Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

  • 🔧 At about Midnight EST I am going to completely fuck up the site trying to fix something.

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.5%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.8%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.5%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 112 24.2%

  • Total voters
    463
Perhaps Russell Greer wants another 90 days because he has pending litigation suing Taylor Swift I mean Ariana Grande ahem I meant a Nevada hooker oh right Green Lantern brothel.

Keep it classy Russ.

Suing prostitutes and brothels is the mark of a virtuous man.

Keep those THOTS patrolled. Russ: Slayer of Hoes.

I am waiting for him to make a filing with the court to make that trust fund null just got be used to fund his lolsuit

He should get HALF. It is only fair.

Yes. There's actually a case about it. Law databases were sued for copyright infringement over holding the plaintiff's copyrighted briefs in their archives. Judge in New York dismissed it finding it to be obvious fair use. White v. W. Publ'g Corp., 12 Civ. 1340 (JSR) (S.D.N.Y. Jul. 3, 2014). It is also "clear that the courts of this country recognize a general right to inspect and copy public records and documents,' including judicial records and documents", and while the right is not unlimited, it would also seem to favor your idea. See, Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589 (1978)

As is, many different services already compile such works such as Westlaw, Justia, CourtListener, and many more. I certainly don't see why putting it in a book would be any different. If anything, to make the book readable, you probably would be only including excerpts, which would only bolster your claim of fair use.

While he certainly complained about his image being used whilst raising the money, he only asked for time to raise his own funds.

This seems like a worthy cause, but any American would be sued.

Do you think that he would be retarded enough to try to sue a britbong?

Just log off nigga!

Internet bullying isn't real. Just close your eyes!

I'm curious, is a reply to a response for a stay allowed? I expect there's some limit otherwise you'd just be sending replies back forever.

Also, if he had spent the time working on the responses/replies he does owe the court he'd be done by now.

He had his request to reply again to one of Null's filings denied, so no, there is not an unlimited reply amount. Usually it works like cross and direct with a narrowing scope.
 
All this legal analysis is more than I'm qualified to comment on, so I'll just read it and enjoy.

What I am qualified to comment on is that Greer is confirmed to be a filthy light theme user. Do his levels of shame know no limits?
View attachment 5704369
How do we sue for reverse defamation because this makes him look too damn good.
FR -I can't believe he's seething abt it when I worked extra hard on his to make sure it wasn't overboard or just straight "offensive". What does this dude honestly think he looks like?
Aha this guy! Let’s sue for actual damages - $35 trillion Zimbabwe.
 
I will once again point out Russell's adopted parents paid for his defense attorney in the Erika stalking case but none of his frivolous lolsuits. Therefore, Russell's own parents must not think Kiwifarms an eminent threat, and see this as just another one of Russell's frivolous lolsuits. Russell's parents are on our side.

Alternatively, it's long been theorized that Russell's parents paying for his lawyer (and probably his car and move to Nevada) was the extent of his prodigal son inheritance. "You fucked up bad this time, so we'll pay for your lawyer, and a car to help you fuck off to Nevada with, and that's it, never bother us again!"

In which case, Russell's been cut off for years, hence why he's been getting rejections for payday loans
 
Last edited:
I will once again point out Russell's adopted parents paid for his defense attorney in the Erika stalking case but none of his frivolous lolsuits. Therefore, Russell's own parents must not think Kiwifarms an eminent threat, and see this as just another one of Russell's frivolous lolsuits. Russell's parents are on our side.

Alternatively, it's long been theorized that Russell's parents paying for his lawyer (and probably his car and move to Nevada) was the extent of his prodigal son inheritance. "You fucked up bad this time, so we'll pay for your lawyer, and a car to help you fuck off to Nevada with, and that's it, never bother us again!"

In which case, Russell's been cut off for years, hence why he's been getting rejections for payday loans
That and the "kill list" were the only cases that could have ended with him incarcerated, from what I remember?

I can see reasonable people deciding to help their retard adopted son stay out of pee-pee-poo-poo dungeons but tell him he's on his own when it comes to his idiotic civil suits.
 
In his thread, we've theorized his broken little mind saw how grown ups made the other kids be nice to him because he was a deformed retard. I think this lawsuit confirms that he's carried this view into adulthood. He thinks judges are the grown-up version of adults who can make everyone play along with his bizarre little fantasies, what the other people think be damned. But that's not how reality works. Hence, these tantrums being thrown in the form of a legal filing.
You are absolutely right.

Russell is a spoiled entitled nitwit that uses his disability as a sword and a shield.

All his life, probably from a very young age, his parents and teachers protected him from the vicissitudes of the world outside.

Authority figures put their fingers on the scales out of a misplaced sense of sympathy, but it was a huge mistake. Now Russell thinks he is entitled to special treatment.

Russell thinks no one has it bad as he does.

That only Russell Greer knows the pain of hardship, and thus the world owes him a perpetual and limitless debt of "accommodation."

And it's this attitude - forged as the weird unpleasant kid on the playground that everyone was forced to play with - the kid that would always "tell on you" to get his way - that informs Russell's actions as an adult.

Russell is the loser par excellence - suing prostitutes and celebrities alike - treating the legal system as his personal complaint department.

But no matter what Russell does, no matter how many frivolous lawsuits he files (or even wins), he will always be a loser.
 
Potentially Criminal (Sean) is covering some of Greer's motions on his stream LIVE now:

I enjoyed his impersonation of Russell.
Iw002gHUZQ0156.png
 
Is that at all how a stay of proceedings works?
Pretty much. People (and often lawyers getting paid hundreds of dollars an hour) filing shit that is basically "hamster ate my homework, my dad is gay, bla bla bla gimme 90 days."
and yet, with the $30 grace amount, the federal system is still light years better than many state and local courts where they'll try and squeeze money out of you for a single page or even, sometimes, a search, which may not be able to even be done online.
Never mind a search that gets NO results. Not because you misspelled something, because THEY misspelled something.

If I had all my money back for searches like that I could, I suppose, buy a few pizzas. Maybe even a couple of those KingCobraJFS pizzas with like 50 ingredients. Fucking court cocksuckers.
 
Screenshot 2024-02-10 160003.png
Tldr, "I did not violate court rules, because oopsy woopsie, I have now changed the name of my document"
Screenshot 2024-02-10 160230.png
Screenshot 2024-02-10 160315.png
As an aside, Local Rule DUCivR 7-1 (C) that he cites has him in violation of part (a), and it does not allow any arguments. He violated it, therefore, in two ways
Screenshot 2024-02-10 161018.png
Is that at all how a stay of proceedings works?
If he already missed the deadline, that doesn't help. It would stay further deadlines, though, that he is not yet in breach of.
Do you think that he would be retarded enough to try to sue a britbong?
Probably, though given that I don't know how British laws work, I would then instead not recommend making such book there without consulting a barrister or whatever.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
View attachment 5710023
Tldr, "I did not violate court rules, because oopsy woopsie, I have now changed the name of my document"
View attachment 5710029
View attachment 5710031
As an aside, Local Rule DUCivR 7-1 (C) that he cites has him in violation of part (a), and it does not allow any arguments. He violated it, therefore, in two ways
View attachment 5710044

If he already missed the deadline, that doesn't help. It would stay further deadlines, though, that he is not yet in breach of.

Probably, though given that I don't know how British laws work, I would then instead not recommend making such book there without consulting a barrister or whatever.
Hardin will write a memoir titled "How I Represented a Man Sued By Russell Greer and Falsely Became Known as Frivolous, Litigious and Crazy",
and then he will be sucked into an infinite loop time vortex where the only way out is to sue the wrong person/LLC/"a website". for contributory copyright infringement.
 
Tldr, "I did not violate court rules, because oopsy woopsie, I have now changed the name of my document"

This lying fuckface made a bad filing, got caught, then went back looking for any rules he could use to justify the filing.

I don't know what a "Notice of Supplemental Authority" is (neither does Russ). But I bet it was the first result that turned up from searching "without leave" in the rules section Russ had open on his phone.
 
I know the courts are notoriously slow on doing... well, anything, but how long does a judge usually allow docket-based slap fights to go on before they finally step in and tell the chihuahua to stop filing bullshit? I feel like in most of the other cases I've followed it would have already happened by now, but that may just be hindsight compressing the timeline.
 
Back