FWIW, I'm with those here who are saying that if he got anything like the contract he wanted, he'd be smugly eating a single Dorito at us.
Like
@Balldo's Gate, I believe Nick when he says he's free of contractual obligations, but two possible interpretations of that is that he either has no contract, or a very basic bitch one. I'm too am leaning more towards "no contract" because he (rather conspicuously) hasn't mentioned one at all. Only that he was free of the old terms.
So it was a business decision to defame Montegraph?
Basically, yeah.
By this own admission, goading Montagraph into a lawsuit was exactly he wanted. This was gonna be his Maddox.
But, like Maddox was to Dick, it was supposed to be a new
revenue source. Not the gigantic expense and boat anchor it now is.
There's a video clip somewhere where he goes over his plans for Montagraph. None of them panned out. Even if he wins the case, he still takes a massive expensive L.
Karma.
Maybe I missed this but which other people told him to drop the law stuff, make his show entirely about coom and cuckoldry, and then turn into a gigantic creepy faggot who does nothing but drink and coom?
Nobody. As far as I can tell. Maybe his LOCALS wanted it, but his LOCALS is retarded and that place is clearing out fast.
He will probably shortly drop youtube because switching from youtube to rumble during a show is an incredible work burden on him.
Agreed. This is what I would look for come Monday. If he's admitting his not under the old contractual terms anymore, there's no reason for him to do Youtube. He's been chomping at the bit to get off there.