- Joined
- Sep 25, 2020
I suspect this is false
Article said:Research on why some people lack an inner monologue is in its infancy, and therefore there are no firm answers to the question of why some people may not experience this phenomenon. One study found that people with aphantasia, an inability to see visual imagery in one’s mind, also had weak or completely absent inner monologues, which the researchers labeled anauralia.7
The opposite was also true, with people who could conjure vivid visual imagery also tending to experience a vivid inner monologue. However, more research needs to be done to understand why the inability to see visual imagery would impact whether one has an inner monologue and vice versa.
I've spent far too long arguing in A&N to want to carry that practice over here so if you disagree I'll leave it at that. It's possible to think without an inner monologue. I read the %10-%30 statistic years ago from a different source, that linked to a study, that I don't have the motivation to go find atm.
As far as someone typing out a cogent response to anything with a fever over 106, I'll never forget the time I had a 103 fever and almost pissed in my trashcan thinking I was in the bathroom. That nigger's lying his ass off.