Official Kiwifarms Edgy Atheist Thread - where we make fun of all sorts of sky daddy believers

which ones are the worst?

  • christards

  • muzzies

  • foreskin munchers

  • pagans

  • cow worshippers

  • self-hating atheists ("I rEsPeCt ReLiGiOuS pEoPlE")

  • other


Results are only viewable after voting.
@Odd Opossum I agree with most of what you said, but I'll go over two things:
I call bullshit on anyone who actively posts online, especially on a forum like this, trying to act like they're spiritual and in connection with a higher moral power.
No matter how much religious people profess morals and spirituality, if the religion in question is fundamentally immoral, then it's all moot. We're quick to forget how the Abrahamic faiths are essentially "worship me or I'll make you suffer for eternity; don't ask questions because I know best". If this is at the core of your moral system, it will absolutely taint you and how you see other people - even if nicer things like "love thy neighbor" also happen to be there. So when the worst kinds of people say they're a firm believer in Christ or Allah, I have no problem taking them at their word. This isn't directed at you, but it annoys me how even most atheists will use the lame "you're so pious/devout, yet look at how immoral you are" gotcha. Why were they were expecting better from someone with a fucked up belief system because of that very system? That leads me to:
Christians in real life can be nice
Agreed, but I always see it as them being inherently nice, and in spite of their religion.

In Leviticus, the hebrews are also prohibited from eating shellfish. Though this was probably due to the hygiene standards of the time.
I'm convinced a lot of early biblical commandments are actually just life advice disguised as divine mandate.
They pretty much are. The same goes for all religious texts. Stuff like Ayurveda were just primitive people attempting to make sense of diet, medicine, healing, etc. so I do think it's a bit unfair to call them 100% magic asspulls. But as soon as something gets the "GOD SAID SO" stamp, it's all downhill from there. There is not one Muslim on this planet that can justify how pork is uniquely harmful compared to everything that's permitted or ignored by Islam, yet it's something they'll beat people to death over.
 
Last edited:
Our mentally handicapped friends at Gab are having a normal one.

View attachment 5899060

I'll summarize:

Evil atheist professor: Was everything created by god?
Random student: Yes.
Evil atheist professor: Then god created evil, so he's evil too. *smirks*

Random student is stunned into silence. Evil professor brags about how he just proved god is a myth. (wait, what?)

Based Christian student: Can I ask you a question professor? (you know this implies some really bad cringe is coming)
Evil professor: Sure go ahead.
Based student: Does cold exist?
Evil professor: yeah?
Based student: Nope it's the absence of heat. Does darkness exist?
Evil professor: uh, yeah?
Based student: Nope it's the absence of light. Does evil exist?
Evil professor: ...
Based student: Nope it's the absence of god. So god didn't create evil.

*cue dramatic music*

Everyone stood up and clapped.
Oh man, that's an ancient copypasta, I'm surprised it doesn't end with "That student's name was Albert Einstein", cause that's how it usually goes. I still don't understand what the "absence of God" means, though, cause God by definition is omnipresent. Does that mean "absence of God from people's souls"? But wouldn't that make every action of every non-believer evil?
 
Oh man, that's an ancient copypasta, I'm surprised it doesn't end with "That student's name was Albert Einstein", cause that's how it usually goes. I still don't understand what the "absence of God" means, though, cause God by definition is omnipresent. Does that mean "absence of God from people's souls"? But wouldn't that make every action of every non-believer evil?
The absence of god probably means not living life as god intended, or not believing in god, etc. - implying that's what leads to evil. It's retarded either way because god supposedly created everything but he didn't create evil. Everything happens according to his will, but it's also not his fault when evil shit happens. They couldn't even try to make their made up story make sense.

I've seen a lot of these, although I don't recall this one in particular. And I know exactly what you mean about the Einstein thing. That meme enabled so much retardation, that one time, I came across "once upon a time there was a small child in an African village whose dream was to become president of the United States. THAT CHILD WAS OBAMA!!!" - I'm not even gonna unpack that, but holy shit.
 
Last edited:
No matter how much religious people profess morals and spirituality, if the religion in question is fundamentally immoral, then it's all moot. We're quick to forget how the Abrahamic faiths are essentially "worship me or I'll make you suffer for eternity; don't ask questions because I know best". If this is at the core of your moral system, it will absolutely taint you and how you see other people - even if nicer things like "love thy neighbor" also happen to be there. So when the worst kinds of people say they're a firm believer in Christ or Allah, I have no problem taking them at their word. This isn't directed at you, but it annoys me how even most atheists will use the lame "you're so pious/devout, yet look at how immoral you are" gotcha. Why were they were expecting better from someone with a fucked up belief system because of that very system?
And the fun thing is the entire religious concept is made and spread by Jews. Whatever they did to Rome is exactly the way they manage to convince all of us that people have more than two genders and homosexuality is good for your health. It's just the beginning of what's to come.

Another pet peeve is the idea of "Original Sin" where you deserve to be starved to death just by existing. Yes people actually believe that and there is a reason why people are let starved to death in the Middle Ages.
 
And the fun thing is the entire religious concept is made and spread by Jews. Whatever they did to Rome is exactly the way they manage to convince all of us that people have more than two genders and homosexuality is good for your health. It's just the beginning of what's to come.

Another pet peeve is the idea of "Original Sin" where you deserve to be starved to death just by existing. Yes people actually believe that and there is a reason why people are let starved to death in the Middle Ages.
I'm not big on the JQ, but I have no problem calling out Judaism as the original cancer that produced the other two major Abrahamic religions. And I agree that original sin (everyone's born guilty and needs to be purified, blah blah) is a very cucked, harmful, self-destructive idea.

I'm ambivalent on the LGBTQ+ stuff because firstly, homosexuality is just something that exists within our species - you don't have to like how it's promoted, or like it at all (I think straight men are bound to find gay (not lesbian) stuff gross no matter what, to be honest), but it's something we need to manage. Second, I'll never do the trans/non-binary song and dance which any sensible person can see is hogwash, but gender dysphoria is also a real thing which we need to be able to manage somehow (it was originally classified as a mental illness which seems pretty fair). On the flip side, I think suppressing and/or criminalizing that stuff would also be a pretty bad idea.
 
Last edited:
Dawkins - A genuine expert in his field - a veritable mine of knowledge - but, alas, an intellectual coward. Avoided debating William Lane Craig for 15 years. Used the excuse 'it would look better on his CV than mine' despite the fact that he'd already debated a bunch of young earth retards. Somehow they were more worthy of Dawk's time than a PhD theologian. I do find him funny from time to time though because he struggles to keep up with left wing gibberish and sometimes ends up pissing them off.

Hitchens - Motor-mouthed neo-liberal chickenhawk, worshipped by his followers because he had a bit of rock star swagger and could look good outwitting creationists. Got humiliated by William Lane Craig despite Craig's position being a load of nonsense and got owned by George Galloway in a 'should we kill a million Iraqis' debate. Hitch was all for it. For someone so well read, he had almost nothing interesting to say.

Harris - Oh dear. Not enough moral conviction to embrace truths about race but still too autistic to go along with leftist fantasies. Ended up in no man's land doing podcasts with black people to prove he's not racist. Pitiful.

I do have a soft spot for Dawkins because he's brilliant on the subject of evolution but I wish he had the moral conviction to discuss neck-up evolution in homo-pyramidbuildicus. The other two have contributed fuck all to anything.
 
Our mentally handicapped friends at Gab are having a normal one.

View attachment 5899060

I'll summarize:

Evil atheist professor: Was everything created by god?
Random student: Yes.
Evil atheist professor: Then god created evil, so he's evil too. *smirks*

Random student is stunned into silence. Evil professor brags about how he just proved god is a myth. (wait, what?)

Based Christian student: Can I ask you a question professor? (you know this implies some really bad cringe is coming)
Evil professor: Sure go ahead.
Based student: Does cold exist?
Evil professor: yeah?
Based student: Nope it's the absence of heat. Does darkness exist?
Evil professor: uh, yeah?
Based student: Nope it's the absence of light. Does evil exist?
Evil professor: ...
Based student: Nope it's the absence of god. So god didn't create evil.

*cue dramatic music*

Everyone stood up and clapped.
I mean I would. Most professors are egotistical bastards so anything that knocks their ego down a few pegs is an overall good thing.
 
  • Dumb
Reactions: The Deep State
he struggles to keep up with left wing gibberish and sometimes ends up pissing them off.
The thing is, Dawkins still has enough intellectual honesty to spit out uncomfortable truths like how eugenics work whether we like it or not. Dun dun dun! If you understand how evolution works and what the fuck we've been doing with plants and animals this whole time, you should know that humans are bound by the same exact principles. Brainrot progressives responded by flying into a tard rage.

I remember seeing a pink-haired woman on Youtube "correcting" him on the plants/animals bit by saying "that's not eugenics, that's selective breeding". I was just about ready to fly into a tard rage of my own and punch a hole through my monitor. It's the same fucking mechanism you abject moron.

The tard brigade also brought up this or that failed experiment as if unsuccessful attempts prove the process itself isn't viable. Actually, even if we do manage to breed out a disability for instance, we haven't actually improved the species because it's ableist to think the disability was a flaw to begin with. It's unreal how grug-brained these people are. They unironically think like: "Nazi science bad. Nazi science not work. If Nazi science work, it bad. So it not work".
 
Last edited:
I mean I would. Most professors are egotistical bastards so anything that knocks their ego down a few pegs is an overall good thing.
You're assuming that this is a real thing that happened and not just some made up bullshit.

Like I get it, college professors are more often than not power tripping pseuds but stories like this are so fake and gay they might as well be on reddit. Don't accept something retarded just because it makes "your guys" look like the chad and "their guys" look like the soyjack.
 
You're assuming that this is a real thing that happened and not just some made up bullshit.

Like I get it, college professors are more often than not power tripping pseuds but stories like this are so fake and gay they might as well be on reddit. Don't accept something retarded just because it makes "your guys" look like the chad and "their guys" look like the soyjack.
What? It might not be real!?!?!111?!

My autist in christ, it's an old copypasta. Of course it's 100% bullshit. I just think most professors could use an ego-check. And a swirly.
 
  • Mad at the Internet
Reactions: The Deep State
I'm stealing this @Inside your walls

1712942622118.png


I still can't believe they gave her a Nobel Peace Prize for getting shot in the head that one time.
 
all religions are heckin valid expect the pagans the pagans are the cringe
There's a dissident right twitter/gab account that goes by Racial_Consciousness. He once posted on gab about how Marvel and DC were a conspiracy by evil Jews like Stan Lee to reduce the pagan gods of European peoples into comic book characters (cause you know, people totally still believed in that shit in the 20th century when these companies were founded). It was a such a deeply autistic and funny thing to read, it's a shame I can't find it now.
 
Can I just say I await the return of edgelord atheism? Everyone is such a pretend christcuck these days, even "cultural Christfags" like Dawkins. But if anything should make you atheist these days, it's encounters with third worlder "magic."
I think you mean it should drive you closer to Christ, sweaty. The cracker really turns into meat guys I swear.
 
Back