Why do we put so much stock into loli/underaged characters as a direct link to being a pedo?

[rel=alternate]

Disclaimer : I have not read the thread, but fuck that it's always the same.

Inb4 you're a pedo for even asking the question, but it just seems like such a weird disconnect between how the rest of media is handled. If you want to call it creepy, you're absolutely right. It is. It's just not a 1:1 link with a person who would commit horrific crimes.
Violent media does not make you violent.
Watching porn of adult characters does not make you a rapist
Watching crude humor does not make you sexist
But if you watch or consume loli you absolutely have to be a pedophile. No questions asked, even asking this question means you're defending pedos.

I guess I woke up today and chose violence but it just doesn't make sense. And even though you won't believe me, I have never watched loli or even seen pictures of it by my own choice.

You've been here since 2019 and somehow missed all the retarded debate thread on this subject or do you think there is somehow something people missed before?

I don't even want to argue, because I honestly don't need to. But the movie argument is so disingenuous and you know it, but still use it.

If I watch a movie, there is an intent there. I want to distract myself. And the way I want to do it determines the movie I watch. If I feel like it, I'll watch a slasher. And it's not because I want to kill people, it's because I need this degree of excitation to get my adrenaline rush in my couch.

If I watch porn, it's to masturbate. And what I masturbate to is women I want to fuck. There is no other purpose.

Watching porn of adult characters means you have a sexual desire for them, you would fuck them given the opportunity. Draw your own conclusions retard.

And if you try to tell me that you can jerk to porn with a partner but will never cheat as some kind of parallel, like it's all the same fantasy, you can fuck right off. At the end of the day, it's still a fantasy about fucking kids, no matter how you look or act on it.

 

[Null]

gonna be honest i did not expect this many people to be on my side. again, pardon my ignorance, I thought most people agree with Null's "All lolicons are pedos" bit.

it is just a retarded drawing in the image of a sexy child, and so what

Rethink your position, moron.

 

[SenutiSolidus]

I just need more proof than a chan board connecting the two concepts, Null.

 

[WelperHelper99]

I just need more proof than a chan board connecting the two concepts, Null.

What proof? Without fail, if you have loli on your computer, you've probably touched a kid. Look at the sex offender registry, news reports. All pedophiles deserve a shotgun blast to the mouth, no exceptions

 

[Luke-Warm Tampon Tea]

I think there's a mistake there, Being a lolicon is quite a bit different as the intent is to focus on child like characters, that's where I have a hard time believing the person isn't a pedo. If they're self-identifying that sounds even worse. Someone looking at furry porn or hentai isn't instantly a furry, someone calling themselves a furry and obsessed with it, well it doesn't look good such as in the accusation of zoophile/beastiality. Same too I would argue in this accusation.

I think there's a clear distinction.

I think another point to be made is basic character design, obviously I'm not talking about the pornography that gets drawn, but characters in anime or video games; the character that popped into my head was Etna from Disgaea. I think the medium itself necessitates certain character designs appearing a certain way.
I think it would be very strange to see a 30 year old, mature, big booba'd woman portrayed as a carefree, devious, demon. I think a lot of times characters need to look the way the audience or player would expect based on their character traits. A big booba, maybe weather worn, slightly tired character would read as a motherly or maternal character, or the calm, down to earth, sort of intuitive, highly invested sideline character.
The boisterous, loud, hyperactive, comedic relief character is not going to make sense looking like a buff, athletic, muscular boobgirl who would be the sardonic, cynical, adventurous quippy one-liner character.
and I'd say being a fan of a specific character type doesn't necessarily translate being a pedophile

 

[UERISIMILITUDO]

Without fail, if you have loli on your computer, you've probably touched a kid.

Come now, that's just basic thoughtcrime by that point. Should artistic depictions of murdering politicians be banned, because they may inspire real life violence?

Personally, I'd treat these laws much more seriously if the US government weren't full of Satan-worshipping pedophiles who fuck, kill, and eat children.

 

[WelperHelper99]

Come now, that's just basic thoughtcrime by that point. Should artistic depictions of murdering politicians be banned, because they may inspire real life violence?

Personally, I'd treat these laws much more seriously if the US government weren't full of Satan-worshipping pedophiles who kill and eat children.

Apples and oranges. You can't unfuck a kid, and you can't unfuck your brain once you goon to lolicon. Shotgun mouthwash at that point is the only cure. Also your stance is beyond reprehensible. The law is perfectly fine no matter who's at the top. Stop deflecting.

 

[CumDumpster]

It's an attempt to remove various degrees of separation between harmfully taboo fetishes and the socially acceptable ones.

Spoiler: exemplars

Loli/Shota/Bishoujo types don't like 'Democrat activism', neon-haired dykes not liking anime because of smug anime girls sending them into conniption fits, the negative reaction towards that 'DigifAI' project, Homosexuals dislike vanilla/missionary sex, Furry/Beastiality connoisseurs not jiving with kemono/monster-girls.

Those that enjoy fetishes that hurt people and are ten-degrees removed from normalcy can't get their rocks off that easily when the are more socially acceptable alternatives only 1 or 2 degrees removed from the norm.
In short, 3D pigs have a visceral reaction towards more ideal stimuli since what excites 3D pigs involves hurting others or just being outcasts.

 

[SenutiSolidus]

Apples and oranges. You can't unfuck a kid, and you can't unfuck your brain once you goon to lolicon. Shotgun mouthwash at that point is the only cure. Also your stance is beyond reprehensible. The law is perfectly fine no matter who's at the top. Stop deflecting.

why are anti lolicons so violent?

 

[WelperHelper99]

why are anti lolicons normal people like uncles so violent?

FTFY. I'm not a fan of predators.

 

[Zoobles]

I'm not sure what you mean by "consume loli media," whether it has to be porn/suggestive or not, but if not, I would say that Beatrice from Re:Zero is one of the most interesting and well written characters in the show, but also the least sexually appealing, so I don't think one would be a paedo for just watching Re:Zero.

 

[UERISIMILITUDO]

Apples and oranges.

So is comparing rape and masturbation like this.

You can't unfuck a kid, and you can't unfuck your brain once you goon to lolicon.

Sure, but masturbation hardly warrants death like this. I swear, so many of you people want to stomp out degeneracy, but accept faggots because that was the brainwashing during your childhoods.

Also your stance is beyond reprehensible. The law is perfectly fine no matter who's at the top. Stop deflecting.

Don't misunderstand me. My point was that the laws are mostly to weaponize a form of information, so that people can be imprisoned easily. With the way the laws are written, I can have video evidence of a politician fucking a child, and go to prison for owning that evidence. CP regularly gets posted on small websites in an attempt to have them brought down.

 

[SenutiSolidus]

I'm not entirely sure if anyone else will agree with this, but the fact that Jim Metokur has defended people who enjoy loli in the past but Ross and other pedos were the only thing that genuinely drew his rage is enough for me. Jim was unironically my childhood hero.

 

[Mewtwo_Rain]

I think another point to be made is basic character design, obviously I'm not talking about the pornography that gets drawn, but characters in anime or video games; the character that popped into my head was Etna from Disgaea. I think the medium itself necessitates certain character designs appearing a certain way.
I think it would be very strange to see a 30 year old, mature, big booba'd woman portrayed as a carefree, devious, demon. I think a lot of times characters need to look the way the audience or player would expect based on their character traits. A big booba, maybe weather worn, slightly tired character would read as a motherly or maternal character, or the calm, down to earth, sort of intuitive, highly invested sideline character.
The boisterous, loud, hyperactive, comedic relief character is not going to make sense looking like a buff, athletic, muscular boobgirl who would be the sardonic, cynical, adventurous quippy one-liner character.
and I'd say being a fan of a specific character type doesn't necessarily translate being a pedophile

Althought you weren't talking of pornography I'd bring up in regards to this topic characters that are multi-formed. As in something like Wolf's Rain. The wolves have a human form. However if someone was a hentai-fanatic and looking up the wolf form I'd believe the concept of being a furry in that notion.

If a character per se has an adult form and child form and people are looking up a child form to get their rocks off again I'd agree it's the same issue as above.

I don't think being a fan of a character like Etna makes one a lolicon, if one is a lolicon and a fan of Etna then there's an issue.

 

[Luke-Warm Tampon Tea]

why are anti lolicons so violent?

Read between the lines.
Since this is all representative fiction and not real life, what she's actually mad about is anything that represents humanistic elements that she no longer possesses like: vitality, femininity, enthusiasm, a carefree demeanor, submissiveness, curiosity, respect for others, an unmarred, unspoiled body, an untainted mind.
When she says

Shotgun mouthwash at that point is the only cure. Also your stance is beyond reprehensible.

what she's really saying is "I don't like that men look at things I can never live up because I traded my fertility and innocence for a 9 to 5 and stretchmarks" and her projecting her own suicidal ideation onto others.

 

[WelperHelper99]

So is comparing rape and masturbation like this.

Masturbating to loli leads to child rape. Sex offender registry bitch.

Sure, but masturbation hardly warrants death like this. I swear, so many of you people want to stomp out degeneracy, but accept faggots because that was the brainwashing during your childhoods.

Who the fuck says I like gay people? All of it is heresy

Don't misunderstand me. My point was that the laws are mostly to weaponize a form of information, so that people can be imprisoned easily. With the way the laws are written, I can have video evidence of a politician fucking a child, and go to prison for owning that evidence. CP regularly gets posted on small websites in an attempt to have them brought down.

Bitch the police won't imprison you if you show them you have proof of criminal acts, that's their job numb nuts.

 

[WelperHelper99]

Read between the lines.
Since this is all representative fiction and not real life, what she's actually mad about is anything that represents humanistic elements that she no longer possesses like: vitality, femininity, enthusiasm, a carefree demeanor, submissiveness, curiosity, respect for others, an unmarred, unspoiled body, an untainted mind.
When she says

what she's really saying is "I don't like that men look at things I can never live up because I traded my fertility and innocence for a 9 to 5 and stretchmarks" and her projecting her own suicidal ideation onto others.

....

....

....
I'm a man retard.

 

[SSj_Ness (Yiffed)]

If you want to call it creepy, you're absolutely right. It is. It's just not a 1:1 link with a person who would commit horrific crimes.

Okay, but it's still bad and should be banned because it may cultivate the desire to actually commit horrific crimes in some people. You can't justify its existence, it is a net negative for society.

Watching porn of adult characters does not make you a rapist

Rape porn shouldn't exist either. Perhaps not everyone who faps to rape porn is a rapist, but I guarantee every rapist loves rape porn. It's likely similar with loli, even if it's not a perfect comparison.

And even though you won't believe me, I have never watched loli or even seen pictures of it by my own choice.

It wouldn't change anything even if you did or not, either loli is good or bad independent of your engagement with it, and you've not substantiated a sufficient defense of it.

 

[Luke-Warm Tampon Tea]

Masturbating to loli leads to child rape. Sex offender registry bitch.

Just like playing doom leads to school shootings and smoking weed makes you leave your baby in the oven.

....

....

....
I'm a man retard.

Not until you stop letting your emotions dictate your behavior, miss.

 

[UERISIMILITUDO]

Masturbating to loli leads to child rape. Sex offender registry bitch.

I disagree. The criminalization of information starts with something no one wants to defend; then people want to expand it from there, as we see; and eventually we live in Great Britain, where police beat down our doors for mocking trannies.

Who the fuck says I like gay people? All of it is heresy

I'm glad we agree on that. Many users here are inconsistent in this respect.

Bitch the police won't imprison you if you show them you have proof of criminal acts, that's their job numb nuts.

A teenager was arrested for having naked photographs of himself. People have been arrested for having photographs of their own children in a bathtub. Meanwhile, I'm still waiting to see Epstein's client list.