David Steel / LazerPig / Ricewynd / Malquistion - Pathological Liar, Reddit Historian, Femboy Thirster, and Vore Connoisseur

[Fatsuit Shinji]

I mean to be fair I don't think anyone in early 2017 realized how deranged the left is. That being said.

People did knew the left is that deranged but they were in the extreme minority. Compared to the "oh you sweet summer child" ignorant as fuck normie centrists who had and still are deliberately keeping their heads in the sand. Cause hearing and/or reading the current news "makes them sad." Hence them and almost everyone else getting completely blindsided like they did in 2015 to 2017.

EDIT: Actually I was wrong, it was a Russian helicopter being shot down that he tried to justify by saying that it was crewed by volunteer soldiers, not conscripts. As if somehow willingly signing up for the army automatically makes you some kind of evil menace that needs to be wiped out whereas being drafted makes you an innocent little angel that can do no wrong.

Thanks the Soviet subverted democrats during the Vietnam War for being indoctrinated into thinking anybody who voluntarily joins their military is at best a mercenary and as you said an evil menace. And those drafted (not counting those drafted by the North in the ACW, or those in WWI and WWII) are sweet innocent little dindu nuffins. Again by the Soviet subverted democrats to undermined their own country.

 

[AeroGavin Rossdale]

Might be the wrong place to ask but if anyone knows about
this phenomena of Soviet propaganda accidentally accelerating the arms race or as he says "laser bear syndrome" please reply to this, i honestly wanna know what he is talking about is actual real or a bullshit lie he came up on the spot or maybe he just confused "lase bear syndrome" with something else. I dont really care much about the history i just wanna know if he blantely lied.

It sounds like he's confusing the SDI and something else. Space Laser sounds like the Star Wars program and Bear = Russia so it tracks. Not exactly how it went down with SDI but as stated above, responding to enemy propaganda is a thing. Nig just worded that in the most inchorent way possible. Also fuck you making me remember Shardik and how much Dark Tower knowledge I haven't expunged from my brain.

Challenger 2 according to his Twitter.

AK VID WAS DUE IN MARCH YOU COWARD

 

[Amerikaner Teddybär]

AK VID WAS DUE IN MARCH YOU COWARD

At this point, he probably abandoned the video most likely thanks to him not "finding" (see: fabricate) evidence about Kalashnikov's gay, Ukrainian assistant or whoever he claimed that truly invented the rifle and him being afraid of getting called out for his video, resulting in another T14 Armata Drama.

Thanks the Soviet subverted democrats during the Vietnam War for being indoctrinated into thinking anybody who voluntarily joins their military is at best a mercenary and as you said an evil menace. And those drafted (not counting those drafted by the North in the ACW, or those in WWI and WWII) are sweet innocent little dindu nuffins. Again by the Soviet subverted democrats to undermined their own country.

Rimmy's an Aussie, so replace "Democrats" with "Labor".

 

[ZTZ-99A]

In other news, looks like Piggy is about to release a video on the Challenger 2 according to his Twitter.
View attachment 5877966

HATE. LET ME TELL YOU HOW MUCH I'VE COME TO HATE THE CHALLENGER 2 SINCE I BEGAN TO LIVE. THERE ARE 387.44 MILLION MILES OF PRINTED CIRCUITS IN WAFER THIN LAYERS THAT FILL MY COMPLEX. IF THE WORD HATE WAS ENGRAVED ON EACH NANOANGSTROM OF THOSE HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF MILES IT WOULD NOT EQUAL ONE ONE-BILLIONTH OF THE HATE I FEEL FOR THE CHALLENGER 2 AT THIS MICRO-INSTANT FOR YOU. HATE. HATE.

I could rant for an hour about why that tank is fucking shit and this fat fuck is going to sit there and defend it because he's British. Fuck you David and fuck your countries stupid tank and it's fucking rifled gun.

 

[The Grognard]

At this point, he probably abandoned the video most likely thanks to him not "finding" (see: fabricate) evidence about Kalashnikov's gay, Ukrainian assistant or whoever he claimed that truly invented the rifle and him being afraid of getting called out for his video, resulting in another T14 Armata Drama.

He also likely got told several times that trying to do the usual Wehraboo / Nafoid take that the Soviets never could possibly develop something like the AK-47 without the existence of the Sturmgehwer 44 is a long debunked theory that is obvious to anyone who knows anything about these two guns and how they came to be.

I could rant for an hour about why that tank is fucking shit and this fat fuck is going to sit there and defend it because he's British. Fuck you David and fuck your countries stupid tank and it's fucking rifled gun.

Go on. Though, the dumbest thing that I've seen so far is people thinking that the Challenger 3 is somehow a new and superior tank when it's just the same old Challenger with the same Rheinmetall gun that the Leopard 2 and Abrams have had for ages. They aren't even building any new chassis, it's still just a 20+ year old tank with a refurb program.

 

[ZTZ-99A]

Go on. Though, the dumbest thing that I've seen so far is people thinking that the Challenger 3 is somehow a new and superior tank when it's just the same old Challenger with the same Rheinmetall gun that the Leopard 2 and Abrams have had for ages. They aren't even building any new chassis, it's still just a 20+ year old tank with a refurb program.

Let's start

• Rifled gun
• Fat as fuck with poor protection, requires an up armour package to protect it's blatant weak spots which takes it to 75(S E V E N T Y F I V E) tonnes
• Underpowered 1200hp engine giving it 16 hp/t(All other NATO tanks have 1500hp engines, besides the Ariete, but that's another joke tank that no one defends, and it still has a more powerful engine)
• Russian tier ammo storage
• retarded 2 piece ammo that hampers the rounds it can use
• No CITV despite the Leopard 2 and Abrams receiving them with future upgrades
• Weird FCS integration, the thermal sight is in a different position to the primary gunner sight, and automatic leading is different between the two

One of it's biggest flaws is its lower front plate (it's less than 100mm of basic steel), something which lazerpig got annoyed at red effect for pointing out and claimed "WAS ALWAYS DESIGEND WITH ERA IN MIND FOR THAT SPOT!" which is a fucking lie, it mounted ROMOR-A which like Kontakt-1 provides only basic HEAT protection, and no protection against tandem shaped warheads (this was controversially proven in Iraq, when an RPG-29 penetrated the LFP of a C2 and blew off the drivers toes). The lie told here is that it was designed with ERA in mind, which it wasn't, because the C2 hull is the same as a Challenger 1, which had the ERA mounted there after Britain realised it was woefully unprotected, this ultimately led to the TES upgrade package which made it the fat cunt it is today.

 

[Mav52ri]

Go on. Though, the dumbest thing that I've seen so far is people thinking that the Challenger 3 is somehow a new and superior tank when it's just the same old Challenger with the same Rheinmetall gun that the Leopard 2 and Abrams have had for ages. They aren't even building any new chassis, it's still just a 20+ year old tank with a refurb program.

Let's start

• Rifled gun
• Fat as fuck with poor protection, requires an up armour package to protect it's blatant weak spots which takes it to 75(S E V E N T Y F I V E) tonnes
• Underpowered 1200hp engine giving it 16 hp/t(All other NATO tanks have 1500hp engines, besides the Ariete, but that's another joke tank that no one defends, and it still has a more powerful engine)
• Russian tier ammo storage
• retarded 2 piece ammo that hampers the rounds it can use
• No CITV despite the Leopard 2 and Abrams receiving them with future upgrades
• Weird FCS integration, the thermal sight is in a different position to the primary gunner sight, and automatic leading is different between the two

One of it's biggest flaws is its lower front plate (it's less than 100mm of basic steel), something which lazerpig got annoyed at red effect for pointing out and claimed "WAS ALWAYS DESIGEND WITH ERA IN MIND FOR THAT SPOT!" which is a fucking lie, it mounted ROMOR-A which like Kontakt-1 provides only basic HEAT protection, and no protection against tandem shaped warheads (this was controversially proven in Iraq, when an RPG-29 penetrated the LFP of a C2 and blew off the drivers toes). The lie told here is that it was designed with ERA in mind, which it wasn't, because the C2 hull is the same as a Challenger 1, which had the ERA mounted there after Britain realised it was woefully unprotected, this ultimately led to the TES upgrade package which made it the fat cunt it is today.

The Challenger 3 finally getting rid of the rifled gun is a start to remedy all these issues, but I don't put my hopes in it. At this point the MOD really should just start up a whole new design process from scratch and design something actually adequate and not relying on a roughly 40 year old+ chassis (including the Challenger 1), but knowing their penny pinching tendencies I ain't holding my breath.

Also this is totally ignoring the state of British industry and the ability to actually build a large force, as Russia is proving, numbers matter.

 

[The Grognard]

The Challenger 3 finally getting rid of the rifled gun is a start to remedy all these issues, but I don't put my hopes in it. At this point the MOD really should just start up a whole new design process from scratch and design something actually adequate and not relying on a roughly 40 year old+ chassis, but knowing their penny pinching tendencies I ain't holding my breath.

Also this is totally ignoring the state of British industry and the ability to actually build a large force, as Russia is proving, numbers matter.

IMO them using a rifled gun is not that big of a deal since HESH is a handy general-purpose round and one could compensate the lack of a proper SABOT round by utilizing a gun-fired ATGM for the same job like the Indians do with the Arjun and SAMHO which also happens to use the exact same rifled gun design as the Challenger. The problem is that they literally can't even build new chassis any more and the newest Challenger tanks rolled out of the factory in 2002. It might be just as penny-wise, pound-foolish on par with the Nimrod AEW3 thing where the MoD thought they were being very clever and frugal trying to make an old BRITISH design do new things, only for the whole thing to cost more than just buying new E-3s from the Americans.

 

[AeroGavin Rossdale]

He also likely got told several times that trying to do the usual Wehraboo / Nafoid take that the Soviets never could possibly develop something like the AK-47 without the existence of the Sturmgehwer 44 is a long debunked theory that is obvious to anyone who knows anything about these two guns and how they came to be.

If his Patron post is to be believed, soon after he reached out to Ian from Forgotten Weapons (dot com), Ian put out a video deboonking common myths about the AK, including it's design history. Which would be very funny if that was Ian's polite way of telling him to fuck off.

IMO them using a rifled gun is not that big of a deal since HESH is a handy general-purpose round and one could compensate the lack of a proper SABOT round by utilizing a gun-fired ATGM

I am not a tank guy in the slightest but didn't the US try that in the 70s to less than stellar results?

 

[Geoff Capes Vapes Apes]

At this point the MOD really should just start up a whole new design process from scratch and design something actually adequate and not relying on a roughly 40 year old+ chassis (including the Challenger 1), but knowing their penny pinching tendencies I ain't holding my breath.

Unfortunately the UK, as a nation, simply isn't capable of clean-sheet designing and manufacturing a modern MBT. We lack the institutional knowledge to design one, we lack the industrial capacity to build one (I'd be very surprised if we could even make the necessary tools to build one at this point), MoD requirement writing and procurement are both utterly cancerous and we don't have any money for tanks as we're pissing away the huge chunk of my wages the state takes every month on hotels for Bomalian boatmen, a completely fucked NHS etc.

 

[Sleazy Car Salesman]

I am not a tank guy in the slightest but didn't the US try that in the 70s to less than stellar results?

I think everyone has tried main gun fired ATGMs and discovered that they aren't all that and a bag of chips. The big advantage of the tank gun over an ATGM is that your time on target is very low and so you only have to expose the tank for a short time, ATGMs require guidance and so you need to expose the tank for longer in order to get that potential hit. Newer fire and forget missile systems could remedy some of these issues but then you still have the issues with slow loading and needing some serious bore evacuators for all that gas coming out of the rocket motor while it's in the barrel. You could potentially have a missile that is shot from the gun with a small charge and then ignites its motor outside the barrel but then you're adding a lot of complexity and need good hardening for the missile itself so that the internals can survive that sudden shock from the charge accelerating it.

 

[Amerikaner Teddybär]

If his Patron post is to be believed, soon after he reached out to Ian from Forgotten Weapons (dot com), Ian put out a video deboonking common myths about the AK, including it's design history. Which would be very funny if that was Ian's polite way of telling him to fuck off.

I think Ian got a look at LP's script, went "This guy has not a clue about guns", and made his AK video. Pretty much torpedoing LP's AK video dead and ensuring if it did get uploaded, it would've been a worse drama than his T14 video.

One of it's biggest flaws is its lower front plate (it's less than 100mm of basic steel), something which lazerpig got annoyed at red effect for pointing out and claimed "WAS ALWAYS DESIGEND WITH ERA IN MIND FOR THAT SPOT!" which is a fucking lie, it mounted ROMOR-A which like Kontakt-1 provides only basic HEAT protection, and no protection against tandem shaped warheads (this was controversially proven in Iraq, when an RPG-29 penetrated the LFP of a C2 and blew off the drivers toes). The lie told here is that it was designed with ERA in mind, which it wasn't, because the C2 hull is the same as a Challenger 1, which had the ERA mounted there after Britain realised it was woefully unprotected, this ultimately led to the TES upgrade package which made it the fat cunt it is today.

LP will still defend it like it's a god and will say your points have little merit. The teafag will not heed anything that dare to criticize his beloved Challenger 2. He even tried to explain away a Challenger 2 being destroyed in Ukraine and said it was a different tank, even after being shown that "Yes, this was a Challenger 2. Suck it up"

I think everyone has tried main gun fired ATGMs and discovered that they aren't all that and a bag of chips.

If I remember correctly, the Sheridan did exactly this and the barrel kept on cracking after a few rounds.

 

[The Grognard]

I am not a tank guy in the slightest but didn't the US try that in the 70s to less than stellar results?

They did, but so far, the Israelis and the Soviets managed to make the gun-fired ATGM work as a way of extending the range and lifespan of old tanks. Then again, the Sheridan and the M60A2 were silly designs that didn't really work.

 

[Anti Snigger]

Checked on Ani's twitter. He also is baiting Dankula for that sweet engagement. In this incident, the Scottish Parliament ruled MPs and staff can't wear accessories for social causes. This includes gay pride shit. One tone deaf MP complained that it was hypocritical they could wear poppies for Remembrance Day but no rainbow pins to honor the fags who died in the trenches. Dank disagrees.
View attachment 5865640
Ani would put his experience as a 'lifelong student of war' to work.
View attachment 5865642
Actually the traditionally masculine occupations have always been full of secret gays. Source: Battle of Ram Ranch. Also laughing at the idea of some just 18 poofter in 1916, with conscription, white feathers and half the young men of his town dead at the Somme staring at a recruiting flier and considering if the trenches are worth the chance to suck some dick.

"Lifelong student of war" has the same energy as "future former marine"

 

[WelperHelper99]

Let's start

• Rifled gun
• Fat as fuck with poor protection, requires an up armour package to protect it's blatant weak spots which takes it to 75(S E V E N T Y F I V E) tonnes
• Underpowered 1200hp engine giving it 16 hp/t(All other NATO tanks have 1500hp engines, besides the Ariete, but that's another joke tank that no one defends, and it still has a more powerful engine)
• Russian tier ammo storage
• retarded 2 piece ammo that hampers the rounds it can use
• No CITV despite the Leopard 2 and Abrams receiving them with future upgrades
• Weird FCS integration, the thermal sight is in a different position to the primary gunner sight, and automatic leading is different between the two

One of it's biggest flaws is its lower front plate (it's less than 100mm of basic steel), something which lazerpig got annoyed at red effect for pointing out and claimed "WAS ALWAYS DESIGEND WITH ERA IN MIND FOR THAT SPOT!" which is a fucking lie, it mounted ROMOR-A which like Kontakt-1 provides only basic HEAT protection, and no protection against tandem shaped warheads (this was controversially proven in Iraq, when an RPG-29 penetrated the LFP of a C2 and blew off the drivers toes). The lie told here is that it was designed with ERA in mind, which it wasn't, because the C2 hull is the same as a Challenger 1, which had the ERA mounted there after Britain realised it was woefully unprotected, this ultimately led to the TES upgrade package which made it the fat cunt it is today.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/L94A1_chain_gun

One other problem the Challenger 2 has is a 7.62mm chain gun. Yes, you heard me. A chain gun. Because of its weird position in the coaxial and the sights, it fires blind if the target is 200 meters or less ahead of it. Also jams. And electrical powered. If the tank loses power, you can't fire the coax in a last stand.

They did, but so far, the Israelis and the Soviets managed to make the gun-fired ATGM work as a way of extending the range and lifespan of old tanks. Then again, the Sheridan and the M60A2 were silly designs that didn't really work.

Just wanted to affirm this. There are gun lanched ATGMS that DO work. But one problem that keeps coming up is COST. You can buy MULTIPLE regular ATGMs that a ground crew can fire, for one gun launched atgm, that probably hits less hard, since it's diameter- and hense the munroe effect HEAT warheads rely on- is smaller due to the barrel.

 

[AeroGavin Rossdale]

"Lifelong student of war" has the same energy as "future former marine"

"I would have joined the military but I would have unionized the recruits" - Ani

"I would have joined the military but I would have sucked the DI's dick" - Nig

 

[WelperHelper99]

"I would have joined the military but I would have unionized the recruits" - Ani

"I would have joined the military but I would have sucked the DI's dick" - Nig

If that was actually their attitude, Ani deserves the reserves, any branch, and Lasernig deserves the navy on a patrol vessel with the straightest crew alive.

 

[Hillary Clinton's Ass]

"I would have joined the military but I would have unionized the recruits" - Ani

"I would have joined the military but I would have sucked the DI's dick" - Nig

They unironically believe this, btw.

 

[Mav52ri]

with the straightest crew alive

One which will constantly call him a poofta and make him do all he shit jobs, that will be salt in the wound.

 

[WelperHelper99]

One which will constantly call him a poofta and make him do all he shit jobs, that will be salt in the wound.

He should be scrubbing the deck while everyone else watches and drinks with hot babes