Casey Chen / Lumin City - “fursuiter” and “videomaker” banned from every furry event across several states for constant autistic stalking

[Google.com]

furry drama makes my eyes roll into the back of my fucking head.

why'd you click on animal control then.

 

[parody]

If you are going to use Farm research so openly, be proper about it and report the information in full.

I'm not a TT fan, so maybe I'm missing context - I can maybe count on one hand the amount of videos he's made that I've seen and I recall him citing KF before, which is more than can be said for most dramatubers.

I realized MoistCritikal was trash several years ago when it was apparent he had been using talking points and information directly sourced from KF without ever once acknowledging the sites existence, I havent watched his videos since but I'd bet he still comes here to gather info and still hasn't ever publicly acknowledged the site.

 

[Poops]

Tom is the literal definition of a grifter and Null should have banned him from the Farms years ago. If you are going to use Farm research so openly, be proper about it and report the information in full.

What? He credits the farms in all of his work, he summarizes the information pretty well, and the videos are entertaining without being too watered down content-farm esque (SunnyV2) or unbearable to listen to (SmokeyMCC). I have no idea how he's a grifter considering he isn't selling us on anything, stays relatively unbiased on his main channel content, and doesn't make shit up.
I've never seen him leave out huge details. Like yeah when DSP has a decade of content he can't put down every noted occurrence in his 2+ hour long video, but I have yet to see him fuck up his research in any significant way.

 

[Sneed S. McSneedensen]

What? He credits the farms in all of his work, he summarizes the information pretty well, and the videos are entertaining without being too watered down content-farm esque (SunnyV2) or unbearable to listen to (SmokeyMCC). I have no idea how he's a grifter considering he isn't selling us on anything, stays relatively unbiased on his main channel content, and doesn't make shit up.
I've never seen him leave out huge details. Like yeah when DSP has a decade of content he can't put down every noted occurrence in his 2+ hour long video, but I have yet to see him fuck up his research in any significant way.

At about 10:09 in this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OwQJxA47CDw&

'You can legally, unfortunately, you can dox people and that's how it is' in reference to this site

Kinda bold from a faggot who gets all his material from here

Don't think he's in love with the site. He uses the site. Big difference.

 

[Cheeseknife]

no disrespect to the OP but furry drama makes my eyes roll into the back of my fucking head. furries have been weaving some of the most intricate webs of bullshit on the internet since fucking web 1.0. nothing has changed, the new generation is just as repulsively degenerate and retarded as the last. oh no, they almost let a creepy weirdo host the inflation fetish panel. what an embarassment that would have been! good thing he was outed as the guy who barged into somebody's room to take a picture of them cuddling in their fucking fursuits. we need a blanket ban on this guy to keep people from feeling uncomfortable at the furry con where men are buttfucking each other in the back room while dressed as cartoon animals, selling anatomically realistic animal penis dildos, drawing porn in front of a crowd of mouth-breathing greaselords, and hosting discussion panels about getting sexually aroused by balloons. let the normal people have their fun, freak.

that Turkey Tom vid fucking sucks, it's mostly just him shoving his awful soy fuzz covered face into the camera and talking instead of just showing the fucking footage. I guess it can't be helped, it's not like the zoomies have any good "content creator" role models to look up to, since all their social media superstars are people like Kai Cenat and Jack Doherty whose very presence is a psychological terror attack on anybody unfortunate enough to be nearby

I agree. At a certain point, calling out furries for their drama and degeneracy becomes about as bland as telling everyone there are fish swimming in a lake. Every biography is just full of asterisks and every furfag has some kind of back-pocket explanation as to why they're the exception to the rule. It's all so tiresome.

 

[I'm Retarded?]

why'd you click on animal control then.

you know, I had that thought right around the time I hit the post button. then I noticed the rule that says not to bitch about the furry fandom because it's tired as fuck. I guess I'm just being a front page feature fag ITT, feel free to frag my post, I'm retarded.

 

[0FEE FIVE FOUR FOME0]

Same. I know a lot of Kiwis hate him for whatever autistic reasons, but I enjoy listening to one of his vids when I don't feel like reading a lolcow's thread.

The retards here cry when they don't get enough credit.

 

[Blewberry Nausea]

Tom specifically has this guy portrayed as one of the "better" ones, so sandbagging him as a pedophile feels greatly misplaced.

Wanting proof that someone is a pedophile before calling them a pedophile doesn't mean I have a fursuit.

I really don't understand the confusion.

It’s a furry. They either are or associate with pedophiles among other people with disturbing illegal kinks. I require proof of their insanity like I require proof a nigger is a retard.

 

[Achimadriel]

Tom specifically has this guy portrayed as one of the "better" ones, so sandbagging him as a pedophile feels greatly misplaced.

I think its weird that someone (a furry) who is looking to get some ass and publicly telling their telegram is pretty sus. but i can see where you are coming from. Tom couldve just edit out the shoutout without labeling him as a pedo for being a furry, participating in a furry convention, sharing their telegram all in one go.

 

[Poops]

Don't think he's in love with the site. He uses the site. Big difference.

There's a chance he isn't in love with the site because ~40% of the userbase hates him for reasons I still can't understand. I understand hate if he never credited KF in any of his videos but he almost always shows the thread and OP of the KF thread in his videos.

 

[Sneed S. McSneedensen]

It’s a furry. They either are or associate with pedophiles among other people with disturbing illegal kinks. I require proof of their insanity like I require proof a nigger is a retard.

He branded someone a pedophile. Tom is not nobody. As I said, it's Rekietaesque.

 

[linchan]

He branded someone a pedophile. Tom is not nobody. As I said, it's Rekietaesque.

It's a joke at the cost of Telegram. He says he can't be caught endorsing telegram right after.

 

[Sneed S. McSneedensen]

It's a joke at the cost of Telegram. He says he can't be caught endorsing telegram right after.

As I said, it can be two things: a dig at Telegram, and a dig at furries. And I'm telling you that you can't just hurl "pedophile" at someone without evidence. That's not how it works.

 

[Achimadriel]

I'm not a TT fan, so maybe I'm missing context - I can maybe count on one hand the amount of videos he's made that I've seen and I recall him citing KF before, which is more than can be said for most dramatubers.

I realized MoistCritikal was trash several years ago when it was apparent he had been using talking points and information directly sourced from KF without ever once acknowledging the sites existence, I havent watched his videos since but I'd bet he still comes here to gather info and still hasn't ever publicly acknowledged the site.

That's such a retarded statement.
KF isn't the only site that share the same talking points. and most "sources" Kiwi farm takes happen to be screenshots from twitter and reddit which he also have reddit and twitter. Not to mention Kaya, who is a close friend, in the same podcast, have always mention to be on KF and always tells Charlie the happenings. How you judge someone by whether or not you source a site filled with autists? (i answered my own question kek)

 

[Sneedmiser]

Unironically gatekeeping works and should be encouraged. I don't know how many times people have to see open communities degrade until they realize you need to set standards. Any community, whether it's gaming, fan clubs, or politics, that has no standards is not a community. If everyone and anyone is welcome then you are nothing because you stand for nothing. Communities that are this weak attract egomaniacs because they know you are easily controlled, and it's the only bit of power they have. You become the group everyone goes to when they get blacklisted from everywhere else.

Ironically the people most against gatekeeping turn around and start gatekeeping out the original members of the communities for not being "inclusive enough" or, if it's a fandom, not buying into insane woke headcanons.

 

[Blewberry Nausea]

As I said, it can be two things: a dig at Telegram, and a dig at furries. And I'm telling you that you can't just hurl "pedophile" at someone without evidence. That's not how it works.

Buddy I can hurl whatever I want at whoever I want at any time whether I am nobody or the second sneeding of Hitler. The contention is whether I should or not and I don’t care about some mental patient with a hard on for cartoons to care if some other dude who goes recording their silliness calls them a pedophile. It’s not really a no no word or an accusation he went seriously in on.

 

[Android raptor]

Imagine being so terrible even furries ban you from their meets/cons.

 

[FailurePersonifiedV2]

As I said, it can be two things: a dig at Telegram, and a dig at furries. And I'm telling you that you can't just hurl "pedophile" at someone without evidence. That's not how it works.

How many more pages do we need with you saying the same thing dog?
We get you were offended/find it scummy but it’s a bit unnecessary to go to bat for (maybe you honestly) “someone” when it’s clear nobody thinks he’s a pedo, regurgitating the same point for a questionable joke.

Much love.

 

[SuperConglomerateWhale]

Well I'm sad to say that Tom didn't discuss the convention on the Unsubscrided podcast yet.

 

[Punished Brent]

If he just wore a retarded mascot costume these exceptional individuals would have let him into their petting zoo.
Tom really should have used his head