- Joined
- Feb 4, 2023
But Russia threw their aircraft engine developers to the curb in favor of Western manufacturers, and that turned out to be disastrous in the long run, as Russian companies like Aviadvigatel lost its experience in building these aircraft engines and has to re-master making turbojet engines. Even so, since the more Russified version of the Irkut MC-21 has been constantly delayed, it shows that the Russian manufacturing industry still hasn't re-mastered their capabilities.Still though… Russia is one of the very few countries in the world able to make turbojet engines. Even China hasn’t quite mastered it yet.
Is there a chance that some major airlines would determine that Russian planes are more reliable then Boeing? That could be a good market
With the tragedy that is the Sukhoi Superjet 100, no. If Russia can't keep up with manufacturing planes and parts, what makes their plane, even if it as good as it gets, reliable (even in regards to economic viability)?Boeing/Airbus are very hard to compete with, with their unofficial and official government subsidies.
I would say Russian airliners themselves have the potential capabilities to be more reliable than Boeing and Embraer though. Beating Airbus though is like unreachable. Airbus has literally perfected all their aircraft to be as reliable as possible.
Japan obliterated Russia's navy in 1905 because of Russia's frozen ports. Russian ships of the Pacific Fleet were trapped in Port Arthur in China when Japan invaded because they couldn't use Vladivostok, their home part, because its port was frozen.Russia has rarely had decent naval capabilities but I believe that's at least in part due to its unusual geography and most of its ports are frozen anyway. Plus having little money available to make the required repairs on the vessels they have now.
Corruption played a huge in role in preventing Russian ships to be repaired with what money what was left.