- Joined
- Jan 24, 2020
You’re fucking insane if you think they have any sway in multi-billion dollar Hollywood decisions.Typical RLM fanboy posting. Can't ever admit they fucked up.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You’re fucking insane if you think they have any sway in multi-billion dollar Hollywood decisions.Typical RLM fanboy posting. Can't ever admit they fucked up.
They did. Simon Pegg showed the reviews to JJ Abrams and acted upon their recommendations. The evidence is there, you just ignore it because you're a fanboy.You’re fucking insane if you think they have any sway in multi-billion dollar Hollywood decisions.
Okay, humoring your insane ramblings: even if they did see the Plinkett reviews, they did a piss-poor job taking the criticism, because the sequels fail in the exact same way the prequels did.They did. Simon Pegg showed the reviews to JJ Abrams and acted upon their recommendations. The evidence is there, you just ignore it because you're a fanboy.
Or maybe you just happened to grow up with the prequels during your coming of age and have more of an investment in it?The evidence is there, you just ignore it because you're a fanboy.
Big disagree there.Okay, humoring your insane ramblings: even if they did see the Plinkett reviews, they did a piss-poor job taking the criticism, because the sequels fail in the exact same way the prequels did.
You’re burying the lede here: they were both failures from the foundations of their writing, in that they both lacked an audience surrogate as well as a cohesive plan for how things end. The only benefit the prequels had was that they were needlessly about Darth Vader’s downfall.Big disagree there.
Although one way they're alike is that some of the dialogue is so bad it makes you hate the characters.
- Prequels: The plots generally make sense, but they're shot poorly
- Sequels: The plots make no goddamn sense, but at least they're shot well
No, they fail in the opposite way, with absolutely no world-building and memberberries. The Prequels had very few memberberries and a completely different aesthetic to the OT. The OT had a lot of dirt and rivets everywhere, which the Prequels tend to avoid with slick, clean, sterile look, especially with Kamino and Coruscant. That's why Gen Xers immediately said it didn't look like Star Wars.Okay, humoring your insane ramblings: even if they did see the Plinkett reviews, they did a piss-poor job taking the criticism, because the sequels fail in the exact same way the prequels did.
I’m not gonna disagree with you about the aesthetic, because the overuse of CGI and greenscreens were a major issue, but between the origin stories put in for C-3PO, R2D2, Boba Fett, inserting Chewbacca into the third film, the blind helmet-blast ball training, ect the prequels had their own issues with memberberries.The Prequels had very few memberberries
Yeah if you watched them when you were 12 maybeThe plots generally make sense
Have you considered killing yourself ?Great, now admit to the world that you're a flaming leftist faggot kike yourself who whores for attention and lurks here on the Farms
I’d say dismissing it like that is disingenuous. The stigma of the general audience as a euphemism for kids movies is a result of attempts to disassociate from Disney fare. Even then, smart writers used to have to make general audience movies appeal to adults in some way, because 12-year-olds don’t exactly have a lot of money.Star Wars: A movie franchise made for 12 year olds.
This probably isn’t the conversation to bring this up but I believe half of the enjoyment of the sequels comes from kids enjoying the Lego Star Wars games and other games alike. It made the prequels actually feel action packed unlike the main films.Or maybe you just happened to grow up with the prequels during your coming of age and have more of an investment in it?
Adults that continue to like Star Wars are afraid to admit that it's a franchise made for 12-year-olds (even under that specific age) because they assume that it belongs to other esoteric sci-fi franchises that expand to other stories (such as Star Trek, Blade Runner, Mad Max, Dune, Alien, Terminator, Stargate, etc.), but that's the thing, Star Wars doesn't expand its universe outside of the original trilogy of movies, where the stories of all three are just simple stories of some rookie being trained to become a hero to beat the villain and get the princess, a story that a typical child will understandI’d say dismissing it like that is disingenuous. The stigma of the general audience as a euphemism for kids movies is a result of attempts to disassociate from Disney fare. Even then, smart writers used to have to make general audience movies appeal to adults in some way, because 12-year-olds don’t exactly have a lot of money.
I don’t get what you’re trying to say about expanding to other stories, especially when you list off a bunch that either only explored one concept, or largely failed at expanding from their initial installment. The appeal of the original Star Wars was that it developed characters, and that you cared about what happened to them. If your media can’t do that much (like the prequel and sequel Star Wars), then it’s a failure. If it can, then it’s perfectly valid for any age to enjoy.Adults that continue to like Star Wars are afraid to admit that it's a franchise made for 12-year-olds (even under that specific age) because they assume that it belongs to other esoteric sci-fi franchises that expand to other stories (such as Star Trek, Blade Runner, Mad Max, Dune, Alien, Terminator, Stargate, etc.), but that's the thing, Star Wars doesn't expand its universe outside of the original trilogy of movies, where the stories of all three are just simple stories of some rookie being trained to become a hero to beat the villain and get the princess, a story that a typical child will understand