Sweet Baby Inc. and the Steam Curator Group Conspiracy - The company that is responsible for the diarrheic video game writing.

And we'll see how long these consoomers can keep their ADHD at bay and not buy the latest AAA slop.
I'm actually quite hopeful. The thing is that not only became the woke shit more egregious, now it's also attached to games that become less and less playable GaaS-bullshit. Look at the latest AAA releases. Gotham Knights flopped, Skull and Bones flopped, the Suicide Squad game fucking cratered. It's getting to a point that the normies started noticing, and when they look into why gaming is so bad right now, ESG and DEI is something that keeps coming up.
 
It's getting to a point that the normies started noticing, and when they look into why gaming is so bad right now, ESG and DEI is something that keeps coming up.
If publishers were smart they'd blame the DEI and ESG initiatives instead of how they run their companies. They can distract people from how bad their games are with pretty girls and handsome men, gachas do it all the time. They also got a bunch of other practices that probably wouldn't fly in the main industry, but still I don't see publishers changing strategies on how to develop games. Too cost effective as it is now. They can, however, change the content of the game to distract from just how bad it is. Skull and Bones would probably fair better if it wasn't such an obvious diatribe of why capitalism is evil -- even though it technically didn't exist at that point in history, what they're dealing with is mercantilism which is closer to socialism in that the corporations can only operate with the monarchy or government's blessings and even then typically are the only company operating in that region.

Put some sexy pirate women in there, even on the crew if you want, it's the fat ugly bearded slobs the poor sods have to look at that they take umbrage with women on the ship. Make it about the 90's tone again, running rampant and being a pirate. Watch how people will still find away to enjoy that despite whatever shortcomings you have on the development front. Because again, it's cost effective right now to do things as they are, but the content sure as fuck isn't.
I want to see what their fees are. All these devs getting laid off recently, I wonder how they feel about the hundreds of thousands to millions this company is getting for shitting up games.
Some of these people are so pozzed they'd probably accept it and say it's for a worthy cause that they can't feed themselves.
 

Sweet Baby Inc is immunized against all dangers: One may call them SJWs, feminists, faggots, niggers, it all runs off them like water off a raincoat. But make a list about the games they've worked on and you will be astonished at how they recoil, how injured they are, how they suddenly shrink back: "We've been found out".​


It pains me to see Alan Wake 2 lumped with those other games. I loved it so much.
 
I'm actually quite hopeful. The thing is that not only became the woke shit more egregious, now it's also attached to games that become less and less playable GaaS-bullshit. Look at the latest AAA releases. Gotham Knights flopped, Skull and Bones flopped, the Suicide Squad game fucking cratered. It's getting to a point that the normies started noticing, and when they look into why gaming is so bad right now, ESG and DEI is something that keeps coming up.
This is a symptom of why gaming is bad - not the cause.

Games companies are full of problems and even if Sweet Baby Inc wrote the entirety of Skull and Bones on a type writer - it should not have taken 11 years to release. By the time Skull and Bones released - Sea of Thieves had already been out for six years. There's late to the party and then there's showing up to the party 6 years after it's over.

Suicide Squad is also shamefully late - party looter shooters/action shooters have been done to death and people were already pretty fed up with the concept before you get into any of the shamefully bad writing.
 
One take I heard is that these people don't actually give a shit about the "ideology" and it's just a grift. The ideology is just used to weasel their nepotism friends in, and crybully anyone who tries to fire/expose them. It doesn't matter how much they destroy/ruin in the process, they just want free/easy pay checks.

If this is true, anyone who said "if we'd just ignored Anita Sarkeesian, she'd have no career" -were dead wrong and coping.
Anita Sarkeesian started grifting by being involved in a multi-level marketing scam.


She realized that what we call woke these days was an area ripe for a dedicated scammer to make a quick buck. She then started by going after pop music (Mariah Carey and Kanye West among others).


However, she didn't get much traction there and so she went after videogames. This worked originally because she was working with autistic woke-scold Jonathan McIntosh, who was able to write coherent if dishonest scripts for her. After she cut him loose, and tried to do something other than permanently being a feminist scold of videogames her fortunes sagged. She had a few successful grifts since then, but I have no idea what she is doing now. Her wikipedia hagiography seems to end in 2022.

But yeah, it was always a scam to extort money from the videogame industry, and she's just been replaced by other, hungrier scammers.
Tried wayback machine and found out that the url is excluded.
https://archive.is/https://silverstringmedia.com/
 
Last edited:

Sweet Baby Inc is immunized against all dangers: One may call them SJWs, feminists, faggots, niggers, it all runs off them like water off a raincoat. But make a list about the games they've worked on and you will be astonished at how they recoil, how injured they are, how they suddenly shrink back: "We've been found out".​


It pains me to see Alan Wake 2 lumped with those other games. I loved it so much.
Hey, I loved Spider-Man 2. I can't deny it includes more progressive elements than both Miles and the first game.
 
or they will spoonfeed the audience in great detail the origin story of their entire characterization

Take a look at the live action Cruel movie from Disney for example
  • They spoonfeed where she got the name from
  • They spoonfeed why her hair is the two tone color
  • They spoonfeed why she dressed the way she dresses
  • They spoonfeed why she hates dalmations
All to pretty much paint the picture of "not bad, just misunderstood". The original character from 101 Dalmations dripped character and personality effortlessly and didn't need a fucking novel of scenes explaining who she is and what she does. It's like they think audiences need a character's life story in order for them to go 'WOW, THAT'S RELATEABLE!!!"
Cruella DeVille in 101 Dalmatians was such a great character. She didn't particularly hate dalmatians, she just thought they'd make a great looking fur coat. She was indifferent to their suffering, all that mattered was the coat. Her name was just what her parents gave her. Her hair didn't need an explanation, it was fine for it to be natural or colored as a fashion statement given her personality. She dressed the way she did because she cared about looking fashionable and was vain.

One of my favorite obscure Capcom characters is named Devilotte de Deathsatan IX. As you might expect, she's not really what you would call a good person. I'm glad she's a Capcom character and not a Disney character, so she'll never end up in a live action film like Cruella.
 
I'm actually quite hopeful. The thing is that not only became the woke shit more egregious, now it's also attached to games that become less and less playable GaaS-bullshit. Look at the latest AAA releases. Gotham Knights flopped, Skull and Bones flopped, the Suicide Squad game fucking cratered. It's getting to a point that the normies started noticing, and when they look into why gaming is so bad right now, ESG and DEI is something that keeps coming up.
Meanwhile Helldivers II, a game done by a small studio is blowing up. After banning woke shit complainers and releasing a finished product live service game with minimal micro transactions.

it's almost like if you give customers what they want, they will buy it.

It's amazing to me that these big corporations not only let the grievance grifters at Sweet Baby shit all over their games, but that they paid them to do it. Astounding.
 
It's getting to a point that the normies started noticing, and when they look into why gaming is so bad right now, ESG and DEI is something that keeps coming up.
If publishers were smart they'd blame the DEI and ESG initiatives instead of how they run their companies.
This is a symptom of why gaming is bad - not the cause.
What has happened in the game industry is what happened to Disney—Of which they're now currently seeing the consequences of. They utilize low quality but impossible to ignore (also known as being "fucking obnoxious") DEI/ESG inclusions to hit the checkboxes. They also feel like this shields them from criticism due to the climate of the political and media environment over the past 10 or so years.

The problem is, DEI/ESG isn't "Free Money". DEI/ESG is just goodboy points and better connections and access to "financial resources"—Which you may also known as "exorbitant loans". Which this is the part where you really start to see just how fucking retarded the corporate execs running most of this shit are. They start to think they're on top of the world and the company is doing good because of all this money they now have and all these new projects they can work on, and quarterly reports show their total liquid assets are way higher than last month so they're happy. But they always forget that you have to pay back the loan. So they spend a few years living the good life and ignoring the whims of the market and their userbase, and then once it's time to pay back the loan, they look back and see how things have been going and- Oh fuck we alienated our primary consumerbase oh fuck we're losing so much money oh my god.

Corporations aren't aligning with DEI/ESG because they have morals, or even because they necessarily need the money. They're doing it because a giant investment company is offering huge loans to do it, and those few years of ignoring the market is what every corporation craves. The ability to make any slop no matter how low quality, ignore criticism, and ignore the market. But that's not how reality works. Eventually, they will need their consumers back.
 
If the steam group is banned, will the curator page be banned too? Kind of a difficult question to answer I guess.
I tried to check out the chat cause that's where I assume the glowies will be spamming nigger, but it doesn't seem to work.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Mr Processor
Which this is the part where you really start to see just how fucking retarded the corporate execs running most of this shit are.
But they always forget that you have to pay back the loan.
They're not retarded. They know exactly what they're doing. Hollywood accounting works because of tax write-offs, money laundering and the "too big to fail" philosophy that banks big corporations under the Federal Reserve. The same thing is happening in the gaming industry.
Some people will get fucked over when the time to pay comes, sure. The small ones, work horses, and the eventual talented individual who isn't "in". Studios get dissolved, games are cancelled in development hell, etc. But the people that take those loans are just fine. They'll open new studios, "work" as "producers" and keep repeating this shit until there's no bail-out method available. Then, it's to the next big thing, the next potential industry. They're parasites. There's no intention to keep the host alive after they suck its blood dry.
 
But yeah, it was always a scam to extort money from the videogame industry, and she's just been replaced by other, hungrier scammers.
This MO has been followed by a many of the socialist types (breadtubers in particular) for the last 10 years as well. All following the same formula.

Take a five-second out-of-context video of the player dragging around a woman's body in Hitman or GTA5
Tell your audience, "This game wants you to kill women and drag their corpses around like it's funny. Men are turned on by this."
The SJW/Woke outrage crowd sees this and it immediately becomes a scandal
10 years later, these people are now in the highest echelons of the industry because nobody was fighting back against these lies

Again, almost every popular mainstream Leftoid follows this formula. They have zero clue as to what the fuck they are looking at, but take it out of context and market their backwards socialist ideology which is then lapped up other Leftoids and used a political ammunition.
 
In this case, it is already well into translating to lost sales, for sure. But you're correct, I suspect a lot of this is more bandwagoning a popular hate-train. SBI is a symptom, not a cause. That being said I do see corporations like Blackrock being mentioned more and more which is interesting because I remember not too long ago that mentioning Blackrock fell into the whole "conspiracies" bullshit. Not anymore, it seems.

But if you take the ItsAGundam video, for example, you notice he says he wouldn't have purchased Spider-Man 2 if he had known SBI was involved. I don't believe him when he says this. It's this thing streamers and gamers seemingly need to keep in touch with. An addiction. Even though they know it's bad, they don't stop consooming it. They continue on so they can be apart of the whole Let's Hate scene on YouTube and elsewhere. Same as how Synthetic Man plays games he knows are shit--he does it because it gives him something to complain about for a few hours before he picks up the next thing.

I daresay some people are fine with the ongoing production of bad video games because they have created thriving communities based on trashing bad video games. It doubt a lot of people who rail against the machine even play the new stuff.
1709573118149.png


These people really do exist. Honestly, I know the RLM crew were mocking these people, but they're a main part of the problem itself as well. Gundam, I have less time believing that he'd avoid these titles, because he's on a hate grift. I highly doubt he would've made a video about SBI in the first place (as it's not in his particular wheelhouse of shit to kvetch about), but because they blew up practically overnight, he now feels he has to in order to stay relevant to the "commentary" section of Youtube.

It might just be getting older, but I'm far wary of these "commentary" channels more than I used to be as a young'n. Hanging around the Farms has allowed my more cynical side of self to assert, which in turn makes me more aware of things.
 
Tried wayback machine and found out that the url is excluded.
no idea why it is having issues archiving this.
I take you weren't there back in the day. One of the driving factors of GG was that for the first time we saw wide-scale coordinated censorship on the internet. I began with some literally who whore sucking 5 dicks for publicity, literally shit nobody cared about, but then there was the massive damage control that caused a huge streissand effect. Mass deletions and bans on reddit, social media companies hiding and manipulating trends, takeover of wikipedia articles so its only the official story, and yes the wayback machine not letting you archive what some people are doing least anyone find out. In short the beginning of what's now considered "normal" every time something the woke don't like being discussed started there. Never saw that before GG, but when it happened it went from 0 to 60 in a second, even 4chan was deleting anything GG related because moot was simping for a chick that worked at gawker att.
They're doing it because a giant investment company is offering huge loans to do it
Don't discount the ideological capture of some of the employees. Some of the lunatics working in this industry truly believe in this nonsense, its practically their religion, they were pushing for this shit way before DEI started, nobody was paying them to be woke back in the early 2010s and then many (but not all) games were already moving in that direction. The worst are the converts who have something to prove so they overdo it, like cliffyB who used to be a massive douchebag and borderline pedo then did a 180° around that time and has been a wokescold ever since.
 
Last edited:
Back