Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Oh my actual fucking god....

View attachment 5755967

For reference here is the vid and.....jesus fucking christ i actually cringed in pain
View attachment 5755968

I mean.....the fuck I even need to say?

Is fat straight up trolling us now and making "my wife dreams of getting railed by large black men on the daily and im fine with that" jokes just to screw with our heads?!

because if so its fucking working
He projects so much that even Niki is subject to his fantasies. He thinks that just because he lusts after that particular player, everyone else does as well including his dear wife. This is evident at even a cursory glance of his Xitter timeline. In his mind, he is always right.
 
When you really think about it, this situation is just so insane. For all of us, looking and laughing at Fatrick is something you just do in your spare time, catching up and having a laugh at an idiot. But for him, this is his entire life, every second of it. Could you genuinely imagine what it's like to be this fat pig, seething and xeeting every second of every day?
 
When you really think about it, this situation is just so insane. For all of us, looking and laughing at Fatrick is something you just do in your spare time, catching up and having a laugh at an idiot. But for him, this is his entire life, every second of it. Could you genuinely imagine what it's like to be this fat pig, seething and xeeting every second of every day?

And the ironic thing about it all is that Patrick says the opposite - "this is all these people do. It's all they have; it's all they think about". The thought that he's just an early 40s guy who's being bullied like he was in high school by people who are more successful than him now as they were back then is just unbearable to him. So he has to imagine everyone who taunts him as the incel stereotype because it's the only way his brain won't implode.

Also it'd be remiss of him not to mention that he's quite portly.
 
Oh my actual fucking god....

View attachment 5755967

For reference here is the vid and.....jesus fucking christ i actually cringed in pain
View attachment 5755968

I mean.....the fuck I even need to say?

Is fat straight up trolling us now and making "my wife dreams of getting railed by large black men on the daily and im fine with that" jokes just to screw with our heads?!

because if so its fucking working
At this point, I think Pat just has a humiliation fetish. This is all some bizarre kink. Like the "enjoy prison" is some sort of S&M thing for him.
 
STOP REPLYING YOU FAT RETARD.png


FOR THE LOVE OF GOD JUST STOP FUCKING REPLYING YOU MORBIDLY ROTUND MONGOLOID
 
View attachment 5756327

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD JUST STOP FUCKING REPLYING YOU MORBIDLY ROTUND MONGOLOID
No stalker child, it is you who should stop xeeting about me. Enjoy prison





Oh my actual fucking god....

View attachment 5755967

For reference here is the vid and.....jesus fucking christ i actually cringed in pain
View attachment 5755968

I mean.....the fuck I even need to say?

Is fat straight up trolling us now and making "my wife dreams of getting railed by large black men on the daily and im fine with that" jokes just to screw with our heads?!

because if so its fucking working
I didn't realize Eric Thames was one of the african american men who have farted into Fatrick's wife's vagina
 
View attachment 5756327

FOR THE LOVE OF GOD JUST STOP FUCKING REPLYING YOU MORBIDLY ROTUND MONGOLOID
When I first started paying attention to him that was my first thought as well. I was just completely befuddled at how he would talk about every swatting, respond to every comment on twitter (and goodreads), and just waste his time and life engaging with people that were trolling him as hard as possible.

Eventually I understood it: the man is insane, simple as. IDK if they buck broke his brain, or if he always had these traits, but there is something (multiple somethings, really) wrong with him and it's pretty hilarious how it manifests.
 
Ok after hearing those snippets on the youtube playlist I decided to finally crack open the Bunnahabhain and listen to the pre-bitchtits Josiah calls

Your post got me wondering if the Josiah Tape transcripts were in this thread anywhere and I couldn't find them. Not using that search term anyway. I apologize if this is redundant but they are one of the funniest things I have ever listened to, and reading them is almost as funny. Full credit to the other forum, this is all their work, and it's amazing.

TAPE 1​

Disclaimer: Some sniffs and snorts have been removed for brevity.

[00:00]

P: This is Patrick, how can I help you

J: Hey Patrick, this is Josiah from Huffing Post. How are ya?

P: Yes sir, I’m well. Thanks for calling

J: Well, thanks for taking the time. Before we start, I just want to let you know this is being recorded, however, um, this recording will not be released to the public in any way.

P: Uh hum(heavy breathing)

J: We’re just going to use it as a reference

P: I understand. I’ve done a few of these now

J: Okay, well I apologize then if some of these questions are a bit repetitive, but my first

P: No, I expect I’ll be going through the story more than once (laughs0

[1:00]

J: Ok. Alright then, my first question to you is “How has this group of people on the internet, on O&A forums affected your life outside of the internet. Let’s start there.

P: Well I mean, immensely. They’ve come to my house. They’ve videotaped themselves trespassing on my property in order to intimidate us. They’ve vandalized both our home and my motorcycle in just y’know the last couple of weeks here. They’ve left graffiti around my neighborhood within places they know I walk in between, knowing that I’ll see it.

They harass local business that they know I frequent trying to harass and annoy and intimidate the owners into making it too difficult to do business with me and ban me from the premises. They’ve impersonated female members of my gym and through anonymous emails accused me of taking spy shots of women while they were working out, hoping to get my banned from gym.

[2:00]

They have gone to uh.. cos I’ve done some work for the science channel as a contributor and they have gone to discovery channel and left anonymous false reports that I’ve sexually harassed female cast members or crewmembers while I was visiting the studios, which of course never occurred because all of the stuff was done remotely and I’ve never visited the Discovery studios in LA

Uh, you know I had to have a long conversation with one of Discovery’s lawyers about y’know because she needed to clear these accusations off her to-do sheet.

[3:00]

And I had to have a conversation like the one I’m about to have with you, with her, explaining the situation. No females associated with Discovery have ever had any complaints about me because I’ve never actually met one. (laughs) You know trying to get me kicked off that recurring television gig that I’ve had for a couple of years now.

They have sent death threats to my publishers, um.. yknow and fake reports about my behavior, non-existent misbehavior at conventions trying to get publishers to drop me and cancel my book contracts, or refuse to renew new book contracts.

[4:00]

They text me harassment every single day. They email me harassment almost every single day. They have sent fake food orders defrauding local restaurants to my house almost every single day. They have twice sent the police to our house, using fake police reports, um, including one episode that I would definitely categorize as SWATTING because at 11 o clock, 11:30 at night on a Thursday during Lockdown I answered the door just in my bathrobe to two uniformed police officers of Milwaukee County, or Milwaukee City with their hands on their guns demanding that I tell them where the children are!

J: (disbelief) Oh my god

P: These are – and this is not a full account. They harass.

[5:00]

They text and leave voice mails. They leave voice mails every day. I’ve gotten two voicemails today from “Unknown Email Server”, like a Text-To-Email server thing demanding that I go “Brush my piss yellow teeth”.

My family gets getting inundated with texts. My wife’s siblings keep getting texts, saying y’know “We have photographic evidence of Patrick cheating on Nikki and she should divorce him immediately.

Or the opposite. Texting my mother-in-law saying that your daughter is a whore and she loves giving bukkake by a circle of N-words. All. The Time. Non-stop for three years. It has never let up. It has never relented

J: Okay

[6:00]

P: And that’s not the online stuff, because you asked specifically about offline. And the online stuff is just as bad in some ways. And in some cases, even more damaging

J: Right. I definitely want to get into everything you just mentioned. One of the things you said is that they don’t just go after you. They go after businesses that you frequent. They go after your friends and family. They go after female acquaintances

P: They go after my colleagues in the science fiction and fantasy publishing industry. They’ve gone after reviewers who’ve left positive reviews of my books. They go after my twitter followers who say supportive things, or make it sound like they’re in my corner with all of this. They dox people. They’ve doxxed dozens upon dozens of people

[7:00]

Um, and then proceeded to text and try and intimidate them. They have found a good friend of mine who’s pretty big in our kind of incestuous little sci-fi community. He’s a photographer, and he’s a reviewer and he’s very well liked, and he’s completely harmless. And he deals with, and he struggles with depression and suicidal ideations, and of course they text him demanding that he kill himself.

J: Has this um…

P: (interrupting)

J: I’m sorry go ahead

P: And you know that’s on top of all the death threats they send me and all the rape threats they’ve sent to my wife. All the times they demanded that I kill myself. Um yknow. This is just constant. Unending

J: Yeah. Has this strained your relationship with any of these people? Is there anybody who’s told you “Patrick, I think you’re a great person. I’d love to work with you, but I’m sorry I can’t handle it”

P: Oh Yes. Of course. And I wish them well. And I don’t want this for anyone. I’ve been blocked on twitter and other platforms by people who see it coming and just don’t want anything to do with it. I can’t confirm, but I’m pretty certain I’ve been blocked by people who have fallen for it when some of these people have impersonated me in one way or another.

These are important people in my industry. We haven’t seen each other at a convention in 18 months now, since a lot of this has been happening. I haven’t had the opportunity for them to see me in person and come to me and say “WTF are you emailing me” and I go “No, that’s not what’s going on here.”

That’s usually where we reconnect and air out all our grievances but we haven’t had that personal connection for over a year and a half now. And the first opportunity I’ll have to see if I’m right about any of these folks, that I suspect that I am, having, through no fault of their own, fallen for exactly what these people want them to fall for. It’s not until December of the next Worldcon.

[9:30]

J: So some of these people actually fall for the impersonations and that sort of thing and then other people, they know its fake. They know its trolling but they still don’t want to associate with you because it’s just not worth it. Would you say that’s an accurate characterisation?

P: Not on my end at the very least. Not in a place where these cyberstalkers are actively trying to harvest the next victims

J: Right…

P: We’d see each other at convention or a book signing or something and there’d be no issue. We’d be sitting around in a bar having a few beers. Then there’s no issue. And it’s made it difficult for me. I want to be able to show my support to up and coming authors. I want to be able to show my support to reviewers and readers, and I want to show my support for-

And that’s what you do. You help to promote each other. You help to lift each other up. And now everytime I do, there’s that little gremlin at the back of my head going “Am I going to be [inaudible] the wrath of these fucking sociopaths on this completely innocent unsuspecting person

[11:00]

J: Yeah… So you said you were Swatted by these people. Can you give a little bit more background on when this happened and what they told the police to show up at your ouse?

P: It was last June. Milwaukee was still in lockdown

J: In 2020, correct?

P: What’s that? In 2020. So yeah, June 2020. Sorry, not two months ago, but June 2020. I would have to look up the exact date cos I don’t remember it off the top of my head. I’m pretty sure it was a Thursday night, and what had happened was that one of these people went onto Milwaukee’s local Craigslist page, and created a fake ad using my real name, using my real home address, using my real telephone number, and my real email address. These are things they’ve doxxed amongst themselves for 3 years now, used in all sorts of abusive ways.

[12:00]

But they created a fake Craigslist ad pretending to me offering up free sausage and pepperoni that i had made in my basement out of the bodies of black children I had kidnapped from the neighborhood

J:(disbelief) What the fuck..

P: And then..

J:(disbelief) I’m sorry..

P: No you heard me correctly, heh

J: Okay, where did they get that from? Is that like um..

P: They think grinding black children up into sausage is hilarious. It’s a recurring joke with them

[Transcriber’s note: But it is hilarious]

J: Do you know why it’s a recurring joke with them

P: (serious) Because they are terrorists and sociopaths who need to be put to death. That’s why. These are the worse people on the face of the planet. They are utterly remorseless. They are utterly amoral. They are racists. They’re white supremacists. They’re transphobic. They’re homophobic. They’re antisemitic. They are fascist Nazis. Every last one of them.

[13:00]

They are insane. They’re delusional. They’re obsessed. They have no redeeming qualities of any sort.

J: So…

P: They have no mercy. They have no remorse. They think cruelty is the funniest thing in the world. They have no sense of humor. They only have a sense of inflicting pain on strangers. That’s it. That’s their entire reason for existence. They do nothing else. They think about nothing else. They talk about nothing else. This is the whole… their whole lives revolve around this. I wish I was exaggerating anything I just said.

J: So… let me just get this correct. Somebody, I imagine, Hey let me come up with the absolute worst act that I can possibly thinking of. Kidnapping African-American children

[14:00]

And then doing what you just said… grinding them into sausage and that’s pretty much how it originated? There’s no reference or anything? They just thought let me think of the worst possible thing I can think of and then go on Craigslist and accuse this person of doing that. Is that inaccurate?

P: Correct

J: Okay, and then what happened. Somebody posted that on Craigslist and then…?

P: Someone posted it on Craigslist and then one of them – I’ve never been able to figure out who. But one of them, maybe the same person who posted the fake ad. O maybe one of the other members of this cyberterrorism group working in concert with the person who placed the ad. Then anonymously sent a tip into the Milwaukee police saying “Hey my god you’ve got a serial killer over on Oakland avenue”

J: I’m sorry, so you know the person who sent the tip in was an anonymous person from this group? It wasn’t just a concerned citizen who went on Craigslist and saw this ad.

P: The ad was not up for long enough to have been anybody but them. Only they would have known about it

J: Oh wow… Ok.

P: Because of the fact that they used my email address in the creation of the account that led to.. that they used in order to make the ad. And so I got an alert the second the ad was about to go up, and once I got that alert I contacted Craigslist. The ad was up for maybe 5 minutes. In Craigslist defence they did everything right. Their moderation team was on top of it immediately and it was not up long enough for anybody to do anything about it. Only they knew about it.

[16:00]

J: Okay, realistically speaking nobody really saw this. This was a manufactured swatting thing

P: This was a way for them to get around the anti-swatting laws. In the few jurisdictions which actually have anti-swatting laws almost all of them are specific in saying that in order to be guilty of swatting you have to call and impersonate somebody who is in a hostage situation.

J: Right, that makes sense what you’re saying. You can just post something that somebody else would call the police

P: They know goddamned well that what they were doing was swatting

J: Technically yeah…

P: They knew goddamned well that what they were doing was swatting. What they were trying to do was to get the police to assassinate me on my own porch. That’s what they were trying to do. And they protected themselves against the few laws that are on the books by using this little work around

J: Right. Okay, so somebody from there calls the police. Can you tell us what happens next?

P: (sniff) As I said, at about 11:30 at night or so, two Milwaukee police department officers showed up on my porch. My wife and I had been binge watching something and going through some bourbon because it was lock down and there isn’t a helluva lot else was there to do on a Thursday night?

And so (snort) I answered the door with a buzz going not really expecting the police, not really knowing what to expect at all, to find two hot head idiot officers with their hands on their guns, shouting in my face, demanding to know where the children are. Where are the bodies? What have you done? And I’m like who the fuck are you, what the fuck are you talking about? Come back with a warrant.

[18:00]

And the confrontation escalated to the point that my wife had to step in and go “Ok, you testosterone soaked idiots aren’t listening to each other. We are being stalked. This is a fake report. And she led them away and had a more deescalated conversation with them. Because I was about to fucking punch somebody in the throat. You don’t just show up to my door and accuse me of killing children. Like what the fuck. I don’t care if you’ve got a gun on you or not.

J: I mean, that’s a sort of second-by-second life or death interaction. How are you going to quickly explain to these people that you’ve been stalked for three years, and um…?

P: Well, it had been two at that point, but there simply isn’t any way to.

[19:00]

I mean, these guys are already there jacked up, thinking they were going to get a you know, that they were going to get a huge bust.

J: Yeah

P: And so.. yeah

And then they left, um, and I immediately called dispatch, and I’m sure that call is recorded somewhere. I immediately called dispatch and I was like “WHAT. THE. FUCK. WAS THAT”.

Heh. Y’know, really demanding answers. And then um… their supervisor later that evening, actually within about half hour. I mean, he was very attentive. He called me back, and we talked for a good hour about the whole situation. And he opened a case number. He opened an investigation. But being just a local city wide police department their resources and tech abilities are quite limited. They don’t have an unlimited budget for these sorts of things.

[20:00]

And since none of these people, to be the best of our knowledge, live in Milwaukee they don’t have jurisdiction over them anyway.

J: Oh, so even if they find out who did this, if they live outside of Milwaukee you’re saying there’s nothing they can really do.

P: The Milwaukee PD would have to transfer the evidence and case to the local police departments where the people live, and it would be up to that police department whether they wanted to pursue charges.

J: Did the police indicate to you whether they were going to pursue that, or y’know

P: They attempted to but you know, you’re dealing with anonymous accounts that was created using falsified email address, falsified phone number. Or stolen email address or phone number I should say. You could subpoena Craigslist if you want but they’re hiding behind a VPN.

[21:00]

So like, how many (snort)… They’re using burner emails so you need like-.

Even if the local police are invested in doing something about it, like say I’d been killed or grievously wounded and now they have a public relations disaster on their hands and they want to actually pursue it. You still need to turn it into a federal case in order to get the kinds of resources you need to prosecute across state lines.

J: Yeah… I see what you’re saying. Do you think maybe this one incident, if its sort of like an isolated incident they might not really be willing to go forward with using too many police resources

[22:00]

What do you think that these people have to do-

P: Oh but it wasn’t isolated. There were two other incidents where the police were sent to my house because of anonymous false reports filed by these people. Last November there’s an establishment, one of the local businesses that these people have been harassing for a year and a half. It’s a pub and restaurant called Hooligans, maybe four blocks from my house. They had a house. The fire was ruled an accident – it wasn’t like arson or anything. This group because they so obsessively track everything about me, and ever facet of my life, they knew within half an hour that Hooligans had a fire. And so, they sent anonymous tips into Milwaukee police department saying that I cased the fire.

J: Unbelievable

P: That I was seen running away within moments after the fire started. And so again, at about 10 o’clock at night, police show up to my door questioning me. They were much less confrontational this time because they have it on their record that these sorts of things are occurring.

And the police have come out after death threats were filed. That was more of a wellness check sort of thing. Yeah, my publisher Tor books got an anonymous email from one of them, 18 months, 20 months ago, I’d have to look it up. Saying “Hey just so you know I’m going to be murdering one of your authors at Summerfest today”

J: Oooohhhhh

[24:00]

P: I’ve already kidnapped his lesbian wife, and so yeah, my publisher reported that to the New York police department and then the NY police department contacted the Milwaukee police department and I had a officer out on my porch to make sure I was ok and Nikki hadn’t been kidnapped

J: Wow. What would you say is the status of these… I mean, I guess it’s pretty hard to do anything. They filed a police reported, opened a case, in case one of them was dumb enough to dox themselves or something.

P: Pretty much, yeah. That’s about where its at

J: There’s really nothing else they can do is there?

P: Not the local police no, but I continue to collect the evidence. I continue to save and screenshot every time they text me, every time they email me. I’ve saved all the voicemails, and this is all available. There’s thousands and thousands of them by now

[25:00]

J: Yeah, I can imagine

P: Just thousands of thousands of them

J: I just wanted to shift gears a little bit. I know that you filed a lawsuit, a civil suit against them in January of this year. Is this correct?

P: Yes

J: This started in 2018. What made you decide to finally take legal action against these people?

P: Because nothing else was working. They weren’t letting up. They weren’t getting the hints. The police both local and federal seemed either unable, or in the case of the FBI, uninterested. We were talking to an FBI agent about this last year, and she agreed that blatant criminal activity had occurred. These people could be charged with conspiracy or cyberstalking.

[26:00]

A number of other crimes. It didn’t yet rise to the level of seriousness that the Bureau would commit resources to. Not that she was unsympathetic, but she was saying I would not be able to get approval for this. Let me know when they’ve stolen more than a quarter million dollars or somebody has been killed.

J: Wow. So wait until somebody gets killed before they

P: Yes. Wait until they kill me – then I can open a case against them.

J: Wow. Alright. Well, how did your lawyers react when you explained this to them. Had they ever seen this sort of thing before, or was this

P: Not nearly to this extent. In fact, I dare so nobody has ever seen anything like this. Not to this extent. Not that other people haven’t faced months sometimes years of cyberharassment. That happens all the time and it’s a real and growing problem

[27:00]

But the simply clinical obsession that these people have with me is not something that anybody else has really seen. There’s certainly people out there that have had “A” stalker. Like an ex or something. And some of those cases have been extreme and gone on for years, and sometimes decades. But this gang stalking, this “Hey we’re just going to form a community of like-minded cyberstalkers who will randomly pick a person with the intention of trying to destroy their life and drive them to kill themselves, which is their stated, public goal. They’ve said publicly and proudly that the purpose of all of this is to destroy my career, ruin my marriage and drive me to kill myself.

[28:00]

That’s what every thing they’ve done to me and to my family and to my friends and to my colleagues is driving towards. They want death. They want to be the cause of a random stranger’s death. That is their ultimate fantasy. And they’re not alone. There’s a website which you may be familiar with, or maybe hopefully not, called Kiwifarms, and there’s an overlap between this group and the user base of Kiwifarms.

And Kiwifarms just a slightly larger, not so hyper focused.. Like they focus on a lot of different people, not just me personally. But that’s what Kiwifarms is. It is a cyberstalking website. It is a community of cyberterrorists and cyberharassers and that’s all they do. The website exists for no purpose.

[29:00]

And they keep a kill count of the people they have driven to kill themselves and they celebrate it.

J: Wow

P: They just had another one a few weeks ago.

J: Yeah, Near?

P: Yeah, it was a really famous, the video game guy emulator guy

J: Yeah, the emulator guy

[Transcriber’s note: No matter, how many times I rewound I could not hear Patrick offer the name of this really famous guy]

P: Yeah, so that is the goal. The only goal they have.

J: Wow, that’s pretty dark to be honest withchya. Did your lawyers tell you that this would be an uphill battle or an open and closed case

P: Oh yes. No, Well, it’s an open and closed case on whether or not crimes have been committed. It’s simply true that these people are criminals.

J: But they have to find themselves first, right

P: But, finding them. Identifying them. That is the uphill battle. And that is the battle that we’re fighting right now, because a lot of the laws governing the internet are 20 years behind and they never envisioned something like this. Privacy laws make this very difficult.

“270” which has been in the news off and on the last couple of years because Trump has been saying he’s going to get rid of 270 so he can sue whoever he wanted, which actually wouldn’t work out the way he thinks it would.

[Transcribers Note: I am not an idiot. He said 270 twice, but meant 230. ]

But yeah, that usually frees platforms from any sort of liability from any content posted by their users which in this case, like in the case of twitter, or facebook. If somebody goes on and posts a video (SNORT) of say the Christchurch shooting. Well that was the individual’s decision and facebook certainly didn’t condone it or know it was going to happen, or leave it up once it was up.

But with OnaForums.net, that website exists exclusively for no other reason than to continue to organise, plan and execute, and then brag about the outcomes of their ongoing terrorist campaign against me and my family. It was created after they got kicked off of reddit, by my efforts. It was created after they’d already been kicked off other servers and other webhosts in both Ireland, sorry Iceland and Russia because those hosts would not allow them to doxx people. Because doxxing is illegal in both the Russian Federation and the EU.

[Transcribers note: Iceland is definitely not in the EU, and scores a 95/100 on Internet Freedom. Posting publicly available personal data such as phone numbers, addresses is not illegal in Russia either]

(Cough)

They had to move four times and now they’ve moved again. Onaforums.net now redirects and they’re all doing their stuff on what is it, new.onaforums.net, .com, I don’t remember I have to look it up. They keep moving as every legitimate website, and every legitimate webhost in the world stops putting up with their bullshit, because their bullshit is not only dangerous. In most cases blatantly illegal.

This is a website created by a cyberstalker specifically to continue the illegal harassment campaign of one person. And yet, their counter side lawyers are arguing they deserve 270 protections

[Transcribers note: I heard it correctly again]

That their privacy and that their anonymity should be protected from me trying to figure out who they are so they can be deposed so we can figure out who the other members who’ve been committing all these crimes are.

J: Mmmm. Now-

P: Which is insane

J: I’m sorry

[33:00]

P: Which is insane. You’re telling the person who is responsible for all this, their privacy is more important than the privacy of mine, and my friends and my family and my colleagues? That they have been violating every single day for a thousand days. It’s insanity.

J: Yeah.

P: It’s insanity that they’re being allowed to argue that in court. It’s insanity.

J: Yeah, and as I understand, they started harassing their lawyer as well. You have several lawyers. Is that correct?

P: I have several and they have harassed every one of them.

J: In what way have they harassed them. Has it been sort of the same thing? Ordering food to their house? Leaving negative reviews on their.. whatever the lawyer equivalent of whatever review site thing?

[34:00]

P: It’s all of the above and I would not, I would respect the privacy of my various lawyers before sharing any of those details, but it is that and it is much more.

J: We’re not going to publish any information about your lawyers. Just so you know that. What sort of financial toll has this legal battle taken on you.

P: (snort)(sniff)

J: As I understand it you filed this in January if I’m not mistaken and they’re making it very difficult because as you said there’s a lot of legal grounds to respect their privacy, even though they’ve completely disrespected yours. How would you

P: We’re currently fighting them in both Wisconsin and California because of the nature of the subpoenas we’ve had to send

[35:00]

And this is not information I would want published, i would like this to be off the record, but as of right now we’re closing in on $100,000 worth of legal expenses, and that’s not including the fact that the person we’re trying to identify – Quasi101, the person that administers and owns the website. He’s incurred over $17,000 worth of legal bills in order to maintain his anonymity.

Even after we offered to keep him anonymous if he would just give his identifying information for the people who we really want. He refused that and he spent $17,000 on it

[Transcribers note: Real Ass Dude]

But the reason he’s done so, is if in California you bring a civil suit or subpoena and it gets quashed, then you automatically owe legal fees for the opposing counsel.

[36:00]

So there’s a very real possibility that if this last set of judges here can’t pull their heads out of their asses and see just how big of a problem this is. If they make a decision against us we’ll owe another 17 grand to the person who’s just been terrorising us every day for the past three fucking years. It’s the most insanely broken thing I’ve ever heard of.

I mean, I’m a boring straight white man whose run-ins with the law has been limited mostly to speeding tickets and parking tickets. I’ve never really experienced the judicial system other than a particularly unwanted divorce about 10 years ago. But you know that was a civil matter. So, the experience that this last

In fact, actually the lawsuit was originally begun in October of last year and it just took until January for them to collect all the evidence that they needed , papers signed and get everything actually submitted and filed. So, I mean we’ve been going on with this for months and months , and it just keeps getting more expensive

(sniff)

And now, it looks like- I mean, I haven’t given up hope but it looks like we’re not going to get the information that we need in order to identify and prosecute these people, and get the injunctive relief that we need to legally order them to stop fucking doing this. But I’m going to have to pay him for the privilege of him running a website dedicated to trying to drive me to kill myself.

J: So there’s a chance that the courts are going to take their side and make you pay them, is what you’re saying?

[38:00]

P: Yes. A very real possibility.

J: That’s unbelievable

P: Yes it is. Certainly not something we thought was even a possibility when we began this.

J: Wow… Wow.

P: And it’s all because we have a judge who’s… Judge Pro Tem in this case who said that after reading through the motions that he went and talked to his adult son, who said “Oh that’s just internet trolling “

J: Awww

P: So you’ve got a judge who doesn’t know fucking dick about the internet. Doesn’t understand the situation at all. Doesn’t understand the severity of it. Thinking its just harmless trolling like everybody goes through, when it actually is it’s fucking cyberterrorism.

[39:00]

J: So it appears that the people who call the shots and make the decisions don’t really understand the issues at hand, is what you’re saying?

P: In this case, not in the least. And he’s not the final judge to oversee this, it’s a different one. He doesn’t actually hear the case until later this month, and we’re hoping that person whomever it maybe will be a little bit more hip to what’s actually going on. And maybe they’ll read the actual goddamned filing

J: Right.. You said, that he had to ask his son. That’s correct. He told you that? Was this during the hearing?

P: He said it right out on the public hearing. Yeah.

J: Well that seems like grounds for appeal

P: Yeah, it really does doesn’t it.

[40:00]

J: If the Judge says I don’t understand the issue, I had to ask my son. I wouldn’t give up.

P: Is your son an expert on internet culture

J: Well, even if he is… and it’s not up to the son, it’s up to the judge. I don’t know.

P: Well then the question there is do we want to appeal. Yes. Could we realistically win an appeal? Yes, we believe so. How many tens of thousands of more dollars are we going to have to spend on that appeal? How many more months of this are going to have to go on? And how many more tens of thousands of dollars is the other guy willing to spend on the appeal process, when he knows that if he wins he gets all that money back.

J: Well did you expect him.. you said he spent over, how much? You said like $17,000 dollars.

P: He is currently $17,000 in the hole, according to his most recent legal filing.

J: Did you expect any of these people to have that money on them. I figure most of these people are not exactly cream of the crop people in terms of their careers. I don’t mean to insult people who don’t have tons of money but

P: Successful people do not behave this way. I am fairly certain this guy has maxxed out a lot of credit cards or taken out some loans or borrowed money from family or something. Most people don’t just have $17,000 lying around for a rainy day in case they want to fight a subpoena. It’s not something that happens

J: Especially, you know somebody who is engaging in this kind of scumbag behavior.

P: I’m having a little difficulty hearing you

J: I’m sorry. Can you hear me now?

P: I can yes.

[42:00]

J: I was just saying, I guess this is a good question for you. If you have a sort of image in your mind, the sort of demographic of these people in terms of what they’re like. If you were to doxx any of the – how do you think they’d be described.

P: Well we’re talking about fans of a shock jock radio show that has been off the air now for 8 or 9 years, so I don’t believe these are necessary bored teenagers down in their parents basement. These are people probably in their late 20s to their mid 40s, all men. Exclusively men. Almost overwhelmingly white

[43:00]

They’re white supremacists. They’re disaffected. They’re dissatisfied. They don’t feel like they have any power or community. While there they were the most hated and feared website on the 5th largest website in the world. And they loved that power, and one of the reasons they hate me SO much is that I took that away from them, after they spent an entire year trying to fuck up my life.

J: You got them banned, is what you’re saying?

P: I got the original /r/opieandanthony as well as dozens of others that popped up permanently banned from reddit.

J: Okay, It really blows my mind that this person just has $17,000 lying around. Did you expect that? Did your lawyers expect that? I figure that most of these people probably work dead end jobs. They’re not exactly really successful people. $17,000 is a lot of money.

P: $17,000 is a ton of money for anybody other than independently wealthy people. You don’t just have that lying around usually. Not without dipping into your 401Ks or other retirement savings, if you’re lucky enough to have that. Which is why I think its very possible that he found a lawyer, and that lawyer told him “Hey, this is a nonsense lawsuit. This is a nuisance lawsuit. Whatever money spend we can take it from them”. I’m pretty sure he’s gone enormously into debt over this. Of course, I have no way of knowing that for certain, but I’m pretty sure he’s put most of this on credit cards, or taken out loans.

[45:00]

Or borrowed money from someone in order to maintain this, with the promise to either himself mentally, or to family or friends or whatever that in a couple of months I’m going to get this all back.

J: Yeah, I can’t think of any other possible explanation either. Yeah.. that’s really a shame.

P: The other possibility is that they’re getting bankrolled by somebody. That’s not outside the realm of possibility.

J: Who do you think they could be getting bankrolled by?

[46:00]

P: There are a number of alt-right websites out there. There’s a number of alt-right provocateurs out there who would be happy to see this sort of thing happening. There’s hardcore 1st Amendment [inaudible] that maybe they could be potentially tapping into. I don’t know. I don’t have any specifics. I certainly don’t have any fingers to point and I believe it’s the least likely scenario. But it is possible.

J: Yeah… I just wanted to shift gears a little bit. I don’t have the tweet in front of me, but I do remember reading that you said something how you were in contact with certain higher ups, certain influential people that might be influencing certain congressmen or congresswomen, to end or limit Section 230, in order to prevent this from happening. Has there been any movement on this happening. Can you tell us if you’ve been talking to anybody.

[47:00]

P: I have been in contact with people, a couple of them out in California, who have some experience with this, who have been around the block on this. And are in contact with , not only their local legislators, but national ones as well. And, actually President Biden as part of his campaign, and part of his platform for President had to put out a very strong statement that our justice department and our administration will be looking at ways to prosecute cyberstalking and cyberterrorism and these sort of crimes.

They’ve obviously been focused on other things since January 6th so y’know, they probably don’t rise to the level of prosecuting the insurrectionists.

[48:00]

But at some point I would like to think that they’d be able to have a conversation with someone whether it be my local Congresspeople or Senator Baldwin for example. I think its still a possibility.

J: I’m sorry, Senator Baldwin is your senator, or representative?

P: Tammy Baldwin is my senator. My other senator is Ron Johnson so he’s less useful than tits on a board.

J: Alright alright. I appreciate all your answers to these questions. I just have one more for you Patrick, and it is “If you could go all the way back to 2018 when this first started happening, and you first got on these people’s radar” what would you do differently in dealing with them?

[49:00]

P: Not a single thing. Not one tweet. Not one text. Nothing. I’d continue to go after them with everything I’ve got for as long as I can until they are done. And until some of them are in prison. And I will not rest. I have done nothing wrong. They picked me randomly.

J: You said they picked you randomly.. Hello?

P: I’m still here.

J: You said you’d done absolutely nothing wrong.

P: I said I would do nothing different whatsoever.

J: Wow

P: I have done nothing wrong at any point. They picked me randomly as a target just as they have done to a dozen other people before they found me, thinking I was just going to be an easy punching bag for a little while, and they were fucking wrong.

[50:00]

J: Mmmhmm. Yeah. Alright, well that’s all the questions I have for you Patrick and I definitely appreciate the time in answering all my questions. That’s all the questions I have. We’ll obviously show you the piece before it goes public, we’ll let you comment on it. There were definitely some things you told me that you don’t want to be publicised, and we’re definitely going to respect that.

P: The less said about the lawsuit until its resolved the better, especially as far as the figures involved. I guess I wouldn’t be so worried about letting others know how much HE has been willing to spend on keeping his identity secret. And the fact that there’s a chance that the courts may side with him and say “Yeah, this guy that runs this cyberstalking website, you owe him the equivalent of a small car”

[51:00]

J: Right, well this article is probably still more than a month out. It’s not unrealistic to think that the lawsuit either will be concluded, or y’know. I think the lawsuit will probably be concluded by the time this article comes out, and we’re definitely going to keep the figures that you mentioned completely silent. We’re not going to make any mention of that. But I appreciate the insight Patrick, and I appreciate you taking the time.

P: If I may ask, how did this all come up on your radar at Huff Po in the first place

[52:00]

J: It was actually just a few days ago, or maybe I should say about a week ago. We were going after the suicide of the emulator guy, Near? We were sort of looking into the services the owner of Kiwifarms, Joshua Moon, I’m sure you’re aware of him. And I guess one of the services he sells to monetise what he does is he offers webhosting to sites like Onaforums. So I think that one of the people on our team sort of went down the rabbit hole. It was worth making a story out of. This article is still in its very beginning stages.

P: How long would you expect it to be? I’ve published pieces for the NY Times and The Hill before, so I have some idea how this process goes.

[53:00]

J: How long in terms of how long it until its out, or how long will the article be?

P: Word count, like how long of a story would you expect it to be.

J: I couldn’t tell you that. It honestly depends on how interested my superiors are with it. We’re going to have a meeting after I get off with you, probably tomorrow morning. I’ll have to get back to you on that, but we’ll definitely keep in touch. But I’m happy to answer any questions that you have.

P: I’m good, just keep me in the loop. I’d appreciate it.

J: Absolutely. We’ll definitely keep in touch. And Patrick, I hope you have a great rest of your evening

P: Alright, thank you for your time today.

J: Alright, take care.

P: Bye now.

J: Right Bye

I thought I could fit all of the transcripts in one post because I have no sense of word count, sorry
 
Second tape

[00:00]

P: This is Patrick

J: Hey Patrick, this is Josiah. How are ya?

P: Hello, I'm well. I'm in a bit of a crowded space. I'm going to step outside for a moment. Give me just a second.

J: Oh yeah oh yeah, take your time

P: Ok, it's a little warmer out here, but this is better.

J: Alright, well

P: Ok, it's the reopening night of one my favorite spots in the city, after they had a fire last November, so I've got be here for the family.

J: Oh, the bar you were talking about?

P: Yeah

J: Oh cool. Well hopefully I won't take up too much of your time then



[1:00]

As with last time, so we can get this out of the way, this is being recorded. Obviously not for public release, just for our reference



P: Yep

J: Just to let you know that. And just to give you a little bit of background.. I know we talked about this over email, but I played our interview from last time during our morning meeting, the morning after. It definitely generated a lot of interest. I don't think a lot of people were fully aware what was going on with this community. There's definitely a huge interest in this story, and possibly more than one part.

You asked how long it's going to be. It's looking to be about 8500 words as a gross estimate.

[2:00]

P: Holy shit. Ok, that's a lot. I was thinking something like 1200

J: Well there's a lot of things that we want to touch on there.

P: That's been one of my points of frustration with this. I've submitted around trying to get some interest in this. I've written for the New York Times. I have some by-lines of my own. Try telling 3 years worth of daily terrorism in 800 words, or 1200 words. Like there's just no way for me to explain what's been happening in that short of a span. Yeah. 8500 words is better

[3:00]

J: I think the thing is that this group isn't exactly notorious, in the same way that 4chan or kiwifarms is infamous. They haven't been in the news for any bomb threats or anything of that nature.

P: A lot of that is simply because they're so specialised. They just exist to fuck with ME. They're not going out looking for other targets. Like Kiwifarms, they've got page after page of people they've tried to fuck with. It also kind of diminishes their impact on an individual basis. Not for everybody obviously. "Near" being the most recent example.

[4:00]

But y'know more people end up knowing about them because they end up targeting so many more people. So they come up more often

J: Exactly. So it looks like this group, like the people in this group do a little bit better job tip toeing the line of what is legal and what isn't legal. And how to anonymize themselves, sort of spread out illegality of what they're doing. One person does part of it, and the next person does another piece of it. so it seems like it's very difficult to pin anything-

P: That's exactly the problem that we're facing in California with lawsuit right now, is that they have it parsed out in such a way that the person who started this web forum for the sole purpose...

[5:00]

And they admitted it. This forum exists so we can continue fucking with Patrick. I made this-I moved this forum to this new webhost because the last webhost wouldn't let us dox people, because it was illegal in the EU.



Quasi101, which is their handle on the forum. They know what this is. They're not just an active participant in it. They are the head of it. If the forums disappeared this goes away overnight because they do this for the purpose of performative cruelty. They need to be able to show each other what they've done. If they weren't able to do that, if they weren't able to show off they wouldn't do it.



[6:00]



They do this just to feed on each other. And Quasi knows that. But because Quasi has been very cleverly not to directly do anything to me, even though he set up a place where he knows his friends are going to, it's becoming very difficult in the court in California for us to say "Hey, he's one of them". Because the Judge is then like "Well, what did he do?". [inaudible] this website specifically for the purpose of harassment. And then they bring up Section 230, and they're like "He's not responsible for the posts of other people". This isn't twitter. He's not a neutral party. Anyway. I'm ranting. I apologise.



J: Yeah, I see what you're saying. Technically he hasn't broken the law. Technically there's no direct evidence that he's engaged in the activity.



[7:00]

Technically the Judge's hands are tied, is what it sounds like. They can't really bring any action against Quasi101 himself.



P: The Judge's hands are never tied. That's simply untrue. The Judge can look at something and go "Right, this might not be the letter of the law, but the spirit of the law, and I'm ruling this way, and you can fight it later in an appeal".



We just happened to pick a judge-

A judge was picked out a hat who had to ask his son what trolling means



So, you know.



[8:00]

J: Yeah, I know what you mean. So, in our last interview one of the last questions I asked you was if you could back and change what you did, would you do anything differently, and you said "No". Myself and people in my team have sort of gone down the rabbit hole in the past few days and read tweets and forum posts and done a lot more research into this community and your response to the community. It seems the approach you're taking is sort of a much more offensive approach than most people take.



Most people when they experience trolling like this they tend to lock up. They might lock down their social media for a few days, or a few weeks, however long it takes until it goes away. And you've sort of been a little bit more offensive in fighting after them. You got their subreddits banned.

[9:00]

You've gotten, I think, over a hundred, possibly several hundred of their subreddits banned. And as you've just mentioned they've had to hop from community to - or webhost to webhost. Is this something you would recommend to other people who are in a similar position, if they just want to be left alone. Or is this sort of you



P: I know where you're going with this question and my answer is pretty simple. This is not a normal trolling thing that I and my family and my colleagues have experienced.

[10:00]

This is not a normal trolling route. Most of the time, most of the time, the right thing to do if you're getting dogpiled on the internet, for whatever reason, is yeah, just ignore it. Let it settle for a couple of days. Come back in a few days or a week, because they will have moved on.



That's not what gangstalking is. That's not what this group is, and never was. You can't just ignore them, because they need me. I don't need them. I very much want to pu- [incomprehensible drivel about a cider]



Anyway, they need me. They need the hit of adrenaline.



[11:00]

This is all this group does. It does nothing else. It thinks about nothing else. I have ignored them for months at a time. Because everybody has said "Don't feed the trolls", but that's the completely wrong advice for a situation like this. I've ignored them for months at a time and it drives them crazy. They need the affirmation, and so, when I ignore them, they double down, they triple down. They find new ways to attack me. They start attacking people around me. They force me to deal with them, and so I've had to deal with them for three fucking years now. Because if I don't, they get worse. A lot of people have experienced getting dogpiled on twitter, or instagram, or whatever.

[12:00]

Maybe they've put out a tweet that a bad take, and all of a sudden they've got a thousand comments, most of them are negative. Those people are not being gangstalked. They're getting dogpiled on twitter. Those people, yeah, shut down for a little bit. It's twitter. It's instagram. It's facebook. Whatever. People have short attention spans. It'll be forgotten about in a couple of days. People will have moved onto the next outrage, and they'll never think about you again. But that's not what's happening here. For years, they've decided as a group, what target they're going to go after, and they will hound them to the ends of the earth. Until they delete their social media accounts, which is not an option for me, or my career.



[13:00]

Or, in several cases, as we've seen with Kiwifarms, end it. End it all. So, the last person that they went after was a singer\songwriter out of Portland\Oregon named Logan Lynn, and they went after him just because he was proudly and publicly and unashamedly gay. And he's awesome! Like, him and I have gotten to know each other, because of this situation. And he's a great guy. There was never a reason to go after him, but they did because they are homophobes. And transphobes. And antisemites, and everything. This isn't something you can ignore. It just doesn't go away. You can stop responding. You can stop replying. You can shut everything down, and they're just going to keep hounding you forever, until they read your obituary.



J: Right



P: And I mean that literally



[14:00]

They've gone after the online obituaries of my family members. They've attacked the online obituaries of people who were colleagues of mine, just because this is the level of inhumanity and cruelty that these people find so fucking funny. It's just the funniest thing in the world to them. My father-in-law passed away 5 years ago. He was already cremated two years before these people ever heard of me. But they thought it was hilarious to go onto his online obituary page and leave antisemitic messages, and pretend to be people who were gangbanging my wife, his daughter. And to go on and pretend to me, so it looked like I was insulting my own father-in-law, after he passed away.



[15:00]

I mean, this is what funny looks like to these people. They're not human



J: Right... And actually the reason I asked this is because me and other people on my team went down the rabbit hole, looking at some of the other victims of theirs, or some of their targets so to speak. As you mentioned this isn't just a typical trolling group where you ignore it and it goes away. The other example that I was gonna bring up is that one of their other victims, Joseph Cumia who is apparently the brother of Anthony Cumia, the radio host on Opie & Anthony. And, he apparently ignored them, or tried to ignore them.



[16:00]

I guess from what I can see here they pretty much destroyed his music career. He ignored them, and I guess ignoring isn't enough with this community. He ignored them, and they went after his music career, and they destroyed it. He can't post any of his gigs online anymore. He can't really have an online presence or advertise or anything. Whereas, taking your approach, since this is a unique group you sort of took a more offensive approach than one would reasonable take.



And it looks like you're still an author from what I can tell. You're still selling books. I don't think, at least I can't tell, maybe you can help me out with this, maybe they've affected your book sales, or anything like that. Or your ability to handsell.



[17:00]

P: Oh, I mean not so much my ability to handsell, but they've done everything they've could to ruin me, by posting literally thousands of fake reviews on goodreads, and dozens or hundreds of fake reviews on Amazon in the hours and days immediately after release. I'm certain they have a measurable impact on my book sales, because y'know, people see promotions for a book, and they go to Amazon to order it and it's at 1.2 stars. That's gonna have some fuckin impact. They have absolutely had an impact on my writing career. They've made it more difficult for me to get new contracts. There's no doubt about that.



[18:00]

Not even necessarily from a sales standpoint. My last two publishers have gotten email death threats. They've been trashed on social media by these people and attacked. Even if I was selling incredible well it would make editors and people in acquisitions be-

It would make them second guess whether they would want the trouble. Which has nothing to do with me, or the quality of my work, but the fact that bringing me on also means bringing these motherfuckers into the fold, whether they were invited or not. That's gonna be a consideration, until they're stopped. That's going to be a consideration whenever my agent is trying to negotiate a new contract, and how big my advance is. How many books are going to be in the series. We're experiencing those issues right now.



[19:00]

J: Right. Okay, definitely noted that. I just wanted to transition to something else. A few days ago I spoke to an individual who wishes not to be named who's apparently been-

P: The mole

J: Yeah, the mole. Apparently according to him you have a few of these people's real names, including Quasi101. Including his real name and information. And also apparently a club owner in NYC, named Cris Italia, and a former police officer named Canyon Boykin.

P: Canyon Boykin's identity, as I said in the email, I'm 95% certain on that one. One second-

[20:00]

Yeah, Canyon Boykin's identity. He posts as Spacedge and he is by far one of the worst offenders. I mean, he has committed crimes. He needs to see jailtime for what he's done to me and my friends and my colleagues. He is the one who doxes everyone else’s information. When somebody says something nice to me, or stands up for me on twitter, he's the one who goes to searches them out, doxes their home address, doxes their phone number, doxes all their family connections. So people can then, himself included, can begin text harassing and threatening and intimidating them. He's done this dozens and dozens of times to dozens and dozens of people.



This man is a sociopath. They all are to one degree or another, but he is the most active of them.



[21:00]

Now Quasi's identity I am less- like we have some info on that, but I am less confident of it.



J: Uh-huh



P: We have a screen grab from their private forums that shows an envelope that purports to have his name and address on it, in an accidental doxing sort of thing. I'm much less confident of that one. With Canyon, we've seen other members of the forums, accidentally let slip that he was a cop. We've seen other members of the forums accidentally let slip his initials - C.B. We've seen through the forums in the secret place that they didn't think we could see. We've seen him brag about being a cop. We've seen him during the Chauvin trial showing how much he hated N-words



[22:00]



And how all these N-words come flocking and the policeman always gets the bad end of it. And saying how his life was almost ruined in exactly the same way as what happened with George Floyd. And then someone calls- When another journalist called the number that was uncovered for him he went on the forums. Again the secret part of the forums that he didn't know we had access to, and started freaking out. So his identity I am very confident in. At this point I would be shocked if it's not Canyon Boykin. He absolutely fits the profile. He's a white supremacist. He's a fascist. He's a racist. He's in his early 30s now.



[23:00]



As far as we can tell he's unemployed. He's living off his wife's income. He's got all the time in the world. He's probably got access to all these old law enforcement databases that he had when he was a cop, which explains how doxes everybody within a couple of minutes. Like, all their information. It makes too much sense.



J: Right. And apparently he killed somebody, right? That's why he's no longer a cop?



P: Yeah, back in 2015 he was involved in a traffic stop that ended in the death of a black motorist named Bell. Back in 2015 he was not only fired, but then he was charged and arrested for it, I believe the following year. There's mugshots of him and there's shots of him being walked off in handcuffs. He actually got off on that charge last year when a new Republican-



[24:00]

What am I trying to say?



J: Like a District Attorney or something?



P: No, shit. Come on Patrick, you know this.



J: Somebody who could pardon him, a judge?



P: No, the top attorney in the state?



J: Attorney General



P: Attorney General! Yeah, thank you. A new Republican Attorney General was elected in their state and vacated the prosecution for this. Canyon claims that Bell had a gun, but conveniently his bodycam footage was turned off for the entire encounter, which is why-



He wasn't actually fired for killing the guy. He was fired for not following procedure regarding the bodycamera.

[25:00]

But he was arrested on a manslaughter charge. There was something fairly serious going on there, but it was just swept under the rug by a new Republican Attorney General, just June of last year.



J: And so this is the guy who is doxxing everybody. Okay.



P: This is the guy who doxes everybody. This is one of the people who texts me. I know a bunch of the texts that I sent you earlier today were for him, because he posted them on the new forums to brag about it. He was the one who went to me friend who was suffering from depression and suicidal ideation and through text messages demanded that he killed himself. This is the guy who went to that same guy's brother, and acccused his own brother of pedophilia



[26:00]

And tried to get his own family to turn against him, in the aftermath of his mother's death. This man is a sociopath. He is fucking evil, and I will not rest until he is in prison for all of this.



J: Right... Now, in regards to Rahul Kumar, as I understand it. From what the mole told me, or what he sent me were screenshots. There are actually references to his real name on the secret forum as well. With his address. And we did look up in some open records. I believe he lives in New York, and there is a Rahul Kumar who matches up exactly with that address. But you're saying you're not too certain that it's him?



[27:00]

P: I am less certain of that one. The evidence that I've seen of Canyon Boykin for me personally would be enough to write a story or even to affect an arrest warrant. With Kumar I am not saying it's wrong. It very well could be right. But instead of 95% confident I am sixty. I would need to see some more there. But that's me personally. You guys can come to whatever conclusions you want.



J: Okay, now apparently there was a club owner named Cris Italia who had an account there using ToxicCisWhiteMaleFat and there was another journalist - I forget which publication he writes for. He broke a similar story on Onaforums, and right after he wrote that story this individual deleted his account and hired a bunch of lawyers, and sort of clammed up.



P: Yeah, that was on the New Republic and the guy's name is Seth Simons. Seth is the one who reached out to Canyon Boykin's phone number, trying to get his side or whatever, when Spaceedge on the private forum freaked out. And was like "OMG Seth just called me. He's figured it out". That kind of thing



J: Okay



P: Which again contributes to why I'm so confident about his ID



[29:00]



J: Right okay.



P: And Cris Italia. I know of that, and ToxicCisWhiteMaleFat while male--- Good night guys

And he was also involved with the stuff against me, but not one of the big players. I think Seth has a lot more reason to be cross with Cris Italia than I do. There's a handful of people and a handful of usernames that I want to see brought to justice over this. And he just wasn't enough of a player to warrant much attention



J: Yeah, that makes sense. Okay, my next question is how do you keep tabs on these people. Not just anybody can see these forums. You have to create an account.

[30:00]

I had to be given an answer to a secret question just to make an account here so I could see what's on these forums. Do you have an account on the onaforums to keep track of what they're doing? Or do you sort of wait to be contacted?



P: I do not. I've never had an account there. I've never gone on there, but there are other people who this group has attacked. Some of them as collateral damage for trying to get after me. They've made an awful lot of enemies along the way, people who are just as personally invested as I am in seeing this group be exposed, and identified and taken down.

[31:00]

And those people, several of them have accounts, and whenever it looks like they're about to start a new front, or a new type of attack, or when they've bragged that they've successfully done something, I get PMs



J: They tell you. Okay. So what do your friends, family, lawyers, anybody who you talk to about this situation. What do they think of your approach to dealing with these people? Do they think that you should ignore them? Are they in favor of your proactive approach.



[32:00]

Well, my friends and family for the most part know that they're not going to control me in any way. ANYWAY.

They have seen over the years, literally years now that this is not the usual group of trolls, and that the normal advice of don't feed the trolls does not work here. Everybody, myself included would love it if I didn't have to spend as much time on this as I do. I would love to just get back to writing books full time, instead of also having to defend my reputation at least for an hour a day, every day.



I mean, that's time being stolen from my workouts. But my wife and my immediately family, and her immediate family recognise the need for it. This group, you can't ignore, because they'll just run wild.



[33:00]



And my approach has gotten results. The pinnacle of their power was the subreddit. They had 30,000 subscribers. They had tons and tons of engagement. They were the most feared and hated subreddit on the entire website. Actually voted twice to be the most hated subreddit, which they kept as a point of pride. That was taken away from them because of my proactive efforts. That's why they're still so utterly clinically obsessed with trying to hurt me, because I hurt them when no one else had.



[34:00]

J: So, there isn't anybody sort of pushing back against your proactive approach, especially your lawyers. They aren't telling you to just leave it alone.



P: My lawyers would like me to stop engaging and break off, but we've had conversations where I'm like "Listen, this isn't like anything you've dealt with before". The approach to dealing with it is going to have to be different. So, they understand that. I wouldn't say they're 100% happy with it, but y'know, you have to be able to adapt.



J: That makes sense



[35:00]

P: We've taken this group from 30,000 people to a couple- I mean if you're dicking around on the forums, especially the new forums, the engagement is pathetic. There's a couple of dozen left. Once we actually identify and publicly name at least even a couple of them, and they realize that this shit is real that it will affect their real lives. That they will be named. And it's going to start affecting their job. It's going to start affecting their families. It's going to start affecting them in all the ways they've been trying to hurt people. Once that sinks in the rest of them are going to scatter. They've been losing support at a steady clip this entire time. Every time they have to move to a new forum engagement goes down - usership goes down.



J: Okay, now with regards to this lawsuit, I know that there's a hearing coming up in a few weeks, and you've mentioned this judge doesn't exactly see eye to eye with you. Or he doesn't think that Quasi101 is responsible



[36:00]

The judge pro tem is looking at this entirely too narrowly, and he's looking at this from the perspective of someone who's not an internet native. I'm certainly not trying to be agist here, but he did not grow up in this environment. He doesn't understand it. And hence why he's going and asking his son what trolling means. And his son is not a noted internet expert, who also probably didn't read the case brief and doesn't understand the true depth of the depravity of what's going on here gave the standard "It's trolling" answer.

[37:00]

But the judge is working off an understanding of the case that does not line up with the facts.



J: So I guess my question to you then-



P: But he's just the judge pro tem. He's not even the Judge that's going to be presiding over the final hearing.



J: Right. Okay. So after this hearing is over, if things go your way and you do get Quasi's identity, how are you planning on proceeding. You've already apparently spent all this money, do you plan on continuing to go forward with this case. If things don't go your way...



P: I mean, this strategy will be up to my lawyer. This is there environment, and I'm letting take point on it



[38:00]

So, which sucks, it would have cost me a whole lot less to get some black hat hackers to just go and get me the answers I needed. It would have cost me a whole lot less to pay some people, some programmers, to screw with the base code of their forum and shut them down. Or pull their user data. It would have cost me a lot less to do this the wrong way. But I am the target, I don't get to do things the way they do. I have to do them the right way.



J: Yeah. So, you're gonna essentially do whatever your lawyers say? What if you get Quasi's info but your lawyers tell you it's not worth it, are you just going to just go with that?

[39:00]

P: If we get his identity then we get to depose him, and we get to ask him under oath the real world names of the people like Canyon Boykin. We haven't named him publicly yet, because as confident as I am the evidence we have identifying him probably wouldn't pass muster in a court of law. Which is why we continue to go after Quasi, because he knows. He personally knows all the big players in this, and he can identify all of them.



J: In real life?



P: So that's the goal. Yes, in real life. He said so.



J: Okay



P: And these people have been in a weird dark cyberstalking little hell together for five\seven years at a minimum.



[40:00]

They know who each other is.



J: Right



P: But until we can Quasi identified, and deposed under oath. That's what needs to happen so we can go after the ones that have been text harassing me and my family members every day for over two years.



That's when we can identify the people who made false reports to the Milwaukee police and got my house swatted. That's when we can start identifying the actual criminals. Not just civil suits. Actual criminals



J: Criminal suits. From what I understand this subpoena that's being contested in California, that was one of four websites that’s been subpoenaed. Have you gotten any identifying information from Encyclopedia Dramatica, Kiwifarms or patrickstomlinson.net?

[41:00]

P: I don't believe my lawyers would like that information disclosed.



J: Okay, you don't have to answer anything that would hurt your case. Let's see here... This might be the same answer, but we were looking for anything you had in terms of video surveillance of somebody trespassing on your property and vandalising it?



P: Yes, we do



J: If you could email that to us that would be extremely helpful. It's up to you obviously.



P: I will confer about that. We certainly have it.

[42:00]

J: Definitely get approval from your lawyers, before anything. Okay, we did read the complaints. We didn't get to see the exhibits, but we did get to see who the John Does were, and we were wondering about certain people who have appeared to committed defamation against you but were not named in the suit.



There was somebody who makes video games - Childspitgamestudios who apparently made your two previous books Starship Repo, and In The Black, made extremely offensive adaptations and there's also a song parody artist "Motley Poo" who does similar things. I was wondering if you were planning on pursuing action against either of those people.

[43:00]

P: It's simply a question of money. We have to pick our battles on this stuff. Are those people equally guilty, yes absolutely. As we're learning here in California it isn't just time consuming. It's incredibly expensive. And now there's an outside possibility that they may actually rule that I owe Quasi money. He will never see a penny of from now until the heat death of the universe.



He wanted to spend $17,000 to remain anonymous. Fine, but I will never under any circumstances give you a cent of that back. You spent it. That's yours. That's on you.

[44:00]

J: Even if the Judge orders you?



P: Don't care. Not happening. I'm not going to pay my abuser. That's not going to happen.



J: Okay.



P: That's what the appeals process is for



J: Those are all the questions I have Patrick. Today's Friday - we're probably going to have a meeting about this on Monday morning, but I'm definitely going to keep in touch with you about that. And as always I appreciate you taking the time and answering our questions, and this is looking to be a very interesting story to say the least.



P: It's been less interesting living it, I'll say that much.

[45:00]

J: I can completely empathise. There's not going to be any authors named in this article for that exact reason. We don't want this group of people going after the author's, their families, their funeral pages. That sort of thing.



P: That's a very wise precaution to take. In fact, I would probably add a line like that in there. it's been authored anonymously because this group is so outside the bounds that y'know we wouldn't be able to safely put our names on this article.



[46:00]

J: Alright Patrick, that's all I have. I hope you have a great weekend, and we'll keep in touch.



P: Alright, thank you much. And I would add that towards the end there, me saying I would never pay Quasi even if ordered to, I would like that to not be included in the article. Because even though it's my true feelings that might be actionable.



J: We also have our own lawyers who look over this stuff, so we're definitely not going to release anything, or put anything into the article that would hurt you. Even if you don't ask for it we're still going to have our own lawyers look over and make sure there's nothing that would hurt any of the protagonists in this story.



P: I appreciate it.

[47:00]

The fact that is even a possibility just so blows my mind that the court system is so intrinsically broken. In defense of the Judge pro tem who so far heard the case, even he said in the hearing that he doesn't support sanctions. And that would probably be his recommendation. Even if he decides that Quasi's privacy is more important than mine. And that gives us the possibility of some leverage too. Like we said in the first call, he didn't just have almost $20,000 just sitting around. He's loaned it, put it on a credit card. He's borrowed it from family. Assuring everybody, or assuring himself in the case of the credit card that this is just for a couple of months and he'll get it all back. So, if he really does end up taking that hit, or looking like he's going to take that hit.



[48:00]

Especially if we can go back and say "Right, we didn't get it the first time so now we're going on appeal. Pay up some more. Psychologically that's going to wear him to the point that he folds. Which it turns out, as I'm learning is all the civil court system is. It's just a question of who's got enough money and staying power. Doesn't have anything with who's right. Doesn't have anything to do with who's been wronged. Just whether or not you've got enough to play the games



J: Well would you, I don't want to get too personal, but would you have the resources to appeal that. I don't know how you're financing it, if you're taking out loans or whatever it is, but would that be a possibility for you.



P: We aren't paying a penny.



[49:00]

J: Oh this is insurance or something like that?



P: No, they have made enough enemies with enough people.



J: Okay. I won't



P: This is not coming out of my wallet. They think it is. They think they're continuing to hurt me, but they're wrong.



J: Well, that's good to know. That makes me feel a little bit better at least. Well, Patrick, I wish you the best of luck, and we'll be keeping in touch.



P: Sounds good. Are you thinking like four weeks or so? I mean, an 8500 word article is going to take time to write obviously



[50:00]

J: We still have a lot of research to do. It's a little bit difficult because their previous forums don't exist anymore.



P: Well we've got screenshots of just unimaginable amounts of stuff. Between me and the people who have been watching them. So at any point if you feel like you want something, or need something. If at any point you want something or need something, like I said in the last couple of emails, reach out and I can dig it out



J: Anything that you can send us, especially in regards the real life stalking. You said a person committed vandalism on your property - that'd be extremely helpful. I can get you more specifics probably on Monday, after our meeting.



P: Alright, like I said, I will confer whether or not we should release that footage at this point, but it's been at least a few months now, because that was back in spring.



[51:00]



J: Yeah yeah, definitely get the lawyers permission first.



P: Personally I have no objection to releasing the footage, or the image itself of the vandal. I don't have any problem with that, but there's people who are being paid a lot of money to represent us. I don't want to make their jobs harder.



J: Right. Okay, we'll definitely keep in touch Patrick and I appreciate all your help.



P: I appreciate all the time you guys are putting into this. It's nice to have some people actually paying attention after we've been screaming into the void the last couple of years.



J: Well no problem. It's our pleasure Patrick, and yeah, we'll keep in touch.



P: Alright, sounds good.



J: Take care



P: Enjoy your weekend



J: Alright, you too. Bye bye.



P: Bye. <hangs up>
 
Josiah Tape 3


[Transcribers note: The Cris Italia, or Stand Comedy Club mentioned here has had nothing to do with any of this, and is named by Patrick only out of his own stupidity]



[0:00]

J: Hey Patrick, it's Josiah. How are ya?

P: Yes, Hi. I'm well. I'm going to step outside. It's pretty loud in here.

J: Alright, no problem

P: Okay, that's much better

J: Perfect. So I understand there's been some pretty big developments over the past couple of days. Can you explain that?

P: P: Yeah, I sent you some screengrabs, but without the context it probably doesn't help much. Basically what's happening is that two of the power users on the forums - namely Quasi, who is the Administrator. Quasi101, that is. And then SpaceEdge who has been the chief harassers and doxxers going back more than a year and a half now have been coming to blows. SpaceEdge believes that Quasi has worked either with another journalist named Seth Simons, or with my lawyers to sell out them and give up the identities of several of the most prolific of the forum users. This isn't actually true, but that's what he's got in his head, so we're just going to let him keep having that in his head. But anyway, because of this they've been getting increasingly angry with each other.

[2:00]

There's a growing rift amongst the community, and now that Canyon Boykin, who was the actual real life ID of SpaceEdge, believes that his information is getting out there. He's been much less careful about what he's saying in the group chats. What's happened is that we've found that what you and I were talking about the last time we spoke about the possibility of Quasi being funded from outside. it turns out that's true, and we even know who's doing it. His name is Cris Italia. He is the owner of the Stand, NYC, which is a comedy club that has been closely aligned with the alt-right.

[3:00]

So, Cris Italia is actually the one who's been funding most, if not all of the money for Quasi101's legal defense. What's more is that Canyon Boykin and several other people on the boards, like long time members of the boards like user Coonskin and CarolMaxheinie. They have inadvertently confirmed, for me at least, what Quasi101's identity is as well. We had a screengrab from a while ago that the mole had been talking about, where he had gotten a screengrab of an envelope that had the name Rahul Kumar on it, and an address there in the city. And I've told you before that I was much less confident about that ID, as I was with Canyon Boykin.

[4:00]

But that's no longer the case, because Canyon as well as several other people have in those shots that sent you have been using really anti-Indian slurs, specifically against Quasi. So, and between that and the fact that we now know that Cris Italia being in New York City is the one who's been funding this whole thing, to me that is confirmation that this Indian-American named Rahul Kumar who lives not even a mile away from The Stand comedy club. I think we can call that a positive identification at this point.



[Transcribers note: WRONG]



J: So, do you believe Rahul and Cris Italia know each other in person



[5:00]

P: Yes, I do

J: Ok, that's very interesting

P: Yes, I do

J: So, does this turn the tables at all regarding your lawsuit in any way?

P: I don't know how much it's going to help the lawsuit but now in a lot of ways the lawsuit is moot because the point of the lawsuit was to get Quasi101's identity so that we could depose him, and get confirmation of people like Canyon Boykin. Well, that's done now. At least to my satisfaction. The next phase no longer rests on this round of subpoenas and hearings going on in California and Wisconsin.

[6:00]

J: So that's good news then. You're going to be able to, I guess, subpoena Rahul and depose him? And find information on the rest of the members of the website.

P: Possibly, this is all going to be up in the air. The next hearing is on the 23rd. The outcome of that hearing will determine whether or not we actually end up owing Rahul his legal fees of $17,000. Which we now know is money he owes to Cris Italia, but in a lot of ways even that's moot. Now, either with this article you're writing, or if I just go scorched Earth they're going to be named publicly anyway. Which is all of these people have been desperate to avoid, especially Canyon Boykin, with his history.

[7:00]

We don't know what he's doing for work anymore, but if it comes out "Oh hey, here's this disgraced ex-cop who probably got away with manslaughter of a black motorist, now it turns out that 5 years later he's moonlighting as a cyber-terrorist". I mean that's going to be a big fucking' story. It wouldn't surprise me if that ends up on national television.

J: Right, okay

P: And Canyon has taken great great pain to avoid being identified, because the last time he was dragged through the national media back in 2017. He has tried very hard.

[8:00]

He has no real social media presence, other than the occasional picture on his wife's Instagram account and Facebook. She does very little other than post pictures of their kids. They aren't out there. They've done their very best to scrub their numbers and their addresses and everything from all quarters of the internet to make it much harder to find. Presumably because they're just trying to put the whole thing with the death of Bell back in 2015, because the last time he just got dragged all to hell and back.



[Transcribers note: Patrick says "Bell" but he should have said, "Ball" as in Ricky Ball, the deceased. He's very fat at this]



Which would completely happen again. That's why he's so scared.



J: Right. Now you said that the true source of this information is not Quasi or Rahul, but rather the mole.

P: Yes, correct

J: Can you give some more details about how valuable the mole's information has been in terms of your fight against this community.

[9:00]

P: The mole has been the only source we've had for any sort of information inside their inner circle. They had secret forums or secret chats set up which were not publicly visible, which is how they coordinate a lot of their stuff. But also it's been able to give us insight into the group's thinking at any given time. Because they put on the really brave bold face, that they aren't afraid of anything, that they're invincible. Blah blah blah. But in reality, once this lawsuit got started, they were scared shitless. They put on a brave face for a public face, but on the private side... That's the only reason you spend $17,000 of someone else's money, to try and keep your identity secret.

[10:00]

These guys have been freaking out for months over this stuff.



J: Right. Actually, I noticed that Time had published an article about you

P: Yesterday

J: Yeah, yesterday. It seems they specifically target sci-fi and fantasy authors. Do you know why it is that they seem to go for that specific genre?

P: Well it's not specifically sci-fi and fantasy authors. This group we're talking about does because they're trying to destroy me, and my reputation and my career. But other unaffiliated groups of stalkers and scammers and things like that, they go after whatever genre they want



[11:00]

J: I see. Well what role would you say the science fiction writers of America in helping you fight these trolls. I know that they helped in getting touch with higher ups at goodreads. How valuable have they been in your fight against this group?

P: Immensely. If it hadn't been for some of their backdoor contacts into the administration staff at goodreads, there'd still be literally thousands absolutely wrecking my ratings. Across all six of my books.

[12:00]

Not just on good reads but on Amazon and other sites as well, so without their resource it would be an enormously uphill battle trying to continue my career.



J: Right, I see. I had a few more questions actually. Earlier in the call you mentioned two other users, one I believe named "Coonskin" if that's correct



P: Yeah, that's one of them

J: And "Carol Maxinie"?



P: CarolMaxHEINIE



J: Yeah... Can you sort of explain their role in the forums and what they've done to affect your life.

P: It's the same sort of thing

[13:00]

They're there to contribute to the harassment campaign. They're there to send harassing texts and leave harassing voicemails. CarolMaxheinie or CarolMaxinie, however they're pronouncing that. They're particularly upset with the outright lie that I cheat at half-marathons that I run. They claim to have discovered concrete evidence that at the 2016 Brewers Mini Marathon that I skipped timing mats and I don't appear where certain photographs are being taken. And therefore I must have cut the course. Even though that was by far my worst marathon time, because about 5 miles into it I stepped off a curb wrong, and twisted one of my ankles pretty good. So I ran the last 8 miles wincing.

[14:00]

Well, ran or walked. There's absolutely no way they could see the timing mat data. That's simply not public. There's no way... Every runner out of 5000 people, not everyone gets their picture taken at every photography stop. That's just not how any of this works. And I ran the entire race with a close friend who I've run several half marathons with. We didn't cut the course. We didn't cheat. There'd be no reason for me to cheat just so I could get a 2 hour and 40-minute time on a half marathon. People are just completely nuts.



J: Right, yeah. Now that it seems a few of them are going to be identified, have you thought about what you're finally going to say to them once you see them face to face. Maybe even in a court room?



[15:00]

P: Well I'm hoping it's in the context of a criminal trial, especially in the case of Canyon Boykin because doxed dozens and dozens of people. He has been part of a conspiracy to harass through the telephone and through fax, dozens of people. He's tried to intimidate dozens of people. In fact, Paul Weimar, I gave him your email address so hopefully he'll be reaching out, but he's dealt with suicidal ideation over the past couple of years for a number of reasons, that are no fault of his own. People know that. And Canyon Boykin bragged openly about sending Paul texts demanding that he kill himself, and bragged about the fact that he was trying to convince Paul's brother that Paul is a pedophile. Which is a complete lie. This man is a criminal



J: Yeah



[16:00]



P: And he's already literally gotten away with murder from the looks of it, and now he's moonlighting as a fucking cyberterrorist. I absolutely want to see him as he sits behind a desk, as I'm sitting on the witness stand as I'm explaining all his crimes to the jury. That's what I want to have happen



J: Right, that's definitely understandable. Sorry, go ahead

P: No that was it.

J: Alright, well Patrick we did have a meeting yesterday morning, just to discuss the status of the article, and one major point that our managers brought up. I don't know where you are in terms of conferring with your lawyers, but we were discussing what it would take to have our readers take it seriously, and see it for what it is.

[17:00]

As I understand you have a video of one of these stalkers coming onto your property, and vandalising it. If we could show that to our readers that would be pretty invaluable in terms of getting people to read our article. In terms of coverage, and getting people to pay attention to our story. I don't know where you are in terms of conferring with your lawyer, but if you could get that to us that would be extremely helpful for the article.



P: When do you believe this article might go live. What's the publication time frame?



J: I'm thinking probably 3-4 weeks.



[18:00]



P: So early to mid-September



J: Yeah, if you need to hold onto it for a little bit that's okay. Especially if you have to go with what, your lawyers say. Everything I'm saying... I'm just telling you what my bosses are saying.



P: I'm thinking I'd probably feel better handing it over after our next hearing, which is in two weeks.



J: Okay. And that's in two weeks, so that will be perfect



P: September 23rd



J: Alright, I just wanted to relay that message to you. Is there anything else you had to add? Any questions I haven't asked you, or anything else you have to say about this group?



P: No, I don't think so. The revelation about Cris Italia is very interesting to me, that he is funding this from the outside. But it fits kind of nicely with what we know about his history. Oh, and the other thing, it appears to be, though they are unnamed at this point a video game developer at Rockstar games who is also a silent partner in all of this. So, this starts to kind of smack of Gamergate 2.0 sort of thing. With all of the toxicity culture that's come out of Bethesda games that's been in the news the last couple of weeks, with the strike and everything. That puts a very interesting wrinkle on all of this as well.



J: Right...No Cris Italia used to be a member of the forums, correct?

[20:00]

P: Yes, he was

J: So that will probably be his motivation...

P: He may still be under a new username, but we know he used to be, based on an article from Seth Simons at the New Republic a couple of months back. Yeah, we know he was a user. A pretty big one



As far as I can tell not one that did anything except point and laugh and be supportive of the terrible things they were doing to us. It's not exactly a situation that I can pin any particular heinous act against me or my family on Cris, except he was there pointing and laughing, and encouraging the whole thing.



J: Yeah, that makes sense. That's all the questions I have for today, Patrick.

[21:00]

If anything changes, please make sure to let me know. I will definitely keep you updated as well. I appreciate you taking the time



P: Absolutely, and like I said. And I think once we clear this next hearing and see what the outcome of that was then more than likely I'm going to go ahead and give you the images as well as the video clip, of the trespassing and the vandalism.



J: Perfect, that would be very valuable. Alright Patrick, it was nice talking to you again. Hopefully we'll be in touch and I'll speak to you again soon.



P: Alright, sounds good. Thanks for your time. Bye now.



J: Bye.
 
[00:00]



P: Hello



J: Hey Patrick, it’s Josiah again. How are ya?



P: I’m well. Let me step in the back here



J: Sure



P: It’ll be a little quieter. Alright, a little more privacy back here.



J: Perfect. Alright, I understand there’s been a few recent developments that you wanted to talk about.



P: Yeah, I’m not really sure where to start. With regards to your question the other day about them going off on these pro wrestler things. Really what you’ve got to understand with these people there’s really one focus for them at all times. And that is…



[1:00]



I call it performative cruelty. They are simply playing this out to try and extract the most pain and suffering out of the people they are targeting as possible, so that they can then show off and brag about it to the other sociopaths.



J: Right



P:[inaudible]



J: Hey Patrick I don’t hear you very well. Are you sure you’ve got good cellular service where you are? Is that me?



[inaudible]



Patrick?



P: Hello?



J: I can hear you now. Can you say that again. You were talking about that they were trying to maximise the performative cruelty and that’s when it got cut off.



P: All I was saying [inaudible]



As a way of buying capital amongst themselves, so they can come back and brag and show off about how they found a new way to hurt somebody. How they found a new way to intimidate or threaten somebody. How they found new ways to inconvenience someone’s life or make them waste time chasing after something. That’s always been the point of this group. They egg each other on to do more of that



J: Right, so you’re saying the WWE stuff is sort of like style points ?



P: Yeah, it’s a bit. They like WWE. They enjoy the idea of being the heal, so they co-opt that sort of language, or that sub culture while they’re showing off to each other. While at the same time harassing me. While at the same time threatening me, trying to intimidate me. All of it.



J: Right, I guess that kind of makes sense. It’s not really something I’ve ever seen before, but it sounds like they’re trying to gain as much pleasure as they possible can out of being cruel to people.



[4:00]



P: That’s all it’s ever been about. That’s how these people get off. They are true sociopaths.



J: Right, it makes sense. Actually if you don’t mind I did have a few questions because I noticed that there’s been an update in the defamation lawsuit. Are you willing to talk about that and give your opinion on that?



P: Yes, it will have to remain off the record for the moment. We still have another hearing coming up in late September.



J: Right, so it looks like you don’t want to talk about that at all?



P: I’m not able to. Not about that particular topic, because it’s an ongoing thing. We have a final hearing in front of another judge, on September 23rd I believe. And that will determine whether we end up owing Rahul Kumar $23000 or more.



J: How do you think its looking right now. Is it looking like you’re going to win this. Is it looking like he’s going to win this? Is it looking about 50:50?



P: To be perfectly honest at this point it doesn’t matter what happens. The money of course matters, but his name is now known due to a number of screwups. And that was the entire point of pushing the subpoena, trying to identify him. We’ve done that now. This no longer matters.



[6:00]



J: Do you think the Judge is going to rule in your favor or Rahul’s favor?



P: Again, I don’t think that’s something I’m able to comment on at this point. Not with the final hearing still on the docket.



J: Ok, you don’t have to talk about anything your lawyers don’t want you talking about of course. And of course I should mention we also have our own lawyers. We put all this past them and if they see this may hurt one of the subjects of our article we wouldn’t put that out there. Just so you know that.



P: I appreciate that, but I try to cover my own bases



J: Right. So a few weeks ago you sent us footage of what was apparently the vandal who vandalised your motorcycle and side of your house?



[7:00]



P: Yes.



J: Is that the only footage that you had of that incident?



P: Yes, the way our security system at our house works it’s able to take clips of up to 30 seconds at a time. By the time he was in camera range he had already finished and ran away



J: So once he got into frame is when the camera turned on, and it only recorded 30 seconds and then it stopped recording, and then it didn’t record while he was vandalising?



P: Yes, that’s correct



[8:00]



J: The reason I bring that up is that some of the higher ups were shown the footage. I’m sure you understand that we have some skeptical readers. Readers who pay very close attention to detail. It’s going to be very difficult for us to show that and say that it’s evidence of vandalism.



P: There was nobody else who was near my bike that night, and as you saw in the pictures from the next morning. That guy was in there from 1:37 in the morning while my wife and I were asleep upstairs. He walked onto our property. He was trespassing on our property the entire time. He walked right up to my motorcycle, holding a small flashlight just before the footage cut off. That man absolutely vandalised my house, and vandalised my motorcycle. There’s absolutely no question about it.



J: Did you have any more footage of the vandal?



[9:00]



P: No at the time we didn’t have a camera at the front that would get the angle on the side of the house to show when he was vandalising along the side there. So we didn’t get him in the act of doing that.



J: I understand. Are there any police incident reports or anything of the vandal that we could possibly reference?



P: Oh Yes.



J: Ok



P: There’s a police report. The police showed up the very next morning, took pictures, dusted for, looked over for prints. There weren’t any prints, but there’s absolutely a police report.



J: Oh you said there weren’t any prints. That’s a shame..



[10:00]



Alright, obviously it’s up to you completely, but if you could send us the incident report numbers that would certainly help. Just because we showed the video to some of the higher-ups, and just based off the video alone they might not want to put that into the article. Just based on the video alone.



P: There’s also the still images that I sent along as well to show the aftermath, but I can certainly send over the police report number. I just have to find it.



J: Okay, if you could do that, it might actually suffice. If you have an incident number of the “swatting” event, as well, that would also definitely help.



[11:00]



P: I do know for sure that I have that one but I’d have to go back to my email and find it, but I do have that one.



J: Okay, if it’s not too much trouble for you.



P: No. Those are two of the most credible threats that we experienced directly in a way that an audience would recognise as real world, so I would certainly want them included.



J: Exactly, and that is pretty much the main theme of this article, is how far this can go off the internet into the real world. So that’s why some of these real life events such as the vandalism and the swatting, it’s crucial that we have as much information as we possibly can. So that we can include it in the story and be as detailed as possible.



[12:00]



P: Yeah, certainly. I’ll get those two report numbers as soon as I can.



J: Okay, I appreciate that Patrick. I just have a couple of more questions. Going back to what we were talking about earlier with WWE and text harassment in general, what do you think the best way to deal with these people is? Do yo u respond to these people? Do you just ignore them? Do you block them?



P: Ignoring people like this serves no purpose. It simply forces them to double and to triple down, because their whole thing is trying to extract suffering.



[13:00]



So if you don’t they don’t stop, they don’t get bored. They only increase the pain.



J: Right.



P: They only double and triple down until you have to deal with them again. I mean, I ignored them for months at a time. They never stopped, they never moved on. They want me dead. That’s what they want. That’s what they work for every single day, and if they don’t get their fix they’re just going to do an even more monstrous thing.



J: Right, what kinds of things?



P: When they text I explain to them their conduct is criminal, that they’re being investigated, and that they’re going to face consequences for what they’re doing. They may laugh and taunt, and say you’ll never find us, not knowing I already know who at least three of them are.



[14:00]



J: Right. Alright, I have one last question, Patrick. Since you are a writer have you considered writing a book or some other long form piece about your experiences with the trolls, or maybe getting together with a documentary maker. Maybe writing a script and telling your story that way.



P: Those things are already being discussed.



J: Okay. Perfect, can you give us any more details about that, or they’re just being discussed



P: No, not really, at this point. I mean, there’s several different ways we might approach that. I’ve already appeared on a podcast that’s growing in popularity called Strictly Stalking.



[15:00]



I was on there like last October or November, and that generated quite a bit of interest. Documentaries are not out of the question. Me, getting back into blogging once some of these stories go live. Certainly, not out of the question. There’s a bunch of things, and writing a non fiction book about it at some point in the future, if I was able to generate any interest from non fiction publishers. Certainly I would write about it.



J: Do you think that’s what it’s going to take, for law makers and law enforcement to take this serious, because it sounds like right now they aren’t.



[16:00]



P: It is going to take national attention in the form of articles like yours. Any other platforms that may pick it up afterwards. That’s the kind of pressure this will take. That’s what always needs to happen in situations like this, that enough people know about it that it takes on its own momentum



J: Right.. right. Yeah, I see what you’re saying. Is there anything else that you have to add at this point? Maybe that we forgot to talk about that you wanted to let us know about?



P: Nothing that really spins off the top of my head. I mean, this is still just my every single day, even though these people are beginning to suspect that I know more than they wish I knew, which is they’re finally right about something.



[17:00]



It takes a lot out of ya after a while. I have to spend a couple of hours a day on this, instead of doing my writing, instead of doing my self promo, instead of trying to pitch. I am doing this, and its all hours and days and weeks and months and now years that have been stolen away from the life that I’m supposed to be living. Just so these people can get their jollies trying to hurt someone they have never met and know absolutely nothing about



J: Right, right. Okay, well Patrick I appreciate the phone call. I appreciate the extra information



[18:00]



I’ll keep you posted and updated on the status of the article.



P: Alright, I’ll get those incident numbers together. I don’t know if we ever got the incident report for the vandalism but it shouldn’t be too hard for me to figure out what that is. As far as the swatting incident I know we’ve got that somewhere and I can reference that through my email search. I can get that to you later tonight.



J: Yeah, that will be extremely helpful



P: What are.. I know you don’t make the final decision on this, but do you have a time-frame, as far as when publication is.



J: We’re thinking..



[19:00]



It’s definitely a little bit later. It’s not that people are dragging their feet so much. It’s just that we want to make sure we get everything right, because there’s a lot of details. Like I said, we have a lot of readers who like to pay very close attention to detail. And because of the subject matter we have to make sure that we get everything right. I think the last time I told the beginning of September. It’s looking to be more mid September, 2nd or 3rd week of September. If I had to guess. That’s what it’s looking like right now.



P: Oh, and I can probably get you login and passwords so you can access the current forums, at least the public space inside of them. I’m sure that would be helpful



[20:00]



J: Yeah that would be extremely helpful



P: Alright, I’ll get all that together and get it over to you as soon as I can.



J: Alright, thank you Patrick. We’ll keep in touch.



P: Sounds good



J: Alright, take care



P: Good night.



J: Alright, bye



Hopefully, I didn't fuck that formatting up. These are all from Thomas Apostle Investigations and you should go listen to them right now if you haven't. There isn't a transcript for tape 5 on the site, if I can't find one I will try and type it up myself.
 
There isn't a transcript for tape 5 on the site, if I can't find one I will try and type it up myself.
Thanks for posting these for posterity. You can try running the audio thru https://riverside.fm/transcription . It runs kinda slow and isn't perfect, but at least you can leave it run and go do other stuff for awhile. Instead of having to sit there and type it all out yourself. I've used it in the past to transcribe podcast episodes so I could do a text search on something somebody said.
 
Patrick said something I found curious:
dan-rather-fail.png

If he's referring to the Killian documents controversy, he's made some serious errors here. The reporting wasn't correct, as Rather himself admitted. Rather was not fired, and his resignation may not have been related to the controversy, although it probably was.

Sloppy work, just like Fat Rick himself.
 
Patrick said something I found curious:
View attachment 5756968
If he's referring to the Killian documents controversy, he's made some serious errors here. The reporting wasn't correct, as Rather himself admitted. Rather was not fired, and his resignation may not have been related to the controversy, although it probably was.

Sloppy work, just like Fat Rick himself.
This is my first memory of Internet autism blowing up shit, and I believe iirc the Cope was “the documents were basically true even if the actual ones shown were forged”
 
Back