Sweet Baby Inc. and the Steam Curator Group Conspiracy - The company that is responsible for the diarrheic video game writing.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
The daily Ambien binge, as he's been doing for at least a decade

Not sure if this was talked about already, but some chick who's working on Insomniac's upcoming Wolverine game has made a thread defending SBI and their antics.
View attachment 5812919

Nice gaslighting. "The developers don't have to take the note! They can just refuse to... uh, follow the 'advice' of the company that has its own leadership on record saying they run it as a racket."

I really don't care - even if what this thot is saying was true (lol), the simple truth is that these people are all universally terrible and everything they touch turns to shit.
 
I know that a lot of people are saying that women are the only ones who care about being "seen" and what not in entertainment but that isn't really the case. Women also like beautiful looking women. It is one of the reasons why Barbie and Taylor Swift are so popular. From what I've seen the only people that care about being "seen" is LGBTQ+ people. I mean, Pride Parades are all about faggots demanding to be seen. Every member of Sweet Baby Inc. and the jornoscum defending them is some flavor of gender special. Companies are going to have to one day admit that pandering to faggots and trannies loses you profit and that the populace does not want them shoved down their throat's. It doesn't help that most gay and trans people online are some of the most insufferable, entitled and unlikable people in the world. Nobody wants to see these people, least of all in our escapist entertainment.
 
I leave for a few weeks and look what happens. I thought we all had a mailing list and were supposed to agree in advance on when GG2: BIPOC Boogaloo was going to happen. I would have use my vacation time to fight the good fight rather than touching grass if someone would have bothered to send out the mass mailer. Who the fuck was in charge of that again? Wasn't that Sargon? Someone find his ass and make sure to explain, using small words, how serious of a fuckup not sending out the mailer is.

1710373140588.jpeg

However, I am excited to speed-run the whole affair this time around. We'll definitely nab that WR this time on how quickly a movement can be co-opted by grifters and faggots while the other side is appearing before the UN and setting up corporate nepotism networks for the next ratcheting up of the censorship regime by TPTB.

1710373153153.jpeg

But yeah, this time "it's different". :story: (Although, I guess that's true in that it's been a decade of this shit already and my knee now pops if I'm asked to stand up for something.)

I support consumer action in these cases, but really what's the point?

If someone's buying new releases, actually paying $70 for videogames when the options for free and low price entertainment are wider than at any other time (especially with emulation and sites like GoG) and the quality of new releases is worse than at any other time, they've already made themselves into a bitch.

I am finding some nice A and AA gems to add to my library as I catch up on the thread, so that's at least a small win. Couldn't even be a AAA bitch if I wanted to, can't afford that crap in this economy.
 
Games will become worse. People will stop buying new ones.

We will lose, but we still have good games to fall back onto. They will win, but will lose everything in the process.

More or less what kind of happened with Gamergate 1. AAA suffered, and really only Sports games and Chinese coomer shit made money.
I wouldn't call people falling back to their backlogs, and AAA going under a "loss," Jim. Hell, i'd even make the argument that a AAA studio going under would be a win in my books. Might as well make 'em go under for bending the knee to DEI.
 
This is what I don't get:

With the original GamerGate, there was only so much I could care about video game journalism being corrupt, because that had been common knowledge for years, and so I never read that shit. My ears perked up when mainstream media picked up the story, because of how biased and one-sided it was. It begged the question: are these mainstream news outlets protecting minimum wage video game journalists for some reason? Or are they also so bad at their jobs that they don't see the problem with interviewing the accused and taking that as a reflection of the full story, whilst representing the opposition by quoting "Fart_Muncher_69420's" heavily downvoted Youtube comment all the way at the bottom where he said "women r idiots lol."

It was either protectionism, as if the mainstream news outlets were under the same corporation as the game websites, or it was a show of gross incompetence and reason to worry about mainstream media. (which sure enough, steadily declined over the years)

And now with this "GamerGate 2.0..."

I already don't buy the games Sweet Baby Inc has consulted for because I don't have such garbage fucking taste that I actually buy this shit. Me "boycotting" Sweet Baby Inc is thus as simple as continuing to have good taste in video games, so cool, I'll do that. I don't have to care about this topic.

But again my ears have perked up, because WHY THE FUCK are groups funded by government agencies throwing their hat in the ring to protect Sweet Baby Inc?! What "misinformation" has been spread? No one has released some extensive document or something where they could have uncited claims against Sweet Baby Inc, and instead everything criticized was a direct quote by Sweet Baby Inc themselves, with video evidence.

Unless they wanna tell us the first example of an extensive deep fake campaign involves the misrepresentation of...a random video game consulting agency...? Then no, there's no potential for misinformation here. People saw a company behaving in mafia-like coercion and pressure while saying racist things, people are upset, and so people are utilizing their rights as consumers to boycott products consulted on by the company to send the message that letting Sweet Baby Inc through the door will not benefit sales. By chance, the heads of the boycott campaign are not even from US & Canada, yet being dismissed as extremist rightwingers within the US & Canadian political systems. I would also argue that the fact we do not see the same support for Sweet Baby Inc outside of US & Canada is again a strong argument for why this is likely another story of corruption within those two.

This shit is mind-boggling. It's like the free market has decided what it wants for the second time now, rightfully points out inappropriate comments and practices by Sweet Baby Inc, and then the consumers are being dogpiled by seemingly unrelated corporations and agencies for...not buying a product? Like WTF how bad is corruption in USA and Canada? There's no other viable explanation I can think of.

And even if it's corruption, why are the corporations and agencies not just...y'know, recognizing people don't wanna buy this shit and adjusting their opinions appropriately. These are supposed to be businesses. Why is it that businesses are always ruthlessly pragmatic and will do ANYTHING to make a buck, but when it comes to the topic of this woke shit in particular, we have multi-billion dollar businesses like Disney that are like "no, I would rather give myself multiple brain tumors and hurt my bottom-line than make money by going back to the harmless films I was making before." Insanity.
 

Going to point out that the reason Samus Aran, of Metroid fame, is a woman is because the guys at Nintendo wanted a change of pace since Link, Pit, and Mario were all men.

That’s right folks, Samus being female was because some guys were tired of the sausage fest. Done purely on a lark, and Western media ignored the dev team and drummed up a power fantasy for women.
 
Brianna Wu has always been "truscum". He's from like rural Kentucky or some shit, I think his father was even in the GOP? So even though he's a mindfucked pornsick tranny he's also from a really religious family. Being a 'woman' to him is being a country wife. See:
I genuinely never got a pornsick vibe from Wu, he's always seemed to me like an unfortunate looking HSTS. One of the ones that just genuinely always wanted to be a woman because being a regular homo buckbroke their brain due to not being able to live out their dream of being a wife and mom like their mom was.

Still weird though, still damaging to society, but less gross, more just sad.
 
@A Flying Nun

I'd argue it's cuz they've been nationalized, so they get government backing, hence why the DHS and FBI are involved. Cuz Sweet Baby Inc. and their ilk are part of the government, and by refusing to consoom, we are witholding money from the government. Why do you think our tax dollars go to SBI?
 
It is not too hard if you are interested. I learned in high-school to configure IRQs, use config.sys/autoexec.bat. Indeed you have to study a little bit how certain configurations happen or what hardware you need.
Of course it’s not. It’s dead simple compared to actually understanding the current NT operating system, but zoomer’s are so retarded they will just seize up and cry as soon as you start making references to FORMAT C: and AUTOEXEC.BAT.
 
And even if it's corruption, why are the corporations and agencies not just...y'know, recognizing people don't wanna buy this shit and adjusting their opinions appropriately. These are supposed to be businesses. Why is it that businesses are always ruthlessly pragmatic and will do ANYTHING to make a buck, but when it comes to the topic of this woke shit in particular, we have multi-billion dollar businesses like Disney that are like "no, I would rather give myself multiple brain tumors and hurt my bottom-line than make money by going back to the harmless films I was making before." Insanity.
If the business was as straight-forward as making products that appeal to customers, that would be it. But when you have influences like investment firms and social mandates for organizations, then it becomes the usual clown world affair.
 
But again my ears have perked up, because WHY THE FUCK are groups funded by government agencies throwing their hat in the ring to protect Sweet Baby Inc?! What "misinformation" has been spread? No one has released some extensive document or something where they could have uncited claims against Sweet Baby Inc, and instead everything criticized was a direct quote by Sweet Baby Inc themselves, with video evidence.
The Federal Government has been doing research into how to decapitate headless movement structures since Occupy Wallstreet.

The Internet, up until about 2012, was a very large and important economic backbone to the country that lawmakers were afraid to touch and alphabet people didn't understand. It was huge, international, complicated, and mysterious. When Occupy Wallstreet genuinely threatened to heal racial divide that Obama worked very hard to open up, and even more dangerously threatened to put the spotlight on the rich, they needed to fix it.

They couldn't just "shut it down". Someone warned them that the Internet was very important and trying to fuck with it would hurt the US's culture export more in the long run, than would help in the short run (see: China's limited culture export despite being the #1 economy, because the Great Firewall went up before there was even widespread Internet adoption in the country).

So how do you terminate a headless, decentralized, grass roots political activist movement without just censoring the Internet or forcing people at gunpoint to disperse? You inject fags. You make it not about equalizing the already enormous and unprecedented wealth inequality in the US (which has only grown unchecked since), but about 'equity' and making sure blacks get more than whites because they need it more, gay marriage, and abortion, and all this other retarded shit.

Thus, your laser focused goal of reducing wealth inequality (which threatens the banks that own the Federal Reserve and by extension the entire world) spreads out and dilutes until nobody cares enough to keep going. They just stay at home so they don't have to listen to some dyke sheboon cry about slavery or whatever the fuck.

In GamerGate it was a similar test but the government knew what they were doing. Unlike with Occupy Wallstreet, there was no organic media attention that was sympathetic, and they learned how to use Wikipedia and other major trusted sources to solidify their grip on narratives.

This is just more of the same. Some retards got caught pushing dumb shit and gaymers are hoping to BudLite them. But that wont work. What they really don't want this time around is another 8chan to spring up and cause problems like the last one did. So any attempts to organize this centrally will fail. If they make a website, it will be nuked from orbit.
 
I know that a lot of people are saying that women are the only ones who care about being "seen" and what not in entertainment but that isn't really the case. Women also like beautiful looking women. It is one of the reasons why Barbie and Taylor Swift are so popular. From what I've seen the only people that care about being "seen" is LGBTQ+ people. I mean, Pride Parades are all about faggots demanding to be seen. Every member of Sweet Baby Inc. and the jornoscum defending them is some flavor of gender special. Companies are going to have to one day admit that pandering to faggots and trannies loses you profit and that the populace does not want them shoved down their throat's. It doesn't help that most gay and trans people online are some of the most insufferable, entitled and unlikable people in the world. Nobody wants to see these people, least of all in our escapist entertainment.
Bayonetta's designer is a woman.

And you only need to look at any piece of media "claimed" by LGBT to see how laced with narcissism it is. Don't know what happened, but I miss the 2006 gay dudes that just wanted to go suck dick in peace. Something happened, and instead it's now a constant demand for approval, as if broadcasting low self-esteem on behalf of huge percents of the LGBT community. I'm always reminded of a Lewis Black stand-up routine, where when arguing for gay marriage, he mocked the idea of Gay Banditos breaking into people's homes and forcing families to watch them fuck on a coffee table. He's right! It sounds absurd!

But fast forward and something about the way US/Canadian culture has developed has made LGBT draw narcissists over like moths to a flame. No we don't have gay banditos, but my god is there a demand to acknowledge the fuckers every two seconds, and any attempts to call out the narcissism are dismissed as bigotry. I have legitimately been told "you're not welcome here, this is OUR space," for simply disagreeing with some theory that Gortash and Dark Urge from Baldur's Gate 3 are canonically gay lovers. (it's based on some letter where Dark Urge says he admires Gortash's ingenuity before stating he still plans to kill him, and apparently any expression of admiration now means they're hella big gay) The same group that claims to be for equality will now act with hostility towards anyone even remotely expressing that not everything is gay all the time, while claiming games they like as "ours" as if everyone else is a guest there. Can't stand interacting with the BG3 community as a result, because for as good as the game is on some fronts, it pandered too hard to LGBT, so now all it's star narcissists run around like they own the place.

Can't tell you how much I hate that the trans community loves Fallout New Vegas and now insists it's a trans game. Which wtf, WHY? There is not a single trans character in that game! Everyone loves that game! Just because you like it too doesn't make it "yours." Get the fuck in line and cut it out with this entitled bullshit.
 
Not sure if this was talked about already, but some chick who's working on Insomniac's upcoming Wolverine game has made a thread defending SBI and their antics.
View attachment 5812919
I've seen this thread from this Insomniac narrative director Mary Kenney (who now has her Twitter account protected) before and have some points to make:
  • Insomniac is one of the most openly woke studios that I'm aware of with a history of antics like making a video crying about Trump's immigration policy and rallying to oust Oculus VR founder Palmer Luckey for being a Trump supporter.
  • Sweet Baby Inc is just an obvious, clearly-identifiable example of wokeness plaguing the video game industry while enriching parasitic fraudsters, but the issue is much bigger than just a single consulting company. While it's true that SBI only gets work by the consent of the companies like Insomniac they're hired by, those companies are just as much part of the problem as SBI, and they need to cut that shit out.
  • While it's true that anything SBI does is with approval of their employer, I'm sure that rejection will be countered with guilt-tripping, threats, and other arguments about how they must be approved in everything they do or else it's bigotry, like as CEO Kim Belair laid out in that infamous GDC video clip.
  • Earlier in that same GDC presentation, Kim Belair tells a story in which a previous employer only took her advice for the purpose of "mitigating risk", lamenting about how she wants to have more narrative control over a game project, a sentiment that I suspect Mary Kenney would fully agree with.
  • I wish I had this screencapped in light of the protected account, but after making this thread, upon being asked, Mary Kenney said that she agreed with the Kotaku writer Alyssa Mercante that you can't be racist against white people.
1710375259732.png
 
Last edited:
I know that a lot of people are saying that women are the only ones who care about being "seen" and what not in entertainment but that isn't really the case. Women also like beautiful looking women. It is one of the reasons why Barbie and Taylor Swift are so popular. From what I've seen the only people that care about being "seen" is LGBTQ+ people. I mean, Pride Parades are all about faggots demanding to be seen. Every member of Sweet Baby Inc. and the jornoscum defending them is some flavor of gender special. Companies are going to have to one day admit that pandering to faggots and trannies loses you profit and that the populace does not want them shoved down their throat's. It doesn't help that most gay and trans people online are some of the most insufferable, entitled and unlikable people in the world. Nobody wants to see these people, least of all in our escapist entertainment.
yes its not a woman thing. not just a faggot thing either, it's pretty universal: the entertainment industry with its promise of fame and spotlight is very attractive to attention seekers in general.
and video games are now a huge market, comparable to music or film in size, so now they attract some of those types too.
 
lmao a fucking 4080 recommended? jesus christ
All the PCgamer faggots wondering why 500$ consoles that make the devs optimize for it are still popular while PC games make you spend 10k on a rig just to have to configure shit for 8 hours to be able to play a game for 30 minutes before it crashes. Keep your 180 fps, I'll remain comfy at 30.
 
The Federal Government has been doing research into how to decapitate headless movement structures since Occupy Wallstreet.
Current Year most definitely did start around 2012, and it absolutely was an astroturfed response to OWS. I've been saying a much more sarcastic and abridged version of this for years, but it's nice to see dear feeder also shares this view.

Legacy news exploded with headlines about racial strife and police shootings around that time, trannies pre-2012 used to be the butt of a joke rather than any serious political faction. Never in grade school did I imagine adult me would see gangs of communists and neo-nazis brawling in broad daylight, but that happened during the 2016 election. Things were good after Rodney King up until the end of OWS, and someone intentionally made that world disappear.
 
Back