Unfortunately he can get away with as much defamation as he likes. That's the perk of doing it in a legal filing, can't be taken to task for it.
"I am suffering hardship because I chose to be a schizo dumbfuck pro se litigant and harass people with bullshit! REEEEEEE! HELP MEEEEE!"
Whilst trying to butter up those clowns from DJF, he's told on himself for being an incompetent buffoon with that last line about "competent counsel". So much for doing most of the work himself because he's best.
The only response required for all that tl;dr Russel just tard screamed onto the docket is a perfunctory motion to strike. Maybe a sanctions motion for frivolous filings if Hardin is feeling particularly inclined. But that may be a waste of time at this point and could be instead brought up as an option in the motion to strike.
Yes, but, playing fast and loose with what you say in a legal case can run you into trouble. In this case it would be Rule 12(f) for salacious statements. Whether or not the Kiwifarms did or did not do the things Greer is alleging, is not a subject for review by the court. The court can only take legal notice of things which have been adjudicated by other courts, and none of the shit Greer is accusing us of in the filings has been subject to any sort of judicial review. Which means its legally bunk and prejudicial to the defense. If shit lips keeps this up, he may actually run into a fee shifting scenario because Hardin now has to spend Nulls money to wash Russel's crayon scribbles off the docket.
Hardin's response by linking the AGT Freemantle lawsuit filings is a brilliant counter to that. And Russ threw the door open for it. That may (just maybe) push the Judge past the usual Pro Se tard shield to actually see him for the Morlock that he is.
What else are you supposed to do? Ignore it? Surely, you jest.
Reminds me of when Melinda Scott accused Mr. Hardin of leaking documents that were under a seal order because I posted them. Even tried proving to the court I was him, lol. Turns out I just grabbed the docs before the court sealed them. Tough. I mean, there are ways to avoid that, but hey.
Motion -> Response by the Defense -> Counter Response -> Order
I'm positive the deadline for that has long since passed.
I did not. This is big!
You can on counterclaim, I think. Isn't Dershowitz famous for this? I mean, Giuffre win comes to mind.
The deadline was actually when the answer was filed, so it wasn't too long ago. We did discuss the merits of raising a counter-claim against Russell and didn't believe it would be fruitful.
“Before DJF could really entertain re-representing again” after saying he just needed an extension to get the money together because that’s all he lacks to hire them again?
Certainly, I'd say it's sanctions worthy. Remains to see if Mr. Hardin agrees
I hope he sues them next
Random text material right there @Null
