US US Politics General - Discussion of President Biden and other politicians

Status
Not open for further replies.
BidenGIF.gif
 
Last edited:
Wait, this thing has a 13" barrel and a suppressor, and it’s supposed to be a battle rifle? Has the laws of physics changed or am I completely ignorant of modern warfare?
6.8 wonder waffle pushes 80k psi. That's how they get 2800 fps out of 13 inches.
Modern suppressors are flow-through so you don't have to worry as much about back pressure.

 
In Wisconsin tonight along with the primary there are two very important amendments to the state constitution on the ballot

One would ban Zuckerbucks. AKA rich leftists can't pour money into voter registration and ballot harvesting under the guise of 'non-partisan election administration' only in Democratic areas anymore

The other would allow only officials designated by law to perform the tasks of running elections. AKA Democrat operatives can't park themselves in polling stations and vote counting rooms and do whatever the fuck they want

No more Zuckerbucks is currently leading 55%-45% with 22% of the vote in

No more Democrats being allowed to get behind closed doors in polling places is already projected to win

EDIT: No more Zuckerbucks is also now projected to win

Trump's chances of winning Wisconsin in November just went up bigly
 
6.8 wonder waffle pushes 80k psi. That's how they get 2800 fps out of 13 inches.
Modern suppressors are flow-through so you don't have to worry as much about back pressure.

Why in God's name do they want that much PSI to save 13", to add a long suppressor? If it weighed a lot less overall and had lighter ammo I'd be ok, but does losing 4 inches or so that cuts of quite a bit really help in a general combat situation? I can see it for paratroopers or something, maybe.

Even if this takes over the military, which I doubt, it'll be a long time before affordable .277 Fury is even around, much less the Sig semi versions, and much less those sub 16" (never) and those with built in suppressors (maybe).

Whole thing sounds like a method of moving the military away from civilian semi-parity to me.
 
In Wisconsin tonight along with the primary there are two very important amendments to the state constitution on the ballot

One would ban Zuckerbucks. AKA rich leftists can't pour money into voter registration and ballot harvesting under the guise of 'non-partisan election administration' only in Democratic areas anymore

The other would allow only officials designated by law to perform the tasks of running elections. AKA Democrat operatives can't park themselves in polling stations and vote counting rooms and do whatever the fuck they want

No more Zuckerbucks is currently leading 55%-45% with 22% of the vote in

No more Democrats being allowed to get behind closed doors in polling places is already projected to win

EDIT: No more Zuckerbucks is also now projected to win

I've been watching the wisconsin primary results and so far those votes are still in the lead by a lot. The dems still could rig it the other way last minute, but I do hope not. On another note, so far in only one county in the state has "uninstructed" won a primary and surprisingly it's the GOP one (49% for uninstructed vs 41% for Trump). I know there was a big push to have that option added to the ballet by leftists as a protest vote against biden over the war israel-palestine conflict but so far it seems that barely any dems have voted for that option even in the deep blue counties.
 
Lmao, you think the boomers are gonna be in positions of power and authority? No, their gonna be grunts and answer to DEI negresses a decade to two decades younger than them. Gonna be hell.
Only till they learn 'fragging' is a thing.

Honestly, this is such a bonehead maneuver I guess I shouldn't be surprised. It's like if they wanted to recall JosephStalin and Jet Fuel Johnny.
 
Only till they learn 'fragging' is a thing.

Honestly, this is such a bonehead maneuver I guess I shouldn't be surprised. It's like if they wanted to recall JosephStalin and Jet Fuel Johnny.
Just based on his posts alone, I have a feeling Jet Fuel Johnny is the last guy they want to recall.
 
Just based on his posts alone, I have a feeling Jet Fuel Johnny is the last guy they want to recall.
That's the irony. The guys they need the most, are the ones least likely to be useful because they are absolutely done with the military. And trying to drag them back is a bad idea at best and a fatal idea at worst.
 
That's the irony. The guys they need the most, are the ones least likely to be useful because they are absolutely done with the military. And trying to drag them back is a bad idea at best and a fatal idea at worst.
"so it says here you're a master of traps and combat, so we're gonna drag you out of your home and take you with us, that'll work right?"
 
I've been watching the wisconsin primary results and so far those votes are still in the lead by a lot. The dems still could rig it the other way last minute, but I do hope not. On another note, so far in only one county in the state has "uninstructed" won a primary and surprisingly it's the GOP one (49% for uninstructed vs 41% for Trump). I know there was a big push to have that option added to the ballet by leftists as a protest vote against biden over the war israel-palestine conflict but so far it seems that barely any dems have voted for that option even in the deep blue counties.
Racine County voting for 'uninstructed' in the GOP primary is a tabulation error. They'll update it later to show Trump ahead by a ton
 
Why in God's name do they want that much PSI to save 13", to add a long suppressor? If it weighed a lot less overall and had lighter ammo I'd be ok, but does losing 4 inches or so that cuts of quite a bit really help in a general combat situation? I can see it for paratroopers or something, maybe.
Its to make mounted operations out of APCs/IFVs and airborne assaults from helicopters easier. There's also the aspect of fighting in heavily urban environments/interiors that favor a shorter weapon. Most infantry combat takes place at 300 yards or less. No need for a long ass rifle unless you are a designated marksmen, in which case you are going to be using a different rifle.

Someone finally realized hey, Nebraska shouldn't have apportioned electoral votes, and it would help Trump to get to 270 just winning AZ, GA and NV.
That results in a 269 tie. Trump would have to win one more state to win. I think America would be better off if every state would be required to do as Nebraska currently does and split electoral votes based on who won what amount of votes. Would motivate a lot more people to vote because their votes are no longer worthless.
 
Its to make mounted operations out of APCs/IFVs and airborne assaults from helicopters easier. There's also the aspect of fighting in heavily urban environments/interiors that favor a shorter weapon. Most infantry combat takes place at 300 yards or less. No need for a long ass rifle unless you are a designated marksmen, in which case you are going to be using a different rifle.
Length36 in (914 mm) (with suppressor)
M4:

33 in (838 mm) (stock extended) 29.75 in (756 mm) (stock retracted)

So this new system, with the suppressor is far longer. I think suppressors are a great thing overall and would recommend them for all civilian and military use.

But we know the NFA is there.
 
Last edited:
In Wisconsin tonight along with the primary there are two very important amendments to the state constitution on the ballot

One would ban Zuckerbucks. AKA rich leftists can't pour money into voter registration and ballot harvesting under the guise of 'non-partisan election administration' only in Democratic areas anymore

The other would allow only officials designated by law to perform the tasks of running elections. AKA Democrat operatives can't park themselves in polling stations and vote counting rooms and do whatever the fuck they want

No more Zuckerbucks is currently leading 55%-45% with 22% of the vote in

No more Democrats being allowed to get behind closed doors in polling places is already projected to win

EDIT: No more Zuckerbucks is also now projected to win

Trump's chances of winning Wisconsin in November just went up bigly
I will gladly inhale the hopium.
Someone finally realized hey, Nebraska shouldn't have apportioned electoral votes, and it would help Trump to get to 270 just winning AZ, GA and NV.

Let's see the Dan Bacon RINOs axe this because "that's not what we do."

View attachment 5873442
Even if they manage to pass it, the Dems up in Maine will probably convert to winner-take-all as well, meaning no net change in electoral votes (Trump will win 1 of Maine's 4 EV's under the current rules).
 
Length36 in (914 mm) (with suppressor)
M4:

33 in (838 mm) (stock extended) 29.75 in (756 mm) (stock retracted)

So this new system, with the suppressor is far longer. I think suppressors are a great thing overall and would recommend them for all civilian and military use.

But we know the NFA is there.
It's not really competing with the M4 though, the round it fires is closer to the 7.62x51 than 5.56x45, so you're looking at something like an AR-10 which clocks in at over 40" with no suppressor
 
Last edited:
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Abraham Lincoln
Its to make mounted operations out of APCs/IFVs and airborne assaults from helicopters easier. There's also the aspect of fighting in heavily urban environments/interiors that favor a shorter weapon. Most infantry combat takes place at 300 yards or less. No need for a long ass rifle unless you are a designated marksmen, in which case you are going to be using a different rifle.


That results in a 269 tie. Trump would have to win one more state to win. I think America would be better off if every state would be required to do as Nebraska currently does and split electoral votes based on who won what amount of votes. Would motivate a lot more people to vote because their votes are no longer worthless.
In the case of a 269-269 tie, the election would be decided by whoever wins the majority of the 50 House Delegations.


Each of the 50 states has a House Delegation (with each delegation comprised of the combined number of Representatives in the House from each respective state). The House Delegation from Wyoming, in this case with only 1 Representative, would be equivalent to the House Delegation from California which has 52 Representatives. Even if the GOP doesn't win the majority of representatives in the House, they would still likely have the majority (26 or higher) of House Delegations.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back