- Joined
- Sep 25, 2021
Update 1/2
A German lawyer who runs a YouTube channel and covers legal aspect of the Drachenlord saga -usually on a very surface level- did a video about the legal aspects of founding a nude community (video here, German language, no English subtitles).
This video and all the talk about his new project caused Rainer to write another very (!), very (!!), very (!!!) lengthy spergy blog post explaining how his community is totally not about being naked all the time and having sex but totally only about being naked and free love.
So what is love? Wanna know? Read here:
The commune theme of free love
by Drache January 11, 2024
In his next not so lengthy but still very lengthy and spergy blog post Rainer talks about said video from the lawyer I mentioned in the beginning and tries to debunk some stuff.
If you are getting confused while reading, don't worry, that's part of the Drachenlord experience.
The municipality topic Reports and news
by Drache January 11, 2024
A German lawyer who runs a YouTube channel and covers legal aspect of the Drachenlord saga -usually on a very surface level- did a video about the legal aspects of founding a nude community (video here, German language, no English subtitles).
This video and all the talk about his new project caused Rainer to write another very (!), very (!!), very (!!!) lengthy spergy blog post explaining how his community is totally not about being naked all the time and having sex but totally only about being naked and free love.
So what is love? Wanna know? Read here:
The commune theme of free love
by Drache January 11, 2024
Free love
Before we get started, I would like to make the following clear: Free love does not necessarily have anything to do with sex. There are many false rumors about this commune, and many people misunderstand or misrepresent it. Therefore, I ask you to read the post carefully. I will divide the post into two categories for a better overview: Love and Sex. This should also clear up any misunderstandings.
The topic of love
Love comes about in many different ways, but mostly, even if it doesn't follow any logic, through emotional closeness. By this I mean that if you have one or more people to whom you open up emotionally, tell them about your worries and, conversely, listen to theirs, love can develop. There is not necessarily a desire for physical closeness, and there doesn't have to be. Love does not necessarily mean that you want to touch someone else. Rather, love (at least that's how I would describe it) is the need to know everything about the other person and to be able to confide in them, no matter what it is.
Of course, there is also a great risk involved. Exposing your soul and feelings to another person in this way is always associated with the risk of being vulnerable yourself. I would say that you should think carefully about who and when you expose yourself to another person (or people) in this way. But that doesn't work, because if you feel that way, you've usually already said what you think without understanding why. Of course, there are also people who deliberately provoke this and try to lure others by being deliberately friendly to them. It's unfortunate, but there are many people who pretend to be what they are not in order to enrich themselves.
Right or wrong?
Letting another person get close to you can be one of the most beautiful experiences there is. But should you really risk it? It is proven and obvious that you can have a lot of control over another person if you know everything about them. But that doesn't mean you shouldn't risk it, does it?
Love is worthwhile, at least for most people. Every person and every living being in general deserves love and affection. An animal that is loved by its owner misses them when they are not around. There are even reports of animals that a dog or other pet they loved passed away shortly after their death. TikTok is full of videos in which animals are happy for their owners when they come home, haven't seen them for a while or are simply happy to be with them. So love doesn't just exist in humans.
What is love?
Everyone might ask themselves this question: There are people who say that love is irrational and illogical. If you want to explain it scientifically, it probably has something to do with neural pathways, which, at least I suspect (but don't know), are connected to the brain's reward center. This means that when you're happy, your body releases hormones that make you happy, called endorphins. When you love someone, you are very often happy. As a result, the brain produces a lot of this hormone or enzyme. But is that love? A chemical reaction of our brain? And if it is, why is love not always present for us humans? Or to put it another way: why aren't people always in love?
I don't think it makes sense to philosophize about a scientific aspect of love. I think something that makes you so happy doesn't have to follow any logic. And I think it's better to spend your time on more important research. Nevertheless, the question remains: What is love?
What love means to me!!!
For me at least, love is the most important thing on this level of existence. At the same time, in my opinion, it is often what is missing the most. Love cannot and should not be explained, but felt. If there was more love, there would be much less war. I'm probably coming across like a hippie from the 70s. Nevertheless, I stand by my statement. Hate is something we don't need. Hatred that arises from envy and anger only causes problems and will sooner or later plunge the world into disaster, just as it has done for the last 300,000 years. There is a quote (I had to google it because I didn't know who it was from): "In this world, hate has never dissolved hate. Love dissolves hate." The sentence "This is the law, ancient and inexhaustible" is actually missing from the quote. But I was concerned with the first two sentences. It wasn't quite the way I had it in my head, but it expresses the same thing. Love is what fights against hatred and only with love can you stand up to hatred.
Hate develops more easily than love and requires less nurturing. Love is something that needs to be nurtured. You have to protect it and fight for it, not with sword and shield, but rather with understanding and compassion. By the way, the quote above is from the Buddha's teachings, just for those who might be interested. I am not religious, but there are various statements from different scriptures that have accompanied me in my life. These include various statements, teachings or quotes from Christianity, Buddhism or others. But I digress.
For me, love means accepting another person, no matter what mistakes they have made, no matter what they might do in the future. Not everyone deserves my love, but everyone deserves love. Love to me is the desire to do what I can for someone else, be it verbally, physically or emotionally. It is perhaps important to mention at this point that it doesn't matter to me whether the person would do the same for me. By this I mean giving someone encouragement, pointing out someone's mistakes and giving someone warmth through touch (this does not mean sex). To pick up on that right away,
Love through touch.
Love through touch - and we're still not talking about sex here. It starts with the touch of hands. It's not about arousing someone sexually, but simply about the simple feeling of skin on skin, the body heat transferred and the heartbeat you can feel. We will also touch on the subject of spirituality later. This kind of touch also allows you to feel the other person's energy. At the same time, you can also make some of your own energy available to the other person and give them strength. A simple hand on the shoulder can give another person more strength than many believe. It doesn't even matter whether there is clothing between the skin areas or not. A simple touch on the feet or a hug can give another person more strength than mere words can.
Humans are herd animals and therefore automatically creatures that are dependent on physical closeness. However, we have started to equate physical closeness and affection with sex and are harming ourselves as a result. There is nothing wrong with reaching out to another person, hugging them or even just giving them a friendly pat on the shoulder. But many people often see this as a sexual act or misconduct. I have another quote for you, even though I unfortunately couldn't find out who it's from - and believe me, I googled it: "A hug is worth a thousand words." Everyone has probably heard this saying.
At this point, I would like to briefly refer to a statement by J.K. Rowling. In "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire", she writes: "Hugged as if by a mother." This is the scene in which Harry is in the hospital wing. That's another scene where I thought to myself: Here we have a person who is loved and also experiences this love through physical closeness. I just want to say that the meaning of love has been so massively lost in our society that hardly anyone has understood what I was trying to say with "free love". Of course, sex is also part of it and I will go into that in a moment, but many people will probably be surprised at what I have to say about it. Because here, too, there are many things that are related to spirituality.
I wanted to briefly touch on the point of spirituality in relation to love. Love is something that is positive in the majority of cases. But affection and love are also something tangible, independent of touch and feelings. In my opinion, there are hardly any stronger energies than feelings, and love in particular is one of the most powerful feelings of all. I have already said a few words about energies in the article on spirituality. It's not always about touch or words; sometimes you just feel what's around you, coming towards you or moving away. Most people always need to see everything in order to understand it. That's why much of what I write is rather secondary for many. But no less important.
And another thing: just because something is right for me doesn't mean it's right for you reading this.
Think about it.
Love between people of the same sex
Oops, I've already published the post and forgot that I wanted to include something else. So I'd like to quickly add something to the topic: Love knows no gender, as it is affection for another person. It doesn't matter whether it's two men, two women or the classic man and woman. But polyamory also plays a role because, as I have already mentioned, love is not limited to one person, but can also bring several people together. I will be writing many more posts on the subject of love, because the topic is independent of gender and therefore much more far-reaching. You can also love your children, friends and relatives. So, please just wait and see, there will be much more to come on this topic. Remember to write comments if you have any questions or would like to share your opinion.
I say it all the time. Laugh at me. I wonder how much you even know about me. You don't even understand a fraction of what makes me tick. and you probably never have and never will. (This statement is addressed to all those who think badly of me or talk about me without knowing me and to many who think they know me but don't.)
The subject of sex
Something that many people have probably been waiting for for a long time, I have to make clear right from the start: This is not about a sex commune.
Sex is important and is part of life. It is something that liberates, helps, supports and gives strength in many different ways. I will divide the topic into several categories. This will make it easier to read and I imagine it will also be easier for many people to understand. And perhaps it will also make it more interesting in general.
Emotional and unconditional
With "emotional" and "unconditional", I would like to point out two opposites. For some, sex is just a means to an end, which the unconditional ones are. They have no problem having fun themselves, but don't take offense if their partner doesn't like it. (ATTENTION) This already means consensual sex. My point is that if someone is having sex, then they're both having fun, right? No, not necessarily. There are many people who focus more on their own pleasure during sex, but if their partner doesn't climax, it's not important to them. That's not necessarily a bad thing, even if it sounds like it is. There are many people who are actually into this kind of thing or are even looking for it. And this even applies to many men who don't climax.
The nice thing about sex like this is that it generally happens in such a way that you discuss it in advance and know what the other person is aiming for and what they enjoy (him or her). Unfortunately, this is not always the case; men in particular are quite merciless. The main thing is that they have fun - and I say that as a man. This makes the whole thing very uncomplicated. Of course, a sexual arrangement doesn't have to be like this, but can also simply involve meeting up from time to time and having fun together - once or three times a week or month. However, there are no feelings involved, it's all about the sex, i.e. the physical pleasure. No obligations, no emotions, no interaction outside of bed.
If you can cope with that, that's fine. But I think it's inconsiderate, because both people should have fun during sex - or everyone, if there are several people involved.
The following can be said about the emotional part:
There are people, and I count myself among them, who often rack their brains. This not only affects their self-esteem, but also their performance from time to time. This does not necessarily mean that someone has potency problems. It's often because there are too many question marks in your head and you need a little time to warm up to someone. And again, yes, that applies to me too. This is less common with men because they are more of a doer by nature. This means that men act, while women like to talk and think. Please don't get me wrong. This is biologically proven. Be that as it may, many still think that women are less interested in sex. And if it's different, they think it's funny.
But there's more to that.
Emotional simply means that you think more and prefer to share your feelings before you share your body. Anyone can talk and write, but acting is still something else. At this point, I've just told you something that not so many people know about me. Precisely because I'm always portrayed as the perpetual hard-on who's always hot and wants everything that's not up to scratch.
Orchids and roses
The title may be confusing, but there's a reason for it. I wanted to paraphrase it a bit, meaning flowers and rough sex.
Let's start with something softer: Orchid, also known as "cuddle sex," is a type of sex that tends to be gentle and quiet. In terms of what I've written before, the emotional fits best. Why do I break it down like this? Because it's a good start to explain why sex is also a good way to open up spiritually. In a nutshell, I believe that energy is inherent in all life. You can feel this energy, you can receive it and give it away and you can use it positively and negatively. In the case of physical love, this is one of the most intense experiences when you allow yourself to feel it.
A gentle touch of the hands, even without sexual ulterior motives, lets you feel the energy of the other person. But what about touching places that are normally perceived as even more intimate? For example, on the bare back, buttocks, breasts or intimate areas? The energy is much stronger and you can really feel how much power can be released. During the actual act, be it by hand, mouth or penetration (or whatever else you can think of), it stands to reason that the climax is the moment when you can best feel, release and receive the energy. (Of course, there are other methods too. What I am describing here relates exclusively to sexual contact).
Since everyone is different and some people are as soft as silk in the wind, while others are like roses - beautiful but with thorns - uninhibited sex can be just as intense and energetic. Every person has their own behavior, and so these are also different. It is therefore not uncommon for some people to grip a little harder or like to be touched harder. A mixture of gentleness and hardness, i.e. silk and thorns, can also be a blessing. Freedom, and in this case, free love, also includes ways that are considered abhorrent or pathological by many. Nevertheless, these people also have a right to their happiness, and freedom is of course also important here. (PS: I'm not talking about criminal acts. Sad that I have to mention that).
Sex, especially BDSM or similar forms of play, is often practiced behind closed doors, as it is still despised or disapproved of by many people. Although society is becoming increasingly open, there are still many who do not want to accept or tolerate these preferences.
Equality and difference
Homosexuality, just like bisexuality, is an invention of modern times? No, that's wrong! Homosexuality, just like bisexuality and similar forms, has been around for much longer than people think. There are even traditions from medieval times in which it is talked about more openly than is the case today. It is somehow disturbing to keep hearing how prudish people were in the past. There are some cultures where same-sex sexual acts were even more than normal. To be honest, I've never quite understood why this was or is ultimately forbidden or disapproved of.
There is a saying that goes "Anything can be done, nothing has to be done". This means that nobody is obliged to do something they don't want to. Nevertheless, many people get upset when something is done that they don't want, even though it doesn't affect them in any way. So what exactly is so bad about me as a man spending sexually active time with another man? And how is it different from what I do with a woman (apart from obvious differences such as sexual organs etc.)? Love is independent of gender, but so is sex. I am a man and have been thinking for many decades about why I like both men and women sexually. I am simply fascinated by the other man because I am one myself and therefore know what it feels like to be stimulated accordingly and then also when you climax.
I am not a woman, but I am fascinated and find it exciting to stimulate a woman sexually. How she feels, how she reacts to my touch and how she finally has her release climax also excites me. So for my part, I've come to the conclusion that I find it fascinating and exciting, whether it's with a man or a woman.
One of the less important reasons for this commune is that I no longer want to justify the fact that I enjoy sex, regardless of the partner and regardless of their gender. It didn't take me long to find my way in life. When I realized that I find both sexes attractive, I communicated that immediately. Many people are afraid and have been for a very long time, if not their whole life. I have never been someone who is afraid, neither of failure nor of rejection. Why should I be? I'll live; if I'm lucky, 80, maybe even 100 years. If I'm unlucky, I'll die tomorrow. So why should I worry about what others think when I sleep with a man or a woman?
Sexual desire and lust
For a long time, only men were allowed to feel sexual pleasure. To this day, women's lust has sometimes been ignored, denied or described as heretical. I would like to briefly discuss the biology of life. Biologically speaking, humans are not very different from animals. In most animals, the sexual act is directed towards the female and not the other way around. This is mostly about producing offspring, and since females can only become pregnant at certain times, sexual behavior is also tied to this. Or to put it more simply: the male is only allowed to have sex when the female is in the mood for it. (Of course, this is highly simplified and not entirely correct; it's just an example. Please don't make any negative comments, thank you).
What I'm trying to say is that women, who are female beings, also feel sexual desire and therefore naturally also want to have sex. Nevertheless, this has been denied or simply ignored for centuries, if not millennia. Then as now, women are called sluts if they enjoy sex. (First of all, sorry for the term, and secondly, I know it's not the same for everyone or everywhere, but it's actually still the case today).
It depends on the culture, the time and the ancestry. Different centuries, different cultures and different people logically look at everything from different angles.
Something I also find sexist as a man is that a man who has slept with many women is celebrated as a hero, while a woman who has slept with more than one man is called a whore (sorry for the expression, it's meant to be crass on purpose of course). Why is it like that? A boy is taught from an early age: "Be a man, don't cry, be strong, stand your ground" - a way that I find moronic. I cried as a child and today I'm physically bigger than many men who act tougher than me. I have not confessed to being a man and yet I am more masculine than many who pretend otherwise. My point is: it's nonsense. Why is masculinity drummed into a boy? Because thousands of years ago it was necessary as a man, who is physically stronger by nature, to protect the tribe and women.
But we no longer live in the Middle Ages or the Stone Age, or wherever all that was necessary. Nowadays, there are women who can physically lift me even though I weigh almost 200 kilograms. There are women who can beat me at arm wrestling, even though I am anything but physically weak. And yet there are women who can knock me out with ease. "Women have to be in the kitchen and keep the bed warm." Men are the best cooks in the world. I was once told that it is now extremely difficult for a woman to be recognized by men in the kitchen. As far as I know, in ot kɥiˈzin (haute cuisine) in France, women are almost completely banned from the kitchen (of course, I could be wrong).
To come back to the topic: Why is a woman who enjoys sex still referred to today as a lady who gets paid for it? Apart from the fact that there's nothing wrong with getting paid for something you might enjoy doing. But I digress again. I'll probably never understand. As you can see, this is a topic that concerns me a lot, and not just in terms of the sexual act itself, but also love itself.
Sexual desire and needs are in our blood, as they are in the blood of all living beings. But we humans are the only ones who think so much about it. Don't get me wrong: there are definitely some things that should not be tolerated and accepted. Nevertheless, as an adult, I don't see any problems in not only talking about the topic with other adults, but also practising it. And without having to justify it or explain why, why and with whom!
My personal opinion in general
Last but not least, a brief summary of my opinion: Since I started with "love" in the text above, I would like to briefly express my opinion on the subject here as well. I was a very precocious person and that doesn't just apply to my sexual needs, but also to my emotional needs. And yes, the desire for emotional closeness is also a need. I came into contact with harsh reality very early on in my life and had to experience how cruel and full of hate this world actually is. I don't know why it got to me so early on, but I think it changed my world view in a way that few others have. Although many people rejected me early on, I never lost my willpower, faith or hope that things would change one day. That still holds true today.
The world is full of hate, and as quoted earlier, I believe that only love can conquer it (a belief I shared long before knowing this quote). In my opinion, everyone has the right to love, happiness and security. It's about a balance in life that neither evil nor good can dispel. Unfortunately, there are people, of which I seem to be one, who do not manage to achieve this in their lives. Quite a few who don't succeed give up and end it on their own. Others fight on, and I think some make it, while others have to fight for it all their lives. I think that will be my fate too.
So much for the spiritual and philosophical part of the whole thing. Now we come to the physical part. I've had a lot of sex in my life, and I started early, both with boys and later with men. I only got together with women very late, I was already 27 years old, and I always felt like I had missed out on something. Especially now that I'm 34, I'm no longer as young as I would like to be. Nevertheless, it's not just about sex for me, but also about what it does to you. Craving something that you rarely or never get is hard to bear. In my case, this particularly applies to women at the moment.
I'm often called a sex addict or a sex fiend, but many people who say that about me have no idea what it feels like to be in my shoes (and no, that wasn't a double entendre). It's more like I just want to enjoy what I actually consider normal. At the same time, many people accuse me of things that are lies, hang on to these lies and even call for crimes to be committed against me. Am I really that "perverted"? To bring in a little joke: The difference between erotic and perverted? Erotic is when you stroke your partner with a feather. Perverse is when the chicken is still attached to the feather. By that I mean that I would prefer the feather without the chicken. If only because I find it unattractive when the chicken is screaming around, but also impractical when you have to hold a wriggling chicken all the time.
Ok, enough jokes. I've been involved in sex for many years, so I think I've developed a good feel for sex addiction and perversion and know what it means and what it doesn't mean. And I can tell you clearly: I am many things, but not a sex addict. And certainly not in the way I've been accused of.
After all, I'm not as sick as some practices that are still considered normal.
(Not to mention all the hate).
So, now to the end. I hope I haven't bored you with this very extensive and long post. Feel free to write comments and let me know what you liked and what topics you would like to see in the future. I will also be happy to answer any questions in additional posts.
Your dragon
Before we get started, I would like to make the following clear: Free love does not necessarily have anything to do with sex. There are many false rumors about this commune, and many people misunderstand or misrepresent it. Therefore, I ask you to read the post carefully. I will divide the post into two categories for a better overview: Love and Sex. This should also clear up any misunderstandings.
The topic of love
Love comes about in many different ways, but mostly, even if it doesn't follow any logic, through emotional closeness. By this I mean that if you have one or more people to whom you open up emotionally, tell them about your worries and, conversely, listen to theirs, love can develop. There is not necessarily a desire for physical closeness, and there doesn't have to be. Love does not necessarily mean that you want to touch someone else. Rather, love (at least that's how I would describe it) is the need to know everything about the other person and to be able to confide in them, no matter what it is.
Of course, there is also a great risk involved. Exposing your soul and feelings to another person in this way is always associated with the risk of being vulnerable yourself. I would say that you should think carefully about who and when you expose yourself to another person (or people) in this way. But that doesn't work, because if you feel that way, you've usually already said what you think without understanding why. Of course, there are also people who deliberately provoke this and try to lure others by being deliberately friendly to them. It's unfortunate, but there are many people who pretend to be what they are not in order to enrich themselves.
Right or wrong?
Letting another person get close to you can be one of the most beautiful experiences there is. But should you really risk it? It is proven and obvious that you can have a lot of control over another person if you know everything about them. But that doesn't mean you shouldn't risk it, does it?
Love is worthwhile, at least for most people. Every person and every living being in general deserves love and affection. An animal that is loved by its owner misses them when they are not around. There are even reports of animals that a dog or other pet they loved passed away shortly after their death. TikTok is full of videos in which animals are happy for their owners when they come home, haven't seen them for a while or are simply happy to be with them. So love doesn't just exist in humans.
What is love?
Everyone might ask themselves this question: There are people who say that love is irrational and illogical. If you want to explain it scientifically, it probably has something to do with neural pathways, which, at least I suspect (but don't know), are connected to the brain's reward center. This means that when you're happy, your body releases hormones that make you happy, called endorphins. When you love someone, you are very often happy. As a result, the brain produces a lot of this hormone or enzyme. But is that love? A chemical reaction of our brain? And if it is, why is love not always present for us humans? Or to put it another way: why aren't people always in love?
I don't think it makes sense to philosophize about a scientific aspect of love. I think something that makes you so happy doesn't have to follow any logic. And I think it's better to spend your time on more important research. Nevertheless, the question remains: What is love?
What love means to me!!!
For me at least, love is the most important thing on this level of existence. At the same time, in my opinion, it is often what is missing the most. Love cannot and should not be explained, but felt. If there was more love, there would be much less war. I'm probably coming across like a hippie from the 70s. Nevertheless, I stand by my statement. Hate is something we don't need. Hatred that arises from envy and anger only causes problems and will sooner or later plunge the world into disaster, just as it has done for the last 300,000 years. There is a quote (I had to google it because I didn't know who it was from): "In this world, hate has never dissolved hate. Love dissolves hate." The sentence "This is the law, ancient and inexhaustible" is actually missing from the quote. But I was concerned with the first two sentences. It wasn't quite the way I had it in my head, but it expresses the same thing. Love is what fights against hatred and only with love can you stand up to hatred.
Hate develops more easily than love and requires less nurturing. Love is something that needs to be nurtured. You have to protect it and fight for it, not with sword and shield, but rather with understanding and compassion. By the way, the quote above is from the Buddha's teachings, just for those who might be interested. I am not religious, but there are various statements from different scriptures that have accompanied me in my life. These include various statements, teachings or quotes from Christianity, Buddhism or others. But I digress.
For me, love means accepting another person, no matter what mistakes they have made, no matter what they might do in the future. Not everyone deserves my love, but everyone deserves love. Love to me is the desire to do what I can for someone else, be it verbally, physically or emotionally. It is perhaps important to mention at this point that it doesn't matter to me whether the person would do the same for me. By this I mean giving someone encouragement, pointing out someone's mistakes and giving someone warmth through touch (this does not mean sex). To pick up on that right away,
Love through touch.
Love through touch - and we're still not talking about sex here. It starts with the touch of hands. It's not about arousing someone sexually, but simply about the simple feeling of skin on skin, the body heat transferred and the heartbeat you can feel. We will also touch on the subject of spirituality later. This kind of touch also allows you to feel the other person's energy. At the same time, you can also make some of your own energy available to the other person and give them strength. A simple hand on the shoulder can give another person more strength than many believe. It doesn't even matter whether there is clothing between the skin areas or not. A simple touch on the feet or a hug can give another person more strength than mere words can.
Humans are herd animals and therefore automatically creatures that are dependent on physical closeness. However, we have started to equate physical closeness and affection with sex and are harming ourselves as a result. There is nothing wrong with reaching out to another person, hugging them or even just giving them a friendly pat on the shoulder. But many people often see this as a sexual act or misconduct. I have another quote for you, even though I unfortunately couldn't find out who it's from - and believe me, I googled it: "A hug is worth a thousand words." Everyone has probably heard this saying.
At this point, I would like to briefly refer to a statement by J.K. Rowling. In "Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire", she writes: "Hugged as if by a mother." This is the scene in which Harry is in the hospital wing. That's another scene where I thought to myself: Here we have a person who is loved and also experiences this love through physical closeness. I just want to say that the meaning of love has been so massively lost in our society that hardly anyone has understood what I was trying to say with "free love". Of course, sex is also part of it and I will go into that in a moment, but many people will probably be surprised at what I have to say about it. Because here, too, there are many things that are related to spirituality.
I wanted to briefly touch on the point of spirituality in relation to love. Love is something that is positive in the majority of cases. But affection and love are also something tangible, independent of touch and feelings. In my opinion, there are hardly any stronger energies than feelings, and love in particular is one of the most powerful feelings of all. I have already said a few words about energies in the article on spirituality. It's not always about touch or words; sometimes you just feel what's around you, coming towards you or moving away. Most people always need to see everything in order to understand it. That's why much of what I write is rather secondary for many. But no less important.
And another thing: just because something is right for me doesn't mean it's right for you reading this.
Think about it.
Love between people of the same sex
Oops, I've already published the post and forgot that I wanted to include something else. So I'd like to quickly add something to the topic: Love knows no gender, as it is affection for another person. It doesn't matter whether it's two men, two women or the classic man and woman. But polyamory also plays a role because, as I have already mentioned, love is not limited to one person, but can also bring several people together. I will be writing many more posts on the subject of love, because the topic is independent of gender and therefore much more far-reaching. You can also love your children, friends and relatives. So, please just wait and see, there will be much more to come on this topic. Remember to write comments if you have any questions or would like to share your opinion.
I say it all the time. Laugh at me. I wonder how much you even know about me. You don't even understand a fraction of what makes me tick. and you probably never have and never will. (This statement is addressed to all those who think badly of me or talk about me without knowing me and to many who think they know me but don't.)
The subject of sex
Something that many people have probably been waiting for for a long time, I have to make clear right from the start: This is not about a sex commune.
Sex is important and is part of life. It is something that liberates, helps, supports and gives strength in many different ways. I will divide the topic into several categories. This will make it easier to read and I imagine it will also be easier for many people to understand. And perhaps it will also make it more interesting in general.
Emotional and unconditional
With "emotional" and "unconditional", I would like to point out two opposites. For some, sex is just a means to an end, which the unconditional ones are. They have no problem having fun themselves, but don't take offense if their partner doesn't like it. (ATTENTION) This already means consensual sex. My point is that if someone is having sex, then they're both having fun, right? No, not necessarily. There are many people who focus more on their own pleasure during sex, but if their partner doesn't climax, it's not important to them. That's not necessarily a bad thing, even if it sounds like it is. There are many people who are actually into this kind of thing or are even looking for it. And this even applies to many men who don't climax.
The nice thing about sex like this is that it generally happens in such a way that you discuss it in advance and know what the other person is aiming for and what they enjoy (him or her). Unfortunately, this is not always the case; men in particular are quite merciless. The main thing is that they have fun - and I say that as a man. This makes the whole thing very uncomplicated. Of course, a sexual arrangement doesn't have to be like this, but can also simply involve meeting up from time to time and having fun together - once or three times a week or month. However, there are no feelings involved, it's all about the sex, i.e. the physical pleasure. No obligations, no emotions, no interaction outside of bed.
If you can cope with that, that's fine. But I think it's inconsiderate, because both people should have fun during sex - or everyone, if there are several people involved.
The following can be said about the emotional part:
There are people, and I count myself among them, who often rack their brains. This not only affects their self-esteem, but also their performance from time to time. This does not necessarily mean that someone has potency problems. It's often because there are too many question marks in your head and you need a little time to warm up to someone. And again, yes, that applies to me too. This is less common with men because they are more of a doer by nature. This means that men act, while women like to talk and think. Please don't get me wrong. This is biologically proven. Be that as it may, many still think that women are less interested in sex. And if it's different, they think it's funny.
But there's more to that.
Emotional simply means that you think more and prefer to share your feelings before you share your body. Anyone can talk and write, but acting is still something else. At this point, I've just told you something that not so many people know about me. Precisely because I'm always portrayed as the perpetual hard-on who's always hot and wants everything that's not up to scratch.
Orchids and roses
The title may be confusing, but there's a reason for it. I wanted to paraphrase it a bit, meaning flowers and rough sex.
Let's start with something softer: Orchid, also known as "cuddle sex," is a type of sex that tends to be gentle and quiet. In terms of what I've written before, the emotional fits best. Why do I break it down like this? Because it's a good start to explain why sex is also a good way to open up spiritually. In a nutshell, I believe that energy is inherent in all life. You can feel this energy, you can receive it and give it away and you can use it positively and negatively. In the case of physical love, this is one of the most intense experiences when you allow yourself to feel it.
A gentle touch of the hands, even without sexual ulterior motives, lets you feel the energy of the other person. But what about touching places that are normally perceived as even more intimate? For example, on the bare back, buttocks, breasts or intimate areas? The energy is much stronger and you can really feel how much power can be released. During the actual act, be it by hand, mouth or penetration (or whatever else you can think of), it stands to reason that the climax is the moment when you can best feel, release and receive the energy. (Of course, there are other methods too. What I am describing here relates exclusively to sexual contact).
Since everyone is different and some people are as soft as silk in the wind, while others are like roses - beautiful but with thorns - uninhibited sex can be just as intense and energetic. Every person has their own behavior, and so these are also different. It is therefore not uncommon for some people to grip a little harder or like to be touched harder. A mixture of gentleness and hardness, i.e. silk and thorns, can also be a blessing. Freedom, and in this case, free love, also includes ways that are considered abhorrent or pathological by many. Nevertheless, these people also have a right to their happiness, and freedom is of course also important here. (PS: I'm not talking about criminal acts. Sad that I have to mention that).
Sex, especially BDSM or similar forms of play, is often practiced behind closed doors, as it is still despised or disapproved of by many people. Although society is becoming increasingly open, there are still many who do not want to accept or tolerate these preferences.
Equality and difference
Homosexuality, just like bisexuality, is an invention of modern times? No, that's wrong! Homosexuality, just like bisexuality and similar forms, has been around for much longer than people think. There are even traditions from medieval times in which it is talked about more openly than is the case today. It is somehow disturbing to keep hearing how prudish people were in the past. There are some cultures where same-sex sexual acts were even more than normal. To be honest, I've never quite understood why this was or is ultimately forbidden or disapproved of.
There is a saying that goes "Anything can be done, nothing has to be done". This means that nobody is obliged to do something they don't want to. Nevertheless, many people get upset when something is done that they don't want, even though it doesn't affect them in any way. So what exactly is so bad about me as a man spending sexually active time with another man? And how is it different from what I do with a woman (apart from obvious differences such as sexual organs etc.)? Love is independent of gender, but so is sex. I am a man and have been thinking for many decades about why I like both men and women sexually. I am simply fascinated by the other man because I am one myself and therefore know what it feels like to be stimulated accordingly and then also when you climax.
I am not a woman, but I am fascinated and find it exciting to stimulate a woman sexually. How she feels, how she reacts to my touch and how she finally has her release climax also excites me. So for my part, I've come to the conclusion that I find it fascinating and exciting, whether it's with a man or a woman.
One of the less important reasons for this commune is that I no longer want to justify the fact that I enjoy sex, regardless of the partner and regardless of their gender. It didn't take me long to find my way in life. When I realized that I find both sexes attractive, I communicated that immediately. Many people are afraid and have been for a very long time, if not their whole life. I have never been someone who is afraid, neither of failure nor of rejection. Why should I be? I'll live; if I'm lucky, 80, maybe even 100 years. If I'm unlucky, I'll die tomorrow. So why should I worry about what others think when I sleep with a man or a woman?
Sexual desire and lust
For a long time, only men were allowed to feel sexual pleasure. To this day, women's lust has sometimes been ignored, denied or described as heretical. I would like to briefly discuss the biology of life. Biologically speaking, humans are not very different from animals. In most animals, the sexual act is directed towards the female and not the other way around. This is mostly about producing offspring, and since females can only become pregnant at certain times, sexual behavior is also tied to this. Or to put it more simply: the male is only allowed to have sex when the female is in the mood for it. (Of course, this is highly simplified and not entirely correct; it's just an example. Please don't make any negative comments, thank you).
What I'm trying to say is that women, who are female beings, also feel sexual desire and therefore naturally also want to have sex. Nevertheless, this has been denied or simply ignored for centuries, if not millennia. Then as now, women are called sluts if they enjoy sex. (First of all, sorry for the term, and secondly, I know it's not the same for everyone or everywhere, but it's actually still the case today).
It depends on the culture, the time and the ancestry. Different centuries, different cultures and different people logically look at everything from different angles.
Something I also find sexist as a man is that a man who has slept with many women is celebrated as a hero, while a woman who has slept with more than one man is called a whore (sorry for the expression, it's meant to be crass on purpose of course). Why is it like that? A boy is taught from an early age: "Be a man, don't cry, be strong, stand your ground" - a way that I find moronic. I cried as a child and today I'm physically bigger than many men who act tougher than me. I have not confessed to being a man and yet I am more masculine than many who pretend otherwise. My point is: it's nonsense. Why is masculinity drummed into a boy? Because thousands of years ago it was necessary as a man, who is physically stronger by nature, to protect the tribe and women.
But we no longer live in the Middle Ages or the Stone Age, or wherever all that was necessary. Nowadays, there are women who can physically lift me even though I weigh almost 200 kilograms. There are women who can beat me at arm wrestling, even though I am anything but physically weak. And yet there are women who can knock me out with ease. "Women have to be in the kitchen and keep the bed warm." Men are the best cooks in the world. I was once told that it is now extremely difficult for a woman to be recognized by men in the kitchen. As far as I know, in ot kɥiˈzin (haute cuisine) in France, women are almost completely banned from the kitchen (of course, I could be wrong).
To come back to the topic: Why is a woman who enjoys sex still referred to today as a lady who gets paid for it? Apart from the fact that there's nothing wrong with getting paid for something you might enjoy doing. But I digress again. I'll probably never understand. As you can see, this is a topic that concerns me a lot, and not just in terms of the sexual act itself, but also love itself.
Sexual desire and needs are in our blood, as they are in the blood of all living beings. But we humans are the only ones who think so much about it. Don't get me wrong: there are definitely some things that should not be tolerated and accepted. Nevertheless, as an adult, I don't see any problems in not only talking about the topic with other adults, but also practising it. And without having to justify it or explain why, why and with whom!
My personal opinion in general
Last but not least, a brief summary of my opinion: Since I started with "love" in the text above, I would like to briefly express my opinion on the subject here as well. I was a very precocious person and that doesn't just apply to my sexual needs, but also to my emotional needs. And yes, the desire for emotional closeness is also a need. I came into contact with harsh reality very early on in my life and had to experience how cruel and full of hate this world actually is. I don't know why it got to me so early on, but I think it changed my world view in a way that few others have. Although many people rejected me early on, I never lost my willpower, faith or hope that things would change one day. That still holds true today.
The world is full of hate, and as quoted earlier, I believe that only love can conquer it (a belief I shared long before knowing this quote). In my opinion, everyone has the right to love, happiness and security. It's about a balance in life that neither evil nor good can dispel. Unfortunately, there are people, of which I seem to be one, who do not manage to achieve this in their lives. Quite a few who don't succeed give up and end it on their own. Others fight on, and I think some make it, while others have to fight for it all their lives. I think that will be my fate too.
So much for the spiritual and philosophical part of the whole thing. Now we come to the physical part. I've had a lot of sex in my life, and I started early, both with boys and later with men. I only got together with women very late, I was already 27 years old, and I always felt like I had missed out on something. Especially now that I'm 34, I'm no longer as young as I would like to be. Nevertheless, it's not just about sex for me, but also about what it does to you. Craving something that you rarely or never get is hard to bear. In my case, this particularly applies to women at the moment.
I'm often called a sex addict or a sex fiend, but many people who say that about me have no idea what it feels like to be in my shoes (and no, that wasn't a double entendre). It's more like I just want to enjoy what I actually consider normal. At the same time, many people accuse me of things that are lies, hang on to these lies and even call for crimes to be committed against me. Am I really that "perverted"? To bring in a little joke: The difference between erotic and perverted? Erotic is when you stroke your partner with a feather. Perverse is when the chicken is still attached to the feather. By that I mean that I would prefer the feather without the chicken. If only because I find it unattractive when the chicken is screaming around, but also impractical when you have to hold a wriggling chicken all the time.
Ok, enough jokes. I've been involved in sex for many years, so I think I've developed a good feel for sex addiction and perversion and know what it means and what it doesn't mean. And I can tell you clearly: I am many things, but not a sex addict. And certainly not in the way I've been accused of.
After all, I'm not as sick as some practices that are still considered normal.
(Not to mention all the hate).
So, now to the end. I hope I haven't bored you with this very extensive and long post. Feel free to write comments and let me know what you liked and what topics you would like to see in the future. I will also be happy to answer any questions in additional posts.
Your dragon
In his next not so lengthy but still very lengthy and spergy blog post Rainer talks about said video from the lawyer I mentioned in the beginning and tries to debunk some stuff.
If you are getting confused while reading, don't worry, that's part of the Drachenlord experience.
The municipality topic Reports and news
by Drache January 11, 2024
Reports and news
There are always people who report on things that happen in the world. And since I am unfortunately no longer a blank sheet of paper, many people report on me and the things I do. This is also the case with the commune. Now I have a post for you in which I go into the statements made in the video by lawyer Mr. Solmecke and say a few things about it. The post is of course linked at the end of the post and you can watch it. Incidentally, yes, I sent Mr. Solmecke audio recordings as answers to questions, and yes, I was aware that he used them in his video. In my experience, however, an interview would look different, just as additional information in passing.
Statements from the video and my answers
The first thing addressed in the video is the legal requirements. I have said several times in my blog that I have no idea whatsoever about rights. I know a few basic rights such as fundamental rights in general, but the legal situation in Germany is mostly a matter of interpretation and therefore difficult. But to summarize the topic briefly: No, I have no idea about the rights and laws, and I imagine it's anything but easy. But I also said that everything in the municipality is decided as a community and I hope that there are people who are familiar with it or who find it easier to deal with it than I do. I have other talents and skills, and since a commune is a community project, I don't have to be able to do that because I'm not alone. So, it was never my plan to know my way around the law, because it wouldn't work anyway.
The municipality - and I keep saying this - needs people from different areas who are familiar with the respective topics. Later in the video it is said that if all decisions are made jointly, a committee or something similar must also be set up to make this possible. In order to implement this, the community would possibly have to be set up as a club or association. Once again, I emphasize that this is a specific issue. I have no knowledge of this and am therefore reliant on people who know how to legally secure and organize this. This will certainly involve many trips to lawyers, legal advisors and government agencies. Apart from the fact that I'm not even that far yet, because it's still just an idea. I already said in the first streams on TikTok that I don't know if it will ever work out. And also that I didn't really want to make it public because there are a lot of things I have no idea about. So once again, I'm not taking this lightly and there are no plans to realize it yet. I'm saying this because many people are already treating it as if it's going to start tomorrow, but it's not yet clear if and when. So far, it's just a dream.
In the video it is also mentioned that there are reports about me from time to time and that it is also about criminal offenses. Yes, some of the things that were reported about me were not real, but were statements by haters that I had never met and that came from false and incorrect sources. But so be it.
Then I watch a video. Here is a reproach from me to you, Mr. Solmecke: It would be good if you would not refer your sources to videos by Ofenkäse ["Der Heilige Ofenkäse" is the name of a troll who does videos about Rainer] in the future, because this gentleman not only earns money illegally with my content, but there are currently even legal proceedings against him for defamation and disregard of my copyrights. Just as well-intentioned advice, because your reputation as a law firm and especially as a lawyer is certainly not uninteresting, is it?
PS: Free love not capitalized but small it is a part of the whole but not the main point of the whole.
Here at minute 3:03, it's not my original blog that is called up, but a website run by haters, which is also overflowing with data theft of my data. If they hadn't found it, I could have sent them my original blog. It also subliminally promotes hater activities, which I assume is anything but your goal. I repeat: you should check your sources. Showing hater websites that also use criminally relevant data in a video and a channel with almost 150,000 views and almost a million subscribers is hardly sensible, is it?
He then reads out outdated information from the fake blog of a hate website. He also briefly addresses the issue of privacy. I'm not quite sure anymore, but I think I already wrote in the first report of the blog that you should definitely think about building or setting up private retreats. Because I like to be alone myself and enjoy my private time, as I think everyone does.
And so the statement that I don't take privacy very seriously is wrong and, to be honest, I don't think it's a nice statement.
Then we talk about the legal consequences of nudism and free love as well as the topic of joint accounts and money. We also discuss the statement that only two people besides myself should work for money for the commune, and that this should be very difficult. At this point, it should be said that it obviously depends on how much money you earn and how much money you need. However, I am not qualified to make a statement or estimate. That was just an example. What is meant is that you don't work to get rich, you just have the money you need. In addition, the statement probably didn't take into account that everyone who comes to the community and contributes their money to the community also builds up a financial cushion and that I don't earn very little with my job either or (if I get my YouTube account back at some point or other websites come along) will earn more in the future than three people who go to work for a month. So the idea is based on my assumption of what my earnings are, what they can be, and the assumption that others may also have one or more (personal) jobs. In addition, the blog also says that there are planned things, at least from my side. For example, a campsite to bring in money, or other facilities such as a kiosk, café or similar. Again, nothing is firmly planned yet.
So to the three people who go to work: If more people have to go to work, that's just the way it is. It's not a fixed number, of course not. I actually assumed that this was logical and I think that I even wrote about it, for example.
About self-sufficiency: I grew up in the countryside and when I was little we grew a lot of things ourselves in the garden. So I'm aware of how much work and how exhausting it is and how easily it can go wrong. I'm now better qualified for this again than I am for numbers or laws, for example, because I've practically been doing that for half my life.
The temperature should never drop below 20 degrees, that's what I want. But since it's not up to me alone, but to the general public, it's clear that it's not my decision for now. It's just my wish.
And you definitely won't find me on the doorstep in Cologne, because it will undoubtedly be somewhere in the countryside, far away from villages and towns, if possible. After all, it's all about self-sufficiency and not having civilization, i.e. noise and bustle, right on your doorstep, but rather birdsong, wind and forest.
I'm aware that local authorities already exist, because at some point I came up with the idea. And no, I haven't thought about the legal situation, as that won't be my job and I'm not familiar with it. But I hope so: if the company is ever founded, someone who is more familiar with it will take over. As far as I know, the legal situation varies from state to state. This means that it ultimately depends on where you found the municipality, i.e. in which federal state. How you join or leave the municipality must of course be regulated accordingly when the time comes. As a group, you need to seek advice and/or guidance in advance. Incidentally, it is also unprofessional to mention the holy oven cheese again. I didn't say anything to Ofenkäse. He illegally stole videos from my livestream and used them, as he always does.
As an association, you have to elect a board of directors, regardless of whether you call it a board of directors, a local council or a council of elders. That's exactly what I meant with my statement: a group of people who make decisions.
As for legal advice, that is planned when the time comes. Regarding the plan with nudism and free love, I already made a very long post today on the subject of "free love" and said that it's not just about sex. But only in passing. I was already aware of §183 and §183a. As far as my own garden concept is concerned, I was aware of the basic concept, but not in detail. To summarize: the commune should be as isolated as possible from other villages and places so that no major problems should arise if sexual love occurs. Ultimately, everything is checked to see how it works. Free love, specifically sex, is, as I said, only a small part of the goal and relates more to love and sex between people of the same sex, groups and so on. So sexual freedom, not sex in the open (which of course is not ruled out either).
And the statement that he would rather apply to us than Rainers Kommune was also not a particularly fine move. But well, he's welcome to it. Then it's on to the topic of children in the commune. And again, not the original, but the hater website shown in the video. So, seriously, I don't understand how you want to make it serious and then not refer to the original. So, it was clear to me that children and nudism belong together. It wasn't so much a question, as I said, I had experience of it before, when I was still a child myself. In the meantime, of course, the subject has been dropped and will remain so. Or rather, I will stay out of the topic in the municipality. If the community, i.e. the other members, decide to do so, that's their business. I defer to the group, but I have clearly stated that I am out of it and will leave the decision to the group. I can also abstain.
PS: I don't have a manifesto. The blog is a collection of my opinions, my ideas and my wishes. There is no manifesto in this sense yet.
As far as the school system is concerned, the laws vary from state to state, I believe. And it also seems to work with private lessons or you set up a private school within the municipality. However, I suspect that this is even more difficult than founding a commune itself. (And again a NOTE) This is just an idea, not a suggestion or plan. What is meant by parents deciding is that they have to decide how to arrange private schooling or what other options are then available. Since I don't have kids myself and probably never will, I'm not involved.
And the third time he searched for an update on children, he again ended up on a hater website. Mr. Sherlock Solmecke, please use original sources for future research. At this point, however, I have to give him credit for at least finding the actual post, even if it was apparently not clear what was meant by "deviant species in the head". And not the organal blog but a hater website. For those who don't know either: I changed my mind about children because everyone was claiming that DrachenLord was a pedophile. (Me) and that only because I wanted to found a nudist commune where everyone, including children, is welcome, is no longer relevant. Perhaps it would have made sense to mention this in the video and to go into the penalties that await you for such false accusations, because maybe then people will stop making me out to be a pedophile, which I am not. As far as I know, the penalties for such defamation of character and slander are quite severe.
You can't apply yet because there are no applications and there are not even any plans for implementation. It's already clear why I changed my mind about children if you had read the original post and the other posts on the blog, Mr. Solmecke. Because it was explained there and you could have asked me why. I would have liked to have sent you a detailed answer.
Then, for me personally, the name of the commune was a huge ass-bomb into the biggest fat hole I could find. With a running start, because I have no idea about this right-wing radical garbage and didn't google it, and the abbreviation was just crap. If I had googled it, it would have been my mistake. I'll have to be more careful in future. However, I'm pleased with what you said, because that was exactly the intention. I wanted to start something with freedom and I don't think you can get much further away from the right-wing nonsense. It's about freedom spirituality and self-sufficiency community and also free love regardless of gender skin color or origin. As for the name, I have often said that it is more of a working title than a fixed name. I was interested in freedom and a commune. Hence "Commune of Freedom". But it can still be renamed and that is also planned for later. But then, like everything else, as a group decision.
So much for the video and my reaction to it.
There are always people who report on things that happen in the world. And since I am unfortunately no longer a blank sheet of paper, many people report on me and the things I do. This is also the case with the commune. Now I have a post for you in which I go into the statements made in the video by lawyer Mr. Solmecke and say a few things about it. The post is of course linked at the end of the post and you can watch it. Incidentally, yes, I sent Mr. Solmecke audio recordings as answers to questions, and yes, I was aware that he used them in his video. In my experience, however, an interview would look different, just as additional information in passing.
Statements from the video and my answers
The first thing addressed in the video is the legal requirements. I have said several times in my blog that I have no idea whatsoever about rights. I know a few basic rights such as fundamental rights in general, but the legal situation in Germany is mostly a matter of interpretation and therefore difficult. But to summarize the topic briefly: No, I have no idea about the rights and laws, and I imagine it's anything but easy. But I also said that everything in the municipality is decided as a community and I hope that there are people who are familiar with it or who find it easier to deal with it than I do. I have other talents and skills, and since a commune is a community project, I don't have to be able to do that because I'm not alone. So, it was never my plan to know my way around the law, because it wouldn't work anyway.
The municipality - and I keep saying this - needs people from different areas who are familiar with the respective topics. Later in the video it is said that if all decisions are made jointly, a committee or something similar must also be set up to make this possible. In order to implement this, the community would possibly have to be set up as a club or association. Once again, I emphasize that this is a specific issue. I have no knowledge of this and am therefore reliant on people who know how to legally secure and organize this. This will certainly involve many trips to lawyers, legal advisors and government agencies. Apart from the fact that I'm not even that far yet, because it's still just an idea. I already said in the first streams on TikTok that I don't know if it will ever work out. And also that I didn't really want to make it public because there are a lot of things I have no idea about. So once again, I'm not taking this lightly and there are no plans to realize it yet. I'm saying this because many people are already treating it as if it's going to start tomorrow, but it's not yet clear if and when. So far, it's just a dream.
In the video it is also mentioned that there are reports about me from time to time and that it is also about criminal offenses. Yes, some of the things that were reported about me were not real, but were statements by haters that I had never met and that came from false and incorrect sources. But so be it.
Then I watch a video. Here is a reproach from me to you, Mr. Solmecke: It would be good if you would not refer your sources to videos by Ofenkäse ["Der Heilige Ofenkäse" is the name of a troll who does videos about Rainer] in the future, because this gentleman not only earns money illegally with my content, but there are currently even legal proceedings against him for defamation and disregard of my copyrights. Just as well-intentioned advice, because your reputation as a law firm and especially as a lawyer is certainly not uninteresting, is it?
PS: Free love not capitalized but small it is a part of the whole but not the main point of the whole.
Here at minute 3:03, it's not my original blog that is called up, but a website run by haters, which is also overflowing with data theft of my data. If they hadn't found it, I could have sent them my original blog. It also subliminally promotes hater activities, which I assume is anything but your goal. I repeat: you should check your sources. Showing hater websites that also use criminally relevant data in a video and a channel with almost 150,000 views and almost a million subscribers is hardly sensible, is it?
He then reads out outdated information from the fake blog of a hate website. He also briefly addresses the issue of privacy. I'm not quite sure anymore, but I think I already wrote in the first report of the blog that you should definitely think about building or setting up private retreats. Because I like to be alone myself and enjoy my private time, as I think everyone does.
And so the statement that I don't take privacy very seriously is wrong and, to be honest, I don't think it's a nice statement.
Then we talk about the legal consequences of nudism and free love as well as the topic of joint accounts and money. We also discuss the statement that only two people besides myself should work for money for the commune, and that this should be very difficult. At this point, it should be said that it obviously depends on how much money you earn and how much money you need. However, I am not qualified to make a statement or estimate. That was just an example. What is meant is that you don't work to get rich, you just have the money you need. In addition, the statement probably didn't take into account that everyone who comes to the community and contributes their money to the community also builds up a financial cushion and that I don't earn very little with my job either or (if I get my YouTube account back at some point or other websites come along) will earn more in the future than three people who go to work for a month. So the idea is based on my assumption of what my earnings are, what they can be, and the assumption that others may also have one or more (personal) jobs. In addition, the blog also says that there are planned things, at least from my side. For example, a campsite to bring in money, or other facilities such as a kiosk, café or similar. Again, nothing is firmly planned yet.
So to the three people who go to work: If more people have to go to work, that's just the way it is. It's not a fixed number, of course not. I actually assumed that this was logical and I think that I even wrote about it, for example.
About self-sufficiency: I grew up in the countryside and when I was little we grew a lot of things ourselves in the garden. So I'm aware of how much work and how exhausting it is and how easily it can go wrong. I'm now better qualified for this again than I am for numbers or laws, for example, because I've practically been doing that for half my life.
The temperature should never drop below 20 degrees, that's what I want. But since it's not up to me alone, but to the general public, it's clear that it's not my decision for now. It's just my wish.
And you definitely won't find me on the doorstep in Cologne, because it will undoubtedly be somewhere in the countryside, far away from villages and towns, if possible. After all, it's all about self-sufficiency and not having civilization, i.e. noise and bustle, right on your doorstep, but rather birdsong, wind and forest.
I'm aware that local authorities already exist, because at some point I came up with the idea. And no, I haven't thought about the legal situation, as that won't be my job and I'm not familiar with it. But I hope so: if the company is ever founded, someone who is more familiar with it will take over. As far as I know, the legal situation varies from state to state. This means that it ultimately depends on where you found the municipality, i.e. in which federal state. How you join or leave the municipality must of course be regulated accordingly when the time comes. As a group, you need to seek advice and/or guidance in advance. Incidentally, it is also unprofessional to mention the holy oven cheese again. I didn't say anything to Ofenkäse. He illegally stole videos from my livestream and used them, as he always does.
As an association, you have to elect a board of directors, regardless of whether you call it a board of directors, a local council or a council of elders. That's exactly what I meant with my statement: a group of people who make decisions.
As for legal advice, that is planned when the time comes. Regarding the plan with nudism and free love, I already made a very long post today on the subject of "free love" and said that it's not just about sex. But only in passing. I was already aware of §183 and §183a. As far as my own garden concept is concerned, I was aware of the basic concept, but not in detail. To summarize: the commune should be as isolated as possible from other villages and places so that no major problems should arise if sexual love occurs. Ultimately, everything is checked to see how it works. Free love, specifically sex, is, as I said, only a small part of the goal and relates more to love and sex between people of the same sex, groups and so on. So sexual freedom, not sex in the open (which of course is not ruled out either).
And the statement that he would rather apply to us than Rainers Kommune was also not a particularly fine move. But well, he's welcome to it. Then it's on to the topic of children in the commune. And again, not the original, but the hater website shown in the video. So, seriously, I don't understand how you want to make it serious and then not refer to the original. So, it was clear to me that children and nudism belong together. It wasn't so much a question, as I said, I had experience of it before, when I was still a child myself. In the meantime, of course, the subject has been dropped and will remain so. Or rather, I will stay out of the topic in the municipality. If the community, i.e. the other members, decide to do so, that's their business. I defer to the group, but I have clearly stated that I am out of it and will leave the decision to the group. I can also abstain.
PS: I don't have a manifesto. The blog is a collection of my opinions, my ideas and my wishes. There is no manifesto in this sense yet.
As far as the school system is concerned, the laws vary from state to state, I believe. And it also seems to work with private lessons or you set up a private school within the municipality. However, I suspect that this is even more difficult than founding a commune itself. (And again a NOTE) This is just an idea, not a suggestion or plan. What is meant by parents deciding is that they have to decide how to arrange private schooling or what other options are then available. Since I don't have kids myself and probably never will, I'm not involved.
And the third time he searched for an update on children, he again ended up on a hater website. Mr. Sherlock Solmecke, please use original sources for future research. At this point, however, I have to give him credit for at least finding the actual post, even if it was apparently not clear what was meant by "deviant species in the head". And not the organal blog but a hater website. For those who don't know either: I changed my mind about children because everyone was claiming that DrachenLord was a pedophile. (Me) and that only because I wanted to found a nudist commune where everyone, including children, is welcome, is no longer relevant. Perhaps it would have made sense to mention this in the video and to go into the penalties that await you for such false accusations, because maybe then people will stop making me out to be a pedophile, which I am not. As far as I know, the penalties for such defamation of character and slander are quite severe.
You can't apply yet because there are no applications and there are not even any plans for implementation. It's already clear why I changed my mind about children if you had read the original post and the other posts on the blog, Mr. Solmecke. Because it was explained there and you could have asked me why. I would have liked to have sent you a detailed answer.
Then, for me personally, the name of the commune was a huge ass-bomb into the biggest fat hole I could find. With a running start, because I have no idea about this right-wing radical garbage and didn't google it, and the abbreviation was just crap. If I had googled it, it would have been my mistake. I'll have to be more careful in future. However, I'm pleased with what you said, because that was exactly the intention. I wanted to start something with freedom and I don't think you can get much further away from the right-wing nonsense. It's about freedom spirituality and self-sufficiency community and also free love regardless of gender skin color or origin. As for the name, I have often said that it is more of a working title than a fixed name. I was interested in freedom and a commune. Hence "Commune of Freedom". But it can still be renamed and that is also planned for later. But then, like everything else, as a group decision.
So much for the video and my reaction to it.
