Russian Special Military Operation in the Ukraine - Mark IV: The Partitioning of Discussion

Well the dainty fags at Vogue came up with propaganda only the State Department and Blinken could love:
1709610634835609.jpg
Pre-op Pooners for Ukraine! (or post-op troons, I can't tell).
moar like hohlushka trench rape for the 65th version of Azov but whatever
 
Well the dainty fags at Vogue came up with propaganda only the State Department and Blinken could love:
View attachment 5790218
Pre-op Pooners for Ukraine! (or post-op troons, I can't tell).
moar like hohlushka trench rape for the 65th version of Azov but whatever
Government sponsored barrack bunnies?
They are really trying everything to stop forcefuly conscripting people
 
Tell me you're a Bernie bro without saying you're a Bernie bro.
Are they going to have a "No Refunds" moment?
Government sponsored barrack bunnies?
They are really trying everything to stop forcefuly conscripting people
That sounds like a good way to give your entire platoon the clap.
 
There are some that do, like Elizabeth I

Elizabeth I was a delicate woman who certainly hadn't the foggiest clue what getting into a fight was like. That's not a criticism of her reign. But no, she didn't have any better visceral, intuitive sense of what inflicting violence is like any more than any other woman.
 
Elizabeth I was a delicate woman who certainly hadn't the foggiest clue what getting into a fight was like. That's not a criticism of her reign. But no, she didn't have any better visceral, intuitive sense of what inflicting violence is like any more than any other woman.
She had Mary, Queen of Scots beheaded so I very strongly disagree.

That's is, after several years imprisonment, during which she couldn't help but continue inveigling against Elizabeth.

Also, she may have portrayed herself as delicate and dainty but this was a person who even as a young child was in a precarious position, especially after declaring herself a Protestant. She escaped having her head lopped off by her sister, Queen Mary, her brother's supporters, the supporters of other claimants and after becoming Queen herself more plots and ambitious claimants. She was shrewd and had sharp political instincts, managing to keep England out of various wars and invasions.
 
Last edited:
why do your fonts look so fucked up?
View attachment 5790661
do you have this disabled or something?
I wasn't even aware that could be off, thank you!
Tbh, Medieval and Renaissance people in general had a better understanding of violence than most modern people outside combat veterans. Keep in mind dueling was a socially accepted practice and public executions were a form of entertainment.
Yeah, going from violence being accepted as a part of life, to the hippie idea that violence is a social construct and we can just wish it away, to going back to needing to raise an army due to unstability is scrambling our societies real bad
 
Tbh, Medieval and Renaissance people in general had a better understanding of violence than most modern people outside combat veterans. Keep in mind dueling was a socially accepted practice and public executions were a form of entertainment.
Agreed. They also had a higher acceptance of death. Things like the infant mortality rate being between 30% and 50% along with the likelihood of dying from simple fevers and infections meant that death was a much more familiar concept to the average person then.

America's greatest weakness and Russia's greatest strength all rely on the acceptance of death. Having a populace that accepts that people die in war, and it is sometimes necessary is much better than the US which has to prop up the MIC in the construction of evernew "wunderwaffen" to give the illusion of immortality and invulnerability to its soldiers. "our tanks are inpeneratrable, our planes are undetectable, we can see in the dark whilst our enemy is blind". It comes as no surprise the US spent decades playing "war" with illiterate goat herders in their efforts to justify the MIC.
 
Speaking about Russians being able to accept death more readily then those in the West it's useful to point out that one of the advantages of Russia as opposed to the West. Is that the Orthodox Faith underpins society. Now obviously not everyone goes to church on Sunday or anything but when you have an understanding that life is temporary and you can't live forever leads you to being much more accepting of those types of things when they happen.
 
She had Mary, Queen of Scots beheaded so I very strongly disagree.

She had Mary beheaded by men. One man held her down, and the other man hacked at her neck until her head was severed. The physical acts of violence were all committed by men.

You don't seem to understand what I mean by physical. I mean that very literally, the use of your own body to deliver deadly force. It's something women don't really understand, because, as I said before, violence is something men do on behalf of women, and your example of Elizabeth I having men imprison and execute Mary on her behalf is a perfect example of that.

Having people do something on your behalf is not the same as doing it yourself. As I said before, women do not inflict violence. They have men do it. Elizabeth I is no exception.

Also, she may have portrayed herself as delicate and dainty

She was 5'4" and slender. She absolutely was delicate and dainty and completely incapable of physically subduing anyone larger than a child.
 
Back