Patrick Sean Tomlinson / @stealthygeek / "Torque Wheeler" / @RealAutomanic / Kempesh / Padawan v2.5 - "Conservative" sci-fi author with TDS, armed "drunk with anger management issues" and terminated parental rights, actual tough guy, obese, paid Quasi, paid thousands to be repeatedly unbanned from Twitter

oh Stalker child, you have completely undone yourself and you don't even realize it. You're going to suffer Fatrick. Suffer so that people can understand why you don't file flagrant bullshit.
Everyone will know what a huge faggot you are. We will document your shame and remember it always.
Have fun retard.
 
Clearly his outbursts about being fine, that nothing's wrong, he's not having any troubles what-so-ever is going to bite him right in his fat ass. Top that with him consistently bashing cops, judges, attorneys, and everything else and you have a solid reason to dismiss his case based on his own ramblings. He really is his own worst enemy.
Just his own tweets denying shit he claims in his complaint would sink him, at least at that discovery/summary judgment phase. You know, he claims he was stark naked and handcuffed. But he has repeatedly denied that on Twitter.
 
I suppose that is what lawsuits are for in the perfect world. To ascertain the truth. Pat could be full of shit, but on the face of his complaint he has a case. Even if Russell Greer is a better legal writer then the three lawyers who wrote this thing like it was some sort of pro forma class exercise in civil torts.
It doesnt matter if he has a slam dunk, its Pat, and he fucks it up all the time. He could stop all this if he wanted, has been told time and time again how to, and still he suffers.

As others have pointed out, he has openly lied. He actually doesn't need to, he has been swatted and continues to receive abuse. But It's Pat, no reason to play it straight for an easy payday, nope, fucks his own case up with his own version of events.

I really think people have a hard time understanding how much of a fuck up Pat is. No matter what luck falls his way, he will fuck it up. He could win the lotto and he would fuck that up, lose his money on some shite we all saw coming a mile away.

I like it when Pat wins, because its always followed by some epic fuck up, pushed along by his absurd levels of arrogance and delusion. BAM!. Another Fatty Patty fuck up we can all laugh at, again.
 
Just his own tweets denying shit he claims in his complaint would sink him, at least at that discovery/summary judgment phase. You know, he claims he was stark naked and handcuffed. But he has repeatedly denied that on Twitter.
I just want some judge to rule that “your life is already over, stalker” is fighting words. Is that too much to ask?
 
Are you suggesting I believe the Police instead? You put me in an impossible situation.
Also I know I'm responding twice, but I'm not really believing the police either. The only thing I really believe here is the video I actually saw of some of the events described in the complaint, and it completely contradicts what Fatty is saying.
There is video footage of at least one real swatting so we know at least one was real.
I suppose you could Technicality Tomlinson it and say it wasn't a literal unit called SWAT but I think any armed and aggressive police response qualifies under the usually accepted meaning of the word. There was at least one actual swatting. The rest have just not been, though. Pat is a lying liar who lies.
 
Also I know I'm responding twice, but I'm not really believing the police either. The only thing I really believe here is the video I actually saw of some of the events described in the complaint, and it completely contradicts what Fatty is saying.
The main thing putting me mostly fairly on the pigs (cops) ((sad I have to specify)) is that if there had actually been some long untoward happening, fats would have wildly publicized and sued and complained long before.
 
Pat's fattest problem is that he does funny shit like this near the beginning of the year, and Lolcow of the Year usually just goes to someone who just had a scandal that month, hopefully this year he can break the pattern with the sheer girth of his retardation. I think it would mean a lot to him to finally win an award

#DLTIW

But I hope he gets a second or third place again.
 
The rest have just not been, though. Pat is a lying liar who lies.
Lying isn't real, Stalker, that's just your delusions again. You keep saying the l-word over and over again, because you don't have anything else to say. Your life is already over. Wait for the knock and enjoy prison, Child.
 
The main thing putting me mostly fairly on the pigs (cops) ((sad I have to specify)) is that if there had actually been some long untoward happening, fats would have wildly publicized and sued and complained long before.
You don't really have to feel bad about siding with pigs. Like almost all things, it's just a job and the people doing it are just normal humans. They are mostly not some kind of weird inhuman monster, just people like you and me with a shitty job.
 
Also up on courtlistener already:

Anyone inclined to believe any of Pat's bullshit should just consider this single paragraph:
"34. Patrick was home alone, and without even time to get dressed, was ordered out of the home at gunpoint and left completely naked in handcuffs outside while the officers entered his home without a warrant to search it."

The one thing we've actually seen on video that he talks about, he absolutely lies about. So the idea his lolyers watched this is nonsense. They just reiterated Pat's abject lies. Or they actually did watch the video and then lied about it anyway.
Having not seen this myself, did they really not have a warrant?
 
You don't really have to feel bad about siding with pigs. Like almost all things, it's just a job and the people doing it are just normal humans. They are mostly not some kind of weird inhuman monster, just people like you and me with a shitty job.
Oh I don’t feel bad about that. I feel bad that I have to specify that pigs is cops because fatrick is more pig than any officer ever.
 
Just because that Court found no 14th Am due process right of non-custodial victims to be protected by police officers and school personnel in the Parkland shooting doesn't mean cops have no duties to investigate or generally do their jobs. (That ruling was really about whether being in school is "in custody" for purposes of the 14th Am.). You're still going to be disciplined, fired, or sued (win or lose, it's a hassle). And MAYBE some cops actually are scrupulous and believe in serve and protect, regardless of a technical out on specific legal liability.
The comment I was responding to is one of legal liability, not general duty. I think it's important to remind people: If the police don't keep you safe, the courts don't let you sue the cops, even if the judge might say she feels really bad about it (like the stabbing case). Plenty of caselaw behind it.
"Pat has a case" is operating on two things:

1. Forgetting that Fatrick, like Chantal, LIES
2. That more than the initial few "swattings" were actual swattings, and not just Officer John Smith nocking on Pat's door for a wellness check

I think at one time Fatty's SWAT total was 48 or more, and the fellas at ONA determined that the a not small percentage of these were actually calls to neighbors. Additionally, I think Pat's case will hit a road block depending on how they choose to define swatting. Did cops clad in SWAT gear bust down the door with firearms and hold Pat and Nikki down 40 times? Did they shoot Mewler? Is Sally littered with bullet holes? DOUBTFUL.
A lot of this stuff (especially #1) is stuff for the trial to suss out and I'm looking forward to it because I can't imagine it would be easy to get away with perjuring one's self with all the witnesses and cameras.

At least some of the 'neighbor' calls WERE for Pat- looking at the blotter isn't going to tell the whole story. The swatters figured out that the police had presumably flagged his address in the computer-aided-dispatch system; so instead of saying "123 Fat Street" they would say "the house just to the right of 122 Fat Street" so that the police would respond to his place but it would come up in the system as another address (and thus avoid the flag). I remember this happening at least a couple times but I'm not sure how many in total.
 
It seems Niki Robinson et al. are suing the City of Milwaukee and Sergeant Lyndon Evans.

https://dockets.justia.com/docket/wisconsin/wiedce/2:2024cv00264/107055 (archive)

View attachment 5771293

"A vicious campaign of domestic terrorism carried out at the hands of a group of bullies".

View attachment 5771302

Police children must stop ignoring reality.

View attachment 5771301

True enough, there is a vibrant international community dedicated to following this insanity.

View attachment 5771311

I have to say, the very term "swatting" (wonder why Rick didn't insist on SWATTing) conjures up images of a SWAT team doing some kind of "dynamic entry". If the worst you have is a police officer insisting to take a look inside your home in response to a call, that's not so dramatic.

View attachment 5771287

View attachment 5771288

So were you lying then, or are you lying now?!

View attachment 5771318

Wait, "vindicate the violation of Plaintiffs' constitutional rights"? Wouldn't that mean showing the violation is justified, or do I not understand English?

Anyway, it goes on. I'm attaching the PDF of the complaint for analysis and critique.
Yes Pat, because acting unhinged on the internet is going to make the police go soft on you. If they took 5 min on the internet looking you up they'd probably baker act your ass.
 
Having not seen this myself, did they really not have a warrant?
You don't need a warrant if you have probable cause. The call they got before showing up plus the occupant of the house chimping out at them as soon as they showed up is probably enough for probable cause. There is also the chance that he fatly and stupidly consented to them searching the home, which again means a warrant is unnecessary but you can still claim they searched "without a warrant."
 
At least some of the 'neighbor' calls WERE for Pat- looking at the blotter isn't going to tell the whole story. The swatters figured out that the police had presumably flagged his address in the computer-aided-dispatch system; so instead of saying "123 Fat Street" they would say "the house just to the right of 122 Fat Street" so that the police would respond to his place but it would come up in the system as another address (and thus avoid the flag). I remember this happening at least a couple times but I'm not sure how many in total.

What evidence is there of this?
He lives in a shit neighborhood, there are calls to Oakland Ave every day. He has taken pictures of fire engines parked down the street and claimed them as swats. He lives next door to a low income apartment complex which has multiple tenants.

How about the swats he claims that aren't even in the blotter.
Or even better, when jackie tweeted about it before Pat and before the blotter was even updated.
 
Back