Greer v. Moon, No. 20-cv-00647 (D. Utah Sep. 16, 2020)

When will the Judge issue a ruling regarding the Motion to Dismiss?

  • This Month

    Votes: 66 14.1%
  • Next Month

    Votes: 56 12.0%
  • This Year

    Votes: 73 15.6%
  • Next Year

    Votes: 159 34.0%
  • Whenever he issues an update to the sanctions

    Votes: 114 24.4%

  • Total voters
    468
There's gotta be at least one lawyer who decided sucking dicks for a living was less soul crushing than lawyering
Well, there is at least one paralegal who decided paying someone for a car ride in money was less preferable than paying them in handjobs.
it's russ btw
 
trth.png
The mail was sent to the address Russell had on record with the court when it was sent.

You'd think he'd might realise that being late to change his address is just another example of him failing to participate in his own case.



fsdgfsdf.png
Russ, attach this one to a motion! I'm sure it can't be self-incriminating or anything, can it?



etrtrt.png
I don't know, Hardin made it look pretty easy. Then he made it look easy again, in Florida.




I'm still pulling for him to keep sending his pleadings to the Utah court, acting as if the move to Florida's court system was all a bad dream...
Good call!

Every time I think Russell can't surprise me with his retardation any more, he whips out something even stupider than the last thing.
 
Is there any law saying the public can't listen in? These instructions are publicly posted, and in the days before telephones these things would happen inside a public court room. (Or in chambers, or at the bench)

Obviously just to listen in, not to say anything or disrupt.
Do Not Attempt to Call in or Record the Call! Doing so could hurt Null. Just don't touch it.

This is also my question.

If this were a hearing in a court house, any member of the public could quietly and politely sit in and listen (and not record)

That's the whole point of the US legal system, right? In theory . It's transparent.

(That we don't generally do secret hearings, secret evidence, secret proceedings, etc.)

Obviously no one wants to do anything to jeopardize the case, but is this considered a public hearing, or not?
 
View attachment 5850969
Lmao, he uses the same tools as Melinda Scott.

So did his lawyers on the 10th. Almost like that isn't really hard.
If you google “motion to stay proceedings” the second result, from Cornell Law School, tells you it’s not always automatic and can rely on judicial discretion.

He’s stupid in such a special way.
 
It ain't just that either, he also doesn't have to answer motions if his not-lawyers don't answer for him.
1711466174034.png
Anyway, this is something I found funny from Russ' motion
Screenshot 2024-03-26 174335.png

These filings are the adult equivalent of a toddler stamping his feet and chanting, "But it's not faaaaaair!" When Russ filed pro se, he believed Null would have to fight the suit without a lawyer. He chimped out when Null retained Skordas the Formerly Based, but settled down when he got his own ambulance chaser lawyers. When Null and Skordas parted ways, Russ's lawyers also left, so again Russ thinks it's fair. But now Null has Hardin, a substantial war chest, and a website full of flightless New Zealand birds, while Russ has nothing but his drool and a rumpled suit.

Russ is filing motions for stays because he doesn't think the case is faaaaaaaair. It's not faaaaaaaair that Null gets a lawyer and Rusty doesn't. It's not faaaaaaaair Null has hundreds of people supporting him while Russ has to go it alone. It's not faaaaaaaair Null has a massive war chest and Russ only has his hooker fund.

In all his ranting about how "It's not faaaaaaaair" it never occurs to him that this is entirely his own fault. We didn't force him to file pro se. We aren't forcing him to ignore the court's filings. We certainly didn't force him to do all the things that earned him a thread in the first place. We've told him, in his thread, time and again, how he can get us to stop talking about him. He chose to ignore us, and so remain an interesting topic of conversation for us.

Russ, here's something the elders at your former church probably said that you ignored: we reap what we sow, later than we've sown, and more than we've sown. You've sown the wind for years, and guess what, Ratface? It's time to reap the whirlwind.
 
This is one of my pet peeves:
2024-03-26_09-27.png
It's no longer "Standard" time. One could argue "Summer" time but that's European.
The automated email gets it correct:
2024-03-26_09-27_1.png
I knew Pensacola was actually southern Alabama but I didn't know that part of Florida actually changed timezones and is in Central time.

I wonder what if anything he will file in Florida?
As soon as he files in Florida he(in his mind) acknowledges the case has been transferred and that the Florida court has jurisdiction.

I'm just sad we have to wait over a week to see what's officially going to happen next.
 
Does this kind of pleading ignorance actually work for pro se litigants, or is Russ as dumb as I think he is for whining to the court like this?
Neither retardation, nor pro se status, relieves plaintiff's from having to follow the rules. See, Novero v. Duke Energy, No. 17-14963 (11th Cir. Oct. 16, 2018), where the Plaintiff used many of the same arguments Russ did, and the 11th Circuit denied all of them.
 
Neither retardation, nor pro se status, relieves plaintiff's from having to follow the rules. See, Novero v. Duke Energy, No. 17-14963 (11th Cir. Oct. 16, 2018), where the Plaintiff used many of the same arguments Russ did, and the 11th Circuit denied all of them.

Surely if they sincerely believe that they don't have to follow the rules, the Court will allow them to do whatever they want, though? I mean to do otherwise would be a total racism.
 
Back