie specifically. Also interesting how he made sure to point out how mean and transphobic all the boy students were so the little girls had to be his shield while they were fawning over him all day. That's the really gross part; how much he wants little girls to validate him while he villainizes all the boys.

Regardless if it was him or her that posted, apparently that person was stupid enough to dox themselves and someone said they contacted the school. LOL.

View attachment 5689175
View attachment 5689177View attachment 5689187
Tranny Barbie had something like two lines in the whole film. That character made an impression on no one. Just like all the other Token Barbies, he was only there to appeal to adults on Reddit. So, mission accomplished, I guess.
Lol, “Translink.”
 
Eh…

Not sure if someone being 1/4 black is in any way an argument that “race is a social construct” lol!

Yeah, if someone is a mutt, they won’t exactly look 100% black.

Most basketball Americans have various degrees of white ancestry, so when one of them hooks up with a white dude, the result is a Megan Markle (who’s like what… 20-30% black?) who looks mostly white.
The obvious way to tell that race is a social construct is the way ethnicities like Jews, Italians and Irish weren't "really white" until it was politically convenient. The average jackoff may judge based on appearance but the cultural idea of who's white and who isn't follows the ruling class's needs. Much like it's in trans activists' interest for as many people as possible to count as trans to give the movement legitimacy and foot soldiers.
 
Troons and handmaidens claiming that "terfs" are responsible for Brianna Ghey's murder make me MATI.

Both murderers were aspiring serial killers. They had a kill list of four cis boys plus Brianna, and Brianna was actually their second choice of victim after the first intended victim realised that something was wrong and wouldn't engage with the killers. This is why transphobia was described in in the sentencing remarks as a secondary motive, their primary motive was simply that they wanted to kill.

The female murderer, Scarlett Jenkinson, was not transphobic. She actually liked and admired Brianna, she was just a psychopathic sadist. Brianna was Scarlett's choice of victim, therefore the targeting of Brianna was not transphobic in itself.

The male murderer, Eddie Ratcliffe, was transphobic, and also homophobic. He is the stereotypical violent male who is actually a genuine danger to trans people. In his messages he was generally politically incorrect, and was probably even less influenced by feminism than the average 15 year old boy. As usual, women are always held responsible for male violence.

I could say the same about Scarlett getting a longer sentence than Eddie, even though there was zero evidence she participated in the stabbing, and she's a massive fantasist and makes up bullshit stories about herself to sound scary. Eddie got a lesser sentence due to "mitigating factors" with his new bullshit autism diagnosis, even though it's very mild autism, and he was infuriatingly manipulative and dishonest on the stand. Somehow the girl with her scary words is still more guilty than the transphobic boy who actually did the stabbing.

Anyway, a lot of these complaining trannies don't understand the English justice system.

There was no forensic evidence that Scarlett partook in the stabbing, so the best way to ensure her conviction was for her to be charged under the joint enterprise law, meaning she didn't need to participate in the physical act for her to be equally guilty of murder. Since she was not transphobic, being charged with a transphobic hate crime under joint enterprise would have risked her getting away with it, or getting away with a much lesser alternative charge.

The police have to submit an overview of their evidence to the Crown Prosecution Service, who are the only ones who decide whether an accused should be charged. They will only agree to take crimes to court if it has a >50% chance of getting a conviction. The police are now whinging and want it to be considered a hate crime, but this is probably the reason the CPS wouldn't do that in the first place.

Also the UK has really strong sub judice laws. This includes not treating the accused as guilty before the verdict, or even predicting the verdict. Anything that threatens the defendants' right to a fair trial cannot be reported or spoken about, as it could be used to throw the whole case out. Insisting that the crime was transphobic before it was even heard in court would have threatened their right to a fair trial. This is why the police asked people not to speculate, and (partially correctly) stated that it was not transphobically motivated. And this is why if trannies really cared about Brianna, they wouldn't have been bitching online before the verdicts were reached.
 
The female murderer, Scarlett Jenkinson, was not transphobic. She actually liked and admired Brianna, she was just a psychopathic sadist. Brianna was Scarlett's choice of victim, therefore the targeting of Brianna was not transphobic in itself.

The male murderer, Eddie Ratcliffe, was transphobic, and also homophobic. He is the stereotypical violent male who is actually a genuine danger to trans people. In his messages he was generally politically incorrect, and was probably even less influenced by feminism than the average 15 year old boy. As usual, women are always held responsible for male violence.
Have a read through the main thread on this: https://kiwifarms.us/threads/two-ch...f-murdering-girl-16-in-warrington-park.149981

Scarlett's definitely the worst of the two.
 
Have a read through the main thread on this: https://kiwifarms.us/threads/two-ch...f-murdering-girl-16-in-warrington-park.149981

Scarlett's definitely the worst of the two.

I am very familiar with the case and have followed the trial the whole way through.

I disagree, they are both as bad as each other. Scarlett is very open about her sadism and wants to look as notorious as possible. Eddie is getting a free pass because he's smart enough to want to try to hide his proclivities, plus his autism/selective mutism performance was successful on both the judge and the general public.

Scarlett is a pure sadist, and also a fantasist. If you read between the lines in Eddie's police interviews, he repeatedly says in present tense that he still thinks that Scarlett is all talk. He sounds like he sees himself as the real deal, and her as nothing more than a bullshitter.

I get the impression that Scarlett is just wired wrong and is one of nature's psychopaths, just pure cold blooded and excited by torture. Eddie is violent because he feels inadequate, and has probably had a bad upbringing due to his nonce dad.
 
I am very familiar with the case and have followed the trial the whole way through.

I disagree, they are both as bad as each other. Scarlett is very open about her sadism and wants to look as notorious as possible. Eddie is getting a free pass because he's smart enough to want to try to hide his proclivities, plus his autism/selective mutism performance was successful on both the judge and the general public.

Scarlett is a pure sadist, and also a fantasist. If you read between the lines in Eddie's police interviews, he repeatedly says in present tense that he still thinks that Scarlett is all talk. He sounds like he sees himself as the real deal, and her as nothing more than a bullshitter.

I get the impression that Scarlett is just wired wrong and is one of nature's psychopaths, just pure cold blooded and excited by torture. Eddie is violent because he feels inadequate, and has probably had a bad upbringing due to his nonce dad.
But didn't Scarlett try to poison Brett without Eddie's involvement? I agree that she was a bullshitter, though, she claimed she'd killed before, when she almost certainly hadn't.
Scarlett was also the one with the flowery "serial killers wot I like" notebook.

Both of them claimed that the other did the stabbing. It doesn't really matter though, as even if one of them hadn't they'd still be aiding and abetting the other.
 
Troon wonders how they can refute the "Well I identify as another race" argument.
Really not that hard. Race is inherited, sex isn't; a baby's sex is random. Sex is a local property of one's own body, race is a relationship.

I would say that by the same logic that someone could declare themselves transgender, if we're being honest and internally consistent in our beliefs, 'trans race' should absolutely be an accepted thing. But it's not.
Nuh uh.

Let's say I have a younger brother and a husband, and I poon out. In woke terms, my brother was the oldest son, now he's the middle or youngest son. My husband was in a normal marriage to a woman, now he's a faggot. But they're still men. More importantly they can ignore me and their relationship to the wider society will stay unaffected.

Now let's say I start telling everyone I'm half-Japanese. This could mean one or more of: I'm adopted, or my mom is a whore, or one of my parents is lying about his or her own race. For me to weeb out, my right to racial identity has to be privileged over that of my parents, which is unfair in any value system.

Now you could say, why should anyone anywhere compromise on anything in the service of a fucking lie? Right, they shouldn't! But, choosing between two lies, the tranny lie is localized, while weeabooism has ripple effects throughout history.

Mutts aren't relevant, they have a legitimate claim to being mixed. The race equivalent to gender identity is delusional or grifting weeaboos and pretendians.
 
Back