Chris Pratt draws ire for razing historic 1950 LA home for sprawling mansion - Actor and wife Katherine Schwarzenegger dismantle 1950 Zimmerman house designed by architect Craig Ellwood

From The Guardian, 19 April 2024
Archive, link to original

375_640_2490_1493.jpg
The Zimmerman house in 1953. Photograph: Julius Shulman/J Paul Getty Trust, Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles

Chris Pratt has drawn ire from architecture aficionados after news broke that the actor and his wife, Katherine Schwarzenegger, had razed a historic, mid-century modern home to make way for a sprawling 15,000-sq-ft mansion.

Last year, the couple purchased the 1950 Zimmerman house, designed by the architect Craig Ellwood, in Los Angeles’s Brentwood neighborhood for $12.5m. The residence, with landscaping by Garrett Eckbo – who has been described as the pioneer of modern landscaping – had previously been featured in Progressive Architecture magazine.

It was most recently home to the late Hilda Rolfe, the widow of Sam Rolfe, co-creator of the series The Man from Uncle. Video of the property from December 2022 shows a light-filled home that appears to have been well-preserved, with large windows, wood floors and mid-century furniture.

The single-story home and its grounds have since been cleared and in its place will be a massive home in the modern farmhouse style that has come to dominate US suburbs.

0_172_4032_2688.jpg
The lot once occupied by the home designed by Craig Ellwood. Photograph: Adriene Biondo

Architect Ken Ungar, whose portfolio largely features high-end modern farmhouse-style residences, will design a home for the couple, Architectural Digest reported. The property, which is just across the street from Schwarzenegger’s mother, Maria Shriver, will also feature a three-car garage and a secondary unit near the pool.

The Los Angeles Conservancy, a non-profit that seeks to save and protect historic buildings, warned of the impending demolition in January and said that the residence appeared “to be highly intact and a noteworthy example of modernist design from this era”.

The city’s SurveyLA program had identified the property as potentially historic, but no protections were afforded, the conservancy wrote on Instagram.

161_443_2731_1821.jpg
The interior of the home in 1953. Photograph: Julius Schulman/J Paul Getty Trust, Getty Research Institute, Los Angeles

The Eichler Network, which covers mid-century homes in California, lamented the destruction.

“At the same time as architectural homes are being marketed as high-end, collectible art, others are being torn down to build new,” the writer Adriene Biondo said. “Perhaps a historic-cultural monument designation could have saved the Zimmerman house, or allowed the necessary time to delay demolition. Tragically, calls for preservation fell on deaf ears.”
 
Last edited:
iirc there's LA-ish homes that are designated historical artsy shit, like probably that house from House On Haunted Hill and some other Frank Lloyd Wright joints
I have a soft spot for that sort of interior but yeah this seems very samey of that era unless this was literally the one in Octopussy and all those other "that house that looks sorta like that house" in movies
 
Dude’s literally moving in next door to his mother-in-law, he’s got enough problems already.

Besides, the house was from the early 50’s, and the last resident was 99. In all likelihood the wiring was never updated, there was a ramp for every exterior door, the bathroom was remodeled for a sitting tub, and the furnace was permanently stuck on the max thermostat setting.

And that’s not even mentioning the old person smell.

Took forever to get that smell when my brother bought a house from an estate same. You could walk in, close your eyes, inhale, and your brain would force 1950s/60s images and TV show sounds onto you.
 
Nobody ever accused Chris Pratt or the Schwarzeneggers of having taste. Still, it's their money and the house seems like an example of a real mid-century modern if I've ever seen one.
I know more than one mid-mod in town that looks way more unique and interesting than this. It seems like an example of the architect's name carrying more weight than the house.

Btw I looked up the new architect mentioned. It's mostly modern (tastefully done) slop.
Nothing exciting. Nada. Zip.
Screenshot 2024-04-22 at 21-12-29 Ken Ungar Architect.png


if you have the means In this world of white paint and sterility and classic taste isn't your style, at least be a Richard Garriot. That nigga has built three castles in a row, each more castle-y than the last. I respect a man who respects gargoyles and parapets more than resale value.
1713838792439.jpeg
 
Architecture is transitory, and unlike sculptures or paintings, buildings are living spaces that are required to serve a functional purpose. Preserving that space for some one floor shack because it's a 'Zimmerman' is missing the point.
I'm guessing you're not from anywhere near Europe.

So, it's not that architecture can't stand the test of time. Some old buildings are beautiful and remain habitable hundreds of years after they were first built – if they are properly taken care of, which necessarily includes removing small pieces of the building when they wear out and making identical pieces to replace them. If it lasts long enough, you may have a Ship of Theseus type situation. But the alternative is severing our connection to the past, and that's worse.

can you really call something ''historic' when there is a distinct possibility that some of the young men who built the damn thing are still alive today?
I guess 'notable' would be a more applicable term than 'historic' in this context. Although it should be noted, I couldn't find much information about the house online, other than the handful of sites where I found the images. There weren't even enough pics of the place to fill up a Google search, since most searches turned up other houses by Craig Elwood, or a similarly named dwelling on the east coast. I'm not saying it doesn't have value if it isn't famous, but there are many more buildings that are just as deserving of preservation that don't get the attention this one did because, well, Chris Pratt is a popular person for journalists to hate right now.

But with all that being said, I should mention how we in the UK sneer at Americans' silly notions of what could be considered a 'historic' building. First, you make everything out of drywall, which gets damaged if you so much as look at it the wrong way. Did you forget how to make bricks out in the colonies? And secondly, we have so many more old buildings worth preserving (but not as many as we used to). Every house that I've ever lived in is way older than that pioneering 1950s design, most of them probably twice as old. And none of those houses ever made the cut for having a special listed status. Sure, I took it for granted growing up, but not now that I've seen what other countries are like.
 
This has successfully ruined my day. A&N has finally broken me, this is not a joke any more. I have gone full MATI. I understand why people go full doomer when they visit this side of the website, the west has fallen. I'm now going to A-log the shit out of Chris P Rat by going onto his twitter and commenting "you have zero taste in architecture, I will pirate your next shit Jurassic park film in hopes you loose twice as much money out of spite. get felted rat!"

On a serious note beauty is in the eye of the beholder and I personally didn't mind this style of architecture. there are far worse buildings that are built within recent years or of that time that could have been knocked down in place of this building. Im also use to boomers who keep buying old architecture and ruining it with terrible redesigns or knocking it down to the point that I fear that I will never obtain an actual vintage house (or at least one thats kind of designed like one). Its funny though Lego had a series of architecture themed sets and 4 of theme were Frank Loyd themed, this house did not make the cut.
 
There are non-profits who will
Sort of, it depends on where you are.

People always take architecture like this for granted. We barely have any Art Deco buildings left because people in the 70-90s thought they were eyesores.
There's a non-profit for this issue called Docomomo. Hopefully they're more successful than the LA Conservancy.

Screenshot (49).png
 
Last edited:
if you have the means In this world of white paint and sterility and classic taste isn't your style, at least be a Richard Garriot. That nigga has built three castles in a row, each more castle-y than the last. I respect a man who respects gargoyles and parapets more than resale value.
View attachment 5930168
iirc Lord British also has the cheevo of first space cosplay, rocking his Tabula Rasa gear on the space station before Dice-K who couldn't gundam in space because of health issues
 
Other photos I managed to find of the house before demolition:

View attachment 5930028
Source

View attachment 5930033 View attachment 5930035
Source

View attachment 5930041
Source

View attachment 5930042 View attachment 5930045
Source

Looked better on the inside than it did on the outside if you want my honest opinion. Might have also looked better in black & AFAICT but I can't find any colour shots of the interior.
There are so many houses that look like this all over Southern California, it hardly matters. Plus these houses are really outdated at this point and need at least renovation.
this is just someone bitching about Chris Pratt for ulterior reasons. If they really gave a shit they'd be against zoning single family home areas into apartment complex cities, and criticizing the massive, ugly mcmansions with brutalist, stucco architecture. These manshits that get built with low quality materials are like giant cubic growths that take up the entire plot of land, leaving no room for any flora or fauna.
 
Back