Furry Fandom and Drama General

aidstime said:
You seem to know a lot about this business and how it creates its products.
Click to expand...
Not really. But I do have a good grasp on copyright law.

And seriously you're retarded if you don't think people who make animal penis dildoes are zoophiles. I mean DUH.
aidstime said:
If they were casting sex toys from living animals isn't that just sexual abuse and probably prosecutable under some state law?
Click to expand...
Probably. So I hope they didn't do that in one of those states. Wait. Actually, I hope they did.
 
  • Agree
  • Like
Reactions: Broken Cuddles, Cat Phuckers, Cyberpunk Panatela and 4 others
Alcatraz said:
I imagine it's like second-hand clothes. They probably wash or sterilize it. At least I fucking hope they do. I'm not visiting that site to find out.
Click to expand...
From what i've seen on Twitter in the past, they claim to wash them in boiling hot water before putting them on sale. However despite this I still wouldn't trust even touching a preowned one with a ten foot pole - over time materials like that develop cracks which microbes can get into, making them effectively impossible to clean thoroughly.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Informative
  • Like
Reactions: 90 Seconds, miniature chungus, Mister Loser and 33 others
SomeSpook said:
I can’t say I feel sorry for them, and I hope their case gets thrown out on the count of how absurd it is. Just for anyone who hasn’t jumped into the pit of depravity like me, Bad Dragon is well known for having products of questionable quality and absurd prices. Some dildos are nearly 90 dollars. But furries love that shit.
Click to expand...
When there's no real competition, you can afford to cut corners and skimp costs, because who the hell is gonna oppose you? See: Nintendo and any porkyman game the last ten years. Palworld came out, even if it looked derivative, and sold gangbusters.

By comparison, this lolsuit feels like a kneejerk response. I feel sorry for the normie bastards having to inspect animal dick toys.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cat Phuckers, goyberg, Vecr and 2 others
Rukario said:
From what i've seen on Twitter in the past, they claim to wash them in boiling hot water before putting them on sale. However despite this I still wouldn't trust even touching a preowned one with a ten foot pole - over time materials like that develop cracks which microbes can get into, making them effectively impossible to clean thoroughly.
Click to expand...
The ones with cum tubes are apparently really bad for that, they inevitably get some separation between the tube and the rest of the dildo which is impossible to clean. I can't remember the name but there was some animal dildo company that does life casting, and I was reading their Q&A to see how they justify that as ok. While reading the Q&A, they said they don't sell products with cum tubes for that exact reason. I had no idea people sold used ones, that is absolutely disgusting.
 
  • Horrifying
  • Informative
Reactions: Essay2414778, Arkin O'Brien, FunPosting101 and 12 others
Roxanne Wolf said:
MOD EDIT:
Welcome to another Animal Control feature! Today's sticker is :feels:. If you just want to make a post about how much you hate furries and the fact they disgust you, as does everyone, consider just hitting the :feels: reaction for this post instead.


Who's ready for a good ole degenerate lolsuit slapfight?
(ty to the fren who brought this to my attention BTW, good find)

View attachment 5853781
https://bsky.app/profile/orcishlaw.bsky.social/post/3kod23atdx42x (sign in required to view)

Court Docs: https://www.courtlistener.com/docke...rprises-incorporated-v-sinsaint-incorporated/

View attachment 5853798

Bad Dragon vs. SinSaint, and some light-making of the situation has already begun:
View attachment 5853797

TLDR; "N-no! You-you can't just rip off MY animal dildos because... BECAUSE YOU JUST CAN'T OKAY!?!"
Click to expand...

Ok, I have to be honest here. The judges are more than likely going to dig up an old obscenity law, or find ANY reason to throw this over to arbitration. Specifically, this shit violates the Miller Test.

(1) whether the average person applying contemporary community standards would find the work, taken as a whole, appeals to the prurient interest;

Uh, YEAH. IDK about what most of these disgusting, diseased faggots want to believe but zoophilic sex toys intended for self penetration seems like a damn good definition for prurient interest.

(2) whether the work depicts or describes, in a patently offensive way, sexual conduct specifically defined by the applicable state law;

The Raison D'Etre for both BD and SS (hah).

and
(3) whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value.

I think this can be ruled as a 'yes.' this shit is not literary. It is NOT artistic, I would argue as it is literally a sad, disturbing re-color of live casts of animal genitalia. If anything this is animal cruelty, not sculpture. Political value insofar as being a reason to bring back the mental asylums. Finally, neither of these firms do jack shit to advance the cause of science.

Here's to hoping the judge says "get fucked, (you seem to be good at that, at least.) find an arbiter and good luck not spending more than your damages for any halfway decent counsel's time."
 
  • Optimistic
  • Like
  • Disagree
Reactions: CEO of Gay, FunPosting101, DannyDevitoUpMyAss and 20 others
Seems to me like this is just gonna be about one of their made up designs.

Although trying to copyright an actual dog dick in court would be hilarious, I can't imagine the BD folks being that stupid.
 
  • Optimistic
Reactions: Cat Phuckers
sovereigncitizen said:
A big question I have is... If your dildos are zoophilic and beastiality in nature.. how do you explain this in a court of law...?
Click to expand...
There's no federal anti-bestalitity law in the US aside from Military regs (10 U.S.C.A. § 925):
any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with . . . an animal is guilty of sodomy.
Click to expand...
Therefore it'd have to fail the Miller obscenity test in federal court. Given AZ is 9th circuit I find that unlikely to fail, at least at the en-banc level. If it was maybe 5th circuit with Ty Beard representing I could see the death penalty being levied.

I'm not sure you can get charged with bestiality in Arizona. State code returns the following on A.R.S. § 13-1411, A class 6 felony (4mo - 5 years) which can be downgraded to a misdemeanor.
1. Engaging in oral sexual contact, sexual contact or sexual intercourse with an animal.

2. Causing another person to engage in oral sexual contact, sexual contact or sexual intercourse with an animal.
Click to expand...

I await Vaush to file Amicus curiae since according to him, there's no cock like horsecock, so you can send your asshole into shock.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Cat Phuckers, FunPosting101, Broken Cuddles and 6 others
Cat tit bingo said:
Will this set a precedent on if you can copyright a cock? If Bad Dodongos some how proves that the defendant copied there imitation penises could traditional dildo manufacturers claim suits over there design? Imagine hundreds of court case of "your honor both white taliwackers are circumcised, 7 inches long, 3 inches in diameter and clearly bend to the left, this is a clearly the same ding-a-ling as my client's and allowing its sale is miscarriage of justice set forth by Bold Dragoon vs the SS".
Click to expand...
Unless it's an obvious bootleg, they can only get shut down on the basis of trademark confusion, under the Lanham Act and further clarified with trade dress (Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.. But the idea isn't likely to declare similar dildo designs, it's more likely that they just want to waste SinSaint's time and money so they go under.

Bad Dragon is based out of Arizona, which is one of the weakest anti-SLAPP states and not California or Texas, both of which are rated A as far as anti-SLAPP goes.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
  • Agree
Reactions: Trenchbucket, Cat Phuckers, Coo Coo Bird and 8 others
Roxanne Wolf said:
MOD EDIT:
Welcome to another Animal Control feature! Today's sticker is :feels:. If you just want to make a post about how much you hate furries and the fact they disgust you, as does everyone, consider just hitting the :feels: reaction for this post instead.


Who's ready for a good ole degenerate lolsuit slapfight?
(ty to the fren who brought this to my attention BTW, good find)

View attachment 5853781
https://bsky.app/profile/orcishlaw.bsky.social/post/3kod23atdx42x (sign in required to view)

Court Docs: https://www.courtlistener.com/docke...rprises-incorporated-v-sinsaint-incorporated/

View attachment 5853798

Bad Dragon vs. SinSaint, and some light-making of the situation has already begun:
View attachment 5853797

TLDR; "N-no! You-you can't just rip off MY animal dildos because... BECAUSE YOU JUST CAN'T OKAY!?!"
Click to expand...
I wonder how a non zoophilic furry would justify buying one of these "its okay if I imagine it belongs to a sapient biped,or even just sapient,or heck,maybe they're 90% the same except for the fact that the imaginary one can consent"!
Despite the evil of these companies,they did bring us this ID :
Still gross that this Pepper Coyote guy is/was a high school music teacher.

1711600318763.png
 
  • Horrifying
  • Like
Reactions: PlagueCabaret, Essay2414778, Cat Phuckers and 9 others
Roxanne Wolf said:
MOD EDIT:
Welcome to another Animal Control feature! Today's sticker is :feels:. If you just want to make a post about how much you hate furries and the fact they disgust you, as does everyone, consider just hitting the :feels: reaction for this post instead.


Who's ready for a good ole degenerate lolsuit slapfight?
(ty to the fren who brought this to my attention BTW, good find)

View attachment 5853781
https://bsky.app/profile/orcishlaw.bsky.social/post/3kod23atdx42x (sign in required to view)

Court Docs: https://www.courtlistener.com/docke...rprises-incorporated-v-sinsaint-incorporated/

View attachment 5853798

Bad Dragon vs. SinSaint, and some light-making of the situation has already begun:
View attachment 5853797

TLDR; "N-no! You-you can't just rip off MY animal dildos because... BECAUSE YOU JUST CAN'T OKAY!?!"
Click to expand...
Imagine going to law school for this.
 
Maybe it is just my expertise, but I can see the difference.
But that is about as ridiculous as any dildo company suing another because their dildo looks like penis as well.
 
Vinluv Handesbukia said:
I wonder how a non zoophilic furry would justify buying one of these "its okay if I imagine it belongs to a sapient biped,or even just sapient,or heck,maybe they're 90% the same except for the fact that the imaginary one can consent"!
Despite the evil of these companies,they did bring us this ID :
Still gross that this Pepper Coyote guy is/was a high school music teacher.

View attachment 5856242
Click to expand...
Not all zoophiles are furries, but all furries are zoophiles!
 
  • Agree
  • Thunk-Provoking
  • Like
Reactions: Whatevermancer, Wild Wild Wisteria, Flying Whale and 23 others
Oligarca Caballero said:
To be fair both companies must already have their established lawyer team so this will most definetely not be their first rodeo.
Click to expand...
SinSaint might have counsel but I'm spotting what seems like a rookie error. Saying you'll take some down for redesign is easily taken as an admission you were infringing the copyrights and knew you were infringing them. You either say "fuck you, we're not infringing, these listings stay up" or you extremely carefully negotiate a way to remove the listings without making any admission of wrongdoing. Neither one prevents a lawsuit but they are more defensible. At least for any of the redesigns it's probably now a matter of determining how much they owe BD. If it's a forgone conclusion they're infringing with one it is easier to argue they are infringing with all of them.
 
  • Like
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Rattus Ebrius, Broken Cuddles and Vecr
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back