Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 67 14.4%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.1%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.7%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 155 33.4%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 113 24.4%

  • Total voters
    464
i believe that this was paid for with the litigation fund. regardless, while i agree that there ought not be any errors in a petition to the ussc, the errors to which i'm referring are fairly insignificant, thus easily forgiven by the court.



none of those companies will do that. not a single one of them will risk the wrath of the twitteratti to defend the farms, even if doing so would be in their own best interest. even the eff, which allegedly exists solely to defend "digital privacy, free speech, and innovation" was incredibly weak in its defense against cloudflare's decision to drop us, and has refused to engage with us since. if the tenth circuit's decision stands, and hardin's assertion is correct, the eff will likely be one of the first to be "thrown in the shitbucket along with kf", and rightfully so for not standing with us.

from page 31:
View attachment 5770419View attachment 5770466
View attachment 5770468
View attachment 5770473
The EFF has largely followed the path the ADL has lead the way on. Politics above principles, bureaucracy instead of effectiveness, left over right. While if I remember correctly they held out for a time they sold their soul some years ago. I do wonder if there are any other lesser known orgs out there, something akin to the NRA versus the smaller orgs like GOA, orgs that are still standing effectively for what's right in this domain.

If this gets cert, we need an 'F the EFF! We're going to SCOTUS!' shirt.
Welp, that's it, the "court" is closed, and Russ is officially in breach of contact (I should fucking trademark that because it's awesome).

Start the 120 day clock on the "court" politely asking him to submit something with no repercussions for his idiocy or tardiness.

Contact with Russ should be avoided, in general.
 
I can’t believe there’s a chance that hyperlinks on the internet might become illegal around the same time Reddit does it’s IPO.

Lol, lmao even.
I think we should troll the fuck out of reddit - and USA Today - with their quotes from users on KF, seek approval that those user comments can be "owned" as content by KF and Null can file copyright notices on these sons of bitches and let them eat shit.

But that's just my thought.
 
Well I hope that if by some miracle this case gets picked up by SCOTUS that when EFF and FIRE come begging to get in on the action so they can brag about being on a Freedom of Speech SCOTUS case @Null tells them to go fuck themselves with pinecone.

Because they will, they're desperate to latch onto anything they can use to fundraise with.
 
Mfw utah judge dismisses the case due to failure to prosecute before it goes to Supreme Court

images.png
 
If SCOTUS takes the case and Russell's lolyers come crawling back, do you think Russ'll tell 'em where to shove it?
They will tell him that he is the handsomest boy, and even if he loses, all the hookers will want to date him for free. Hearing someone else tell him what he has been saying to himself for years will establish a rapport, and he will happily let them use him.
 
Are supreme court things televised/streamed or at least recorded?

is there a chance, however small, that we'll see josh in court with a slobbermutt tie calling greer a whoremonger?
All court cases are public record. There will be a record somewhere. For supreme court there is a voice recording for oral arguments. You can go to a website right now and listen to the voice recordings from the court while the transcript shows on screen with highlighted text. I've seen Uncivil Law cover supreme court oral arguments for content. The website isn't live and there is a lag between when the actual arguments occur and when the website has the transcripts ready.
 
Just finished reading the SCOTUS petition. Really good read, genuinely fun seeing that handsome chad of a lawyer explaining in detail what a bunch of retards the 10th circuit is.
Also, I love how he squeezed "Why I Sued Taylor Swift and How I Became Falsely Known as Frivolous, Litigious & Crazy" in there.
Also, I noticed he exclusively used capital "I" Internet. I wonder if he already did that previously or if Null went out of his way to sperg about this like he does on MATI. I really hope it was the latter.
 
Well I hope that if by some miracle this case gets picked up by SCOTUS that when EFF and FIRE come begging to get in on the action so they can brag about being on a Freedom of Speech SCOTUS case @Null tells them to go fuck themselves with pinecone.

Because they will, they're desperate to latch onto anything they can use to fundraise with.
I think they will ignore it even if it cripples copyright law forever because they are so afraid of trannies wrath being directed at them and being *gasp* cancelled.
 
SCOTUS is incredibly persnickety about this and has very strict rules. This is how these petitions are formatted unless you want them instantly thrown in the trash.
Is there any particular reason for them, or is it a bit like the story of Van Halen asking for a bowl of M&Ms with all of the brown ones removed, just to act as a way of seeing how serious the petitioner actually takes their submission?

I don't think you need money to appeal to even the supreme court if you're poor. Correct me if I'm wrong but in forma pauperis is a thing even at that level isn't it? Otherwise inmates would be unable to appeal.
As Null said, if you're one of the people who get their case accepted, you'll have lawyers lining up to take your case if you somehow don't have one and if nothing else the court will assign someone if you're without representation. Gideon v. Wainright is one such example, where the petitioner (Gideon) wrote his own petition on prison stationary and acting as his own counsel. Clearly an exceptional case, but interesting.

Also, I love how he squeezed "Why I Sued Taylor Swift and How I Became Falsely Known as Frivolous, Litigious & Crazy" in there.
Also, I noticed he exclusively used capital "I" Internet. I wonder if he already did that previously or if Null went out of his way to sperg about this like he does on MATI. I really hope it was the latter.
Spot any acrostics tucked away in there? If Josh didn't at least ask Hardin if he could sneak a "sneed" in there somewhere, he'll have to live his life in disappointment even if the court takes up the case and he ultimately prevails.
 
but they generally care about misapplication of law, since that's their job.
Disagree. Their job is to protect the corrupt State (and its oligarchs) above all.

That said, I pray your petition gets picked up, and I'm really glad you submitted it.

I donated hundreds of dollars to the cause, and I'm proud to be a member of this forum.

I don't want my pessimistic (realistic?) sperging below to detract in even the slightest way from the recent major KF successes.

Congress will never let someone get appointed to SC who won't protect the pedo blackmail intelligence system above all else.

That's how it's been for a long time, certainly since the expansion of the "general welfare" clause in 1937's Helvering v. Davis.

Americans Are Fighting For Control Of Federal Powers That Shouldn’t Exist

In more recent intolerable corruption, Chief Justice John Roberts sits as head of the secretive FISA Court and is supposed to provide oversight for it.

"The 11 FISA judges, chosen from throughout the federal bench for seven-year terms, are all appointed by the chief justice. In fact, every FISA judge currently serving was appointed by Roberts, who will continue making such appointments until he retires or dies. FISA judges don’t need confirmation — by Congress or anyone else.

No other part of U.S. law works this way."

sauce

And

"Chief Justice, John Roberts is in charge of everything to do with the FISA court. The guy running the office of the lawyer doing the counseling of Roberts, is {Ed: corrupt former DOJ National Security Directorate attorney] Mary McCord [and her] husband.

Mary McCord, knowingly and with specific intent, lied to the FISA court to support the FBI targeting of Trump. Mary McCord’s husband runs the office which would intercept any communication from the FISA court to the Chief Justice if the FISC had any concerns about the false FBI application. See the problem?"

sauce
 
Back