- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)
- Thread starter AnOminous
- Start date
-
🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
Hardin doesn't have to reply either. It would be a waste of money anyway.. the court has been apprised of where things stand
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2015
There’s some magical world where Null’s counsel manages to get Greer to try to give his full testimony in the form of a musical number performed by The Accommodations and that all gets entered into public record and I can only weep that our gay world will never allow that to be.
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
There is also the world where Russle stops wasting everyone's time and money.
I want to live in that world.
I want to live in that world.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
I expect a reply like: "As plaintiff has mentioned he intends to draw this out as long as possible to bankrupt defendant we object to this motion and request a scheduling conference be held at the earliest possible time."
Also, does the appeal to the Supreme Court pause this anyway?
Also, does the appeal to the Supreme Court pause this anyway?
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
If either party files a motion to stay pending SCOTUS, and the district court grants it, it does.
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
The fuck is he talking about?
I have no idea what "Answer" he means here. I can't think of anything that Russ has to file an "Answer" for and the first of his responses to the "barrage of motions" that Null's lawyer filed aren't due till the 29th.
- Joined
- Nov 21, 2020
So Mr. Plaintiff could instead of just said: "I have been informed that this is being appealed to the Supreme Court and wish to request a stay pending outcome of that appeal." and probably would have been approved.
Instead of writing several pages of unhinged ranting. Although it is fun reading.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Proposed schedule, I suppose, because that is the only date that fits (by his inaccurate calculations). The date is only a day off
Also, lmao, they aren't doing it for free anymore:
Last edited:
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2012
This new filing is insane for a lot of reasons but I'll restrain myself.
goblin enby
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jul 12, 2022
The idea that suing Null for copyright infringement will somehow prevent anonymous weirdos from emailing him photos of Hitler is an ironclad legal argument.
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2018
This is what big boy lawyers have to deal with, Russell. You should've paid more attention in law school.
This is why Rusty is one of my favorite cows. He always produces top quality content.
Russ, you picked this fight. To use your metaphor, you told Josh to fight you in a boxing ring because you think you're a professional fighter and, because Josh isn't, you thought you had an easy win. But Josh found a professional fighter (Matthew Hardin) willing to fight on his behalf, and you're only now starting to realize how out of your depth you really are.
Drop the lawsuit, my dude.
This is a doozy of a tantrum. "I'm a big boy lawyer except not really, I don't want to do the extra work, just give me what I want!"
My dude. My nigga. I'm going to say this as simply as I can:
NOBODY FORCED YOU TO FILE PRO SE.
Kiwi Farms didn't use its secret mind-control ray on you. Nobody held a gun to your head. That was you. It's your own fault that you didn't consider Josh would hire a real lawyer to fight back.
6
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
Actually I think he's just retarded.
The Answer was filed on 2024-01-17. He must think his deadline is 21 days from that date.
Utah R. Civ. P. 12 states "if a reply is ordered by the court, [the plaintiff must serve it] within 21 days after service of the order". Except the date of the order was on 2024-01-22 and the order specifically denied Russ request to file a Reply to the Answer.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
How long do you all think he can fund his lawyers if they join in? Does he realize how expensive this will be on him?
- Joined
- Mar 10, 2019
Well, of course they aren't.Also, lmao, they aren't doing it for free anymore:
I'd think Russ should at least have to proffer some evidence to show that he'll be able to obtain the funding he needs within the time frame that he's defined in his motion. Or does his entire premise for the motion to stay boil down to "just trust me bro"?
- Joined
- Dec 24, 2018
No.
I imagine that would be between him and the ambulance chasers he's trying to recruit. I don't think it would matter unless the court specifically asked.
- Joined
- Aug 20, 2019
"Your honor, it will take plaintiff approximately 90 days to gather funds to drive out to Nebraska and New York, and give hand-jobs to Grimm and Keenan as retainer, respectfully."
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2017
Greer has the most wonderful writing for legal briefs. "He has to jump through hoops".
You know Greer, if you feel like having to do the bare minimum to sustain your lawsuit is akin to acting like a performing animal, you could always drop the case.
You know Greer, if you feel like having to do the bare minimum to sustain your lawsuit is akin to acting like a performing animal, you could always drop the case.
- Joined
- May 4, 2020
Essentially, yeah.
I disagree. Why does he need 90 days (60, but he wants 30 extra to be safe)? Where is the money coming from? Is that just 3 months worth of paychecks as original retainer? What happens when it runs out? Will he return to pro se? This is important to address to avoid it all being a massive waste of time