WonderWino
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Dec 17, 2019
The thing is the opposite is the case. Countries are explicitly prohibited from deporting a person if they are stateless or doing so would make them stateless. The person is not bound to follow any order forcing a deportation, no government organization can legally execute one and any government attempting to do so is opening the door for that person to sue citing a violation of their civil rights and of international lawI doubt they care whether they can do it or not, its just a threat to the target audience of potential conscripts who I doubt know much of international law. And it gives a lot of refugee host countries a convenient way to deal with a potentially politically annoying refugee problem, and claim they're helping Ukraine enforce its laws and win the war. Any refugee that breaks the smallest of law can get processed and deported "in partnership with our allies and international law". Just because you don't have an extradition agreement doesn't mean you can't give them up anyways.
I doubt it'll help much, but I will say that jumping right to the full draft is probably Ukraines best move overall. If they want to try and survive this, they really can't afford to try and play the slow game on this, especially now that Russia's stopped pulling as many punches.
They can be as politically annoying as they want, the moment they get made stateless the government can't deport them no matter what they do. If anything ukraine is fucking themselves and asking for an international incident doing stuff like this