Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 63 17.5%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.1%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 93 25.9%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 60 16.7%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 139 38.7%

  • Total voters
    359
This would be illegal in the UK. If you trap an animal that's regarded as a pest of some kind -- we don't have raccoons, that I'm aware of, but say you caught rats? You can't go releasing those pests on land that you don't own. It's akin to delivering a plague to somebody else's property. It's a criminal offence and you'd be potentially liable for any civil damages -- ie, paying pest controllers to eradicate them from the land where you released them.

Although people tend to think they're doing the humane thing, they actually aren't. Animals that get transplanted into strange territory generally struggle to survive. They'll often panic. Most pest controllers in the UK believe that the best way to deal with the issue is by humanely killing them.
Always been surprising to me that we can all agree that raccoons, coyotes, etc. are a nuisance and threats to property/livestock, but 'outdoor' cats are great. They will just as surely kill a chicken or rabbit out of someone's yard, kill native wildlife, and dig up gardens to shit in. And they breed like crazy.
 
I figured the wild reaches of the United States could handle more animals, but I am just a Scandanavian prude, so what do I know?
As long as you don't release it into someone's back yard or property its not really doing any harm. Raccoons will eat literally anything so as long as they can find a source of water I'm sure they'll be fine.
These are wild animals they're made to exist in the wilds. And 10 miles out isn't that big of a difference.
 
Personally, I'd like to be able to take a plague of feral rats and release them in the houses of my enemies. But my inability to do so is pretty low down on my list of impositions on my freedom.

Also: Massachusetts has the same laws as we do. If you trap, you can only release on your own property.
I think this might be one reason for the difference between the U.K. and U.S. with regard to this: in much of the U.S., there is probably a lot more "wilderness" that is effectively no one's property (well, the state's). This is probably less true in the smaller, more densely populated states like Massachusetts, but otherwise, going a few miles out from the city you'll be able to find a field or wooded area that doesn't belong to anybody in particular.
 
Okay Rackets for your next trick I need you to down another bottle of whiskey, seethe at my existence, and wish me a million dollars.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6032.jpeg
    IMG_6032.jpeg
    963.6 KB · Views: 32
  • IMG_6033.jpeg
    IMG_6033.jpeg
    1.2 MB · Views: 32
I think this might be one reason for the difference between the U.K. and U.S. with regard to this: in much of the U.S., there is probably a lot more "wilderness" that is effectively no one's property (well, the state's). This is probably less true in the smaller, more densely populated states like Massachusetts, but otherwise, going a few miles out from the city you'll be able to find a field or wooded area that doesn't belong to anybody in particular.
It's not surprising Massachusetts has laws like that since it is a shithole that puts the "England" in "New England". But it's also full of wilderness and has plenty of open spaces. Nobody would give a fuck if you relocated an animal beside the Moviebobs, Brianna Wus, all the fags in the commie college towns and Boston suburbs.
 
There's a shedload of stuff you can legitimately criticize the UK about, but insisting that people break the necks of rats rather than capturing and transporting them to make them somebody else's problem doesn't seem to me to be one of them.
Skunks and raccoons are not fucking rats. (If they really were rabid and you had them trapped you'd probably call animal control to report it and dispose of them, or shoot them if they said to.)
 
every cow who hates the farms is like this. nick, dax, vito, ralph, keffals, etc

But you don't understand how FUNNY and WEIRD their lives are! They are just telling stories and want to have a good time. Why don't you want to just RELAX and have FUN telling JOKES! What are you? Some Scandanavian, virgin,, Republicans, trad, Catholic incel prude or something?

I think this might be one reason for the difference between the U.K. and U.S. with regard to this: in much of the U.S., there is probably a lot more "wilderness" that is effectively no one's property (well, the state's). This is probably less true in the smaller, more densely populated states like Massachusetts, but otherwise, going a few miles out from the city you'll be able to find a field or wooded area that doesn't belong to anybody in particular.

Exactly. I doubt there are game watchers as vigilant as the UK to safeguard Biden's deer. Vast tracts of land exist where you could do virtually anything.
 
I think this might be one reason for the difference between the U.K. and U.S. with regard to this: in much of the U.S., there is probably a lot more "wilderness" that is effectively no one's property (well, the state's).

In Canada (and possibly in the UK) the spaces between and everything not explicitly owned is referred to as "Crown Land" like the Robin Hood days of yore.
 
But you don't understand how FUNNY and WEIRD their lives are! They are just telling stories and want to have a good time. Why don't you want to just RELAX and have FUN telling JOKES! What are you? Some Scandanavian, virgin,, Republicans, trad, Catholic incel prude or something?

Nick could be sober, not go on tard rants every stream, not be a terrible father/husband, and even go back to doing trials.

Even if that were all the case, the fact that he's so adamant on being buddies with self declared pedos is enough to lose my viewership forever. There are some things you just don't budge on, and that's one of them.
 
I can't help but cringe at how the kids are going to eventually hear about the animal shit if he hasn't already bragged about it to make daddy seem like a cool tuff outdoorsman. I'm vomiting rainbows of optimism here, but I'm going to presume that at least the older ones are exposed to the world (or at least the Internet) enough to twig pretty fast that if you're doing shit like that you're doing it wrong.

I'm pretty far from a bleeding heart, had my share of early lessons about life and death on the farm and giving a clean death to something incapacitated as a kid and teen. But there's something more than a little icky about the idea of a kiddo coming up to a learning moment like that and instead of getting a funny story about how his uncle put a possum he wasn't sure about in a bag at deer camp to dump it behind the outhouse and got scared when it woke up swinging halfway there or valuable life advice with a horror story about not taking the shot if you can't make the shot and instead getting an earful of Rackets' nature conquests.

It's probably not as bad as finding out about the Balldo or as damaging as being a degenerate drunk around the family, but it's somehow more distasteful to me than a lot of the other bad role model aspects of his life. All of his stories about dealings with the animal kingdom give me a vibe of something a teenage boy might do once out of morbid curiosity and regret enough to never talk about again except maybe years later on anon, but he was an adult when they happened, an adult when he decided to share them with the world, and it's nasty fucking behavior.
 
It's probably not as bad as finding out about the Balldo or as damaging as being a degenerate drunk around the family, but it's somehow more distasteful to me than a lot of the other bad role model aspects of his life.
If his children rebel and stand against him, it will be painful for them. But ultimately, it will mean that their scarred souls can start healing.
However, the alternative scenario has to be always considered: Nicks' kids may go through life thinking their father is super normal and everyone else is weird. And then, they will have their own kids and raise them in a similar way. If Nick would tell them - hey, I am a degenerate and I'll never change, but what I am doing is wrong, and I want you to be better than me - we could remain optimistic. But he just doesn't strike me as a person who can genuinely, honestly self-reflect and admit to wrongdoings.

There were occasions where he was saying something self-critical, but to me, it always felt like baiting. Like when a girl posts "OMG am so ugly", just to get "Noooooo queen ur so pretty" comments back. Or even more manipulative - as to have an explanation for others - and peace of mind for himself - that he akshually is very very humble. He said it, so it must be true.
Is he humble though? Is a man screaming at one streamer, because another streamer is critical of him and won't be brainwashed, humble?
Is a man mocking somebody's mental health struggles, and painting himself as the Saviour and Good Samaritan, WHILST mocking, humble?
Is a man laughing about needlessly drowning a skunk TWICE, humble?
Have you ever worked with a person who would try to maintain the image of being very rational, professional and open to criticism, but as soon as you do politely criticise them, they would either blow up or start a passive-agressive war, and never EVER lose that grudge against you? That's my impression of Nick.
I don't think he can change, there is something wrong with his brain. Alcohol and financial success exacerbated it, but it was always there. Like a rotten seed waiting to grow into a rotten tree.
So yeah, it's gonna be a big gamba of life as to whether his kids wake up, or are they irretrievably lost in hands of this demonic man.
 
Skunks and raccoons are not fucking rats. (If they really were rabid and you had them trapped you'd probably call animal control to report it and dispose of them, or shoot them if they said to.)

Rekieta must be boring as hell at the moment for us to be getting involved in retarded slapfights about pest control.
 
Rekieta must be boring as hell at the moment for us to be getting involved in retarded slapfights about pest control.
That is what kept him out of scrutiny for so long. He is so boring when he isn't doing degenerate coomer shit or going on rants about blacks. It was so powerful it even gave people like Drex protection just by being associated to him.
 
Nick could be sober, not go on tard rants every stream, not be a terrible father/husband, and even go back to doing trials.

Even if that were all the case, the fact that he's so adamant on being buddies with self declared pedos is enough to lose my viewership forever. There are some things you just don't budge on, and that's one of them.

He might have a redemption arc with the ability to get a new audience, but I would say the old audience and level of support is gone forever.

If Nick would tell them - hey, I am a degenerate and I'll never change, but what I am doing is wrong, and I want you to be better than me - we could remain optimistic. But he just doesn't strike me as a person who can genuinely, honestly self-reflect and admit to wrongdoings.

My Nan was like this. She would say, 'Don't you go smoking, now. It's a dirty, nasty habit. If I ever catch you, you'll be sorry.' She would do this straight-faced, while pulling drags on half a pack of fags. She just figured she was too old to change, but really knee how bad it was.

Nick is not in this camp.

Rekieta must be boring as hell at the moment for us to be getting involved in retarded slapfights about pest control.

I have hope that he will rose like a lolcow Phoenix from the gelatinous mass of reminders of his last milking session to provide yet more content. Russell Greer is one of those cows who has some long stretches of drought, then pours a bunch of milk like a geyser.

I hope Nick is one of these, and not the spwe'd run cows like BossmanJack. I fear he will bot be long for entertainment, but Nick could limp along into a healthy senescent cow.
 
My Nan was like this. She would say, 'Don't you go smoking, now. It's a dirty, nasty habit. If I ever catch you, you'll be sorry.' She would do this straight-faced, while pulling drags on half a pack of fags. She just figured she was too old to change, but really knee how bad it was.

Nick is not in this camp.
some addicts (most smokers, but also some alcoholics) will tell you that it's the devil and that you should never ever touch the stuff
other addicts (most stoners) will tell you how it's harmless and natural and healthy and you should definitely try some

i feel nick is probably in that second category
 
I suggest we give them the same treatment(s). We can get some Chinese company to design feeders that are connected to an application, where bystanders can pay to have a bowl of Heinz Beans deposited to capture and ID wild bongs, neuter them (physically), and then let them loose.
It's completely unnecessary to neuter bong males. Much like mules they're all sterile. In order for modern day Brits to breed a melanated bull must be involved.
There's a shedload of stuff you can legitimately criticize the UK about, but insisting that people break the necks of rats rather than capturing and transporting them to make them somebody else's problem doesn't seem to me to be one of them.
The NAP doesn't extend to rats and mice. In my cellar I have 15 traps. 14 kill traps and one live trap. If the mouse chooses wisely it gets to live.
Always been surprising to me that we can all agree that raccoons, coyotes, etc. are a nuisance and threats to property/livestock, but 'outdoor' cats are great. They will just as surely kill a chicken or rabbit out of someone's yard, kill native wildlife, and dig up gardens to shit in. And they breed like crazy.
People who leave their cats outside are jerk owners. Too much shit can happen to them. Rabbits are dumb. I support rabbit genocide. Predating on chicken? The cat would have to be starving. Cats avoid animals that can fuck them up. Chickens are mean fuckers. There are much bigger threats out there and anyone experienced at raising chicken will have their birds protected from them.
Okay Rackets for your next trick I need you to down another bottle of whiskey, seethe at my existence, and wish me a million dollars.
I want him to wish me ALL THE MONEY IN THE WORLD. Heartfelt.
Skunks and raccoons are not fucking rats. (If they really were rabid and you had them trapped you'd probably call animal control to report it and dispose of them, or shoot them if they said to.)
The time we had a sick raccoon in our front yard, we called the local cops. It was clear there was something very wrong with it. An officer came with a shotgun and blew its brains out. A nice quick death for the poor sick thing.
Rekieta must be boring as hell at the moment for us to be getting involved in retarded slapfights about pest control.
Tripod! Nick is such a lazy cow we've got no milk. He probably won't even stream tonight because he got STEELTOE'D last night.
 
Last edited:
Watched a thing on Elissa clips.

Nick Rekieta: "Its OK to commit crimes if you don't think anyone's watching."

Warski: "Family could allege emotional damages from the grief of a grave being defaced, and financial damages from having to get it cleaned or repaired."

We live in times where Warski makes actual better legal arguments than Nick Rekieta the Lawyer.
 
Back