Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

Useful_Mistake said:
That's not what he said, though. If we take it that Pat's not lying then he said that he "was well aware of the situation" which can mean many things. Pat uses that fractured quote (notably the last part is not in quotes) to imply that the officer knew that the call was bullshit, as opposed to the officer knowing that there are many reports/calls issued on Pat.
Click to expand...
I suspect that what we have here is a standard "some asshole gives a story" and the cop is saying "look, faggot, even if your story is true, we still have to fuck you in the ass" - this is standard cop stuff. Even if your stalker child story is true, we have a probable cause call and we need to clear it.

The fact that he waited until now to do this shit lends quite a bit of credence to this all being planned, first build up some media shit over it, then do the lawsuit.
Jacknife said:
1. The clerk just throwing this
2. The judge flat out dismissing it
Click to expand...
Clerk can't throw it, has to file.

The niggers in this thread are arguing (and moderately effectively) that IF you take it on a pro se level of "assume everything said is true, is there a case" then they can't just dismiss it.

Which is glorious, because that means more milk for us.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: REGENDarySumanai, Neetorino, Associate Rick and 4 others
reptile baht spaniard rid said:
The niggers in this thread are arguing (and moderately effectively) that IF you take it on a pro se level of "assume everything said is true, is there a case" then they can't just dismiss it.
Click to expand...
That's actually the rule for dismissal under 12(b)(6) if the state defendants opt for that. The factual claims of the plaintiff, no matter how nonsensical they are, are assumed to be true. It's conceivable that Fatty has lied so much he gets over the threshold of a qualified immunity defense.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Nate Higgers, REGENDarySumanai, Neetorino and 9 others
AnOminous said:
I don't know why anyone is assuming anything Fatty claimed is true when he openly denies shit even in the face of obvious proof. "No stalker child I didn't threaten my wife." [response to police document showing he threatened his wife]. "No I am not fat!" [response to picture of him being obviously fat] What the fuck is wrong with these people? Do they have brain damage?
Click to expand...
Patrick has a reputation problem yes, but the Patrick A-logs have a reputation problem too.

I'm sorry, but I am getting intense DSP vibes here, where it's hard for me to determine who is the bigger shit heel. The Cow or the Cows A-Logs.

I suppose that is what lawsuits are for in the perfect world. To ascertain the truth. Pat could be full of shit, but on the face of his complaint he has a case. Even if Russell Greer is a better legal writer then the three lawyers who wrote this thing like it was some sort of pro forma class exercise in civil torts.
 
  • Dumb
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Interesting Times, Neetorino, Qonas and 10 others
MeatyRatKing said:
Honestly, He probably made this one because

A: He's narcissistic and believes that his court failures were flukes by evil baby child judges

B: Needs money + a new grinder with sausage attachments

What's your guy's ideas on what Pat plans to spend settlement money on
Click to expand...
Probably plans to buy a lightly used Mustang with only a couple scratches. Of course he's going for the 6 cylinder model again, that's what real men drive
 
  • Like
Reactions: Caverlock, REGENDarySumanai, SneedYstwyth and 7 others
MeatyRatKing said:
Honestly, He probably made this one because

A: He's narcissistic and believes that his court failures were flukes by evil baby child judges

B: Needs money + a new grinder with sausage attachments

What's your guy's ideas on what Pat plans to spend settlement money on
Click to expand...
Prezzies. That way he gets toys and can also pretend he got gifts from friends and family on twitter.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheGuntinator, Caverlock, MidUSA and 6 others
MeatyRatKing said:
Honestly, He probably made this one because

A: He's narcissistic and believes that his court failures were flukes by evil baby child judges

B: Needs money + a new grinder with sausage attachments

What's your guy's ideas on what Pat plans to spend settlement money on
Click to expand...
This is why he can never do anything right. He'd be better off going for Lem's stuffers. They have a 20lbs. model so you can get through a ground up black person a lot quicker.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Caverlock, REGENDarySumanai, internet friend and 3 others
mindlessobserver said:
Pat could be full of shit, but on the face of his complaint he has a case.
Click to expand...
That's why it might conceivably get past the qualified immunity defense into discovery, because Pat has lied enough to create a triable issue of fact (generally at the dismissal stage they do not question the factual allegations no matter how ridiculous they are).

In that event, things get fun.

That said, if you believe anything Pat says you're literally retarded.
 
  • Like
  • Agree
  • Informative
Reactions: Interesting Times, Nate Higgers, Caverlock and 23 others
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back