- Joined
- Apr 22, 2022
Evangelical Christianity is correct, everything else is wrong, I will not be elaborating
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
My dick is correct and your mom is wrong.Evangelical Christianity is correct, everything else is wrong, I will not be elaborating
Fun fact: 2007 was around when the Christian rock invasion of Warped Tour was at its peak. About half the bands scene kids loved were Christian or kinda Christian. Why am I talking about this? That description screams Christian scene kid.But this does remind me of this one Jesus fan-art I had fav'd a long time ago because I thought it was amusing. This predates the MCU by a good couple years, so I can't imagine what a superhero Jesus fan-art would look now.
View attachment 5607972
View attachment 5607974
I've heard it said that the modern depiction of Jesus as a long haired man with a beard is thought to be Christ in the likeness of Cesare Borgia. Don't know how true that is but it sounds like something the Borgias would've done.Being mad about how Jesus is portrayed physically is the most retarded edgy shit I've seen in a while. You realize no one alive knows what he looked like right? All we know for sure is he was a man. He could be blue eyed blond, black, brown, etc, we will never know. The paintings arent actual photographs and you're all retarded for even discussing his appearance.
Also lmao at people thinking bible fandom is a new thing. Even bible slash isn't new.
I just found it funny.Lastly, there are replies lambasting Wolfy for being a sinner
I would take it a bit more seriously, but you'd have to consider that accepting the faith would mean large changes and epiphanies. You have to understand that these people are coom brained, gooner-pilled retards. They don't really care for the canon more for degenerate gay shipping.I think all and all, this kind of strikes me as being like that Patty/Peter Locke character:
Most of them seem to be autists who genuinely want to do good, who are genuinely wholesome people. Certainly lolcow traits mixed in, but very little, if any, of the degeneracy, histrionics, or outright malice that accompany most other cows.
No, these people aren't gooners and porn addicts. Most of these types of autists aren't, especially if they're young and/or female. The real degenerates are into nasty communities like furries and lolicon, not cutesy lovey-dovey gay shipping art of Biblical figures.You have to understand that these people are coom brained, gooner-pilled retards.
Now that you say it and I take a second look... I believe you're for the most part right, but there can be overlap between the two. But looking at what is shown in the OP thread, I have to say I think you're for the most part right.No, these people aren't gooners and porn addicts. Most of these types of autists aren't, especially if they're young and/or female. The real degenerates are into nasty communities like furries and lolicon, not cutesy lovey-dovey gay shipping art of Biblical figures.
No, these people aren't gooners and porn addicts. Most of these types of autists aren't, especially if they're young and/or female. The real degenerates are into nasty communities like furries and lolicon, not cutesy lovey-dovey gay shipping art of Biblical figures.
Now that you say it and I take a second look... I believe you're for the most part right, but there can be overlap between the two. But looking at what is shown in the OP thread, I have to say I think you're for the most part right.
The art 'offends' my sensibilities' ever so slightly if I was thin skinned. But it does look like the art would be made by young 13-15 year old autists.
To be fair, he is supposed to appear in beguiling forms and probably engages in sodomy.Satan is a super sexy bisexual man
Everything is based on giving a super autistic interpretation of what Jesus must be for THEM
If you're right in that regard, God is interpreted in different ways but even then those representations feel more genuine (you know, from people who actually read the Bible, go to church and respect the values of their religion) and not what whatever the crazy fandoms do who treat God not as what he is, but as a fun fictional character to whom they can put all the changes they want.That's what everyone does though. Every religion does this. Hell, different preachers in churches near each other will characterize Jesus differently. He's a symbol more than anything and using his face to preach whatever you agree with is the whole point.
If you go looking through the posts of these people you'll rarely find anything THAT wrong with them. They often emphasize the "love and compassion" parts of Jesus, or look for a more human angle of him a la Jesus Christ Superstar.
To me it reads rather inoffensive if not a little silly. I do think these people are actually more likely to come from religious families and trying to reconcile their new more woke beliefs with a big part of their life. I come from a majority catholic country and people who don't become edgy atheists frequently engage in this behavior. Probably because it feels safer to do so away from organized religion.
Other than that, interpretation and representation of these stories has always been a thing people do. Bible fanart has always been a thing, it's just that people who did it used to be classically trained + cripplingly afraid of going to hell.
Now they just have digital art tablets and are afraid of le big bad bigots who are going to kill them.
It's the same autism, really.
He's not wrong, but he doesn't know the difference between art made by actual gays and art made by straight women. That art style just screams fujo.
How can you tell the difference?He's not wrong, but he doesn't know the difference between art made by actual gays and art made by straight women. That art style just screams fujo.
Real fags never draw uwu shit, and most definitely not in that highly-recognizable tumblr art style. The most inoffensive true gay art you will encounter is bara (reenforcing the "/fit/ is gay" meme) while at the other end of the spectrum you'll find the most foul fetishes that are generally male-dominated (furry, body odor, diapers, scat). I would say the most obvious difference is the presence or absence of tranny self-insertion (mastectomy scars, pride flags, etc.).How can you tell the difference?