Poll: Do you want sticker notifications back? - Not the score, just the notifications.

Should sticker notifications be brought back?


  • Total voters
    1,550
Or just keep crying about it, that works too. But stop acting like stickers aren't there and that you can't get feedback or links to your stickies. It is maybe 1 second and 1 click less convenient. Oh no. Nothing has actually been taken from you.
You couldn't just leave the reaction there to get the point across, you had to reply again. You prove my point too well faggot.
 
Or just keep crying about it, that works too. But stop acting like stickers aren't there and that you can't get feedback or links to your stickies. It is maybe 1 second and 1 click less convenient. Oh no. Nothing has actually been taken from you.
89EF6704-F1FE-4342-866A-816E85F3E3D7.jpeg
 
Before you would load the front page and the sticker notifications are right there staring you in the face. If you wanted to turn off sticker notifications you could as a choice (I presume?).
It was absolutely a choice. I turned them off a few weeks after joining because I too thought it was silly to get notified for anything other than direct replies.

I found the site harder to navigate after that (I gave it probably a week, honestly), so I turned them back on, assuming they were enabled by default for a reason.

Boy, was I wrong.
 
Do some of the people here realize how pathetic they come across as?
This is a site meant for goofballs to laugh at weirdos and general shenanigans on the internet. It's not exactly a bastion of high-mindedness that bestows higher social status on its users.

Despite this a lot of posters here are very thoughtful and a proportion of those thoughtful posters probably had reaction notifications enabled and I liked that I could show my appreciation of their thoughtful posts with the single click of a button. Or to tell someone that they are retarded and should feel bad at the single click of a button. For either case the user receiving a reaction could turn off the notifications if they felt like it. Having it forced off is simply a downgrade.
 
Last edited:
Late November 2023 - Null banned users @Matt Damon and @polonium (latter joined OnionFarms) in the Woman-Hate Thread because he got in a really bad argument with them. @Johan Schmidt, who was barely even a woman hater, also got banned, because he made a beer joke off of Null's expense.
My nigga @polonium got banned? I shitposted with him across like 3 or 4 forums! I'm pretty sure he was one of the people who got me to come here.

Fucking gay.

for-my-homies-respect.gif
 
I think one thing we can all agree is that no matter how this goes, Null needs to take a chill pill and probably a decently long vacation, the lashing out and rage bans are a symptom of a bigger issue that even if he suddenly gives in and reverts all the changes, this is just gonna happen all over again.
 
@Mango Cobra gets banned by Null for being his most prominent critic in the thread and the fact that he brings up Null's hostile arguments in the Woman-Hate Thread.
I'm torn on this, retrospectively.

On the one hand I feel completely justified for hammering him on how he was acting by randomly running into the woman hate thread and retard-posting only to demand nobody is allowed to call him a retard/ the blatant hypocrisy of pissing blood for journoscum because some faggot said it was bad despite him constantly ranting about how "If you can't make money off of something you make, you deserve to starve to death"/ Riding the balding british breadtuber's dick and I successfully hammered him hard enough by calling him 'malding' that his only response was (as the ban message was calling me malding) "NO KIWI-CHILD, YOU ARE MALDING! Enjoy banworld", on the other, most of my points were off completely off-topic and maybe should have been saved for a different time and place.

Unlike the other bans in that post, I can see why I'd catch a temp-ban.
 
Last edited:
Back