Newsflash: humans are living beings that have bodies. Half of these humans, due to their bodies and ability to give birth, have faced oppression by the other half since the dawn of civilization. And this is no exaggeration: The oldest laws recorded in Sumerian texts had misogyny in them, declaring that a woman who is involved in infidelity should be killed (but when men do it, they just have to pay a fine for ruining some man's woman—his property), and that high priestesses were forbidden from having vaginal sex so they had to take it up the ass instead because despite their celibacy they still had to be sexually available.
Guess how ancient people from all over the world, far predating the infamously misogynistic Greeks that libfems love to criticize, figured out who their gender-specific laws should affect?
Libfems falsely equate the statement "men are physically stronger than women and women can give birth, which is why men have oppressed women" with "men are better than women", but that's not what that means. It is a statement where neither physical strength nor the ability to give birth are given values. Because physical strength alone is not a virtue if the only thing it is used for is destruction. The ability to literally create another human is not in itself a burden, but misogyny turns every trait that can be associated with females (when demonstrated by females) into something perceived as a weakness, something utterly passive that deserves to be exploited.
And whenever libfems fail to understand why the physical differences between males and females are the root of misogyny and believe that pointing this out is the same as saying that women are inferior, they unknowingly display their own misogyny by reducing womanhood to some ethereal essence, a collection of socially-constructed stereotypes that cannot be measured yet is accessible to anyone (yet troons themselves feel free to exclude others from it by saying "TERFs aren't women").
Pointing out that women's oppression stems first and foremost from their biology is not objectification, it is pointing out that they are objectified. Not every woman is feminine, or empathetic, or patient, or pretty, or has breasts, or capable of reproduction, or interested in reproduction, or even looks or behave like what society expects a woman to, but they still face the same expectations and societal pressure as those who are because their sex is female. Sex is not legos; it is the sum of its parts, which is why even if there were a hypothetical TiM who passes perfectly in both appearance and behavior, he is still a male and does not experience the same things that a woman does.