Official Kiwi Farms Man-Hate Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Men age like wine is such cope; they all think they're gonna get rich and in shape! Babe, if you're already like 90% of men and not standing out that's not likely to change, you're just gonna get wrinkles, a beer gut, receding hairline and hair sprouting out of your ears. Do they not notice middle aged men on the streets or what?

Is it being terminally online and only looking at 'Chads' (haha gaaay!) that creates the delusion? Or just a desperate fight against the inevitable followed by a breakdown (midlife crisis) when it doesn't pan out how they imagined...
 
The fact that there isn't a standardized curriculum is what makes each Girl Scout troop and Boy Scout troop unique.
This is a big part of why people's experiences are different. If you end up in a troop that votes for indoorsy activities and you want the outdoors, that isn't the troop for you. If you're in a small town, you might not have other troops of the same age in your council that you can switch to, or join together for activities that half of your both your troops wanted. Yes, you can complete badges on your own, or with a couple of friends from the troop, but that's not the same as having a room full of automatic friends all working on the same project.

To be honest, I don't want to find out more about what Girl Scouts is like in 2024, because at first glance it's pozzed as heck. Since we're talking Juniors, the modern crop of badges look skimpy and pretty corporate; I especially don't want to know more about "Journeys." Is individual practice different from the GSUSA website? Probably.

I was a Girl Scout back when there were Try-Its and Interest Project Patches and with different words to the Law. I have my Silver Award, too. One thing I notice is that there are way fewer badges available these days. In trying to figure out a timeline, I found out that there are a lot of old Girl Scouts, now leaders, who are salty about that dumbing down and work together to keep their troops earning old patches.

I'm realizing I don't have much of a point. My troop set fire to a lot of things (on purpose) going camping and volunteering to serve in flag ceremonies; we did useful stuff and learned first aid and car repair, but it was due to my getting lucky with a troop, my mom volunteering, and we still did a lot of things I wasn't too interested in, too. I earned an awful lot of badges/patches on my own because I fucking love lists of goal-based tasks. It was nice to get a list of things to do to learn about/get better at a focused area, in a way that you don't get when you try to make everything flow together.

I think there's a romantic view of Scouting, from people who didn't get to, or who looked at the other sex's Scouts wistfully, and there would be the same view towards the past versions of Scout programs if the history were more widely known. I doubt either modern Boy or Girl Scouts are providing what people wish they'd had in their own youth. Perseverating on what might have been starts to sound like a adult man in a dress wishing he'd been invited to girls' sleepovers in junior high, and speculating on the erotic delights he might have found in a classmate's rec room; having never known makes it grow bigger and bigger in the telling.
 
Queen tbh
1712829245412.png
And it’s usually the same old copy-paste shit for the entirety of the first page, exactly the kind of autism you’d see on Reddit but with a right-wing slant.

“Let’s play guess the race!”
“Women, you voted for this. Suffer from the consequences of your own actions.”
“Oh look! The thing that never happens, happened again!”

These were mainly the same assholes who bitched at Null about taking away their precious stickers, so yeah I’m sticking with my theory that they were post-2019 Reddit rejects who never got over the fact that repeating the same tired statements that coincided with the hive-mind meant it got the most updoots, therefore they believe they’re making good arguments. They get ass-blasted when somebody tries to express dissenting opinions, especially when it’s a female user who does it. No matter how logical you can come across, they’ll throw a bitch fit in a vein similar to the SJW’s they mock, hijack other threads, and go crying over to daddy Null and the Thunderdome mods. There’s a reason they bash Reddit so ardently.

Also much for being for free speech, eh? You fucking hypocritical retards.

I lurked for many years before creating an account on Kiwifarms so I’ve been here for quite a while. It really does feel like the culture here is declining because of these people. These past few weeks Null has been pretty upset with how the user base has been acting, and I can’t say I blame him. I am for free-speech but when you’re doing nothing but spewing the same bullshit hive-mind conservatoid opinions and getting butthurt at people who express different perspectives and bitching at the site owner for not taking their side all the time, I’m sorry but it’s your time to go. They were used to getting their way on other sites before coming here. These people are absolute poison to any community.
I wanted to touch on this subject actually, it's really funny to see how many AnHfags cry about how Josh sees them as bunch of retarded gorilla niggers with no worthy opinions on anything when they constantly insult and chimp out on him every time he doesn't validate their opinions by parroting retarded online brainrotted manosphere/RW political points, along with accusing him of being in some feminist allegiance, never mind the fact he lets them create 5000 threads shitting on him or women. Also calling Josh fucked in the head along with anyone that was raised by a single mother.

How is this any different than a retarded hoodrat going up to a white person, calling them all kinds of names and telling they want them to be shot but then have the audacity to go "HOW COME WHITEY DOESN'T WANT TO INTERACT WITH ME" and vice versa?
Men age like wine is such cope; they all think they're gonna get rich and in shape! Babe, if you're already like 90% of men and not standing out that's not likely to change, you're just gonna get wrinkles, a beer gut, receding hairline and hair sprouting out of your ears. Do they not notice middle aged men on the streets or what?

Is it being terminally online and only looking at 'Chads' (haha gaaay!) that creates the delusion? Or just a desperate fight against the inevitable followed by a breakdown (midlife crisis) when it doesn't pan out how they imagined...
The other cope that heavily overlaps with the one you mentioned is the "Men become more desirable in mid 30s and early 40s! Young women find men in that age more desirable" and how dudes who are old enough to be fathers of women they are chasing (usually early 20s) are such GIGACHADS, KINGS and how women that think these men are really fucking weird and creepy are just jealous bitter hags , when every time moids show a couple with this type of age gap that supposedly hecking based, almost every one of them looks like this:
1712826777619.png
 
B b b but men age like wine!!!!!

I mean maybe it's true and these guys started off pretty ugly to begin with.
Handsome guys maybe have a tendency to get more handsome with a little bit of gray hair and some lines, but most men look like shit and aging just makes them look worse. And it’s not like there aren’t countless things they could be doing. Moisturise. Exercise. Sunscreen. Get a prescription for finasteride. Ask the lady at the optician’s for help finding frames that fit your face. Buy slightly more expensive clothes and then take care of them, rather than just the cheapest, ugliest trash available. Use some minoxidil to fill out your eyebrows properly.
Most men aren’t hideous to start with, they make themselves look that way through neglect. And when I point that out “I’m being a woman” by only caring about appearance rather than just money. Ugh.
Women age like wine because we take care of ourselves, while men age like milk because they don’t.
 
I dunno really. My kids are in scouting. I know the local leaders well (or no way they would be in scouting) and help out here and there. I like to be familiar with their activities and the people around them. The troop is well supported locally; almost everyone in it goes to the one local primary and the one local secondary.

They seem to enjoy it a lot.

Scouts in the UK are mixed, in their troop the little scouts (beavers and cubs) are majority female, but the big scouts are overwhelmingly male. It seems to happen quite naturally. It is definitely not something the leaders want: fewer big girls mean the mixed-ages activities and camps are harder on the female leaders than the male leaders - fewer trustworthy hands to help out.

The girls seem naturally to float away from it round about the time they start secondary. The camping trips get a lot more frequent then, though, and I think if scouts isn't going to be your big/main hobby, it's difficult to manage the time.

They don't seem to develop any skills whatsoever so far, but they do seem to have fun and be kept pretty safe, so I'm chilled out about it.

That kind of regimented group activity would absolutely not have been for me at that (or any) age, though. It would have been the worst hobby imaginable for me. I really don't believe there's any point in continuing to send a kid to an activity like scouts where it's clearly a terrible fit for their personality and interests. Outside of education which is obviously essential, I don't think kids get anything out of being "forced to do something they hate". It's far enough to give something a fair try, but it's also okay to walk away from an activity or hobby that doesn't spark joy, as Marie Kondo would say.

It's okay for things not to be for everyone, as long as everyone has a choice to opt out.
 
What do you guys think of this video or the idea that incels are going to start some sort of revolution? ( and I guess save the west in doing so or something)



I haven't watched this video yet, but this is something I first heard years ago from that faggot black pigeon speaks. Does their revolution just mainly consist of bitching about women on the internet?
And yes the comments on the video are as cringey as you'd expect.

It's funny how they'll complain about the term "incel" being overused or dismissive, but then call every guy who they disagree with a simp, beta male, white knight, cuck, etc.
 
What do you guys think of this video or the idea that incels are going to start some sort of revolution? ( and I guess save the west in doing so or something)



I haven't watched this video yet, but this is something I first heard years ago from that faggot black pigeon speaks. Does their revolution just mainly consist of bitching about women on the internet?
And yes the comments on the video are as cringey as you'd expect.

It's funny how they'll complain about the term "incel" being overused or dismissive, but then call every guy who they disagree with a simp, beta male, white knight, cuck, etc.
“My nasty personality precludes women from dating me. That must mean no other young man is getting laid either. Incels rise up! State-assigned boyfriend-free girls for all!”
Let me preface by saying I’m not listening to almost an hour of this guy’s boring voice. Anyway I don’t think very highly of the argument as presented in the first fifteen or so minutes. The majority of young men are socially well adjusted, no matter how much nonsense we see on the internet, because it’s the nature of the algorithms governing social media to lift up controversial viewpoints, because that’s what drives engagement.
That’s not to say men’s mental health isn’t a real problem. It absolutely is, and that’s driving not only the incel movement but also troons, depression, and porn addiction (which I consider connected to each other). Men aren’t inclined to therapy because they’re never taught to talk about their emotions, but I think if they were to give it a try even though “it’s for women”, it could help them understand and work around a lot of their problems.
 
What do you guys think of this video or the idea that incels are going to start some sort of revolution? ( and I guess save the west in doing so or something)



I haven't watched this video yet, but this is something I first heard years ago from that faggot black pigeon speaks. Does their revolution just mainly consist of bitching about women on the internet?
And yes the comments on the video are as cringey as you'd expect.

It's funny how they'll complain about the term "incel" being overused or dismissive, but then call every guy who they disagree with a simp, beta male, white knight, cuck, etc.
Just watch it is summation of all the bs the men say on here ignoring the blatant issues with western men loyalty and their credo until inconvenience do us appart . Or the fact the average western man is more likely to be unemployed and uneducated bum than western woman. He mentions how if marriage becomes impossible men burn down the society to get a chance for a crumbs of pussy which is disingenuous as anything else and cherry picked to boot . Sometimes that happens and sometimes is what we see now happens men just refuse to play ball and retreat in monasteries, religion or hedonism or porn and games . Refuse to be part of the military, social life etc , write endless creeds about not getting pussy or children in roman times. Fun fact the first monasteries and monastic orders were founded around the 5 th century around failing western empires. One of the things you is strengthening the strictness of marriage and divorce making divorce impossible for example you could divorce in bysantine empire but you either both had to go to monstateries or the man had to pay maintenance til he dies if he is well off to prevent fuckboys and deadbeats reproducing.


Another thing when men lie down like little bitches and give up and just bitch sometimes women help to burn down the empire and the men with them i present to you.

Honoria

Growing up around powerful women, such as her mother and aunts, gave Honoria the presumption that imperial women like herself should have some power. Rome has had a history of strong imperial women that operate within the gender roles to increase their power, and this history influenced Honoria to attempt to exercise her power. This led her to ask Attila the Hun for assistance when what power she had was taken away, as an attempt to regain her power and more. The emperor was distracted with a multitude of different issues, such as the attack of Britain, North Africa, and Spain, as well as the continuous advance of Attila the Hun. The Western empire is continuously weakened, and Honoria hastened the Huns invasion with her message to Attila the Hun. She sent her eunuch with her signet ring and a message asking for assistance in 450 A.D. Whether she intended this message as a proposal is widely debated, however it was interpreted that way by Attila, and he chose to invade seemingly on Honoria’s behalf.


You can read more but i feel her pain have to marry late roman limp dick senator because bro is a little bitch and can't produce heirs instead of adopting her kid.

To add divorces are more common than some think in middle east albeit technically one sided but they are much more brutal than the wests man doesn't have right to wifes property, has to pay full child maintenance regardless of how they share custody, has to pay divorce tax money to the wife, if wife makes money she has no obligation to share the money with the husband. Etc . Yet they marry and breed like rabbits .

Tl: dr dipshit with the most annoying nasal voice tell us women that western men will put down porn, drug, burgers and games get in shape and burn down the society because no pussy. Nigger half of them their dicks don't work without porn.
 
Last edited:
What do you guys think of this video or the idea that incels are going to start some sort of revolution?
I haven't watched the video but I can still tell you it's a cope. Testosterone has been in decline for 8 decades now. If they were capable of outward revolution they'd be capable of inward revolution (the proverbial clean your room). Incels have no fighting spirit. No backbone. No strength. No strong conviction except in their own worthlessness and victimhood. If they gathered weapons and stormed the capital, and there was one man or woman in uniform telling them "sorry, you can't do that, you have to disperse and go home" they'd complain and they'd obey.

Why would women want to fuck them anyways?
 
What do you guys think of this video or the idea that incels are going to start some sort of revolution? ( and I guess save the west in doing so or something)



I haven't watched this video yet, but this is something I first heard years ago from that faggot black pigeon speaks. Does their revolution just mainly consist of bitching about women on the internet?
And yes the comments on the video are as cringey as you'd expect.

It's funny how they'll complain about the term "incel" being overused or dismissive, but then call every guy who they disagree with a simp, beta male, white knight, cuck, etc.
I personally think niggers that talk tough shit such as "OH WE'RE GONNA HAVE AN INCEL REVOLUTION IT'S GONNA BE SO BLOODY! FOIDS GET READY TO SUFFER" are no different than tumblr fags who say shit like "BE GAY DO CRIMES", because the common point both of these groups have is that they talk all this mad larp shit but then proceed to get an anxiety attack while ordering a McChicken at a McDonalds.
 
Last edited:
"BE GAY DO CRIMES"
exhibit gAy:
nick.dark.triad.png
ETA: he got the men are whores part right
image_2024-04-11_092931778.png

another interesting ss giving away the game
image_2024-04-11_094927639.png

tbqf, the transcript is a litany of nonstop self-ownage: "there was a point in my life in which a majority of my friends were fuckboys and they could genuinely get laid a lot but not meet women they wanted or respected enough to date or marry..." fuckboys fucking fuckgirls is a self-fulfilling prophecy, my dude, lol.
 
Last edited:
I haven't watched the video but I can still tell you it's a cope. Testosterone has been in decline for 8 decades now. If they were capable of outward revolution they'd be capable of inward revolution (the proverbial clean your room). Incels have no fighting spirit. No backbone. No strength. No strong conviction except in their own worthlessness and victimhood. If they gathered weapons and stormed the capital, and there was one man or woman in uniform telling them "sorry, you can't do that, you have to disperse and go home" they'd complain and they'd obey.

Why would women want to fuck them anyways?
You know what is ironic their replacement is brought in already in the form of endless waves of mostly male immigrants flooding the west . The majority of those charities that help them are all women . They don't understand that if they don't man up women and the elites will just bring in someone else to do it instead of them ( albeit with disastrous consequences) . The roman elites flooded parts of the empire with germanic tribesmen and replace the weak willed and limp dick roman men of the time. Same happening today.

I am sure they will storm the capital and fight battle hardened former cartel members and not piss themselves when they see them .
 
Men age like wine is such cope; they all think they're gonna get rich and in shape! Babe, if you're already like 90% of men and not standing out that's not likely to change, you're just gonna get wrinkles, a beer gut, receding hairline and hair sprouting out of your ears. Do they not notice middle aged men on the streets or what?

Is it being terminally online and only looking at 'Chads' (haha gaaay!) that creates the delusion? Or just a desperate fight against the inevitable followed by a breakdown (midlife crisis) when it doesn't pan out how they imagined...
It's just losers clinging on to hope that they will one day be attractive to women when they are "older and established". But even if they ever got to be rich handsome old men (lol cope) they would just resent the women that they can then get who are willing to overlook their horrible personality and just go for resources, because deep down they know those women would have never given their younger poor self the time of day ever. Men really just hate having to work to make themselves appealing to women (that's why they seethe about Chad constantly) and they envy how effortless women can attract men.
 
It's just losers clinging on to hope that they will one day be attractive to women when they are "older and established". But even if they ever got to be rich handsome old men (lol cope) they would just resent the women that they can then get who are willing to overlook their horrible personality and just go for resources, because deep down they know those women would have never given their younger poor self the time of day ever. Men really just hate having to work to make themselves appealing to women (that's why they seethe about Chad constantly) and they envy how effortless women can attract men.
For anyone who wants to read the poetic waxing of millions must die because i don't get my dick wet fuckboy edition they should head up to " why are you single" thread. Some of them admit that dating gets harder in 30s and women are less forgiving. The screeching and gnashing teeth is insane. Here is hint to the men reading here women easily learn of your new tricks its an arms race between men and women who will fuck over who in dating the only way to win is either settle with someone or accept being single forever.
 
Cross posting from another thread

There should be some rule similar to mutt's law, but applied to terminally online right wingers that every time they open their mouth
about how women ruined the west or some other gay shit, you're guaranteed to find a post where they're bitching about how age of consent
too high and that's detrimental to hu-white because men aren't allowed to just fuck and potentially impregnate 16-year olds.
 
Last edited:
The way that paedophiles and zoophiles are supposed to have fantasies about being their victim of choice before they become predators themselves I think rapists, especially serial rapists, probably invent fantasies of being assaulted or wronged by women in a way that justifies doing it, or that they secretly want it.
According to men, women read exactly 2 books (Twilight and 50 Shades) and their personal sex drive is exactly like that of Bella/Ana.

Women do not want to be raped (that’s a contradiction in terms anyway, if you want to be raped then you aren’t being raped) yet they fantasize about situations in which a powerful man takes control of the situation and does sexy kinky things to them without having to ask.

Contrapoints/Nick said in his last video that part of the fantasy here is not having to ask; that the hero imposes this sexual pleasure on the heroine so she doesn’t face the guilt and shame of having to ask her boyfriend to fuck her like a whore or eat her ass or whatnot. I think that’s an important distinction.

I think straight women, when they fuck, want to feel physically dominated by their partner and that giving the partner some status that gives him control over your body (eg he’s a dominant, role playing doctor and patient, boss and secretary, etc.) heightens the physical pleasure women experience.

Women are always worried. I think the main difficulty of enjoying sex is an inability to stop worrying; worrying about your partner’s judgment, worrying your requests are too slutty, or too vanilla, where am I in my cycle, did I take my pill today? etc etc. And one main worry women have about sex is that it’s slutty/whorish/unattractive to ask for what you want in bed. “Good girls” as defined by men aren’t supposed to know shit about sex, let alone take pleasure from it. So many women can’t enjoy themselves unless they can basically absolve themselves of responsibility for the encounter.

Both sexes need single sex spaces. The Boy Scouts should have stayed boys only. The girls scouts exists and should offer activities as fun as the boys get. We can’t demand female only spaces if we deny men those spaces as well. BOTH sexes need a single sex space. There’s an argument to be made when there’s no separate but equal access - the gentlemen’s clubs are a key place the power brokering happens, and if women are excluded then that’s excluding them from power. But there is no argument we can make that allows us to keep our spaces but denys men and boys theirs. Women MUST be able to exclude men from some places and if that’s true then the reverse is as well.
> women are being asked to tolerate sex pests in our locker rooms and toilets
> men are being asked to tolerate coed hiking and knot-tying classes in their scout troop

One of these issues is patently more urgent and carries worse consequences than the other. I’m still not totally clear on what the Boy Scouts are being deprived of by letting girls join their troops, but it seems obvious what women would stand to lose letting trannies into the women’s locker rooms and bathrooms and private women only pink subway cars etc.
 
Back