Nicholas Robert Rekieta / Rekieta "Law" / Actually Criminal / @NickRekieta - Polysubstance enthusiast, "Lawtuber" turned Dabbleverse streamer, swinger, "whitebread ass nigga", snuffs animals for fun, visits 🇯🇲 BBC resorts. Legally a cuckold who lost his license to practice law. Wife's bod worth $50. The normies even know.

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

What would the outcome of the harassment restraining order be?

  • A WIN for the Toe against Patrick Melton.

    Votes: 62 23.8%
  • A WIN for the Toe against Nicholas Rekieta.

    Votes: 4 1.5%
  • A MAJOR WIN for the Toe, it's upheld against both of them.

    Votes: 80 30.8%
  • Huge L, felted, cooked etc, it gets thrown out.

    Votes: 30 11.5%
  • A win for the lawyers (and Kiwi Farms) because it gets postponed again.

    Votes: 84 32.3%

  • Total voters
    260
Does anyone remember when nick did a watch party about a movie he said he has already watched before and it's about some prostitute? He was fairly excited about it when he saw it was available on watch party. The movie is fairly old and set around the time there were nobles and stuff. I think the movie was french and dubbed into english and had lots of nudity in it (it involved a whore house with orgies). Part way thru the movie, the chat informed him that the main actress was underage (can't remember if the chat said she was 14 or 16) when this was filmed and I think she got naked too but nick moved past that pretty quick and kept watching. I tried looking for the movie based on what I mentioned above but what I have was very vague since I was listening in the background so I couldn't find it and twitch deletes vods past 3 months.
Did he really bring up Pretty Baby? Is that the movie? Movie takes place in plantation times and involves a guy falling in love with an underage prostitute played by brooke shields. Only reason i know about it is because its directed by the guy who did "My Dinner with Andre"
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: Roboute Guilliman
My primary concern is too much focus on Nick's family wealth, and using that to try explain why he is the way he is, could allow him the cope that KF is jealous of that.
The issue for me is that like many "self-made" individuals, Nick frequently omits, misleads, and otherwise downplays his vast familial wealth to appear hard-working and of humble origins to prop up his own image and seem more relatable. In reality, Nick only became a lawyer on a lark and only had the ability to pursue YouTube because he's never actually had to work for a living in his life. Despite this, Nick constantly lies and tells his fans that he came up in the rough streets of Houston because he knows the "pulled up by your own bootstraps" shtick sells.
 
Did he really bring up Pretty Baby? Is that the movie? Movie takes place in plantation times and involves a guy falling in love with an underage prostitute played by brooke shields. Only reason i know about it is because its directed by the guy who did "My Dinner with Andre"
I don't think that was the movie. The movie was set in europe of even older times I think. It had a noble's son falling in love with the girl while the girl was using another old noble as sugar daddy (he bought her a house?) Had horse carriages and everything.
 
Last night’s stream could be summarized with a Sopranos quote:

“I happen to know you were high at my mother in law's wake, you were talking nonstop for twenty minutes, nothing but gibberish.”
“They say no two Balldos in the world are exactly alike…but how do they know that for sure? The only way is if they got every Balldo togetha in one room, past and present. And they can’t do that nowadays, not even with computahs”
 
My point is this: the market for this type of content never stopped existing. It's still there, waiting for someone who's not fat and shit at streaming to capture it. Sorry, Sean, and by "shit at streaming" I don't just mean the technical side of things.
If he fixed the technical side, it would make up for the quality somewhat

- Nick finds out some CNN guy is named Elie Honig: "His name has ho and nig in it!"; pulls up a photo; calls the guy, who looks a lot more masculine than him, a lesbian
I was surprised Nick didn't rail on him for being a Jew. That was a layup

I don't want my concern-posting to imply that I think Sean will turn into Rekieta 2.0, but there are some things there that worry me a little (especially the inheritance of the wine moms, and sudden growth in viewers). I don't want to believe he definitely will or won't, but I'll be ready if it does happen.

I'll queue the "Anakin's Betrayal" John Williams song if that day comes.
His channel is anemic compared to the rest of the creators in this universe. Nick's viral load grows faster than Sean's channel
 
Why is that a concern? That sounds like amazing content. If he does it I hope he does it in the kitchen for old time's sake.
You're quite right, of course. He's gonna do what he's gonna do regardless of what the truth actually is. He's already utilized dishonesty as a means of trying to criticize and "own" the Farms.

Concern might be the wrong word.

That said, I do predict he's gonna try and spin your research and post as jealousy though. Even though it's pretty clearly not. I'm just saying. You may or may not want to be prepared for that.

The issue for me is that like many "self-made" individuals, Nick frequently omits, misleads, and otherwise downplays his vast familial wealth to appear hard-working and of humble origins to prop up his own image and seem more relatable.
Again, fair point. I yield.

Carry on.
 
Last edited:
Nick just dropped another 1K subs today.

1712791686034.png


His channel is anemic compared to the rest of the creators in this universe. Nick's viral load grows faster than Sean's channel

Just because Sean's channel is smaller does not in any way discount the surge in growth he's gotten.

Look at this. Since December 2023, he jumped from 28,890 views gained that month to 129,573 views gained last month. For a channel his size, that's huge.

Plus since December 2023, he's gained 1,600 subscribers as of last month. Again, for a small hobby channel, in such a short period of time, that's massive.

And you bet your ass most of those subs and views are from former Nick fans that Nick himself could have kept around.

1712792092909.png
 
I don't think Nick is a bad person because he is rich.
Agreed. I take umbrage that he pretended like he ever had it truly hard financially. I think wealth played a large role in his downfall but as has been said countless times throughout the thread that has more to do with it amplifying already existing negative traits, not the being wealthy itself.

If you ever find yourself thinking everybody sucks, that's a good hint that you need to look at yourself in the mirror.
What if I think everybody sucks including myself?
 
If he would be at least funny or creative. If he can't be noble and be an example to us peasants, someone to look up to, can't he at least be a bit more creative when it comes to entertainment? He's got fuck-you money.
He could be running his own gay club, the gayest one of all.
This is exactly right. For someone as rich as he is, we should be awed by what he does with his hobbies, even if that awe is mixed 50:50 with revulsion. Everything that we say "That's kinda cool but I'd never do it unless I had a kajillion dollars", he should be doing if he wants to impress. Instead he just consooms one pay bracket up. Instead of driving a $40K car straight off the lot, he drives a $100K car straight off the lot. Instead of a $20 whiskey bottle, he gets a $200 whiskey bottle. Nothing changed except the number got bigger.
Like, if you're going to go in on being a wastrel, go all-in. Get a custom car with every option, riced-out to the gills with tons of modifications. Go in-person to the whiskey distillery and throw money at them until they let you open up the oldest barrel in the place and drink right out of it live onstream. I dunno, do something.
 
I think Nick's fortune just makes it even more enjoyable to laugh at him. Like nigga, you have all this money, for doing nothing other than being born in a good family, and you still cry "woe is me." Just send your kids to a boarding school and buy a fucking yacht if you hate your life so much. But you won't, because you're addicted to balldos, booze, gay sex, and Internet fame. He could at the very least buy some better art and liquor, but having money doesn't mean having good taste.
 
Richard hater here, I hate the rich because every single one born into it has the personality of a toddler. They never grow, act like babies, and their lack of character is all okay because they will never struggle.
Nick reminds me of my cousins so much. The annoying brattiness, the indignation when someone slightly disagrees with them, the righteousness in their convictions when they are complete babies. They are worms crawling out of the shit of a more successful man at some other point in history.
The worst part is, they all wish death upon their family. The luxury lifestyle that was given to them is not enough, they must be the executors. They will talk withe glee about the imminent deaths of their fathers or grandfathers. I’ve had one richard be ecstatic that his father had cancer.

On a spiritual level, I understand what Genghis Khan thought when he looked down on China.
 
After all, this isn't even his final form!

I don't think he has enough body mass left to reach final form. Final form would require:
- Divorce
- Moving to a totally degenerate city like LA or Las Vegas.
- Getting on real coke
- Recruiting an entourage of live-in porn stars.
- Public rants about how he is a magical god.
- a positive HIV test.

Final form would look alot like 2011-2012 Charlie Sheen or 1996 Robert Downey Jr.

"It's like I have a shotgun in my mouth, and I've got my finger on the trigger, and I like the taste of the gun metal." - Robert Downey Jr.

"I have a different constitution, I have a different brain, I have a different heart. I got tiger blood, man. Dying's for fools, dying's for amateurs." - Charlie Sheen

He may have it in him to go all the way to final form though. After all, I never thought he had it in him to reach his current form.
 
And you bet your ass most of those subs and views are from former Nick fans that Nick himself could have kept around.
To that end, it's worth pointing out that one thing Sean is doing, that Rekieta used to do (and was appreciated), is cover KF's legal fights.

He covering the Acerthorn bullshit, for example. BTW, new docs just dropped on that.

Hardin is going in hard on Stebbins' IFP bonafides (or lack thereof). Just as Sean suggested he do just recently on his show.

Meanwhile, Nick snottily claims that Null had no case against Epik, and then Epik surrenders.
Or he claims that, somehow, Null needs Nick's help to take on Greer. Null just needs to put on the Balldo, answer his shower calls, and probably shut down this thread and ban most people in it... especially that bitch Himedall who chased away on the wine mommies giving him and CGoody ass pics.

I wonder if Nick even believes, as his e-daddy Dick apparently does, that Hardin is a figment of Null's imagination?
 
What if I think everybody sucks including myself?
Then it means you're wise and you successfully resisted certain aspects of oversocialization and from my point of view, there should be more people who are perpetually humble. Fucking tired of the narcissists, they're so predictable and shallow.
They will talk withe glee about the imminent deaths of their fathers or grandfathers. I’ve had one richard be ecstatic that his father had cancer.
I hate the gleeful greedy richard you described so much, I hope he will choke to death on his own feces.

oh yeah, sorry i forgot it's Boring Rekieta thread - he gay, big time gay even
 
Part way thru the movie, the chat informed him that the main actress was underage (can't remember if the chat said she was 14 or 16) when this was filmed and I think she got naked too but nick moved past that pretty quick and kept watching.
Looked it up. It's a 2006 movie. The actress, Nikki Reed, was born in 1988. This would make her 17, possibly 16 during filming. Also on Wikipedia, the producers infobox notes one of them was none other than Kevin Spacey. Things that make you go hmmm.
Did he really bring up Pretty Baby? Is that the movie? Movie takes place in plantation times and involves a guy falling in love with an underage prostitute played by brooke shields. Only reason i know about it is because its directed by the guy who did "My Dinner with Andre"
Louis Malle is an excellent director but being French, is pretty much a blatant pedo too. The character Brooke Shields played is 12, according to Wikipedia, while Shields herself was 11. So of course he got her naked for it.

I haven't actually seen that movie, but a favorite of mine is his last, Vanya on 42nd Street, also starring Wallace Shawn (of Princess Bride fame as well as My Dinner With Andre). It's an adaptation of Chekhov's Uncle Vanya written by David Mamet. It's well worth a watch.
I wonder if Nick even believes, as his e-daddy Dick apparently does, that Hardin is a figment of Null's imagination?
Seriously, is this faggot's brain so full of worms he doesn't realize it's trivially easy to prove the existence of a lawyer?
 
Last edited:
Looked it up. It's a 2006 movie. The actress, Nikki Reed, was born in 1988. This would make her 17, possibly 16 during filming. Also on Wikipedia, the producers infobox notes one of them was none other than Kevin Spacey. Things that make you go hmmm.
Also, per Wikipedia, the character is in high school. Just like Mena Suvari's character.

Da fuck is it with Nick and movies where high school girls put themselves out to be banged by grown men?

His infatuation with American Beauty was creepy enough, and this is more of the same.

My go to answer for these sort of things is usually Dick's influence, but even Dick seemed kinda wigged out over Nick's explanation as to why he liked American Beauty (which says a lot).

Look at his wrist when he raises his hand. Does it look really thin to you?
 
Back