Megathread Trannies posting their L's Online - Heckin valid people posting their funny misfortunes on the internet

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
What? Homo men are notorious for being extremely picky about looks and build. They don't want to fuck an ugly gay guy, and they DEFINITELY do not want to fuck a fucking troon with a roll of flesh between its legs. (or worse, a vagina.) They know what they like and they will roast a fat or ugly guy out of the room if he tries to make a move above his league (unless they are specifically into bears).

It's the lesbians who often have lower standards re: physical looks and go for the personality/value fit. Lil pooner will never get it from a gay guy. They could get it from a bi/straight guy lying to them, though.
I work with a fat balding gay man, they arent picky.
 
Maybe only some are picky? :)


Back on track.
NB and genderfluid are part of the team! Oh yes indeed! 8)
Link Archive
1712420379626.png


Twenty one comments so far .
Different slants in a way, but they all agree on total inclusion. :christine: tee hee

Here's the one I find most amusing.

1712420540887.png
 
Maybe only some are picky? :)


Back on track.
NB and genderfluid are part of the team! Oh yes indeed! 8)
Link Archive
View attachment 5882827

Twenty one comments so far .
Different slants in a way, but they all agree on total inclusion. :christine: tee hee

Here's the one I find most amusing.

View attachment 5882832
I wish I could react "Dumb" in a way that conveys I mean the content of the screenshots and not the post. This is every new age hippy, every psychic medium, every chi energy flow reiki motherfucker out there that claims to be able to feel "things" in an nonspecific but super mystical way. Only we're also supposed to pretend it's not that because gender is involved.



I think there is a difference as in who they want to be seen with and who they will happily anonymously fuck in a cottage.
Yes, which is to say that they behave more or less like straight men do when it comes to women. There's people they want to be seen with/have relationships with, and there's people they want to fuck and forget about.
 
It’s been years since I saw it, so I’m relying on the Wikipedia synopsis, but if Miranda was overpowered and then shot then self-defence is off the table even in the US, no? Not that one blames her for doing it. On top of that, Dil is a talented, forgiving and loving person, so hardly a villain. But is she trans? Wikipedia reveals Neil Jordan’s view on his creation: „The character was a transvestite and a gay man, basically... She's not a transsexual”. Bloody TRAs, erasing transvestites…
I might watch it again in next few days. It was a good film, from what I remember.
I also want to soak up a bit of early nineties mundane nostalgia withvibes that aren't overblown.
All they calling the trans character a villain in it? Its been years but I'm pretty sure about saying, where the fuck did they get that?
The people who decide they are the arbiter of this stuff are so infuriating because it's like-you woudknt have trooned out in 1992, without the training wheels on and the whole world holding your hand, after an incubation period in a NEET enabled porn coccoon whilst screaming about muh capitalism.
These were actual lgbt people.
With motivations that the new bunch can't understand because they are empty soulless robots.

To think that anyone can say anything useful (or warn people off-as if it's any kind of important) older media is the most soggy arsed self important tedium.
 
I might watch it again in next few days. It was a good film, from what I remember.
I also want to soak up a bit of early nineties mundane nostalgia withvibes that aren't overblown.
All they calling the trans character a villain in it? Its been years but I'm pretty sure about saying, where the fuck did they get that?
The people who decide they are the arbiter of this stuff are so infuriating because it's like-you woudknt have trooned out in 1992, without the training wheels on and the whole world holding your hand, after an incubation period in a NEET enabled porn coccoon whilst screaming about muh capitalism.
These were actual lgbt people. With motivations that the new bunch can't understand because they are empty soulless robots

I know this is Kiwifarms so many will disagree with the distinction I'm about to make, or its relevance, but I think there is a difference between the gay and lesbian movement and even homosexual transsexuals, as they all existed in the 90s-early 00's, and the imagined community of "Queer Leftists" that exists right now. The latter is an ideological movement not unlike a cult, but I would actually say they are closer to a fandom than anything. If you have ever had any contact with hardcore fans of something, be it trekkies, star wars nerds, LOTR nerds, you can see how many of them develop their own lexicons of terms and in jokes and shared beliefs based purely on memetic mutation and online conversation. In fact, I would say that the Non-binary/genderfluid/general queer but not actually hardcore trans movement is a lot of the same women who were the Superwholock fandom (edit: also fujoshis probably) and ancillary properties, that AGP creepos and incels have colonized not unlike the process that created the bronies.

Obviously the conceptual framework of all this exists in things like gay rights, feminism and social justice rhetoric, but the specific internet subculture that is breadtube, queer twitter and anarcho-communist leftist online generally collectively share memes and ideas and generate a culture that gives its most zealous supporters moral authority in online spaces, or at least did for a few years when they were in their heyday as the internet cracked down on the edgelord fuck-your-feelings culture. I think that edgelord culture is a key example actually, there was a zenith of that sort of comedy and the idea of edgy freespeech online for a few years before real world examples of incels and rightwingers actually enacting violence (shootings, driving a truck through a crowd, etc.) popped the bubble and resulted in a huge increase in moderation and control of speech. That was the perfect environment for the queer leftist name-and-shame/cancellation + kindness and validation combo.

Now the real world sexual crimes (and also, terrible movies and TV) of the "queer" movement are breaking down the queer leftist bubble and suddenly they are finding all the enabling institutions turning on them as the movement becomes toxic.
 
Last edited:
Someone please tell young men and woman they can act "feminine and masculine" and that was never illegal. Asked an NB to explain why they couldnt just be their sex and do the exact same things and got nothing sensible in return.
It is mystifying. Social tolerance of GNC looks and behavior in the West has never been higher. Being a total swishy & gushy glitter tossing fag is tolerated. Men wearing makeup and painting their nails is tolerated. Being an androgynous or even outright masculine looking/dressing/behaving/working female is tolerated. All "gender expressions" are hybrids now. There's very little 100% trad gender anything (work, roles, etc) and yet they're all so hyper fixated on "gender". And costuming up and performing it. The only thing I can think of is that with the young people there's no concept of having a long life where you change as you mature. Or maybe there is a concept, but they're scared to death of it and want to stop time (and customize their "presentation of self") right where they are.
 
I find it funny how symbolic and ritualized the pills are. This person is still taking antiandrogens even though he isn't taking feminizing hormones anymore. Sounds like he was rationing it too. It's not actually a treatment, it's a sacrament.
 
First and foremost the film is very little about Gender or trans issues because when it was made, these things were certainly not fucking mainstream.

What it mostly was about was the contrast of culture between the Catholic community of Northern Ireland, with the hotbed of diversity and mixing in London.

Dil, the homosexual male transvestite character, is introduced to Fergus, played by Steven Rea, who has no idea that Dil is male or a transvestite, due to the reality that Catholic upbringings frequently shelter people from such things.

Everything about Fergus’s values are challenged.
The humanization of the black British soldier he is expected to kill.
Falling in love with a man, a man certainly outside of his realms of experience and perception.
The personal torment over is he really fighting for the right side, or are the hated British not really that much different to him?

The film of course was designed to shock and push boundaries.

But the main boundary it wanted to push, like “Harry’s Game” was to explore the psychological effects of being a PIRA volunteer.

He is a guerrilla fighter, face to face with a legitimate soldier. Learning how his values are not to far from the a legitimate soldier and how they engage and respect the rule of warfare and rules of engagement within NI.
In turn learning the challenges of being a homosexual soldier at the time, people forget that being gay was illegal in the British army at the time, so while it is not fully explored, it is strongly implied that this is why Dil lives so committed as a woman.

Dil himself is portrayed in a very stark and clear light, this is a deeply committed transvestite, who is treated as a woman thoroughly and even by men who are aware that he is not really a woman.

The killing of Miranda Richardson’s character is indeed revenge over the boyfriend in Belfast and to protect and in his hope, to free Fergus from his commitment to the IRA.
This isn’t the act of an insane murderous troon, but of someone hurt and angry, but also flung into a desperate situation they don’t fully understand, with probably the most dangerous people they will ever encounter.

Inadvertently Dil is successful in freeing Ferguson to a certain extent, because Fergus is willing to take the blame for the murder.

The future for them is uncertain, but seems optimistic as the film closes with Dil visiting Fergus in prison.

This is the least transphobic in that regard film of its fucking generation and anyone who says different deserves a fucking nail bomb out of lack of respect for those who suffered in NI as a result.

Alexandra Gonzenbach Perkins wrote in Representing Queer and Transgender Identity that mainstream representation of transgender identity at the turn of the 21st century was limited, observing that "the representations that did exist tended to pathologize transgender people as mentally unstable". Perkins said Ace Ventura, along with The Crying Game, depicted "transgender characters as murderous villains".
This fucking know it all deserves to have their hands nailed to a packing crate, both kneecaps done and “nonce” cut into their forehead.

That way anyone who encounters them will know they are a dirty pedo who fell foul of the RA.
This kind of vigilante justice was usually sanctioned across the paramilitary organizations and even the RUC and British army turned a blind eye.
Perkins hasn't watched "The Crying Game", Dil isn't a villain.
See above
Secret Gamer Grrl once wrote an essay about The Crying Game being a bad movie and the worst kind of transphobia, based on what he thought the movie might be about. He didn't even read a Wikipedia summary. Not wanting Miranda Richardson to kill two of your boyfriends in a row is a pretty reasonable motivation, and as an American I'd call it self-defense.
Secret Gamer girl deserves that and necklacing.
It’s been years since I saw it, so I’m relying on the Wikipedia synopsis, but if Miranda was overpowered and then shot then self-defence is off the table even in the US, no? Not that one blames her for doing it. On top of that, Dil is a talented, forgiving and loving person, so hardly a villain. But is she trans? Wikipedia reveals Neil Jordan’s view on his creation: „The character was a transvestite and a gay man, basically... She's not a transsexual”. Bloody TRAs, erasing transvestites…
TRAs are fucking stupid. And inflammatory.
 
Last edited:
I work with a fat balding gay man, they arent picky.

Maybe only some are picky? :)
The good looking young men who can afford to be picky often are. It doesn't mean they won't fuck a swamp donkey if they're in the mood. Most of the time it's 'no fats, no femmes', often with 'no asians/blacks' added in. It's a big issue with hook-up apps.

There's too much written about this to summarise so googling 'no fats, no femmes' should give plenty of heart-warming breaking stories of poor asian fatties failing to get dick.
 
There's too much written about this to summarise so googling 'no fats, no femmes' should give plenty of heart-warming breaking stories of poor asian fatties failing to get dick.

That sounds fucking hilarious.

Is it Asians in the context of East Asians, or south Asians?

South Asian effeminate fatties failing to get fucked would amuse me the most.
 
That sounds fucking hilarious.

Is it Asians in the context of East Asians, or south Asians?

South Asian effeminate fatties failing to get fucked would amuse me the most.
That would be SE Asians. Guys going for them are often labelled “rice queens.” Conversely, Asian guys going for Europeans are sometimes known as “potato queens.”

I could write a massive sperg on this whole subject, but at the end of the day, even the most plucked circuit queen will go with a fat, balding dude if that’s what’s available. It’s definitely situational in my experience.
 
Back