Dave Brian Muscato / Danielle Tatiana Muscato / Danielle Brian Muscato - Half-Assed Trans Activist, Fully Arrested, Rape Appropriator, Currently Trying to Extort His Parents

Wrong on all counts, bigot. La principessa is a vulnerable adult because she is a goblin with poor muscle tone (thanks to her genetics deliberately perverted by Dr Joe) and a brain broken by twansphobia. She cannot leave as she is too impoverished, also by twansphobia. And if she dares leave, the malign Muscato influence will raise up all against her. No wonder she stays at home hunched over an expensive guitar and eating junk while she waits for the injustice system to destroy her at her father’s behest.
 
I ran a quick PACER party search for Muscato, Da* and another for Muscato, Jo*, and didn't find anything recent that could be a possible match. So if this happened, it happened in a case where neither of them was actually a party.
There's gotta be an ounce of truth. I assume disability is handled at the federal level. Maybe he was rejected initially but was granted whatever status he has on appeal. I don't know anything about how benefits work in the US, but maybe a judge has to rule on it? I wouldn't think so but it's gotta be some federal official who ultimately signs off. If the government acknowledges he is disabled and he believes he is disabled because of Dr. Joe's psychopathy, the government must agree with him about the ultimate cause of his disability.

Or he could be referring to his legal history with his parents and misinterpreting a ruling that affirms the restraining order as one that confirms all his claims about Dr. Joe.

Dave is one of my favorite cows. He is just so blatantly deluded and ridiculous it's hard to believe he is real. Indeed, many people thought he must be a troll for years. It's a shame the OP is so barebones. I quickly looked at the thread to find a detailed outline of all his legal history but failed. It's a short thread so it should be easy enough and maybe I'll get to it later. OP could definitely use an update with writeups of major events of the past few years.
 
Last edited:
Dave is one of my favorite cows. He is just so blatantly deluded and ridiculous it's hard to believe he is real. Indeed, many people thought he must be a troll for years. It's a shame the OP is so barebones. I quickly looked at the thread to find a detailed outline of all his legal history but failed. It's a short thread so it should be easy enough and maybe I'll get to it later. OP could definitely use an update with writeups of major events of the past few years.
I’m willing to kick in what I can. DM if you decide to do it.
 
There's gotta be an ounce of truth. I assume disability is handled at the federal level. Maybe he was rejected initially but was granted whatever status he has on appeal. I don't know anything about how benefits work in the US, but maybe a judge has to rule on it? I wouldn't think so but it's gotta be some federal official who ultimately signs off. If the government acknowledges he is disabled and he believes he is disabled because of Dr. Joe's psychopathy, the government must agree with him 100% in his mind.

Welfare benefits in the US are a byzantine web of both state and federal agencies. My legal training and experience is in criminal and family law so I can't speak on it in too great depth, but typically most of it is handled administratively. A judge would only get involved if there's a specific statute that allows appealing an administrative decision to district court. Unless the record was sealed for some reason however, something like that would have come up on my PACER search if it did happen in federal district court.

Or he could be referring to his legal history with his parents and misinterpreting a ruling that affirms the restraining order as one that confirms all his claims about Dr. Joe.

This must have happened in state court, do we know what states he has lived in or currently lives in?
 
Welfare benefits in the US are a byzantine web of both state and federal agencies. My legal training and experience is in criminal and family law so I can't speak on it in too great depth, but typically most of it is handled administratively. A judge would only get involved if there's a specific statute that allows appealing an administrative decision to district court. Unless the record was sealed for some reason however, something like that would have come up on my PACER search if it did happen in federal district court.



This must have happened in state court, do we know what states he has lived in or currently lives in?
Columbia, Missouri in Boone County.
 
Columbia, Missouri in Boone County.
I'll see if I can find anything interesting but Missouri's online court records access is limited, not every district has actually digitized their records, and the actual documents didn't become publicly accessible online until July of last year, so anything before that I'd need to call the clerk of court if I wanted the actual document.
 
Dave is a lost cause, but how can anyone read what Dave is writing and conclude anything other than he is a lunatic? Tribal loyalties at their best, Dave could stab Dr Joe to death with a screwdriver and they'd be all "Well done Danielle, he deserved that, Justice!"
Severely mentally ill people unable to identify severe mental illness in another person? Color me shocked.
I ran a quick PACER party search for Muscato, Da* and another for Muscato, Jo*, and didn't find anything recent that could be a possible match. So if this happened, it happened in a case where neither of them was actually a party.
It could be some sort of social security administrative hearing, and I don't think those would show up on PACER. Technically it would be a federal (administrative law) judge making the decision, if that were the case.
 
So as I expected, my ability to actually read documents without attorney-level access was very limited. Most of his legal history predates when public access to documents was granted, including the two evictions ("unlawful detainers") his dad filed against him and then apparently voluntarily dismissed, and his name change petition (which disturbingly states that the court ordered his birth certificate updated, meaning Missouri is more pozzed than I feared). There are two restraining order proceedings which appear to have been filed by mom and dad against him, although their names are redacted from the docket, and the judgements are not accessible without attorney-level access.

Muscato Court Records Search.png

I did however manage to get the affidavits of probable cause for his pending felony criminal charges, which are a fascinating read. I haven't read the entire thread so it's possible someone else already found these, but I'll attach them here anyway. They do include full dox (under his "deadname") with SSN and everything, which I am surprised was not redacted - in the jurisdictions where I practice that info is redacted from publicly accessible versions of documents. There are two affidavits, which suggests to me that the county attorney's office got two separate police reports, but decided to charge them together in one case.

It could be some sort of social security administrative hearing, and I don't think those would show up on PACER. Technically it would be a federal (administrative law) judge making the decision, if that were the case.
That is plausible, normal people, let alone tards, don't generally distinguish between an ALJ and an actual district judge.
 

Attachments

Dave is one of my favorite cows. He is just so blatantly deluded and ridiculous it's hard to believe he is real. Indeed, many people thought he must be a troll for years. It's a shame the OP is so barebones. I quickly looked at the thread to find a detailed outline of all his legal history but failed. It's a short thread so it should be easy enough and maybe I'll get to it later. OP could definitely use an update with writeups of major events of the past few years.

@eggs_over_easy put together a timeline back in September.

I've put together a timeline of the Muscato Family Meltdown, bc I've been having trouble keeping track of things. Spoilered for length and nonsense. It really does paint a portrait of just how bizarre and frightening Dave's behavior has been and makes me wonder about his other burned bridges (e.g., his life as a sex pest). Apologies in advance for errors (particularly dates) and for having to be somewhat selective about relevant events.
 
I think by "federal judge" Dave meant the administrative law judge who handled his Social Security disability hearing. The ALJs aren't part of the federal judiciary. They're hired and employed around the country by the Social Security Administration. But Dave thinks he was in front of John Roberts's understudy because his case is the important case.
 
I think by "federal judge" Dave meant the administrative law judge who handled his Social Security disability hearing. The ALJs aren't part of the federal judiciary. They're hired and employed around the country by the Social Security Administration. But Dave thinks he was in front of John Roberts's understudy because his case is the important case.
They're more akin to adjuncts. They're within Article III because their rulings on issues of law are not final and, in case of agencies like the SSA, because they exist to adjudicate "public rights" that are extended by the government to individuals (as opposed to private rights that are at issue between individuals, or between an individual and the government). Since social security rights don't have to exist at all, the logic is that they can be adjudicated by a judge who doesn't go through the confirmation process. And if an ALJ isn't part of the federal judiciary, there's a strong argument that magistrate judges and bankruptcy judges aren't, either.

Regardless, they're basically bureaucrats appointed as in-house lawyers to sit in windowless rooms and adjudicate bureaucratic nonsense without full constitutional rights in a way that the Framers never contemplated as possibly existing at the time of the Constitution's ratification. Certainly not what Dave wants people to think.
 
I can tell you what happened.

Dave said he needed a tugboat for his very real PTSD.

Social Security Administration said "lol, no." (They do this for almost every PTSD claim)

Dave lawyered up (disability lawyers work on contingency so you don't need a big retainer or anything to get started).

Lawyers filed appeals.

Dave had an administrative hearing where a judge decided he was actually disabled after reviewing medical records.

Since the qualifying dx is PTSD and the supposed source of the PTSD is daddy dearest, Dave interprets this as "a federal judge said daddy abused me."
 
Dave soothes himself as he prepares for tomorrow's hearing.

Cruelly, under Mo. law evil Dr Joe can cut his poor struggling innocent daughter out of the will, leaving her no meaningful right to challenge it. It’s ridiculous how slander, harassment, stalking and fraud can justify such an act. For God’s sake, Dave is probably down to the last dozen guitars. At least la principessa has the consolation of a stranger’s tits.
 
Back