Sweet Baby Inc. and the Steam Curator Group Conspiracy - The company that is responsible for the diarrheic video game writing.

[AnOminous]

Like others have said, you should pick your battles and only concentrate on one or a few. Target and Bud Light were some of the most flagrant offenders, and that's why they were targeted.

Bud Light wasn't targeted as an organized activity. The people selling it advertised it as queer beer. People just didn't want to drink it because they didn't want to be mocked by their friends for drinking tranny fluid and asked when they were getting their dick cut off.

That said you're right the monkey on a stick approach is effective. Pick someone, make an example of them, pour encourager les autres.

 

[Calandrino]

Once again, I offer you the solution: Traitors of America 2020

https://archive.md/VFl3J

We need something like this

Oh wow

Are there any based alternatives to grindr and fur affinity?

 

[Mossy Trash Panda]

I disagree. If people are so ADHD that they lose focus once you give them too many names, then frankly they don't belong here. They should just stop what they're doing and let the youtube slop creator factory make content for them and water it all down or get their info from some reddit post.
The more the merrier, if a dev, journo or eceleb says something, it should be archived and cataloged. If a company does something, it should similarly be archived and those should have more than one notable quotes to cement their reputations, they're big entities after all and many people work there.
Like it was already stated, categorization is key: Divide the list between "The Industry"(Developers, SBI employees and journos), "Influencers"(twitter, youtube, discord and otherwise bootlickers who have their own channels, content and personas) and "Companies"(Official statements made by the company as a whole, or individuals who represent the company in their statements). Anyone should find what they're looking for in an instant, and this should be the baseline for any smart customer worth their salt looking into if the product is worth their time years from now. I still use the Traitors 2020 list myself, you would be surprised what names will pop up.

No, dude. It isn't a matter of ADHD, It's a matter of manpower, energy, and time. Neither of which we have to take on all the targets under the sun. That's why we need to focus on just one, or a few. Once they see a titan fall, they'll come to their senses.

 

[Countless irate bees]

I disagree. If people are so ADHD that they lose focus once you give them too many names, then frankly they don't belong here. They should just stop what they're doing and let the youtube slop creator factory make content for them and water it all down or get their info from some reddit post.
The more the merrier, if a dev, journo or eceleb says something, it should be archived and cataloged. If a company does something, it should similarly be archived and those should have more than one notable quotes to cement their reputations, they're big entities after all and many people work there.
Like it was already stated, categorization is key: Divide the list between "The Industry"(Developers, SBI employees and journos), "Influencers"(twitter, youtube, discord and otherwise bootlickers who have their own channels, content and personas) and "Companies"(Official statements made by the company as a whole, or individuals who represent the company in their statements). Anyone should find what they're looking for in an instant, and this should be the baseline for any smart customer worth their salt looking into if the product is worth their time years from now. I still use the Traitors 2020 list myself, you would be surprised what names will pop up.

Eh, you can do both. I remember how Destiny, for all his faults, wrote extensive manifestos to read and reference from during his extensive political arcs and he still managed to omae wa mu shindeiru most of people coming his way with bullshit arguments without listing all 219 chapters.

It does not need to be retard-proof, but the uhm, read theory sweatie approach that the terminally online SJW lefties love so much does not move a lot of people because not a lot of people have time to fuck with a bible's worth of receipts and neetvestigative journalism. Also, there is a gish-gallop fallacy somewhere in there if you want to fish for it (and some nerd will fish for it in an argument online). Just pick a top 8 shitty games, order them by worst rating and put them on a pedestal, job done.

 

[30+GameOvers]

No, dude. It isn't a matter of ADHD, It's a matter of manpower, energy, and time. Neither of which we have to take on all the targets under the sun. That's why we need to focus on just one, or a few. Once they see a titan fall, they'll come to their senses.

This isn't about "making the titan fall" or at least it shouldn't be. I am talking about a big blackbook, internet's shit list that gets constantly updated. What kind of manpower are you even talking about, that Traitor list I linked was done entirely by one dude, with some help of people sending him tweets on the side. You don't need some goobergater army to run a glorified blog, stupid shit like this is what killed GG1

Don't treat this like a "movement", just hurt them the most passive way possible and see them sperg out. Just watch how the Steam group made them react, this is just the natural next step that goes a bit more indepth.

 

[CircuSphere]

Bud Light wasn't targeted as an organized activity. The people selling it advertised it as queer beer. People just didn't want to drink it because they didn't want to be mocked by their friends for drinking tranny fluid and asked when they were getting their dick cut off.

Think about this for a second. How did the word that Bud Light is tranny fluid get from Dylan's deep blue cosmopolitan TicTok to Jim Bob who has nightmares about the UI on his tractor?

The answer is we told him, we distributed those clips well beyond the range Unibev intended (or in fact wanted). We started the mocking! We called the Jihad! The difference between the Bud boycott and previous boycotts is that (and I can't seem to say this enough times) it was targeted, visible and easy to engage in. "Avoid nearly every release for the next several years" is a lot harder for the normies than "Men Helldive, soyboys play Suicide Squad."

If you guys want to eschew Triple A entirely and emulate old shit more power to you but if you want to win we need something normie ass console fags can participate in. They don't fear a 5% dip in the whole sector, they fear massive, highly visible IPs being destroyed in the faces of their investors, they fear their stocks tanking as the word spreads and the MSM can't ignore the fallout....

 

[Meat Target]

This isn't about "making the titan fall" or at least it shouldn't be. I am talking about a big blackbook, internet's shit list that gets constantly updated. What kind of manpower are you even talking about, that Traitor list I linked was done entirely by one dude, with some help of people sending him tweets on the side. You don't need some goobergater army to run a glorified blog, stupid shit like this is what killed GG1

Don't treat this like a "movement", just hurt them the most passive way possible and see them sperg out. Just watch how the Steam group made them react, this is just the natural next step that goes a bit more indepth.

Okay, so one guy has a shitlist.

So what? Why should he be listened to? What is being done with that list? Should it be everyone's full-time job to go around a-logging every entity that ever was for their every bluepilled deed?

The only way you could effectively boycott everything you don't like is to go build your own principality out in Buttfuck, Montana, and get thousands of people to join you.

Not everyone feasibly can, or wants to, boycott everything that has some attachment to something they don't like. When you keep a big long shitlist, the only person who looks like a sperg is you.

 

[marvlouslie]

Honestly, fuck the console fags, tbh.

 

[DumbDude43]

Okay, so one guy has a shitlist.

So what? Why should he be listened to? What is being done with that list? Should it be everyone's full-time job to go around a-logging every entity that ever was for their every bluepilled deed?

The only way you could effectively boycott everything you don't like is to go build your own principality out in Buttfuck, Montana.

Not everyone feasibly can, or wants to, boycott everything that has some attachment to something they don't like. When you keep a big long shitlist, the only person who looks like a sperg is you.

it's worthless anyway because almost all of the entities on that list are just followers and opportunists who are merely going along with the way the wind is currently blowing.
the way to change things isn't to get vindictive and hate on people for doing what they're told, but to identify and target the ones at the very top who are actually in charge of these things.

 

[Corette]

t has companies on there simply for donating to BLM.
Which obviously is a sign, but I feel like there's plenty of people that just got suckered in by the propaganda as well. Or blackmailed into making the virtue signal, to fool us that they're on the wrong side, making up the numbers. And I feel like it would require a little more, or at least a way to find redemption?

They could publicly donate to WLM or some other three letter acronym of similar purpose.

 

[CircuSphere]

Honestly, fuck the console fags, tbh.

You don't have to like pawns to use them in a game of chess.... In fact it's usually preferable that you don't grow particularly attached to them.

I'm not asking you to make friends with them or play games with them or let them dictate your tastes. I am saying you should exploit them to best your enemy because if you don't even put them on the board you will find yourself in check near immediately.

but to identify and target the ones at the very top who are actually in charge of these things.

I agree with all of what you said except we are never going to get the head (hedge funds with nation scale revenue, Blackrock, Vanguard... the Canadian government). We just need a large and visible enough target that can be made into an example. If we can blow off a foot or an arm they will learn.... but random scratches and bruises are not enough.

 

[TATE MOOOOOOOOOOOOOOODE!!]

You don't have to like pawns to use them in a game of chess.... In fact it's usually preferable that you don't grow particularly attached to them.

I'm not asking you to make friends with them or play games with them or let them dictate your tastes. I am saying you should exploit them to best your enemy because if you don't even put them on the board you will find yourself in check near immediately.

Good God go touch some grass.

 

[30+GameOvers]

it's worthless anyway because almost all of the entities on that list are just followers and opportunists who are merely going along with the way the wind is currently blowing.
the way to change things isn't to get vindictive and hate on people for doing what they're told, but to identify and target the ones at the very top who are actually in charge of these things.

Precisely, this is why my idea has three tiers: The grifters, the actual companymen and the companies themselves. Anyone can find what they need in a few seconds, if they're looking for quotes or people to blacklist from their lives and it would take as little as one person to manage said list. I don't see what's so hard to understand about this concept.
Gay culture wars don't work, goobergate 1 proved this. What you need is names and what you need is to financially ruin these people. Nothing else matters, and the quickest way to ruin these people and companies is to simply ignore their products and make sure everyone can sniff their dirty laundry at any point in time, even years down the line. That one list by OAG accomplished more than whatever anyone here is probably planning to do, and once again, it was done by one guy.

 

[marvlouslie]

You don't have to be an autistic sperg like that retard that put together a list to be an effective voice against this shit. Vote with your wallet. At the end of the day, this is what we need to do. Focus on the worst offenders. Don't focus on companies who posted a black square or donated to BLM that one time, but otherwise don't get involved in politicking at all. @CircuSphere is right. A precision strike against the worst offenders is needed here. Once they fall, the rest will fall in line. You don't need to shotgun your approach.

 

[Meat Target]

Precisely, this is why my idea has three tiers: The grifters, the actual companymen and the companies themselves. Anyone can find what they need in a few seconds, if they're looking for quotes or people to blacklist from their lives and it would take as little as one person to manage said list. I don't see what's so hard to understand about this concept.

Your whole plan is nobodies going after other nobodies whom they don't know and never interact with.

Anyone can say anything about someone else on the internet. Doesn't mean they'll be listened to.

Gay culture wars don't work, goobergate 1 proved this. What you need is names and what you need is to financially ruin these people. Nothing else matters, and the quickest way to ruin these people and companies is to simply ignore their products and make sure everyone can sniff their dirty laundry at any point in time, even years down the line. That one list by OAG accomplished more than whatever anyone here is probably planning to do, and once again, it was done by one guy.

Then lead the way.

You are "one person". Show us how it's done. Make us a list and check it twice.

Without a hint of sarcasm: good luck.

 

[Dysnomia]

It's not ADHD. It's a Sysiphean task to have to document every time that every company and influencer that ever was kissed the ring of Wokeness.

It's much more effective to look at the few who do not bow to Clown World orthodoxies, and support them.

Believe me, I've done more slacktivism than I'm proud to admit. In most cases, the money you give to this company or that for their goods or services is numerous degrees detached from whatever wokeshit they nominally pay lip-service to.

Laundry lists of boycotts are a waste of time, and only make you look like a brittle special snowflake afrid to interact with the world. Going after the worst offenders is what sends a message.

I'm looking at the list and some of it is just autism mountains out of autism molehills. A company tweets BLM. So? Just about every company is compelled to do this at least once a year. It's no different than tweeting a pink ribbon every October. Pure corpo slactivism. None of these companies care about anything but money.

It would be impossible to boycott all these companies and their subsidiaries unless you built your own wooden shack and lived off the grid somewhere like a hermit.

 

[Mossy Trash Panda]

You don't have to like pawns to use them in a game of chess.... In fact it's usually preferable that you don't grow particularly attached to them.

I'm not asking you to make friends with them or play games with them or let them dictate your tastes. I am saying you should exploit them to best your enemy because if you don't even put them on the board you will find yourself in check near immediately.



I agree with all of what you said except we are never going to get the head (hedge funds with nation scale revenue, Blackrock, Vanguard... the Canadian government). We just need a large and visible enough target that can be made into an example. If we can blow off a foot or an arm they will learn.... but random scratches and bruises are not enough.

Is it sociopathic of me to say that I am 100 percent behind this analogy?

Edit: That said, i'm no chessmaster, but even I know that when a pawn reaches the other side of the board, their value vastly improves. I think that's what the "people you know" are. Pawns who have yet to become Knights, Queens, and Rooks.

 

[marvlouslie]

I'm looking at the list and some of it is just autism mountains out of autism molehills. A company tweets BLM. So? Just about every company is compelled to do this at least once a year. It's no different than tweeting a pink ribbon every October. Pure corpo slactivism. None of these companies care about anything but money.

It would be impossible to boycott all these companies and their subsidiaries unless you built your own wooden shack and lived off the grid somewhere like a hermit.

Look at Budlight for an example of an effective way to get the point across without being a sperg. While some people eventually came back to it, they did enough damage to the brand DURING the boycott to prove a point.

 

[Mossy Trash Panda]

It would be impossible to boycott all these companies and their subsidiaries unless you built your own wooden shack and lived off the grid somewhere like a hermit.

That's why you pick one, and commit until it becomes optics AIDS.

 

[Xebi]

I'm looking at the list and some of it is just autism mountains out of autism molehills. A company tweets BLM. So? Just about every company is compelled to do this at least once a year. It's no different than tweeting a pink ribbon every October. Pure corpo slactivism. None of these companies care about anything but money.

It would be impossible to boycott all these companies and their subsidiaries unless you built your own wooden shack and lived off the grid somewhere like a hermit.

Yeah, I made this same point. There's plenty of reasons why a company might do that. Whether it's popular, got suckered into the initial optics of it, some autist took over a twitter account, or got blackmailed into it. This is hardly a measuring stick for which companies actually got taken over. And more a signal boost from the other side to make it seem more widespread than it actually is. Plus it wouldn't do well to just sperge list all these companies on a whim, without ever revisiting it for updated and developments. Eventually, that'll bite us in the ass for being about equally as dishonest as them.

For example, AirBnB posted a donation to BLM? A pretty bad sign for sure, but nothing too damning by itself. Instead, it should be a sign that some deeper research might be needed. Especially when a company like that has had a way worse offense for blacklisting a customer, and all of their family for associating with someone they didn't like. THAT... is the kind of stuff I'm looking for! THAT, is the damning evidence and actual criminal activity that absolutely deserves a spotlight.




And then of course there's the other side example I referred to earlier, where an artist got their professional twitter account taken over to signal boost a message/apology. Which they later refuted as being absolutely bullshit, and not something they would ever support.