My big issue with Hillary is that her personal stance and her Supreme Court picks are people who want to repeal Heller vs. DC; i.e. establishing (finally) that firearm ownership is a constitutional right.
I care a lot less about gay marriage than I do about the Bill of Rights being openly attacked.
I agree with you right there.
I don't even give a shit about heterosexual marriage. What I do give shits about is Trump not liking the migrants and being more blunt than the others.
I know it comes off as as selfish and cold, but the environment, lbgt issues, and all such are much, much, much less important than being flooded with an army of rapists and a possible an US war with Russia that would leave the whole Europe in ruins.
Trump won't put gays in camps. Trump won't put enough of a dent in the environment to matter, China has been doing that for ages so if you are a treehugger go bark at them. Get it, bark?
I'm not sure what the idea is, is it to break up the Eurozone because it may be a future threat as an economic superpower? Or is it something more along the lines of
the Hooten plan?
I am pretty sure its the former. Muslim immigrants are unruly and not really good subjects. The local whites are just better and more productive comrades under Russian guns and less likely to revolt, do terrorism and more likely to work.
Plus Germany is not really a threat to Russia in a military sense anymore.
So I feel that these two factors combined with Putin's pragmatic outlook would lead to him simply wanting the EU broken up.
He can move in and offer "protection" to the weaker eastern/southern states, and maybe thus conquer them or bring them under his power without even the need for a politically troublesome military intervetion.
Hillary winning and helping Merkel would play right into his hand by driving the non-west parts of Europe straight into Putin's arms.
Trump winning would mean better relations between US and Russia and thus Putin would have more diplomatic options in getting what he wants with Eu, like better trade deals.
In both instances, Putin gains an advantage.
But if the migrants flood Europe and they are not controlled, it will become a wasteland. Industry and science would began to stagnate, and the population would be much harder to control for him. He could just kill them all and flood the area with Russians, but such a plan would be very inefficient and time and energy and money consuming.
I can see no reason why he would go after this route, if the former above yields better results with barely any effort required on Russia's part.
